Skip to main content
Download PDF

A prediction nomogram for perineural invasion in colorectal cancer patients: a retrospective study

BMC Surgery volume 24, Article number: 80 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Perineural invasion (PNI), as the fifth recognized pathway for the spread and metastasis of colorectal cancer (CRC), has increasingly garnered widespread attention. The preoperative identification of whether colorectal cancer (CRC) patients exhibit PNI can assist clinical practitioners in enhancing preoperative decision-making, including determining the necessity of neoadjuvant therapy and the appropriateness of surgical resection. The primary objective of this study is to construct and validate a preoperative predictive model for assessing the risk of perineural invasion (PNI) in patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC).

Materials and methods

A total of 335 patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) at a single medical center were subject to random allocation, with 221 individuals assigned to a training dataset and 114 to a validation dataset, maintaining a ratio of 2:1. Comprehensive preoperative clinical and pathological data were meticulously gathered for analysis. Initial exploration involved conducting univariate logistic regression analysis, with subsequent inclusion of variables demonstrating a significance level of p < 0.05 into the multivariate logistic regression analysis, aiming to ascertain independent predictive factors, all while maintaining a p-value threshold of less than 0.05. From the culmination of these factors, a nomogram was meticulously devised. Rigorous evaluation of this nomogram's precision and reliability encompassed Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, calibration curve assessment, and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA). The robustness and accuracy were further fortified through application of the bootstrap method, which entailed 1000 independent dataset samplings to perform discrimination and calibration procedures.

Results

The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis unveiled independent risk factors for perineural invasion (PNI) in patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC). These factors included tumor histological differentiation (grade) (OR = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.03–0.74, p = 0.02), primary tumor location (OR = 2.49, 95% CI = 1.21–5.12, p = 0.013), gross tumor type (OR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.22–0.81, p = 0.01), N staging in CT (OR = 3.44, 95% CI = 1.74–6.80, p < 0.001), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level (OR = 3.13, 95% CI = 1.60–6.13, p = 0.001), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) (OR = 2.07, 95% CI = 1.08–3.96, p = 0.028).These findings formed the basis for constructing a predictive nomogram, which exhibited an impressive area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of 0.772 (95% CI, 0.712–0.833). The Hosmer–Lemeshow test confirmed the model's excellent fit (p = 0.47), and the calibration curve demonstrated consistent performance. Furthermore, decision curve analysis (DCA) underscored a substantial net benefit across the risk range of 13% to 85%, reaffirming the nomogram's reliability through rigorous internal validation.

Conclusion

We have formulated a highly reliable nomogram that provides valuable assistance to clinical practitioners in preoperatively assessing the likelihood of perineural invasion (PNI) among colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. This tool holds significant potential in offering guidance for treatment strategy formulation.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) stands as a prominent driver of cancer-related occurrences and fatalities globally, holding the distinction of being the second most prevalent malignancy in adults and a substantial contributor to cancer-related mortality [1]. According to projections from the American Cancer Society, the year 2023 is expected to witness an estimated 153,020 new CRC diagnoses alongside 52,550 unfortunate fatalities attributed to the disease [2]. Treatment strategies for locally advanced colon cancer (LACC) are evolving towards preoperative neoadjuvant therapy, which has significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS) for patients by enhancing the R0 resection rate and initiating early treatment to prevent cancer metastasis [3]. Additionally, this approach offers personalized treatment options based on MMR status. According to the FOxTROT trial, neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly reduces the risk of residual and recurrent cancer in patients with T3-T4 LACC, demonstrating its safety and efficacy. However, caution is advised when choosing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for dMMR LACC patients, as more than 50% did not exhibit a pathological response [4]. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy not only elicits significant pathological responses in dMMR LACC patients but also shows major pathological responses in a subset of pMMR LACC patients, revealing the potential of this treatment strategy to cure more patients with this type of cancer [5]. For T4 LACC patients, despite receiving adjuvant chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin, there remains a high risk of recurrence. Therefore, it is recommended that all T4b LACC patients, regardless of dMMR or pMMR status, undergo neoadjuvant therapy to maximize treatment efficacy [6].

