Skip to main content
Download PDF

An elevated preoperative cholesterol-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts unfavourable outcomes in colorectal cancer liver metastasis patients receiving simultaneous resections: a retrospective study

BMC Surgery volume 23, Article number: 131 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

To explore the clinical prognostic utility of the preoperative cholesterol-to-lymphocyte ratio (CLR) in outcomes for colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) patients receiving simultaneous resection of the primary lesion and liver metastases.

Methods

A total of 444 CRLM patients receiving simultaneous resections were enrolled. The optimal cut-off value for CLR was determined using the highest Youden’s index. Patients were divided into the CLR < 3.06 group and the CLR≥3.06 group. Propensity score matching analysis (PSM) and the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method were conducted to eliminate bias between the two groups. The outcomes included short-term outcomes and long-term outcomes. Kaplan–Meier curves and log-rank tests were used to analyse progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

In the short-term outcome analysis, after 1:1 PSM, 137 patients were distributed to the CLR < 3.06 group and CLR≥3.06 group. No significant difference was noted between the two groups (P > 0.1). Compared with patients with CLR < 3.06, patients with CLR≥3.06 had comparable operation times (320.0 [272.5–421.0] vs. 360.0 [292.5-434.5], P = 0.088), blood loss (200.0 [100.0-400.0] vs. 200.0 [150.0-450.0], P = 0.831), postoperative complication rates (50.4% vs. 46.7%, P = 0.546) and postoperative ICU rates (5.8% vs. 11.7%, P = 0.087). In the long-term outcome analysis, Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that compared with patients with CLR < 3.06, patients with CLR≥3.06 had worse PFS (P = 0.005, median: 10.2 months vs. 13.0 months) and OS (P = 0.002, median: 41.0 months vs. 70.9 months). IPTW-adjusted Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that the CLR≥3.06 group had worse PFS (P = 0.027) and OS (P = 0.010) than the CLR < 3.06 group. In the IPTW-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, CLR≥3.06 was an independent factor for PFS (HR = 1.376, 95% CI 1.097–1.726, P = 0.006) and OS (HR = 1.723, 95% CI 1.218–2.439, P = 0.002). IPTW-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression analysis including postoperative complications, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative blood transfusion and postoperative chemotherapy revealed that CLR≥3.06 was an independent factor for PFS (HR = 1.617, 95% CI 1.252–2.090, P < 0.001) and OS (HR = 1.823, 95% CI 1.258–2.643, P = 0.002).

Conclusions

The preoperative CLR level predicts unfavourable outcomes in CRLM patients receiving simultaneous resection of the primary lesion and liver metastases and should be taken into consideration when developing treatment and monitoring strategies.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a digestive tract tumour, and liver metastases represent its most common malignant progression [1]. The 5-year survival rate of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) is less than 10% [2] without surgical resection and approaches 50% [3] after active multimodal treatment comprising chemotherapy and hepatic resection. Surgical treatment remains the dominant contributor to the long-term survival of CRLM patients [4]. At colorectal cancer diagnosis, synchronous liver metastases occur in approximately 15% [2, 5] of patients. Simultaneous resection of primary lesions and liver metastases, an emerging curative resection for synchronous CRLM, has been increasingly [6] performed by surgeons. Compared with traditional staged resection, simultaneous resection can yield comparable short-term outcomes [6,7,8,9] and has a tendency to improve long-term outcomes [9]. Simultaneous resection is often associated with a shorter hospital stay, reduced hospital costs and a better experience for CRLM patients [7,8,9].

Due to the heterogeneous nature of tumours, the precise and personalized preoperative classification of surgery for CRLM patients could bring many benefits. There is a consensus [10, 11] that chronic inflammatory status instigates the initiation and development of cancer. Based on this notion, preoperative inflammatory biomarkers, such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), were established, and the utility of their prognostic value in multiple cancers was validated [12,13,14]. Among them, lymphocytes, especially tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), played an essential role in the process of progression in CRC [15, 16]. More interestingly, peripheral lymphocyte counts were demonstrated to be useful in predicting the survival of triple-negative breast cancer [17], oral cancer [18] and colon cancer patients [19], and the prognostic utility of lymphocyte counts was reported to be better than that of other circulating serum cells, such as platelets and neutrophils [18].

