Skip to main content
Download PDF

Preoperative aspartate aminotransferase to albumin ratio correlates with tumor characteristics and predicts outcome of hepatocellular carcinoma patients after curative hepatectomy: a multicenter study

BMC Surgery volume 22, Article number: 307 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Aims

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of the preoperative aminotransferase to albumin ratio (AAR) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after hepatectomy.

Methods

From five hospitals, a total of 991 patients with HCC admitted between December 2014 and December 2019 were included as the primary cohort and 883 patients with HCC admitted between December 2010 and December 2014 were included as the validation cohort. The X-tile software was conducted to identify the optimal cut-off value of AAR.

Results

In the primary cohort, the optimal cut-off value of the AAR was defined as 0.7 and 1.6, respectively. Compared to patients with AAR 0.7–1.6, those with AAR > 1.6 showed significantly worse overall survival (OS) and RFS, whereas those with AAR < 0.7 showed significantly better OS and RFS (all p < 0.001). Pathologically, patients with AAR > 1.6 had more aggressive tumour characteristics, such as larger tumour size, higher incidence of microvascular invasion, and severe histologic activity, and higher AFP level than patients with AAR < 0.7. Consistently, the abovementioned clinical significance of AAR was confirmed in the validation cohort.

Conclusions

A high AAR was significantly correlated with advanced tumours and severe hepatic inflammation, and a worse prognosis of HCC.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common cancer and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with the highest incidence in southeast Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. Hepatitis B and C virus (HBV and HCV, respectively) infections are the major etiologies of HCC [1]. Surgical resection is the main curative therapy for early-stage and selected intermediate-advanced HCCs [2]. Compared to other solid tumours, HCC commonly occurs with an underlying liver disease. Therefore, well-preserved underlying liver function is a prerequisite for surgery. Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), bilirubin (TBIL) and albumin (ALB) are the most common liver chemistry parameters for liver function assessment. Hepatic enzymes such as ALT and AST are much sensitive in the presence of acute or chronic hepatic inflammation. In patients with severe liver impairment, TBIL or ALB level becomes significantly abnormal [3]. In addition, these parameters are closely related to HCC incidence and progression. In patients with HBV, elevated ALT levels commonly indicate a high incidence of HCC development. In patients undergoing resection, ALB and TBIL are involved in HCC progression [4, 5].

The Child Pugh (C-P) system, which is deriving from five conventional liver function parameters, namely, TBIL, PT, ALB, ascites, and hepatic encephalopathy, is widely used for liver function assessment. In patients undergoing hepatectomy, C-P grade A liver function is required. Thus, the liver function parameters of patients with HCC almost fall in the normal range. Because the liver function index and HCC are closely related, the role of liver chemistry in HCC patients with C-P grade A liver function is underestimated. The clinical significance of these liver function parameters remains unclear. In 2015, the albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) scoring model for the evaluation of hepatic function in patients with HCC was reported [6]. This score completely adopted two liver function indices, namely, ALB and TBIL, to assess liver function, and the model was proven to be effective and objective. The FIB-4 (fibrosis index based on four factors) score containing ALT and AST and the APRI score (Aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index) containing AST have been developed for diagnosing liver fibrosis [7,8,9]. These risk scores have been mainly designed for assessing underlying liver disease and has shown good predictive power. These scores further grade patients with C-P grade A liver function and have a predictive role in postoperative complications [10, 11]. However, the liver function parameters alone or in combination seldom are reported in predicting HCC prognosis after hepatectomy, particularly in terms of long-term survival. Because of the critical significance of liver function parameters, we attempted to further investigate the predictive role of liver function parameters and propose a more simple and easily used score for HCC patients undergoing hepatectomy.

Among the aforementioned liver chemistry parameters, AST and ALB were reported to be associated with HCC prognosis. Abnormal AST and ALB levels were the most prominent characteristics of HCC patients with cirrhotic hepatitis. At severe hepatic injury stage, mitochondrial lesions occurred and hepatocytes were seriously damaged, which stimulates the release of a large amount of AST, resulting in a significant increase in AST. On the other hand, due to excessive consumption by tumour progression and impaired protein synthesis ability, serum ALB levels might be decreased. Moreover, AST or ALB was identified to be a prominent prognostic factor for HCC patients [12]. Therefore, both these indices might better reflect hepatic inflammation and tumour status. In the present study, we used multi-institutional data to investigate the objective measures of liver function parameters (AST and ALB) and combined them into a risk score (the AST/ALB ratio, AAR). This score could reflect hepatic inflammation and tumour characteristics and distinguish HCC prognosis. We adopted the X-tile software to identify the optimal value. This score would be validated in another group of HCC patients after hepatectomy.

Materials and methods

Participants

In the present study, we enrolled 991 patients with HCC who underwent hepatectomy between January 2014 and January 2019 from five hospitals. The participating institutions included the Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, the First People’s Hospital of Neijiang City, and West China Hospital of Sichuan University. The inclusion criteria were (1) age ≥ 18 years; (2) C-P grade A/B liver function; (3) primary hepatectomy; and (4) pathological HCC. The exclusion criteria were (1) multiple malignancies; (2) antitumour therapy before surgery; (3) positive surgical margin; (4) main PVTT; (5) ruptured HCC; (6) lymph node involvement; and (7) incomplete follow-up information. To validate our proposed risk score, we included another 883 patients with HCC who underwent hepatectomy between January 2010 and January 2014 from West China Hospital.