Tumor invasion and metastasis depend on various components within the Tumor Microenvironment (TME) [7, 8]. Recent studies have highlighted the role of neurons and axons as components of the TME in tumor invasion and metastasis, with increasing attention on the impact of nerves on other cells within the TME [9, 10]. While the roles of blood and lymphatic vessels in tumor growth and invasion are widely recognized, the role of nerves is often underestimated. Growing evidence suggests that Perineural Invasion (PNI) is a critical factor in cancer progression, significantly associated with reduced patient survival rates and increased tumor recurrence and metastasis rates [11, 12]. The term "perineural invasion" (PNI) refers to the infiltration of tumor cells into various layers of nerve walls, nerve bundle sheaths, or the encirclement of nerves by tumor cells exceeding 33% [13]. Within the colorectal cancer (CRC) patient population, the prevalence of perineural invasion (PNI) ranges between 20 and 57% [14]. PNI has emerged as a predictive factor for CRC progression or recurrence, potentially offering valuable insights for clinical practitioners when devising patient-specific treatment strategies [15, 16].

Furthermore, in accordance with the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging manual, perineural invasion (PNI) stands out as a specific and significant prognostic indicator for colorectal cancer [17]. The clinical practice guidelines outlined by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) similarly recognize PNI as a high-risk factor for postoperative recurrence in colorectal cancer and advocate for adjuvant therapy in cases of stage II colorectal cancer combined with PNI [18]. Prior investigations have established a connection between PNI status and the secretion of extracellular vesicles (EVs), as well as the expression levels of plasma miR-21 and nerve growth factor (NGF) [19,20,21], though their clinical utility as biomarkers remains somewhat limited.

While perineural invasion (PNI) holds significant prognostic value, its assessment is currently reliant on postoperative pathological biopsies. The preoperative identification of PNI could serve as a valuable tool for clinicians, aiding in the optimization of clinical decisions such as the necessity of neoadjuvant therapy and the adequacy of surgical resection. As such, the primary objective of this study is to construct and validate a nomogram grounded in the preoperative clinical and pathological attributes of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. This nomogram is designed to predict the likelihood of PNI occurrence.

Materials and methods

Patient selection

This retrospective study protocol received approval from the Ethics Committee of the First People's Hospital of Changde, affiliated with Xiangya Medical College, Central South University. All experiments and methodologies were executed in strict accordance with applicable guidelines and regulations. The analysis encompassed a cohort of 388 patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) who underwent surgical procedures at the Department of General Surgery of the First People's Hospital of Changde, affiliated with Xiangya Medical College, Central South University, spanning from June 2021 to June 2023.

Inclusion Criteria:1. Patients with a verified diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) and tumor staging conducted in accordance with the guidelines outlined in the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC-TNM Staging Manual, 8th edition)0.2. Resectable colorectal cancer lesions assessed and planned for curative resection by a multidisciplinary team (MDT)0.3. Availability of postoperative histopathological reports providing details regarding the perineural invasion (PNI) status.4. Completion of both CT plain scan and enhanced examination conducted within 7 days preceding the surgical intervention. Exclusion Criteria:1. Preoperative conditions such as severe anemia, infections, and hematologic diseases.2. Treatments to increase white blood cells or platelets conducted within one month prior to surgery.3. Patients who underwent preoperative treatments, including radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or chemoradiotherapy.4. Patients diagnosed with metastatic cancer or malignancies in other anatomical sites.5. Patients with incomplete medical records or insufficient examination data.

Following adherence to the defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 335 patients were ultimately included in this study. These patients possessed comprehensive data and were subsequently allocated, in a 2:1 ratio, to two distinct datasets: the training group, comprising 221 cases, and the validation group, comprising 114 cases. This allocation was executed through the utilization of computer-generated random numbers, as depicted in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart of patient selection

Full size image

Data collection

The collected dataset encompassed a range of variables, including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), smoking history, serum tumor markers, complete blood count results, T-stage and N-stage determined via computerized tomography (CT) scans, preoperative histological type, histological differentiation (grading), and tumor macroscopic type. The staging of T-stage and N-stage adhered to the guidelines outlined in the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging manual.