Alteration of lipid metabolism is a hallmark in cancer. Cancer cells increase the uptake and storage of fatty acids, phospholipids and cholesterol, which supports the survival of cancer cells in a nutrient-poor microenvironment. These substances could also act as signalling molecules that activate tumour-related signalling pathways to promote proliferation, invasion and metastases [20,21,22]. Additionally, dysregulated cholesterol metabolism substantially promoted the progression of multiple cancers [23,24,25], including CRC [25]. The prognostic role of blood lipid markers, such as total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), was reported in patients with endometrial cancer, non-small-cell lung cancer and CRC [26,27,28]. Recently, Zhou et al. [29] found that in CRC, the cholesterol-to-lymphocyte ratio (CLR), a marker that combines inflammatory status and lipid metabolism, was associated with long-term prognosis in CRC and exhibited more sensitivity and specificity than the common inflammatory marker NLR. However, the prognostic role of preoperative CLR in CRLM remains unknown. Given the abovementioned evidence, we aimed to verify and examine the predictive value of preoperative CLR in distinguishing the short-term and long-term prognosis of patients with CRLM who received simultaneous resection of the primary lesion and liver metastases.

Methods

Study population and variables

Collection and analysis of data in the study was performed after ethical approval (No. 81,972,311) was approved from the Institutional Review Board of the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) histologically proven liver metastases of colorectal adenocarcinoma and (2) curative simultaneous resection of primary tumour and liver metastases. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) failure to follow-up or absence of clinical data; (2) other coexisting malignancies; and (3) presence of infectious disease before operation. In this study, we retrospectively collected the clinical information of 444 patients with CRLM who underwent simultaneous resection of primary lesions and liver metastases at the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from January 2009 to November 2020.

Detailed information, including demographic characteristics (age, sex, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, and American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) score), clinicopathological characteristics (preoperative cholesterol level, lymphocyte counts, neutrophil counts, and serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)), tumour-related characteristics, treatment and oncological outcomes, was collected from every patient. In this study, comorbidity among CRLM patients was characterized as the presence of preoperative coexisting medical conditions or diseases, including but not limited to hypertension, diabetes, and dementia. All postoperative complications were evaluated using the Clavien-Dindo classification system. Complications were categorized as minor (Clavien-Dindo I-II) or major (Clavien-Dindo III-V) based on the severity of their impact on the patient’s health and recovery.

Cholesterol-to-lymphocyte ratio (CLR)

Peripheral blood samples from each patient were collected within 1–3 weeks before the simultaneous resection. Preoperative CLR was defined by dividing total cholesterol by the lymphocyte count. The optimal cut-off value for CLR as a predictive tool for mortality in patients with CRLM undergoing simultaneous resection was determined using the highest Youden’s index (sensitivity + 1-specificity), which was graphically exhibited as the distance between the 45° line and the ROC. Then, patients were divided into two groups: patients with CLR < 3.06 in one group and patients with CLR≥3.06 in the other group.

Treatment

The optimal treatment management protocol for CRLM patients was discussed and confirmed by a multidisciplinary team (MDT) composed of surgeons, oncologists and radiologists. The surgical data mainly included surgical margin (R0 resection or not), extent of liver resection (major resection or not), intraoperative radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and hepatic portal occlusion. Major resection was defined as resections of ≥ three segments of liver metastases. A combination of 5-fluorouracil/capecitabine and oxaliplatin/irinotecan with or without bevacizumab and cetuximab comprised the pretreatment chemotherapy regimen.

Follow-up and outcomes

After surgery, patients were followed up with regular clinical examinations. The first postoperative follow-up was conducted one month from the date of surgery. Then, all follow-ups were regularly conducted every 3 months for 5 years and every 1 year thereafter.

The oncological outcomes were divided into short-term outcomes and long-term outcomes. The short-term outcomes included intraoperative operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, incidence of postoperative complications and postoperative ICU rate. ICU rate is defined as the percentage of patients who required admission to the intensive care unit after surgery for any reason. The long-term outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). PFS was defined as the period of time from the date of surgical treatment to progression or the last follow-up date. OS was defined as the period of time from the date of surgical treatment to death or the last follow-up date.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were measured as the median and interquartile range, and t tests or Mann–Whitney U tests were performed for comparison. Categorical variables were calculated as percentages and compared using the chi-square test. The preoperative NLR was calculated as (neutrophil count/lymphocyte count). The association of CLR with PFS and OS was firstly evaluated using univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses. Only variables with P < 0.10 in the univariable analysis were included in the subsequent multivariable analysis. And the additional clinical net-benefit of CLR≥3.06 was assessed by employing decision curve analysis (DCA). To compare the short-term outcomes between the CLR < 3.06 group and CLR≥3.06 group, the propensity score matching (PSM) method was performed to balance the imbalanced covariates between the two groups. The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method was performed to eliminate selection bias between the CLR < 3.06 group and the CLR≥3.06 group in the comparison of long-term outcomes.

