Skip to main content

Analysis of anatomical variations of intrapelvic vessels for advanced pelvic surgery

Abstract

Background

In pelvic surgery, it is important to anticipate potential anatomic variations, which may be unknown, and inter-relationships among intrapelvic vessels. Here, we comprehensively analyzed intrapelvic vessel patterns.

Method

This retrospective analysis included 81 patients that underwent colorectal surgery in our institution in 2016. A total of 162 half-pelvises were imaged with contrast-enhanced computed tomography. We scrutinized thin-slice images.

Results

We found variations in the number of internal iliac veins. In 47.5% of cases, one internal iliac vein drained into the ipsilateral common iliac vein in both halves of the pelvis. In the other cases, several internal iliac veins were observed in one or both halves of the pelvis. We analyzed the inter-relationships between the superior gluteal artery and the sacral nerve plexus in pelvic halves. Superior gluteal arteries ran between the 5th lumbar nerve and 1st sacral nerves, in 82% of halves, and lateral to the 5th lumbar nerve, in 17% of halves. Dorsally, the superior gluteal artery ran on the medial side of the internal iliac vein in 15% of halves. In 28% of half-pelvises, two superior gluteal veins were observed. Superior gluteal veins passed through the sacral nerve plexus lateral to 5th lumbar, between 5th lumbar and 1st sacral, and between 1st and 2nd sacral nerve, in 42.0, 47.5, and 37.7% of halves, respectively. We evaluated the rate of symmetric pelvic anatomies, and found that all anatomic variations formed symmetrically, except the number of internal iliac veins.

Conclusion

This study clarified the anatomical variations of intrapelvic vessels and their inter-relationships. These findings will benefit our understanding of pelvic anatomy and enhance the safety of radical surgery for treating pelvic diseases.

Peer Review reports

Background

Many organs and tissues lie in complicated juxtaposition in the pelvic cavity, including vessels, nerves, muscles, urogenital organs, and the rectum. The spatial configurations of these organs are difficult to comprehend for many surgeons. Recent studies have demonstrated that three-dimensional models or three-dimensional simulations could be helpful in understanding this complexity [1, 2]. In performing advanced surgery for rectal cancer and cancers that arise in urological or gynecological organs, it is necessary to have an accurate, comprehensive understanding of pelvic anatomy to perform safe, oncologically appropriate surgery. However, in addition to the complexity of the pelvic cavity, many anatomical variations, particularly vascular patterns, make it even more difficult to understand. Only a few studies have demonstrated the morphological variability in the courses of the internal iliac artery, vein, or obturator vessels. Moreover, most of those studies were based on a small series or they addressed the variability of an individual artery or vein [3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. During surgery, it is also quite important to understand the inter-relationships between intrapelvic organs, in addition to individual variability, and these issues are rarely studied. Based on this background, the current study was undertaken to provide a comprehensive analysis of intrapelvic vascular anatomic variability, to elucidate the distribution of different pelvic vascular pattern variations, and to determine systematically the inter-relationships among intrapelvic vessels.

Methods

Patients

This retrospective analysis included 81 patients that underwent colorectal surgery for colorectal cancers in our institution in 2016. These patients had undergone contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) in a preoperative work-up. All CT images were acquired with a 64-detector row CT scanner (Revolution GSI and Revolution EVO, GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA). The CT scan was started at 70 s after an injection of non-ionic contrast agent with iodine. In our institution, we routinely reconstructed thin-slice CT images (1.25-mm thick or occasionally 0.625-mm thick) for rectal cancer cases that required lateral pelvic lymph node dissection.

Interpretation of intrapelvic vascular anatomy

A total of 162 pelvic halves in 81 patients were examined. CT images were interpreted in detail, independently, by two surgeons (AH, a specialist in colorectal surgery, and TH). In cases of disagreement, the final interpretation was based on a mutual agreement between the two surgeons. After this process, all images were carefully confirmed again (by AH).

We examined the locations of spinal nerves, 5th lumbar nerve (L5), 1st sacral nerve (S1), and 2nd sacral nerve (S2), which join together to form the sacral nerve plexus. We also examined the locations of arteries, including the common, external, and internal iliac arteries (CIA, EIA, and IIA, respectively), the superior and inferior gluteal arteries (SGA and IGA, respectively), and the internal pudendal artery (IPA). We also examined the locations of veins, including the common, external, and internal iliac veins (CIV, EIV, and IIV, respectively), the superior gluteal vein (SGV), and the aberrant obturator vein.