Definitions

Based on the results of complete blood count tests, we calculated the ratios of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte (PLR), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte (LMR). By constructing Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve plots, we identified the optimal cut-off values for the occurrence of Perineural Invasion (PNI). Patients were categorized into groups based on these values: NLR ≤ 2.52 and NLR > 2.52, PLR ≤ 136.98 and PLR > 136.98, LMR ≤ 2.76 and LMR > 2.76. Furthermore, based on the reference ranges of tumor markers, patients were divided into groups according to the following criteria: Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) ≤ 5 ng/ml and CEA > 5 ng/ml, Carbohydrate Antigen 199 (CA199) ≤ 35 KU/L and CA199 > 35 KU/L, Carbohydrate Antigen 125 (CA125) ≤ 35 KU/L and CA125 > 35 KU/L, and Aberrant Glycosylation Protein Detection (TAP) ≤ 121 um2 and TAP > 121 um2.

Nomogram construction and performance assessment

We conducted a thorough assessment of independent predictive factors (p < 0.05) within the training group through multivariate logistic regression analysis. This data was then utilized to formulate a nomogram designed for predicting the occurrence of perineural invasion (PNI) among colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. To gauge the goodness of fit between observed and predicted values in both the training and validation groups, we employed calibration curves and conducted the Hosmer–Lemeshow test.For an in-depth evaluation of the nomogram's performance in both groups, we utilized Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves and calculated the Area Under the Curve (AUC). Additionally, we carried out Decision Curve Analysis (DCA) to assess the clinical utility of the nomogram, evaluating the net benefit at various threshold probabilities within both the training and validation datasets. To enhance the robustness of our analysis, we employed the bootstrap method with 1000 iterations for sample resampling, focusing on discrimination and calibration.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were conducted utilizing R software (version 4.3.0). Logistic regression analysis, nomogram construction and calibration were executed with the rms package. Calibration curves were generated using the calibrate and val.prob functions from the rms package, while decision curve analysis (DCA) was facilitated with the rmda package.Numerical variables were reported as the median and interquartile range (IQR), and group comparisons were conducted employing the Mann–Whitney U test. Categorical variables were expressed as counts (percentages), and group comparisons were performed using \(\chi 2\) tests or Fisher's exact tests. All statistical tests were two-tailed, with a significance level set at p < 0.05.

Results

Clinicopathological characteristics of the patients with colorectal cancer (CRC)

This study encompassed a total of 335 patients, and an overview of the patients' demographic characteristics is presented in Table 1. The training dataset consisted of 221 cases, with 110 males and 111 females, while the validation dataset comprised 114 cases, consisting of 54 males and 60 females. Within this cohort, there were 146 cases of rectal cancer, 105 cases of left-sided colon cancer, and 84 cases of right-sided colon cancer. As per the postoperative pathological reports, 148 patients were diagnosed with perineural invasion (PNI).

Table 1 Clinicopathologic characteristics of the patients with colorectal cancer (CRC)
Full size table

No statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed between the PNI-positive and PNI-negative groups concerning age, gender, smoking history, body mass index (BMI), abnormal glycoprotein TAP, carbohydrate antigen CA125 (CA125), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), and histological classification. However, noteworthy distinctions (p < 0.05) emerged between these two groups in terms of T-stage and N-stage in CT, tumor histological differentiation (grading), tumor macroscopic type, tumor primary location, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen CA199 (CA199), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR).Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified six clinical and pathological characteristics as independent risk factors for perineural invasion (PNI) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). These findings are summarized as follows: tumor histological differentiation (grading) (OR = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.03–0.74, p = 0.02), primary tumor location (OR = 2.49, 95% CI = 1.21–5.12, p = 0.013), tumor macroscopic type (OR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.22–0.81, p = 0.01), N staging in CT (OR = 3.44, 95% CI = 1.74–6.80, p < 0.001), CEA (OR = 3.13, 95% CI = 1.60–6.13, p = 0.001), and PLR (OR = 2.07, 95% CI = 1.08–3.96, p = 0.028) (as depicted in Table 2).