The balance in covariates was evaluated using the standardized difference (SD) approach. A meaningful imbalance in the factors between the two groups was represented as an SD > 0.1. In the IPTW models, we retained all possible factors associated either with the CLR level or survival. We adopted adjusted Kaplan–Meier curves and log-rank tests to compare long-term outcomes (PFS and OS) between the CLR < 3.06 group and the CLR≥3.06 group. The inverse probability weighted Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the IPTW-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of the level of CLR. P < 0.05 (two-sided) was considered to be statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 25 software (Armonk NY, USA) and R software (http://www.r-project.org).

Results

Clinicopathological characteristics

There were 444 patients enrolled in the present study with a median age of 59.0 (IQR [52.0, 65.0]) years. Greater than half of the patients were male (286/444, 64.4%), and comorbidities were present in 188 (42.3%) patients. The median NLR of the patients was 1.86 (IQR [1.34, 2.55]). Fifty-four (12.2%) patients had an ASA score of 3–4, whereas 209 (47.1%) patients had a BMI ≥ 24 kg/m2. Before simultaneous resection, 253 (57.0%) patients received pretreatment chemotherapy. For patients who had primary tumours located in the colon, the rate of patient population was 56.8%, and 89 (20.0%) among them had primary tumours located in the right hemicolon. For liver metastases, the median largest size was 2.5 cm (IQR [1.5, 4.0]), and the median number was 2 (IQR [1, 4]). Bilobular liver metastasis distribution was noted in 177 (39.9%) patients. Three hundred and twenty-one (72.3%) patients had positive lymph node metastasis. As depicted in the Figure S1, the optimal cutoff value of CLR for mortality was determined as 3.06. And two hundred eighty-five (64.2%) patients had CLR < 3.06, whereas 159 (35.8%) patients had CLR≥3.06. For patients who received all laparoscopic surgeries, the rate of the patient population was 21.8%. Concomitant RFA was performed in 43 (9.7%) patients, and the rate of hepatic portal occlusion among the patients was 69.6%. Two hundred and fourteen (48.2%) patients underwent major liver resection. The detailed clinicopathological characteristics of the patients are listed in Table 1.

Table 1 Clinicopathological characteristics and short-term outcomes in CRLM patients receiving simultaneous resection before PSM
Full size table

Short-term outcomes

The median operative time of patients was 335.0 min (IQR [265.0-420.0]). The median intraoperative blood loss volume was 200 ml (IQR [100, 400]), and 103 (23.2%) patients received an intraoperative blood transfusion. The median postoperative hospital stay duration was 10 days (IQR [9.0, 13.0]). Postoperative complications were observed in 218 (49.1%) patients, and 92 (20.7%) patients experienced major complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system. Thirty-five (7.9%) patients had postoperative ICU admission (Table 1).

Compared to CLR < 3.06, patients with CLR≥3.06 had comparable operation times (320.0 [270.0-430.0] vs. 340.0 [260.0-420.0], P = 0.971), blood loss (200.0 [100.0-400.0] vs. 200.0 [150.0-400.0], P = 0.163), postoperative complication rates (51.6% vs. 47.7%, P = 0.436) and postoperative ICU rates (8.2% vs. 7.7%, P = 0.864).

After 1:1 PSM, 137 patients were distributed to the CLR < 3.06 group and CLR≥3.06 group (Fig. 1). No significant difference was noted between the two groups (P > 0.1). After PSM, compared with CLR < 3.06, patients with CLR≥3.06 had comparable operation times (320.0 [272.5–421.0] vs. 360.0 [292.5-434.5], P = 0.088), blood loss (200.0 [100.0-400.0] vs. 200.0 [150.0-450.0], P = 0.831), postoperative complication rates (50.4% vs. 46.7%, P = 0.546), and comparable postoperative ICU rates (5.8% vs. 11.7%, P = 0.087) (Table 2).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Standardized mean difference (SMD) of CLR < 3.06 vs. CLR ≥ 3.06 before and after PSM

Full size image
Table 2 Clinicopathological characteristics and short-term outcomes in CRLM patients receiving simultaneous resection after PSM
Full size table

Association with survival outcomes of CLR before IPTW adjustment

At the time of analysis, three hundred fifteen patients experienced recurrence, and 160 patients had died. The median PFS was 10.1 (IQR 4.1–23.2) months. The 1-year and 3-year PFS rates were 48.6% and 24.5%, respectively. The median OS was 30.9 (IQR 20.0-44.5) months. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS rates were 95.3%, 64.8% and 47.6%, respectively.

