Skip to main content

Absence of a weekday effect on short- and long-term oncologic outcomes of gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis

Abstract

Background

Day of the week when elective gastrointestinal surgery is performed may be influenced by various background and tumor-related factors. Relationships between postoperative outcome and when in the week gastrectomy is performed remain controversial. We undertook this study to evaluate whether weekday of gastrectomy influenced outcomes of gastric cancer treatment (“weekday effect”).

Methods

Patients who underwent curative surgery for gastric cancer between 2004 and 2017 were included in this retrospective study. To obtain 2 cohorts well balanced for variables that might influence clinical outcomes, patients whose gastrectomy was performed early in the week (EW group) were matched 1:1 with others undergoing gastrectomy later in the week (LW group) by use of propensity scores.

Results

Among 554 patients, 216 were selected from each group by propensity score matching. Incidence of postoperative complications classified as Clavien-Dindo grade II or higher was similar between EW and LW groups (20.4% vs. 24.1%; P = 0.418). Five-year overall and recurrence-free survival were 86.0% and 81.9% in the EW group, and 86.2% and 81.1% in the LW group (P = 0.981 and P = 0.835, respectively).

Conclusions

Short- and long-term outcomes were comparable between gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy early and late in the week.

Peer Review reports

Background

Gastrectomy is the mainstay of curative treatment for patients with gastric cancer [1]. Combining surgery with chemotherapy and multi-modal treatment has increased survival of patients with resectable gastric cancer [1, 2]. However, overall 5-year postoperative survival is only about 70%, and is strongly dependent on tumor stage at time of surgery: better than 70% for stages I and II, 35% to 54% for stage III, and less than 20% for stage IV [3]. Therefore, we need to identify additional modifiable factors that can improve postoperative prognosis.

Two large studies [4, 5] have associated performance of surgery for gastrointestinal cancer late in the week with greater mortality within 30 postoperative days, attributing this weekday effect to fatigue among surgeons over the course of the week that might impact details of the operation and extent of dissection. These reports also suggested increased risk of tumor recurrence. In contrast, other studies concluded that any weekday effect observed did not alter postoperative prognosis [6, 7], so the relationship between day of surgery and clinical results remains controversial. To our best knowledge, no analyses of this issue in gastric cancer have made adjustments for background factors using propensity score matching.

In the present study we used propensity score matching analysis to minimize distortion from differing patient characteristics with the aim of determining whether late weekday gastrectomy increases postoperative complications or worsens prognosis in patients with gastric cancer.

Methods

Study population

Between January 2004 and December 2017, elective gastrectomy to treat primary gastric cancer was performed for 699 consecutive patients at the Department of Gastroenterological and General Surgery of Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital. The study population consisted of single-race patients (Japanese). All elective gastrectomies were performed between Monday and Friday.

Among these patients, 145 were excluded from the study for the following reasons: preoperative chemotherapy administration in 61 patients; limited gastric resection in 5; palliative gastrectomy defined as R1 or R2 resection [8] in 25; clinical stage IV in 11; pathologic stage IV in 41; and insufficient data for analysis in 2. For the remaining 554 patients, clinical and pathologic data were collected from medical records for retrospective analysis (Fig. 1). Pulmonary function parameters such as vital capacity (VC), %VC, forced expiratory volume (FEV) 1.0, and FEV1.0%, were measured by spirometry. We defined ventilatory impairment as restrictive or obstructive as follows: restrictive ventilatory impairment was %VC below 80% of that predicted, while obstructive ventilatory impairment was FEV1.0% below 70% of forced VC. Data collection and analysis were approved by the institutional review board of Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital (Approval No. F2020C74). All patients provided informed consent for use of anonymous data through an opt-out methodology.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart of study including patient selection and group assignment

Extent of lymph node dissection was described in accordance with the 2014 Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines (version 4), and cancer staging was based on the 8th edition of the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) TNM classification system [8, 9].

Analysis was performed for a dichotomized weekday model: Monday and Tuesday were defined as early weekday (EW), while Wednesday through Friday were late weekday (LW), based upon the division of the week used in previous studies of surgical outcome according to when in the week surgery was performed [5, 6]. To confirm similarity of surgical outcomes for the beginning and end of the 5-day work week, a subgroup analysis comparing Monday and Friday surgery was added.