Table 2 Univariate and Multivariate logistic regression analysis of the patients with colorectal cancer (CRC)
Full size table

Nomogram construction and performance

Utilizing multifactorial logistic regression analysis, we identified six independent risk factors: tumor histological differentiation (grading), primary tumor location, gross tumor type, N staging in CT, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR). These factors were employed to construct a nomogram (Fig. 2) for preoperatively predicting the occurrence of perineural invasion (PNI) in colorectal cancer patients.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Nomogram predicting the risk of perineural invasion (PNI) in patients with colorectal cancer

Full size image

The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.772 (95% CI, 0.712–0.833) for the predicted nomogram within the training group dataset and 0.752 (95% CI, 0.664–0.839) within the validation group dataset (as illustrated in Fig. 3). Moreover, the calibration curves exhibited a favorable agreement between the predicted probabilities and the actual outcomes for both the training and validation group datasets (refer to Fig. 4). The p-values obtained from the Hosmer–Lemeshow test were 0.47 and 0.72, respectively, indicating no significant deviation and confirming the model's robust fit.

Fig. 3
figure 3

ROC curve. A Training group, (B). Validation group. ROC Receiver Operating Characteristic, AUC Area Under the ROC Curve

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Calibration curve for predicting the possibility of PNI in colorectal cancer patients. A Training group, (B). Validation group. PNI Perineural Invasion

Full size image

Decision curve analysis (DCA) was conducted to assess the practical clinical utility of the nomogram in both the training and validation group datasets (refer to Fig. 5). The analysis revealed that within the training group, setting threshold probabilities between 13 and 85%, and in the validation group, between 8 and 68%, could lead to net benefits when guiding clinical interventions for patients with perineural invasion (PNI) based on the nomogram predictions. These findings underscore the nomogram's practical applicability in clinical settings for estimating the risk of perineural invasion (PNI) among colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Decision curve analysis for predicting PNI in colorectal cancer patients. A Training group, (B). Validation group. PNI Perineural Invasion

Full size image

Clinical utility of the nomogram

Decision curve analysis (DCA) was systematically performed to evaluate the clinical applicability of the nomogram in both the training and validation group datasets (as displayed in Fig. 5). The analysis clearly suggests that when the threshold probabilities for the training group and validation group were strategically set within the ranges of 13% to 85% and 8% to 68%, respectively, clinical interventions guided by the nomogram's predictions had the potential to yield net benefits for patients dealing with perineural invasion (PNI).This unequivocally underscores the practical significance of the nomogram in real-world clinical contexts, particularly in forecasting the likelihood of PNI among colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.

Discussion

Given the profound impact of perineural invasion (PNI) on cancer prognosis, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines and the guidelines of the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) have proposed the mandatory inclusion of PNI status in the pathological reports of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients [22, 23]. The occurrence of PNI not only results in pain and functional impairment in the affected organs but also leads to postoperative local recurrence, metastasis, and infiltration due to tumor cells remaining within or around nerves, which are key factors in poor prognosis [24, 25]. The incidence of PNI varies across different stages of CRC, approximately 10% in stages I-II and up to 40% in stage IV [26]. Adjuvant chemotherapy has been shown to prolong the five-year disease-free survival of patients with stage II-III CRC and to alleviate the adverse effects of PNI on survival [27, 28]. PNI is closely related to tumor metastasis, recurrence, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) [29]. Lymph node invasion (LNI) is another pathological feature associated with poor disease prognosis, and some studies have suggested PNI as a predictive factor for diagnosing LNI [26, 30]. Additionally, the presence of PNI is linked to tumor lymph node metastasis [31], which may be related to frequent contact with large-diameter axons in lymph nodes. Notably, in CRC cases without nerve and lymph node invasion, there is a significant increase in the five-year survival rate of patients [32, 33]. The strong correlation between PNI and lymph node metastasis warrants further investigation.