According to the univariable Cox regression analyses, CLR≥3.06 was found to be linked with PFS (Hazard ratio (HR) = 1.380, 95% CI 1.100–1.730; P = 0.006) and OS (HR = 1.630, 95% CI 1.190–2.230, P = 0.003). Furthermore, after adjusting for preoperative features in the multivariable Cox regression models, CLR≥3.06 continued to demonstrate a significant association with both PFS (HR = 1.400, 95% CI 1.110–1.780, P = 0.005) and OS (HR = 1.660, 95% CI 1.180–2.320, P = 0.003) (Table S2 & S3). Based on the DCA analysis results, CLR has the potential to produce more clinical net-benefit than several common clinical features in predicting both PFS and OS (Figure S2 & S3).

Association with survival outcomes of CLR after IPTW adjustment

IPTW was performed to avoid bias between the CLR < 3.06 group and the CLR≥3.06 group. After IPTW adjustment, the SD for all characteristics was less than 0.1 (Fig. 2), indicating that the weighted population was subsequently comparable.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Standardized mean difference (SMD) of CLR < 3.06 vs. CLR ≥ 3.06 before and after IPTW

Full size image

Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that compared with patients with CLR < 3.06, patients with CLR≥3.06 had a worse PFS (P = 0.005, median: 10.2 months vs. 13.0 months) and a worse OS (P = 0.002, median: 41.0 months vs. 70.9 months). IPTW-adjusted Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that patients with CLR≥3.06 had an unfavourable PFS (P = 0.027, median: 10.4 months vs. 13.1 months) and an unfavourable OS (P = 0.010, median: 42.5 months vs. 75.9 months) compared with those with CLR < 3.06 (Figs. 3 and 4).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Progression-free survival analysis of CLR levels before and after IPTW

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Overall survival analysis of CLR levels before and after IPTW

Full size image

In the Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, CLR≥3.06 was significantly associated with worse PFS (HR = 1.376, 95% CI 1.097–1.726, P = 0.006) and OS (HR = 1.628, 95% CI 1.186–2.234, P = 0.003). In the IPTW-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, CLR≥3.06 was an unfavourable risk factor for PFS (HR = 1.513, 95% CI 1.177–1.946, P = 0.001) and OS (HR = 1.723, 95% CI 1.218–2.439, P = 0.002).

When including postoperative complications, operation time, intraoperative blood loss and postoperative chemotherapy in the Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, CLR≥3.06 was still significantly associated with a worse PFS (HR = 1.415, 95% CI 1.123–1.782, P = 0.003) and a poor OS (HR = 1.611, 95% CI 1.166–2.226, P = 0.004). In the IPTW-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, CLR≥3.06 was an unfavourable risk factor for PFS (HR = 1.617, 95% CI 1.252–2.090, P < 0.001) and OS (HR = 1.823, 95% CI 1.258–2.643, P = 0.002).

Discussion

In this study, we first verified and rationalized the predictive effect of preoperative CLR on short-term and long-term prognosis in 444 patients with CRLM who received simultaneous resection of the primary lesion and liver metastases. PSM and IPTW were applied to eradicate the interfering bias between patients with CLR < 3.06 and patients with CLR ≥ 3.06. The main findings were as follows: (1) The preoperative CLR level could distinguish the long-term prognosis of patients with CRLM undergoing simultaneous resection of the primary lesion and liver metastases. Patients with CLR < 3.06 were associated with prolonged PFS and OS. (2) The preoperative CLR level could not distinguish the short-term prognosis of patients with CRLM undergoing simultaneous resection of the primary lesion and liver metastases. No differences in intraoperative operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, incidence of postoperative complications or postoperative ICU rate were noted between the two groups.