Postoperative complications

Postoperative complications occurring within 30 days after gastrectomy and assigned a Clavien-Dindo classification of Grade II or higher were reviewed retrospectively [10]. If multiple complications occurred in a single patient, the complication with the highest grade was used for analysis.

Follow-up and definition of recurrence

Physical examination and blood testing, including tumor markers, were performed every 3 months. Patients underwent at least one type of imaging, usually computed tomography, at 6-month intervals during the first 2 years after surgery and then at 1-year intervals until 5 years after surgery [8]. Recurrence was diagnosed on the basis of findings of radiologic and/or cytologic studies. Even when tumor markers in the blood exceeded normal limits, no diagnosis of recurrence was made before radiologic and/or cytologic evidence had been reviewed. Follow-up data extended to September 2021.

Propensity score matching

We used propensity score matching to attain optimal balance among baseline variables between EW and LW groups and also between Monday and Friday groups. Propensity scores were estimated using a logistic regression model based on the following 12 variables: age, gender, body mass index (BMI), diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), serum albumin, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen (CA)19-9, impairment of respiratory function, operative procedure, lymph node dissection, and pathologic TNM stage. One-to-one matching without replacement was performed using a 0.2 caliper width, and the resulting score-matched pairs were used in subsequent analyses.

Statistical analysis

Baseline data are presented as medians with interquartile ranges for continuous variables and as numbers with percentages for categorical variables. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare continuous variables, while Fisher’s exact test was used to compare categorical variables. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the interval from date of gastrectomy to date of death from any cause. Relapse-free survival (RFS) was defined as the interval from the date of gastrectomy to the date of recurrence of gastric cancer or the date of death from any cause. Surviving patients were censored at the date that they were last known to be alive. Survival was displayed on Kaplan–Meier curves and compared using the log-rank test. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using the Cox proportional hazards model. P values below 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. Statistical analysis was conducted using JMP Pro version 15.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

Results

Patient demographics

In this study 554 patients were enrolled, including 377 men and 177 women with a median age of 70 years. Among all patients, 233 (42.1%) had gastrectomy on Monday, 6 (1.1%) on Tuesday, 110 (19.8%) on Wednesday, 1 (0.2%) on Thursday, and 204 (36.8%) on Friday. Characteristics of the 554 study participants comprising the EW group (n = 239) and the LW group (n = 315) are presented in Table 1. Patients in the LW group had a lower serum albumin concentration (P = 0.021) than those in the EW group. After propensity score matching for weekday of gastrectomy, 216 matched pairs were selected (Fig. 1). After matching, characteristics of patients were conserved and no statistically significant differences in characteristics were present between the EW and LW groups (Table 1).

Table 1 Comparison of early and late weekday groups (EW and LW) before and after propensity score matching

Postoperative outcomes and pathologic findings

Among all patients, median operative time and blood loss were 345 min and 265 g, respectively. Operative time and blood loss did not differ between the two groups before or after propensity score matching. Before matching, patients in the LW group had more advanced depth of tumor invasion (P = 0.049) and lymph node metastasis (P = 0.018) than those in the EW group. After matching, all pathologic variables including depth of tumor invasion ceased to differ significantly among the groups (Table 2).

Table 2 Comparison of postoperative outcomes and pathologic findings between early and late weekday groups (EW and LW)

Postoperative complications

Details of all complications are shown in Table 3. Considering all 554 patients, morbidity rates was 24.5% (136 patients). Before matching, although the total incidence of complications did not differ significantly among groups (20.5% in the EW group vs. 27.6% in the LW group, P = 0.059), the LW group had a greater incidence of pneumonia than the EW group (P = 0.006). After matching, total incidence of complications and details of individual complications did not differ significantly between groups.

Table 3 Comparison of postoperative complications between early and late weekday groups (EW and LW)

30-day mortality and in-hospital deaths

Considering all 554 patients, 30-day mortality and overall mortality rates were 0.4% (2 patients) and 0.7% (4 patients), respectively. One death within 30 days was caused by pneumonia, while the other resulted from invasive infection by Streptococcus pneumoniae. One later in-hospital death was caused by heart failure and the other by multiple myeloma. No in-hospital death was a consequence of intra-abdominal infection related or unrelated to anastomotic leakage. No difference between groups was evident in 30-day mortality or other in-hospital deaths between groups (none in the EW group vs. 0.9% in the LW group, P = 0.499).