Nomograms, which integrate a variety of significant factors for individualized risk assessment, are extensively utilized in evaluating the prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients [34,35,36,37]. By employing multifactor logistic regression analysis, we identified independent predictive factors associated with perineural invasion (PNI) in CRC patients and based on these factors, developed a nomogram. For each CRC patient, the higher the total score, the greater the risk of developing PNI. For example, consider a CRC patient with the tumor originating in the rectum (60 points), N staging in CT as N0 (0 points), gross tumor type as ulcerative (22 points), low tumor differentiation (100 points), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) positive (60 points), and a platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) > 136.98 (39 points), culminating in a total of 281 points. This score correlates with an approximate 70% probability of developing PNI. Given the threshold of 50%, this patient is classified as high-risk and may be considered for neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

In our investigation, we have discerned that the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) (p= 0.028) serves as an independent predictive factor for perineural invasion (PNI). The presence of malignant tumors can incite an escalation in platelet (PLT) counts through the release of thrombopoietin (TPO) and interleukin-6 (IL-6). Consequently, heightened platelet activation can foster tumor growth and metastasis, a phenomenon recognized as the "positive feedback loop" in paraneoplastic thrombocytosis [38]. When peripheral blood lymphocyte counts diminish, the tumor burden tends to rise, thus promoting tumor dissemination and metastasis [39]. PLR, as a composite biomarker reflecting both inflammatory and immune status within the body, indicates an augmentation in the inflammatory response or a reduction in immune response. This suggests a decline in the body's anti-tumor capacity, which, in turn, results in an unfavorable prognosis and distant metastasis of tumors [40, 41]. Although an extensive body of research has illuminated the significance of increased local lymphocyte infiltration within tumors and elevated systemic inflammatory responses as pivotal clinical indicators influencing patient prognosis [42,43,44,45,46], studies elucidating the impact of PLR on PNI among CRC patients remain scarce. Consequently, further investigations are warranted to delve into the intricate relationship between these factors.

Serum tumor markers, which are substances secreted by tumor cells or produced by the body in response to tumor-related stimuli, play a crucial role not only in assisting the diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) but also in guiding treatment, evaluating therapeutic effectiveness, and predicting outcomes. Studies have indicated that elevated preoperative levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) are an independent predictive factor for perineural invasion (PNI) in CRC patients[43]. Our research supports this finding, highlighting the significance of CEA as a marker for PNI. However, the diagnostic effectiveness of CEA alone is limited. Therefore, we recommend using CEA in conjunction with other indicators, such as the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), to enhance diagnostic accuracy and provide a more comprehensive evaluation of PNI risk in CRC patients. Some studies have proposed quantifying factors such as tumor histological differentiation (grading), N staging in CT (lymph node metastasis), gross tumor type, a family history of cancer in first-degree relatives, and the degree of weight loss in the three months prior to diagnosis. These factors were used to establish a preoperative nomogram for predicting perineural invasion (PNI) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Additionally, another nomogram combining carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels and CT radiomic features has been developed. The clinical utility of both these nomograms has been validated through decision curve analysis (DCA), confirming their applicative value in clinical practice [47, 48]. In our nomogram, poorer tumor histological differentiation (grading) and higher N staging result in higher scores, indicating a greater likelihood of perineural invasion (PNI) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, consistent with related studies [49, 50]. Ulcerative, infiltrative, and polypoid are common gross types of CRC. Previous research has suggested that the gross type of CRC is associated with PNI [51]. Our findings indicate that the ulcerative type is more prone to PNI compared to the polypoid type, which may be attributed to the tumor's destruction of normal tissue.

Our study found that the incidence of perineural invasion (PNI) in rectal cancer is higher than in colon cancer, consistent with related reports indicating a PNI incidence of 20.6% in rectal cancer compared to 14.1% in colon cancer [52]. Currently, no studies have demonstrated the impact of left-sided versus right-sided colon cancer on PNI. Although our research suggests that left-sided colon cancer is more prone to PNI than right-sided, it's important to note that our data come from a single center and involve a relatively small sample size, which may introduce bias. Moving forward, we aim to conduct multi-center, large-scale studies to further explore the influence of the tumor's primary location on perineural invasion (PNI).

Some research has developed a nomogram for predicting perineural invasion (PNI) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients using CT radiomic features [53]. However, the semantic features of regions of interest (ROI) on CT images, such as tumor diameter or size measurements, are highly subjective and can vary significantly between clinicians with different levels of experience, thus introducing certain limitations. In contrast, our study, in addition to CT imaging, incorporates commonly used clinical and pathological features such as serum inflammatory markers and histopathological indicators. Our findings indicate that tissue differentiation (grading), primary tumor location, gross tumor type, N staging in CT, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are closely related to the occurrence of PNI. These clinical and pathological features not only provide a more comprehensive assessment of CRC, but they are also readily accessible. The nomogram constructed using these six clinical-pathological features has demonstrated stability and accuracy in internal validations. Moreover, the results of decision curve analysis (DCA) suggest that our model is also valuable in guiding clinical decision-making by healthcare professionals.