Patients would benefit from convenient and reliable markers that could precisely identify their prognosis before receiving surgical resection or other treatment. In addition, this information would allow the surgeons perform more personalized management for patients since the allocation of medical resources would be more appropriate and satisfactory. To date, previous studies have mainly focused on patients with CRLM who receive staged resection, especially hepatic resection [30,31,32], and the subgroup of CRLM patients who receive simultaneous resection, as well as the specific surgical strategies employed (e.g., laparoscopic or open surgery) [33], have been overlooked. Interestingly, the prognostic effect of CLR in CRC was demonstrated in a recent study [29]; however, researchers only investigated the relationship between CLR and survival in these patients but ignored the possible association between CLR and short-term outcomes or recurrence. Nevertheless, the relatively smaller scale and lower disease stage of the 223 CRC patients compared to the 444 CRLM patients in our study also confined their efforts. This study is the first to holistically estimate the prognostic value of CLR on short- and long-term outcomes in CRLM patients who receive simultaneous resection of the primary lesion and liver metastases, contribute to accumulating evidence on the patient’s experience and provide new knowledge for the clinical guidance of this simultaneous resection procedure recommended by the NCCN guidelines [34] for surgeons. Given that the CLR level could be identified precisely and conveniently prior to surgery, this index would provide novel insight to optimize the risk stratification of CRLM patients.

In this study, we found that elevated CLR was associated with poor prognostic outcomes. Elevated CLR reflected elevated serum total cholesterol and/or decreased circulating lymphocyte counts. Inflammation plays a vital role in instigating the progression of multiple cancers, and a chronic inflammatory status could create a favourable tumour microenvironment (TME) to enable cancer cells to survive and proliferate, of which lymphocytes usually comprise an indispensable component. In general, lymphocytes include T cells, B cells and NK cells. These cells not only participate in host adaptive immunity but also reinforce innate immunity, thus being crucial to the antiviral and antitumour functions of cancer patients. The possible mechanisms explaining the finding that decreased lymphocyte counts were associated with poor prognosis are as follows. (1) Lymphocytes could regulate the secretion of potent cytotoxins, such as perforin [35], which contributed to both CD8 + and CD4 + CAR T-cell cytotoxicity and exerted the antitumour effect directly or indirectly. The depletion of lymphocyte count means weakened immune surveillance and antitumour immunity. (2) Decreased lymphocyte counts could be ascribed to the inflammation generated by tumours, and the inflammatory environment is always accompanied by DNA damage, impaired DNA repair function, degeneration of extracellular matrix, and a disrupted vascular barrier, all of which facilitate tumour progression [11, 36, 37].

Reprogrammed cholesterol metabolism was detected in renal carcinoma, breast cancer and CRC cells [23,24,25]. In this study, we found that when total cholesterol levels in serum increased, the increased CLR was also related to the poor prognosis of patients. It was reasonable to postulate the following possible mechanisms: (1) Elevated serum total cholesterol may reflect the overexpression of its rate-limiting enzyme squalene epoxidase (SQLE), which was demonstrated to be associated with the progression of CRC by activating CYP24A1-mediated MAPK signalling pathway [38]. In addition, it has also been reported that SQLE could promote CRC cells to resist apoptosis and proliferate by triggering gut microbiota dysbiosis and impairing gut barrier function [39]. It is worth mentioning that the accumulation of cholesterol was found to be able to conversely reduce SQLE, which triggered the chain reaction, including activation of β-catenin and inactivation of the p53 tumour-suppressive pathway, thereby aggravating CRC progression [40]. (2) In addition, previous research also reported that the SREBP2-dependent cholesterol biosynthesis pathway was exclusively activated in the liver metastases of CRC [41] but not metastases to the brain or lung. SREBP2 could help circulating tumour cells to resist ferroptosis and acquire drug resistance by upregulating transcription of the iron carrier Transferrin (TF) [42]. The interaction between cholesterol and lymphocytes may also have an important impact on cancer progression. Cholesterol could cause alterations in intestinal immunity and impair intestinal innate immunity by restraining the differentiation of IgA plasma cells [43]. In addition, it has been suggested that cholesterol might disturb the normal function of activated T cells, such as CD8+ T cells, which play an important role in antitumor immunity by regulating immune checkpoint expression levels [44] or specifically combining with the TCR-CD3 complex and directly stopping TCR signalling in T cells [45]. It was also important to emphasize the fact that long-term dietary and behavioural habits are the main reasons explaining changes in the serum cholesterol level [46]. Acute aberrations in serum cholesterol levels before surgery were rarely observed based on our clinical experience. Therefore, the stability and reliability of the index were assured.