Survival outcomes

The median observation period was 4.9 years (interquartile range, 3.0 to 6.8 years). Before propensity score matching, 5-year OS rates were 84.8% and 84.0% for the EW and LW groups (P = 0.736), while 5-year RFS rates were 80.7% and 78.9% for the EW and LW groups, respectively (P = 0.576). Figures 2 and 3 show Kaplan–Meier survival curves for EW and LW groups after propensity score matching. The 5-year OS rate was 86.0% and 86.2% for the EW and LW groups, respectively (P = 0.981; Fig. 2A). The HR was 1.01 (95% CI 0.62 to 1.62). Five-year RFS rates were 81.9% and 81.1% for the EW and LW groups, respectively (P = 0.835; Fig. 3A). The HR was 0.96 (95% CI 0.63 to 1.46). When patients were subdivided according to pathologic TNM stage, no significant differences were evident in OS (Fig. 2B–D) or RFS (Fig. 3B–D).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Kaplan–Meier curves comparing EW and LW for overall survival after propensity score matching. a All patients, b pathologic stage I patients, c stage II patients, and d stage III patients

Fig. 3
figure 3

Kaplan–Meier curves comparing EW and LW for recurrence-free survival after propensity score matching. a All patients, b pathologic stage I patients, c stage II patients, and d stage III patients

Subgroup analysis between Monday and Friday surgery

Gastric cancer patients underwent surgery on Monday (n = 233) and Friday (n = 204) were included. After propensity score matching, 167 matched pairs were selected. No statistically significant differences in characteristics were present between Monday and Friday groups (Table 4). No statistically significant differences were present between these groups for short-tern postoperative outcomes or pathologic findings (Tables 5 and 6). In addition, no significant differences were evident in OS or RFS between cohorts pathologic TNM stages (Figs. 4 and 5).

Table 4 Comparison of Monday and Friday groups before and after propensity score matching
Table 5 Comparison of postoperative outcomes and pathologic findings between Monday and Friday groups
Table 6 Comparison of postoperative complications between Monday and Friday groups
Fig. 4
figure 4

Kaplan–Meier curves comparing Monday and Friday for overall survival after propensity score matching. a All patients, b pathologic stage I patients, c stage II patients, and d stage III patients

Fig. 5
figure 5

Kaplan–Meier curves comparing Monday and Friday for recurrence-free survival after propensity score matching. a All patients, b pathologic stage I patients, c stage II patients, and d stage III patients

Discussion

Our results indicated absence of significant differences in postoperative complications and 30-day mortality between EW and LW groups. The LW group experienced OS and RFS similar to those for the EW group. A subgroup analysis comparing Monday with Friday surgery also showed similar results. To the best of our knowledge, the impact of operative timing within the week for gastrectomy to treat gastric cancer on short- and long-term outcomes according to propensity score matching analysis has not been reported previously.

In this study, patients in the LW group had significantly lower serum albumin concentrations, greater tumor depth, and more advanced lymph node metastases. Similarly to our results, other studies have reported larger numbers of advanced cancer cases undergoing surgery later in the week [5, 11], but the reason for this is not clear. No significant difference was evident between our two groups concerning postoperative complications in general or 30-day mortality. However, our LW group showed a significantly higher incidence of postoperative pneumonia than EW group patients. Advanced gastric cancer and poor nutrition may have contributed to the development of pneumonia [12, 13]. After propensity score matching, no significant differences were evident between EW and LW groups either for postoperative complications including pneumonia or for 30-day mortality. Previous studies found that operative timing during the week when esophagectomy or gastrectomy was performed did not significantly influence risk of 30- or 90-day mortality, but details of postoperative complications were not given [6, 14, 15]. After we adjusted for variables including hypoalbuminemia and pathologic TNM stage, we found no significant difference between groups in incidence of any individual postoperative complication or in 30-day mortality.

Previous studies have examined effects of day of the week when cancer surgery was performed on long-term outcomes [4, 16]. As for gastric cancer surgery, a recent study from the Netherlands found gastrectomy performed late in the week to be associated with a lower lymph node yield than gastrectomy early in the week [15]. However, conclusive evidence has not been found for significant impact of day of surgery on postoperative survival in patients undergoing gastrectomy for gastric cancer [14, 15]. In some reports nutritional status, surgical procedures, extent of lymph node dissection, postoperative complications, and pathologic stage, which often are associated with postoperative prognosis, were not described in detail. In our study these background factors were investigated thoroughly. Patients in the LW group had significantly lower serum albumin, greater tumor depth, and more advanced lymph node metastases than those in EW group. We therefore minimized effect of such background factors using propensity score matching between EW and the LW groups, after which we found no difference between groups, not only for number of lymph nodes dissected but also for long-term prognosis at any stage. A previous report used propensity score matching analysis to isolate the influence of day of surgery on subsequent mortality, finding excess mortality following Friday procedures [17]; however, that study concerned elective colorectal resections for inflammatory bowel disease and other non-oncologic indications as well as malignant disease. Our study is the first to demonstrate that after adjustment for confounding variables, long-term gastric cancer outcomes for patients at any disease stage after gastrectomy were not influenced by weekday of surgery.