In the current study, variations in the branching pattern of the IIV were classified as follows (Fig. 1): in type I, one IIV drained into the ipsilateral CIV in both halves of the pelvis; in type II, two IIVs drained into the ipsilateral CIV in one or both halves of the pelvis; in type III, one of the two IIVs drained into the contralateral CIV, and the other drained into the ipsilateral CIV; and type IV comprised all variations in IIV patterns that did not fit into types I-III. Additionally, type II was subclassified into three subtypes: in type IIa, two IIVs were present in the left half of the pelvis; in type IIb, two IIVs were present in the right half of the pelvis; and in type IIc, two IIVs were present in both halves of the pelvis. Similarly, type III was classified into two subtypes: in type IIIa, one IIV draining toward the ipsilateral cavity ran from the right cavity into the left CIV; in type IIIb, it ran from the left cavity into the right CIV.

Fig. 1
figure1

Variations in the branching pattern of the internal iliac vein. IVC, inferior vena cava; CIV, common iliac vein; IIV, internal iliac vein; EIV, external iliac vein

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed with JMP pro 13.0.0 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). A kappa score was calculated to evaluate whether the pelvic anatomy was symmetric.

Results

Patient background

The cohort of 81 patients included 42 (51.9%) males and 39 (48.1%) females, with a median age of 73 years (range 40 to 84 years). The primary tumors were located in the right-side colon (from the cecum to the transverse colon) in 19 patients (23.5%); in the left-side colon (from the descending to the sigmoid colon) in 30 patients (37.0%); and in the rectum in 32 patients (39.5%). CT slices were 0.675-mm thick in 7 cases (8.6%) and 1.25-mm thick in 74 cases (91.4%).

Internal iliac vein

The vascular branching pattern variations observed in the IIV are shown in Fig. 1 (details in Table 1). The type I branching pattern was observed in 47.5% of all cases. The other cases had several IIVs in one or both halves. Types II and III branching patterns were observed in about 40 and 10% of all cases, respectively. Among 10 cases of type III, 9 were type IIIa. One case of type IV was observed, where two IIVs were present on both sides, and two medial IIVs joined together in front of the sacrum, then drained into the left CIV.

Table 1 Vascular pattern variability in the pelvis

Inter-relationships between the sacral nerve plexus and superior gluteal vessels

On each side of the pelvis, there are four routes for vessels to exit out of pelvis formed by the L5, S1, and S2 spinal nerve branches. The vascular branches of the internal iliac vessels must negotiate these routes as they pass out of the pelvis. We examined the inter-relationships between these routes and the SGA. We found that 82% of SGAs ran between the L5 and S1 branches, and 17% of SGAs ran lateral to the L5 branch (Fig. 2, upper panel; Table 1). Similarly, we analyzed the inter-relationships between the routes and the SGV. In 28% of pelvic halves, two SGVs were observed; therefore, the route through which each SGV passed was evaluated independently (Fig. 2, lower panel; Table 1). We found that the SGVs passed through the routes lateral to L5, between the L5 and S1, and between the S1 and S2 in 42.0, 47.5, and 37.7% of the halves, respectively.

Fig. 2
figure2

Variations in inter-relationships between the spinal nerves and the superior gluteal artery and vein. (Upper panel) Patterns of the superior gluteal artery (SGA). (Lower panel) Patterns of the superior gluteal vein (SGV). IIA, internal iliac artery IIV, internal iliac vein; L5, 5th lumbar nerve; S1, 1st sacral nerve; S2, 2nd sacral nerve

Inter-relationships among superior gluteal artery, internal iliac artery, and internal iliac vein

We investigated the inter-relationships among the SGA, IIA, and IIV (Fig. 3). The SGA ran dorsally, on the lateral side of the IIV in 85% of all pelvic halves. In the remaining 15% of pelvic halves, the SGA ran dorsally, on the medial side of the IIV (Fig. 3a, b and c).

Fig. 3
figure3

Inter-relationships among the superior gluteal artery (SGA) and the internal iliac artery and vein. (a) The SGA (red) runs dorsal, on the lateral side of the internal iliac vein (blue). (b) The SGA runs dorsal, on the medial side of the internal iliac vein. (c) Representative photograph of the right side of the pelvic cavity, which shows the pattern described in (b). Photograph was acquired during laparoscopic surgery for a lateral lymph node dissection. Asterisk (*) represents the internal iliac vein. IIA, internal iliac artery IIV, internal iliac vein; L5, 5th lumbar nerve; S1, 1st sacral nerve; S2, 2nd sacral nerve; SGA, superior gluteal artery

Unique variation

Fifteen pelvic halves showed a unique pattern in the inter-relationship between IIA and IIV (Fig. 4a and b). In these halves, two IIVs intercommunicated with each other, and thus, they formed a venous loop in front of the sacral nerve plexus. The SGA passed through this loop, and then ran dorsally, toward the buttock.