Although statistical methods, such as PSM and IPTW, were both applied to eliminate confounding interference between patients in the CLR < 3.06 group and patients in the CLR ≥ 3.06 group, inevitable innate bias could not be completely avoided due to the retrospective nature of the study. In addition, although up to 444 CRLM patients were enrolled in this study, the study size was still relatively small. The single-centre design also constrained our efforts and potentially affected the representativeness of our research. And lack of gene mutation data is also a constraint of our study, we will perform large-scale, multicentre and prospective studies to further verify our findings in the future.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we combined the influence of inflammation and lipid metabolism to validate the predictive value of preoperative CLR on the short- and long-term prognosis of 444 CRLM patients who received simultaneous resection. These findings provide novel insights into the characteristics of CRLM patients and conferred new knowledge to surgeons to guide the management of CRLM patients.

Data Availability

The datasets analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author (H. Z., Email: pumc95zhao@126.com) on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CLR:

Cholesterol-to-lymphocyte ratio

CRLM:

Colorectal cancer liver metastasis

IPTW:

Inverse probability of treatment weighting

PFS:

Progression-free survival

OS:

Overall survival

CRC:

Colorectal cancer

TILs:

Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes

HDL-C:

High-density lipoprotein cholesterol

BMI:

Body mass index

ASA:

American Society of Anaesthesiology

CEA:

Carcinoembryonic antigen

MDT:

Multidisciplinary team

RFA:

Radiofrequency ablation

DCA:

Decision curve analysis

NLR:

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio

SD:

Standardized difference

HR:

Hazard ratio

References

  1. Adam R. Chemotherapy and surgery: new perspectives on the treatment of unresectable liver metastases. Ann Oncol. 2003;14(Suppl 2):ii13–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdg731.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Manfredi S, Lepage C, Hatem C, Coatmeur O, Faivre J, Bouvier AM. Epidemiology and management of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2006 Aug;244(2):254–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000217629.94941.cf.

  3. Imai K, Benitez CC, Allard MA, et al. Impact of Surgical Treatment for Recurrence after 2-Stage Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases, on patient outcome. Ann Surg. 2019 Feb;269(2):322–30. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002472.

  4. Datta J, Narayan RR, Kemeny NE, D’Angelica MI. Role of Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy in Treatment of Initially Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Review. JAMA Surg. 2019 Aug 1;154(8):768–776. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2019.1694.

  5. Engstrand J, Nilsson H, Strömberg C, et al. Colorectal cancer liver metastases - a population-based study on incidence, management and survival. BMC Cancer. 2018;18:78.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang LJ, Wang HW, Jin KM, Li J, Xing BC. Comparison of sequential, delayed and simultaneous resection strategies for synchronous colorectal liver metastases.BMC Surg. 2020 Jan17;20(1):16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-020-0681-7.

  7. Ejaz A, Semenov E, Spolverato G, et al. Synchronous primary colorectal and liver metastasis: impact of operative approach on clinical outcomes and hospital charges. HPB (Oxford). 2014 Dec;16(12):1117–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/hpb.12302. Epub 2014 Jun 26.

  8. Dulundu E, Attaallah W, Tilki M, Yegen C et al. Simultaneous resection for CRC with synchronous liver metastases is a safe procedure: Outcomes at a single center in Turkey. Biosci Trends. 2017 May 23;11(2):235–242. https://doi.org/10.5582/bst.2017.01019.

  9. Boudjema K, Locher C, Sabbagh C et al. Simultaneous Versus Delayed Resection for Initially Resectable Synchronous CRC Liver Metastases: A Prospective, Open-label, Randomized, Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. 2021 Jan 1;273(1):49–56. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003848.

  10. Elinav E, Nowarski R, Thaiss CA, Hu B, Jin C, Flavell RA. Inflammation-induced cancer: crosstalk between tumours, immune cells and microorganisms. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013 Nov;13(11):759–71. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3611.

  11. Diakos CI, Charles KA, McMillan DC, Clarke SJ. Cancer-related inflammation and treatment effectiveness. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Oct;15(11):e493–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70263-3.

  12. Koh YW, Choi JH, Ahn MS, Choi YW, Lee HW. Baseline neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio is associated with baseline and subsequent presence of brain metastases in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.Sci Rep. 2016 Dec7;6:38585. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep38585.

  13. Fang T, Wang Y, Yin X et al. Diagnostic Sensitivity of NLR and PLR in Early Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer.J Immunol Res. 2020 Mar7;2020:9146042. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9146042.

  14. Ding N, Pang Z, Shen H, Ni Y, Du J, Liu Q. The Prognostic Value of PLR in Lung Cancer, a Meta-analysis Based on Results from a Large Consecutive Cohort.Sci Rep. 2016 Oct5;6:34823. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34823.