While this study has its strengths, there are limitations to consider. Firstly, as a retrospective analysis including only patients who underwent curative surgery, selection bias may limit the generalizability of our findings, indicating a need for future prospective studies to validate and expand upon these results. Secondly, we assessed PNI status using HE staining, not the more precise immunohistochemistry technique based on anti-S100 antibodies [54, 55], which may affect the diagnostic accuracy for PNI-positive cases. Future research should employ more advanced techniques to enhance diagnostic precision. Thirdly, the risk factors included in our model are relatively limited and may not encompass all potential factors influencing PNI occurrence. This implies that the predictive power of the model might be restricted, and future studies should incorporate a broader range of risk factors to improve the model’s predictive capabilities. Lastly, all study participants were from a single hospital and only internal validation was conducted. To enhance the generalizability and stability of our findings, external validation using data from other hospitals is necessary.

Conclusions

In summary, our research introduces a nomogram for preoperatively predicting the risk of perineural invasion (PNI) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. This tool aids clinicians in making more precise decisions and is anticipated to enhance both the staging strategies and treatment approaches for tumors. In the future, we plan to further increase the accuracy and universality of our prediction model through external validation in diverse populations and conditions. Additionally, we aim to investigate more clinical and pathological factors that may influence PNI, which will provide additional information for the personalized treatment of colorectal cancer.

Availability of data and materials

The work dataset supports the findings of this study are available on reasonable request from the corresponding author, and the data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

References

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, et al. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023;73:17–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Siegel RL, Wagle NS, Cercek A, et al. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023;73:233–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Iveson TJ, Sobrero AF, Yoshino T, et al. Duration of Adjuvant Doublet Chemotherapy (3 or 6 months) in Patients With High-Risk Stage II Colorectal Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:631–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Morton D, Seymour M, Magill L, et al. Preoperative Chemotherapy for Operable Colon Cancer: Mature Results of an International Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41:1541–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kanani A, Veen T, Søreide K. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy in primary and metastatic colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2021;108:1417–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nair KG, Kamath SD, Chowattukunnel N, Krishnamurthi SS. Preoperative Strategies for Locally Advanced Colon Cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-024-01184-6. Epub ahead of print.