Fig. 4
figure4

A unique variation of the inter-relationship between the internal iliac artery (IIA) and vein (IIV). (a) The schematic figure illustrates this pattern. (b) Representative intra-operative photograph shows this pattern on the right side of the pelvic cavity. Photograph was acquired during laparoscopic surgery for a lateral lymph node dissection. Asterisk (*) represents the medial internal iliac vein (IIV); dagger () represents the lateral IIV; double dagger () represents the internal iliac artery (IIA); hash sign (#) represents the venous loop between the two IIVs, which has formed in front of the sacral nerve plexus; and the section sign (§) represents the external iliac vein. IIA, internal iliac artery IIV, internal iliac vein; L5, 5th lumbar nerve; S1, 1st sacral nerve; S2, 2nd sacral nerve; SGA, superior gluteal artery

Vascular variations in lateral cavities

Furthermore, we investigated additional variations, including the inter-relationship between the IGA and IPA, at the level of the pelvic outlet, and the presence of an aberrant obturator vein (Table 1). About 70% of the IIAs divided into IPA and IGA branches in the pelvic cavity. In 12% of the pelvic halves, the IIAs passed out of pelvis as a common trunk. In pelvic halves where IPA and IGA were divided in pelvic cavity, the IGA exited the pelvis on the medial side more frequently than on the lateral side of the IPA. The remaining cases had other types of IIA divisions; for example, sometimes, the IGA branched off the SGA outside the pelvis and ran toward the buttock. An aberrant obturator vein was present in 70% of pelvic halves.

Anatomic symmetry in the lateral pelvic cavities

The rate of pelvic anatomic symmetry, or the concordance rate of pelvic anatomies, was analyzed for the following variations; the route that the SGA passed through; a SGA that ran dorsally, on the medial side of the IIV; the number of SGVs; the route that the SGV passed through; the presence of an aberrant obturator vein; and the number of IIVs (Table 2). We found that all anatomical variations, other than the number of IIVs, were symmetric.

Table 2 Anatomic symmetry in the lateral cavities of the pelvis

Discussion

This study revealed details about the inter-relationships among pelvic vessels and their anatomic variations in pelvic cavity. Furthermore, several unique anatomical variations were observed in a few cases. This study was the first to elucidate these patterns, and our findings have important implications for surgeons.

Since Adachi first classified the IIA branching variations into five types [3], several studies have investigated the distributions of branching patterns in different populations [4,5,6]. Although those studies analyzed arterial variations in detail, they only assessed the IIA, independent of other vessels. Information other than arterial variations have not been available, due to the scarcity of studies that investigated vein, muscle, or nerve anatomies. Therefore, the present study addressed the unmet need for a comprehensive analysis of pelvic vascular anatomy, including anatomic inter-relationships and variations.

Current textbooks on human anatomy illustrate intrapelvic vessels and their inter-relationships as invariant [10, 11]. Typically, the SGA branches off the IIA, runs posteriorly, on the lateral side of the IIV, passes between the L5 and S1 nerves, and runs toward the buttock. In addition, the IIV branches off the CIV, one on each side. Many surgeons probably consider this configuration to be typical pelvic anatomy, and they might implement surgery based on that assumption. However, the present study demonstrated that not all pelvic vessels form those stereotypic patterns. In locally recurrent rectal cancer treatments, surgical resection is one of the options for cure, in which we must perform radical surgery with en bloc resection with involved surrounding organs including internal iliac vessels to achieve tumor-free resection [12,13,14]. Understanding the above vascular variations might be valuable to prevent inadvertent intraoperative bleeding from the internal iliac vessels in such advanced surgeries.

In our opinion, some of the facts clarified in this study are quite noteworthy. First, we described the anatomic inter-relationships around the IIA. Although the SGA branches off the IIA and typically passes through the L5-S1 split, 17% of SGAs run in front of L5 and pass lateral to L5. In addition, in some cases, the SGA runs dorsally, on the medial side of the IIV. These uncommon variations should be recognized preoperatively to prevent unexpected vascular injury, which might lead to severe outcomes. For example, lateral lymph node dissection is needed to resect advanced rectal cancer with metastatic lateral node [15, 16]. During this procedure, lymph nodes around IIVs are included in the dissected area, and therefore we must pay attention to the SGA running on the medial side of the IIV which was found to be observed in 15% of pelvic halves. Second, we found that pelvic anatomy was formed symmetrically. This finding suggested that, although many anatomic variations are present in the pelvis, pelvic anatomies are not likely to arise at random. These facts might facilitate the evaluation and detection of anatomic variations in the pelvis with more precision, in advance of surgery.

Although most preceding studies were based on cadaver inspections, in this study, we assessed contrast-enhanced CT images. In cadaver inspection, after dissecting the anatomic structures, it is not necessarily simple to determine the original structure. The procedure might also obscure anatomic inter-relationships. Furthermore, recent advances in CT technology have allowed clear depictions of anatomic structures even when they were covered with visceral fat. Several studies that analyzed abdominal vascular anatomy also adopted CT for making assessments [17, 18].