  15. Bai Z, Zhou Y, Ye Z, Xiong J, Lan H, Wang F. tumour-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in CRC: The Fundamental Indication and Application on Immunotherapy.Front Immunol. 2022 Jan14;12:808964. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.808964.

  16. Wang S, Qu Y, Xia P, et al. Transdifferentiation of tumour infiltrating innate lymphoid cells during progression of CRC. Cell Res. 2020 Jul;30(7):610–22. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41422-020-0312-y.

  17. Afghahi A, Purington N, Han SS et al. Higher Absolute lymphocyte count Predict Lower Mortality from Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Jun15;24(12):2851–2858. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1323.

  18. Diao P, Wu Y, Ge H et al. Preoperative circulating platelet, neutrophil, and lymphocyte count predict survival in oral cancer.Oral Dis. 2019May;25(4):1057–1066. https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.13049.

  19. Noh OK, Oh SY, Kim YB, Suh KW. Prognostic significance of lymphocyte count in Colon cancer patients treated with FOLFOX Chemotherapy. World J Surg. 2017 Nov;41(11):2898–905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4104-6.

  20. Röhrig F, Schulze A. The multifaceted roles of fatty acid synthesis in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2016 Nov;16(11):732–49. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc.2016.89.

  21. Cheng C, Geng F, Cheng X, Guo D. Lipid metabolism reprogramming and its potential targets in cancer. Cancer Commun (Lond). 2018 May 21;38(1):27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40880-018-0301-4.

  22. Cao Y. Adipocyte and lipid metabolism in cancer drug resistance. J Clin Invest. 2019 Jul 2;129(8):3006–3017. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI127201.

  23. Liu Z, Liu X, Liu S, Cao Q. Cholesterol promotes the migration and invasion of renal carcinoma cells by regulating the KLF5/miR-27a/FBXW7 pathway.Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018 Jul7;502(1):69–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.05.122.

  24. Voisin M, de Medina P, Mallinger A et al. Identification of a tumour-promoter cholesterol metabolite in human breast cancers acting through the glucocorticoid receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Oct 31;114(44):E9346-E9355. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1707965114.

  25. Wang Y, Liu C, Hu L. Cholesterol regulates cell proliferation and apoptosis of CRC by modulating miR-33a-PIM3 pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2019 Apr 9;511(3):685–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.02.123.

  26. Luo YZ, Yang Z, Qiu YL et al. Pretreatment triglycerides-to-high density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio in postmenopausal women with endometrial cancer.Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2019May;35(5):303–309. https://doi.org/10.1002/kjm2.12033.

  27. Luo F, Zeng KM, Cao JX et al. Predictive value of a reduction in the level of high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer undergoing radical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy: a retrospective observational study.Lipids Health Dis. 2021 Sep20;20(1):109. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-021-01538-1.

  28. Zhou P, Li B, Liu B, Chen T, Xiao J. Prognostic role of serum total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in cancer survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Clin Chim Acta. 2018 Feb;477:94–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2017.11.039.

  29. Zhou S, He Q, Sheng N, Gong J, Ren J, Wang Z. Blood cholesterol-to-lymphocyte ratio as a novel prognostic marker to predict postoperative overall survival in patients with CRC.World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Jan15;20(1):18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-021-02471-4.

  30. Halazun KJ, Aldoori A, Malik HZ et al. Elevated preoperative neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio predicts survival following hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases.Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008Jan;34(1):55–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2007.02.014.

  31. Giakoustidis A, Neofytou K, Khan AZ, Mudan S. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio predicts pattern of recurrence in patients undergoing liver resection for colorectal liver metastasis and thus the overall survival. J Surg Oncol. 2015 Mar 15;111(4):445 – 50. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.23845.

  32. Cimino MM, Donadon M, Giudici S et al. Peri-tumoural CD3 + Inflammation and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Predict Overall Survival in Patients Affected by Colorectal Liver Metastases Treated with Surgery.J Gastrointest Surg. 2020May;24(5):1061–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04458-9.

  33. Sena G, Picciariello A, Marino F et al. One-Stage Total Laparoscopic Treatment for Colorectal Cancer With Synchronous Metastasis. Is It Safe and Feasible? Front Surg.2021 Nov18;8:752135. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.752135.

  34. Benson AB, Venook AP, Al-Hawary MM et al. Colon Cancer, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021 Mar 2;19(3):329–359. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2021.0012.