Our results demonstrated absence of a need to restrict surgery for gastric cancer to early weekdays. A surgeon may be better rested early in the work week than later because sleep deficits and fatigue could accrue as the week progresses. The contribution of physician fatigue to human error has become a major concern, and has led to enactment of work-hours limitations [18]. Studies using surgical simulation tools have associated sleep deprivation with increased technical errors [19, 20]. Further, previous studies found that a variety of surgical procedures performed on Friday were associated with higher 30-day mortality than similar surgery early in the week [21, 22]. However, our propensity-matched study demonstrated that early vs. late weekday surgery was not associated with differences in postoperative outcome after gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Two factors might explain this lack of a weekday effect. First, surgical indications and preoperative, operative, and postoperative procedures for gastric cancer patients are defined by standardized guidelines in Japan [8], which could help to maintain quality of perioperative management even when the surgeon is tired or the number of staff is reduced. Perioperative management and treatment for postoperative complications are less likely to be dependent on the day of the week. According to a nationwide Japanese database, 30-day mortality is low for both distal gastrectomy (0.6%) and total gastrectomy (1.0%) [23], and our findings are consistent with the results of that report. Second, surgeons in this study may have been similarly rested early and late in the week. At our hospital, we perform emergency surgery for acute abdomen and similar clinical situations as well as elective surgery for malignant disease throughout the week. Effects involving attending surgeons’ sleep time during the week may be lessened by surgeons taking turns during case assignment. Further investigation of the influence of sleep time on surgical care is warranted.

Some limitations are evident in our present study. First, its retrospective nature and single-institutional setting may have biased the data. Second, our study excluded patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. While neoadjuvant chemotherapy is considered standard treatment for gastric cancer patients in most Western countries according to several reports [24, 25], it is not recommended as the standard treatment under Japanese guidelines since its effectiveness remains to be fully proven in the Japanese population [8]. Furthermore, the drugs given and duration of chemotherapy have changed during the time interval applicable to patients considered for this study. Therefore, patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. Third, the number of gastrectomies on Tuesdays and Thursdays was extremely small because of a need to coordinate operating room schedules with other surgical services. We conducted a subgroup comparison between Monday and Friday surgery to supplement the comparison between EW and LW groups. Here too, the subgroups showed absence of a weekday effect on short- and long-term oncologic outcomes of gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Fourth, although many background factors that might have affected short- and long-term postoperative outcomes were adjusted for by our propensity score matching process, unknown variables that we failed to consider as covariates may have affected our analysis.