This study had several limitations. First, the retrospective study design had inherent limitations. In particular, our findings could not be confirmed intra-operatively. Second, the CT scans were performed once in the portal phase; this technique could have obscured the depiction of some individual vessels. Ideally, both arterial and venous phases should be obtained.

Conclusions

This study clarified the anatomic variations and inter-relationships of pelvic vessels in detail. We found some rare patterns, which should be considered during surgery. These findings will benefit our understanding of pelvic anatomy and enhance safety in performing radical surgery for treating pelvic diseases.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CIA:

Common iliac artery

CIV:

Common iliac vein

CT:

Computed tomography

EIA:

External iliac artery

EIV:

External iliac vein

IGA:

Inferior gluteal artery

IIA:

Internal iliac artery

IIV:

Internal iliac vein

IPA:

Internal pudendal artery

IVC:

Inferior vena cava

L5:

5th lumbar nerve

S1:

1st sacral nerve

S2:

2nd sacral nerve

SGA:

Superior gluteal artery

SGV:

Superior gluteal vein

References

  1. 1.

    Sora MC, Jilavu R, Matusz P. Computer aided three-dimensional reconstruction and modeling of the pelvis, by using plastinated cross sections, as a powerful tool for morphological investigations. Surg Radiol Anat. 2012;34:731–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Hamabe A, Ito M. A three-dimensional pelvic model made with a three-dimensional printer: applications for laparoscopic surgery to treat rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol. 2017;21:383–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Watanabe K, Shoja MM, Loukas M, et al. Buntaro Adachi (1865-1945): Japanese master of human anatomic variation. Clin Anat. 2012;25:957–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Braithwaite JL. Variations in origin of the parietal branches of the internal iliac artery. J Anat. 1952;86:423–30.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Roberts WH, Krishingner GL. Comparative study of human internal iliac artery based on Adachi classification. Anat Rec. 1967;158:191–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Sakthivelavan S, Aristotle S, Sivanandan A, et al. Variability in the branching pattern of the internal iliac artery in Indian population and its clinical importance. Anat Res Int. 2014;2014:597103.

  7. 7.

    Krishnamurthy A, Nayak SR, Khan S, et al. Anomalous channels draining the internal iliac veins: embryological and clinical significance. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2007;48:71–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Oto A, Akpinar E, Surucu HS, et al. Right internal iliac vein joining the left common iliac vein: case report demonstrated by CT angiography. Surg Radiol Anat. 2003;25:339–41.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Lotz PR, Seeger JF. Normal variations in iliac venous anatomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1982;138:735–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Netter F. Atlas of human anatomy. 7th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Agur AMR, Dalley AF. Grant's Atlas of Anatomy. 13th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.

  12. 12.

    Alberda WJ, Verhoef C, Schipper ME, et al. The importance of a minimal tumor-free resection margin in locally recurrent rectal Cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015;58:677–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Mirnezami AH, Sagar PM, Kavanagh D, Witherspoon P, Lee P, Winter D. Clinical algorithms for the surgical management of locally recurrent rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53:1248–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Troja A, El-Sourani N, Abdou A, Antolovic D, Raab HR. Surgical options for locally recurrent rectal cancer--review and update. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015;30:1157–63.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Kim TG, Park W, Choi DH, et al. Factors associated with lateral pelvic recurrence after curative resection following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer patients. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014;29:193–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Kusters M, Slater A, Muirhead R, et al. What to do with lateral nodal disease in low locally advanced rectal Cancer? A call for further reflection and research. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017;60:577–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ogino T, Takemasa I, Horitsugi G, et al. Preoperative evaluation of venous anatomy in laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision for right colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(Suppl 3):S429–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Hamabe A, Park S, Morita S, et al. Analysis of the vascular interrelationships among the first Jejunal vein, the superior mesenteric artery, and the middle colic artery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:1661–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Competing interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Disclosures

Atsushi Hamabe, Takashi Harino, Takayuki Ogino, MD, Tsukasa Tanida, Shingo Noura, Shunji Morita, and Keizo Dono have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclosure regarding this study.

Funding

This study received no funding.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors have read and approved the manuscript. Study concept and design: AH, SN and SM. Data collection: AH and TH. Data analysis and interpretation: AH, TH, TO, TT, SN, SM and KD.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atsushi Hamabe.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was approved by the institutional Ethics Committee in Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, and a written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants before surgery for collection and analysis of the data. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hamabe, A., Harino, T., Ogino, T. et al. Analysis of anatomical variations of intrapelvic vessels for advanced pelvic surgery. BMC Surg 20, 47 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-020-00711-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Pelvic anatomy
  • Iliac artery
  • Iliac vein
  • Rectal cancer