  7. Dinevska M, Widodo SS, Furst L, et al. Cell signaling activation and extracellular matrix remodeling underpin glioma tumor microenvironment heterogeneity and organization. Cell Oncol. 2023;46:589–602.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hernández-Camarero P, López-Ruiz E, Marchal JA, et al. Cancer: a mirrored room between tumor bulk and tumor microenvironment. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2021;40:217.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Hanahan D, Monje M. Cancer hallmarks intersect with neuroscience in the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Cell. 2023;41:573–80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Winkler F, Venkatesh HS, Amit M, et al. Cancer neuroscience: State of the field, emerging directions. Cell. 2023;186:1689–707.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Alotaibi AM, Lee JL, Kim J, et al. Prognostic and Oncologic Significance of Perineural Invasion in Sporadic Colorectal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:1626–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fu Y, Zhang X, Ding Z, et al. Worst Pattern of Perineural Invasion Redefines the Spatial Localization of Nerves in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Front Oncol. 2021;11:766902.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Liebig C, Ayala G, Wilks JA, et al. Perineural invasion in cancer: A Review of the Literature. Cancer. 2009;115:3379–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Liebig C, Ayala G, Wilks J, et al. Perineural Invasion Is an Independent Predictor of Outcome in Colorectal Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5131–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Peng J, Sheng W, Huang D, et al. Perineural invasion in pT3N0 rectal cancer: The incidence and its prognostic effect. Cancer. 2011;117:1415–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lord AC, Knijn N, Brown G, et al. Pathways of spread in rectal cancer: a reappraisal of the true routes to distant metastatic disease. Eur J Cancer. 2020;128:1–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Amin MB, Greene FL, Edge SB, et al. The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more “personalized” approach to cancer staging: The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:93–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Benson AB, Venook AP, Cederquist L, et al. Colon Cancer, Version 1.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Nat Compr Canc Netw. 2017;15:370–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fukada M, Matsuhashi N, Takahashi T, et al. Tumor Tissue MIR92a and Plasma MIRs21 and 29a as Predictive Biomarkers Associated with Clinicopathological Features and Surgical Resection in a Prospective Study on Colorectal Cancer Patients. J Clin Med. 2020;9:2509.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lei Y, He X, Huang H, et al. Nerve growth factor orchestrates NGAL and matrix metalloproteinases activity to promote colorectal cancer metastasis. Clin Transl Oncol. 2022;24:34–47.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bai J, Zhang X, Shi D, et al. Exosomal miR-128-3p Promotes Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition in Colorectal Cancer Cells by Targeting FOXO4 via TGF-β/SMAD and JAK/STAT3 Signaling. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:568738.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Benson AB, Venook AP, Al-Hawary MM, et al. Rectal Cancer, Version 2.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022;20:1139–67.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Colorectal Cancer Working Group C, Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO). Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) diagnosis and treatment guidelines for colorectal cancer. English version. Chin J Cancer Res. 2018;2019(31):117–34.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Al-Sukhni E, Attwood K, Gabriel EM, et al. Lymphovascular and perineural invasion are associated with poor prognostic features and outcomes in colorectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2017;37:42–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Amit M, Na’ara S, Gil Z. Mechanisms of cancer dissemination along nerves. Nat Rev Cancer. 2016;16:399–408.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Al-Sukhni E, Attwood K, Gabriel EM, et al. Lymphovascular and perineural invasion are associated with poor prognostic features and outcomes in colorectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2017;37:42–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Suzuki T, Suwa K, Ogawa M, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for the perineural invasion of colorectal cancer. J Surg Res. 2015;199:84–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Song JH, Yu M, Kang KM, et al. Significance of perineural and lymphovascular invasion in locally advanced rectal cancer treated by preoperative chemoradiotherapy and radical surgery: Can perineural invasion be an indication of adjuvant chemotherapy? Radiother Oncol. 2019;133:125–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Knijn N, Mogk SC, Teerenstra S, et al. Perineural Invasion Is a Strong Prognostic Factor in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016;40:103–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee YJ, Huh JW, Shin JK, et al. Risk factors for lymph node metastasis in early colon cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020;35:1607–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Huh JW, Kim HR, Kim YJ. Lymphovascular or Perineural Invasion May Predict Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With T1 and T2 Colorectal Cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:1074–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Skancke M, Arnott SM, Amdur RL, et al. Lymphovascular Invasion and Perineural Invasion Negatively Impact Overall Survival for Stage II Adenocarcinoma of the Colon. Dis Colon Rectum. 2019;62:181–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kim S, Huh JW, Lee WY, et al. Lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, and tumor budding are prognostic factors for stage I colon cancer recurrence. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020;35:881–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Yang Z, Li Y, Qin X, et al. Development and Validation of a Prognostic Nomogram for Colorectal Cancer Patients With Synchronous Peritoneal Metastasis. Front Oncol. 2021;11:615321.