Conclusion

The present study demonstrated that short- and long-term postoperative results for gastric cancer were not affected by the weekday when gastrectomy was performed, and operative scheduling for gastric cancer patients need not be limited to early weekdays.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Sakuramoto S, Sasako M, Yamaguchi T, Kinoshita T, Fujii M, Nashimoto A, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer with S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1810–20.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bang YJ, Kim YW, Yang HK, Chung HC, Park YK, Lee KH, et al. Adjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin for gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy (CLASSIC): a phase 3 open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379:315–21.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Katai H, Ishikawa T, Akazawa K, Isobe Y, Miyashiro I, Oda I, et al. Five-year survival analysis of surgically resected gastric cancer cases in Japan: a retrospective analysis of more than 100,000 patients from the nationwide registry of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2001–2007). Gastric Cancer. 2018;21:144–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lagergren J, Mattsson F, Lagergren P. Weekday of cancer surgery in relation to prognosis. Br J Surg. 2017;104:1735–43.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lagergren J, Mattsson F, Lagergren P. Weekday of esophageal cancer surgery and its relation to prognosis. Ann Surg. 2016;263:1133–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Visser E, van Rossum PSN, Verhoeven RHA, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R. Impact of weekday of esophagectomy on short-term and long-term oncological outcomes: a nationwide population-based cohort study in the Netherlands. Ann Surg. 2017;266:76–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Frostberg E, Christensen RD, Rahr HB. The day of week of elective colorectal cancer surgery has no impact on mortality and morbidity. Dan Med J. 2019;66:A5550.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4). Gastric Cancer. 2017;20:1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brierley JD, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C. Gastrointestinal tumours. In: TNM classification of malignant tumours. 8th ed. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell; 2017. p. 247.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Voeten DM, Elfrink AKE, Gisbertz SS, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R, van Berge Henegouwen MI. Minimally invasive oncologic upper gastrointestinal surgery can be performed safely on all weekdays: a nationwide cohort study. World J Surg. 2021;45:2816–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kiuchi J, Komatsu S, Ichikawa D, Kosuga T, Okamoto K, Konishi H, et al. Putative risk factors for postoperative pneumonia which affects poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2016;21:920–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Baba H, Tokai R, Hirano K, Watanabe T, Shibuya K, Hashimoto I, et al. Risk factors for postoperative pneumonia after general and digestive surgery: a retrospective single-center study. Surg Today. 2020;50:460–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Berlth F, Messerle K, Plum PS, Chon SH, von Ambüren J, Hohn A, et al. Impact of the weekday of surgery on outcome in gastric cancer patients who underwent D2-gastrectomy. World J Surg. 2018;42:1811–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Visser E, Brenkman HJF, Verhoeven RHA, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R. Weekday of gastrectomy for cancer in relation to mortality and oncological outcomes—a Dutch population-based cohort study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017;43:1862–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Njølstad TS, Werner HM, Marcickiewicz J, Tingulstad S, Staff AC, Oddenes K, et al. Late-week surgical treatment of endometrial cancer is associated with worse long-term outcome: Results from a prospective, multicenter study. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0182223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vohra RS, Pinkney T, Evison F, Begaj I, Ray D, Alderson D, et al. Influence of day of surgery on mortality following elective colorectal resections. Br J Surg. 2015;102:1272–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kelz RR, Freeman KM, Hosokawa PW, Asch DA, Spitz FR, Moskowitz M, et al. Time of day is associated with postoperative morbidity an analysis of the national surgical quality improvement program data. Ann Surg. 2008;247:544–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Eastridge BJ, Hamilton EC, O’Keefe GE, Rege RV, Valentine RJ, Jones DJ, et al. Effect of sleep deprivation on the performance of simulated laparoscopic surgical skill. Am J Surg. 2003;186:169–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Whelehan DF, McCarrick CA, Ridgway PF. A systematic review of sleep deprivation and technical skill in surgery. Surgeon. 2020;18:375–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Aylin P, Alexandrescu R, Jen MH, Mayer EK, Bottle A. Day of week of procedure and 30 day mortality for elective surgery: retrospective analysis of hospital episode statistics. BMJ. 2013;346:f2424.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zare MM, Itani KM, Schifftner TL, Henderson WG, Khuri SF. Mortality after nonemergent major surgery performed on Friday versus Monday through Wednesday. Ann Surg. 2007;246:866–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hasegawa H, Takahashi A, Kakeji Y, Ueno H, Eguchi S, Endo I, et al. Surgical outcomes of gastroenterological surgery in Japan: report of the National Clinical Database 2011–2017. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2019;3:426–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, Thompson JN, Van de Velde CJ, Nicolson M, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:11–20.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Al-Batran SE, Homann N, Pauligk C, Goetze TO, Meiler J, Kasper S, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel versus fluorouracil or capecitabine plus cisplatin and epirubicin for locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4): a randomised, phase 2/3 trial. Lancet. 2019;393:1948–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TU1 and KT conceived the study concept and design, analyzed data and wrote the manuscript. RS and TU2 contributed to data acquisition and interpretation. KM contributed to statistical analysis. GK and MM revised the draft. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tsuneyuki Uchida.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. This study was approved by the institutional review board of Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital (Approval No. F2020C74). Informed consent for use of anonymous data was obtained from all patients through an opt-out methodology.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Uchida, T., Sekine, R., Matsuo, K. et al. Absence of a weekday effect on short- and long-term oncologic outcomes of gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis. BMC Surg 22, 302 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01756-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01756-z

Keywords

  • Gastric cancer
  • Gastrectomy
  • Propensity score matching
  • Weekday effect
  • Prognosis