  35. Ishii K, Pouzolles M, Chien CD et al. Perforin-deficient CAR T cells recapitulate late-onset inflammatory toxicities observed in patients. J Clin Invest. 2020 Oct 1;130(10):5425–5443. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI130059.

  36. Kay J, Thadhani E, Samson L, Engelward B. Inflammation-induced DNA damage, mutations and cancer. DNA Repair (Amst). 2019 Nov;83:102673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2019.102673. Epub 2019 Jul 25.

  37. Kidane D, Chae WJ, Czochor J, et al. Interplay between DNA repair and inflammation, and the link to cancer. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2014 Mar-Apr;49(2):116–39. https://doi.org/10.3109/10409238.2013.875514.

  38. He L, Li H, Pan C, et al. Squalene epoxidase promotes CRC cell proliferation through accumulating calcitriol and activating CYP24A1-mediated MAPK signaling. Cancer Commun (Lond). 2021 Aug;41(8):726–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/cac2.12187.

  39. Li C, Wang Y, Liu D et al. Squalene epoxidase drives cancer cell proliferation and promotes gut dysbiosis to accelerate colorectal carcinogenesis. Gut. 2022 Mar 1:gutjnl-2021-325851. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2021-325851.

  40. Jun SY, Brown AJ, Chua NK, et al. Reduction of Squalene epoxidase by cholesterol Accumulation accelerates CRC Progression and Metastasis. Gastroenterology. 2021 Mar;160(4):1194–1207e28. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2020.09.009.

  41. Zhang KL, Zhu WW, Wang SH et al. Organ-specific cholesterol metabolic aberration fuels liver metastasis of CRC.Theranostics. 2021 Apr27;11(13):6560–6572. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.55609.

  42. Hong X, Roh W, Sullivan RJ, et al. The Lipogenic Regulator SREBP2 induces transferrin in circulating Melanoma cells and suppresses ferroptosis. Cancer Discov. 2021 Mar;11(3):678–95. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-19-1500.

  43. Trindade BC, Ceglia S, Berthelette A et al. The cholesterol metabolite 25-hydroxycholesterol restrains the transcriptional regulator SREBP2 and limits intestinal IgA plasma cell differentiation. Immunity. 2021 Oct 12;54(10):2273–2287.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2021.09.004.

  44. Ma X, Bi E, Lu Y et al. Cholesterol Induces CD8 + T Cell Exhaustion in the tumour Microenvironment. Cell Metab. 2019 Jul 2;30(1):143–156.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2019.04.002.

  45. Chen Y, Zhu Y, Li X et al. Cholesterol inhibits TCR signaling by directly restricting TCR-CD3 core tunnel motility. Mol Cell. 2022 Mar 3:S1097-2765(22)00155-1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2022.02.017.

  46. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Repositioning of the global epicentre of non-optimal cholesterol.Nature. 2020 Jun;582(7810):73–77. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2338-1.

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81972311, 82141127), the CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) (No. 2021-I2M-1-066), the Non-profit Central Research Institution Fund of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (No. 2019PT310026) and Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen (No. SZSM202011010).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Yiqiao Deng, Qichen Chen and Jinghua Chen contributed equally to this manuscript.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, National Cancer Center, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China

    Yiqiao Deng, Qichen Chen, Jinghua Chen, Yizhou Zhang, Jianjun Zhao, Xinyu Bi, Zhiyu Li, Yefan Zhang, Zhen Huang, Jianqiang Cai & Hong Zhao

Authors
  1. Yiqiao Deng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Qichen Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jinghua Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yizhou Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jianjun Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xinyu Bi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Zhiyu Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yefan Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Zhen Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Jianqiang Cai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Hong Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Study conception and design: Z.H., J.C., H.Z. Drafting and revising the article: Y.D., Q.C., J.C., Z.H., J.C., H.Z. Analysis and interpretation of data: Y.D., Q.C., J.C. Final approval: All authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhen Huang, Jianqiang Cai or Hong Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This research was performed in accordance with Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (No. 81972311). Written informed consent for participation was obtained from the patients and/or their legal guardians. The patients’ clinical and imaging information are the patient’s private data, which are protected by Chinese laws. Therefore, the data and materials cannot be uploaded and shared with the public.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethical Guidelines

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deng, Y., Chen, Q., Chen, J. et al. An elevated preoperative cholesterol-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts unfavourable outcomes in colorectal cancer liver metastasis patients receiving simultaneous resections: a retrospective study. BMC Surg 23, 131 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-01988-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-01988-7

Keywords

BMC Surgery

ISSN: 1471-2482

Contact us