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ashktorab H, Brim H. Blood-Based Liquid Biopsies: A Noninvasive and Cost-Effective Tool for Improved Risk Assessment and Identification of Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With Submucosal T1 Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2021;161:29–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hu DY, Cao B, Li SH, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and a predictive model for lymph node metastasis of submucosal (T1) colon cancer: A population-based study. J Dig Dis. 2019;20:288–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Xu Y, Chen Y, Long C, et al. Preoperative Predictors of Lymph Node Metastasis in Colon Cancer. Front Oncol. 2021;11:667477.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Lin RJ, Afshar-Kharghan V, Schafer AI. Paraneoplastic thrombocytosis: the secrets of tumor self-promotion. Blood. 2014;124:184–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Nøst TH, Alcala K, Urbarova I, et al. Systemic inflammation markers and cancer incidence in the UK Biobank. Eur J Epidemiol. 2021;36:841–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang L, Wei Z, Xu A, et al. Can the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio be beneficial in predicting lymph node metastasis and promising prognostic markers of gastric cancer patients? Tumor maker retrospective study. Int J Surg. 2018;56:320–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Acikgoz O, Cakan B, Demir T, et al. Platelet to lymphocyte ratio is associated with tumor localization and outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer. Medicine. 2021;100:e27712.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Wagner J, Rapsomaniki MA, Chevrier S, et al. A Single-Cell Atlas of the Tumor and Immune Ecosystem of Human Breast Cancer. Cell. 2019;177:1330-1345.e18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Hao D, Liu J, Chen M, et al. Immunogenomic Analyses of Advanced Serous Ovarian Cancer Reveal Immune Score is a Strong Prognostic Factor and an Indicator of Chemosensitivity. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24:3560–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhang D, He W, Wu C, et al. Scoring System for Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes and Its Prognostic Value for Gastric Cancer. Front Immunol. 2019;10:71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Donnem T, Kilvaer TK, Andersen S, et al. Strategies for clinical implementation of TNM-Immunoscore in resected nonsmall-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:225–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Dolan RD, McSorley ST, Horgan PG, et al. The role of the systemic inflammatory response in predicting outcomes in patients with advanced inoperable cancer: Systematic review and meta -analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2017;116:134–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Huang X, Liu J, Wu G, et al. Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Preoperative Prediction of Perineural Invasion in Colorectal Cancer. Med Sci Monit. 2019;25:1709–17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Huang Y, He L, Dong D, et al. Individualized prediction of perineural invasion in colorectal cancer: development and validation of a radiomics prediction model. Chin J Cancer Res. 2018;30:40–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Cienfuegos JA, Martínez P, Baixauli J, et al. Perineural Invasion is a Major Prognostic and Predictive Factor of Response to Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage I-II Colon Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:1077–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Huang X, Liu J, Wu G, et al. Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Preoperative Prediction of Perineural Invasion in Colorectal Cancer. Med Sci Monit. 2019;25:1709–17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Zhou Y, Wang H, Gong H, et al. Clinical significance of perineural invasion in stages II and III colorectal cancer. Pathology - Research and Practice. 2015;211:839–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Knijn N, Mogk SC, Teerenstra S, et al. Perineural Invasion Is a Strong Prognostic Factor in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016;40:103–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Huang Y, He L, Dong D, et al. Individualized prediction of perineural invasion in colorectal cancer: development and validation of a radiomics prediction model. Chin J Cancer Res. 2018;30:40–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Shimada Y, Kido T, Kameyama H, et al. Retraction Note to: Clinical significance of perineural invasion diagnosed by immunohistochemistry with anti-S100 antibody in Stage I-III colorectal cancer. Surg Today. 2022;52:519–519.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Van Wyk HC, Going J, Horgan P, et al. The role of perineural invasion in predicting survival in patients with primary operable colorectal cancer: A systematic review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2017;112:11–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

There are no fundings to declare.

Open access funding provided by the First People’s Hospital of Changde City for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The University of South China, Hengyang, People’s Republic of China

    Yao Que

  2. Department of General Surgery, The First People’s Hospital of Changde City, Changde, 415003, People’s Republic of China

    Ruiping Wu, Hong Li & Jinli Lu

Authors
  1. Yao Que
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ruiping Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hong Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jinli Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Study concept and design: JL-L, YQ. Drafting of the manuscript: YQ, RP-W. Acquisition of data, analysis, and interpretation of data: YQ,HL. Critical revision of the manuscript: JL-L. Statistical analysis: YQ. Study supervision: JL-L. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinli Lu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the First People’s Hospital in Changde, Hunan Province, China (Protocol Code 2023–197-01). Before collecting any data, each participant provided written, informed consent. Every step was carried out in conformity with the Helsinki Declaration.

Consent for publication

Not applicable. See “Ethics approval and consent to participate”.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Que, Y., Wu, R., Li, H. et al. A prediction nomogram for perineural invasion in colorectal cancer patients: a retrospective study. BMC Surg 24, 80 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-024-02364-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-024-02364-9

Keywords

BMC Surgery

ISSN: 1471-2482

Contact us