This study conformed to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of West China Hospital, Sichuan University.

Variable collection and follow-up

Demographic information, including age and sex, and clinicopathological features, including blood test, HBV infection assessment, and liver function test findings and tumour-related parameters, were prospectively collected within 1 week before surgery. Systemic inflammatory level was evaluated using the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte (PLR) ratio. AAR was calculated by dividing AST by ALB. Computed tomography (CT) or contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed preoperatively to determine the tumour size and number. Tumour differentiation, microvascular invasion (MVI), satellite lesion, and surgical margin status were evaluated on pathology specimens. Hepatic inflammation was assessed using the G score, namely, G1, G2, G3, and G4. The degree of the G score was assessed based on the degree of necrosis and inflammation. Liver fibrosis or cirrhosis was assessed using the S score, namely, S1, S2, S3, and S4. S4 was indicative of liver cirrhosis [13]. Curative hepatectomy was defined as complete macroscopic tumour removal with a microscopically free margin. All pathological examinations were performed by experienced hepatic pathologists.

After surgery, the patients were followed up at postoperative 1 month and then at 3-month intervals in the postoperative first 1 year and every 6 months in the subsequent years. Antiviral drugs were primarily recommended for patients with HBV at the first investigation based on the current guideline. Liver ultrasonography or contrast-enhanced CT and/or MRI, along with serum tumour marker AFP, was performed during the follow-up. HCC recurrence was diagnosed as two typical imaging findings, one imaging technique showing typical features of HCC and increased alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level of > 400 ng/mL, or confirmed by biopsy/resection. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was defined as the time interval between the surgery and the first incidence of detectable recurrence. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time interval between the surgery and patient death or the last follow-up. The last follow-up was performed at the end of March 2020 or until death.

Statistical analysis

Continuous data are presented as mean (interquartile range, IQR) and were compared using Mann–Whitney U test. Age, AFP, ALT, and TBIL were graded as reported in previous studies. The cut-off value of NLR and PLR was defined as the mean value. Categorical variables are expressed as number (frequency) and were compared using χ2 or Fisher’s exact tests, as appropriate. The survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan–Meier method, and the findings were compared using log-rank test. A Cox hazard proportion model was performed to determine the independent risk factors related to RFS or OS. Variables with p < 0.05 in the univariate analysis were entered into the multivariate analysis. All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS statistical package (version 20.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and R software version 3.6.3 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; www.r-project.org). p < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

The X-tile software (version 3.6.1; Yale University, New Haven, CTA) was used to identify the optimal cut-off value of AAR to separate patients into low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk groups of recurrence. This software provides a single, global assessment of every possible way of dividing a population into low-, intermediate-, and high risk of recurrence and then identifying the optimal thresholds by selecting the largest χ2 value [14].

Results

Definition of AAR

To exclude collinearity, correlation analysis was performed between serum log2-transformed AST and ALB. As shown in Fig. 1A, the R2 value was − 0.22 (95% CI − 0.28, − 0.16), suggesting that both variables independently reflect the status of the underlying liver disease. AAR was calculated as the ratio of preoperative serum AST to serum ALB. Of the 991 patients enrolled in this study, we used X-tile plots to generate two optimal cut-off values, namely, 0.7 and 1.6, which categorises resection HCC patients into three strata with a highly different probability of RFS: low-risk (AAR < 0.7, n = 323), intermediate-risk (AAR 0.7–1.6, n = 514), and high-risk (AAR > 1.6, n = 154) (Fig. 1B–D). With AAR < 0.7 category as the reference, the hazard ratios (HRs) for AAR 0.7–1.6 and AAR > 1.6 categories were 1.833 (95% CI 1.358–2.476) and 3.688 (95% CI 2.624–5.183), respectively.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Determination of the optimal cut-off value of AAR. A Correlation analysis of AST and ALB (R2 = -0.22); B–D X-tile analysis of recurrence-free survival data for AAR, which divided AAR into the low-risk (AAR < 0.7), intermediate-risk (AAR 0.7–1.6), and high-risk (AAR > 1.6) groups. AAR aminotransferase to albumin ratio, AST aspartate aminotransferase, ALB albumin

Full size image

Relationship of AAR with clinicopathologic parameters

Table 1 shows all patient demographics and clinical characteristics. There were 830 (83.8%) male patients. The majority of patients (942, 95.1%) had a history of HBV infection, and 821 patients (82.8%) had liver cirrhosis.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics
Full size table

Patients in the high AAR group were more likely to have HBeAg-positivity (p < 0.001), positive HBV-DNA (p < 0.001), larger tumour size (p < 0.001), higher incidence of MVI (p < 0.001), and AFP > 400 ng/mL (p = 0.001) than those in the low AAR group. Patients in the high AAR group also had significantly higher PLR (p < 0.001) and higher NLR (p = 0.001) than those in the low AAR group. Regarding other liver function parameters, patients in the high AAR group had significantly higher ALT (> 40 IU/L, p < 0.001), higher TBIL (> 17.1 μmol/L, p < 0.001), and lower creatine level (p < 0.001) than those in the low AAR group. Generally, with a high AAR, the tumour was more advanced and systemic inflammation was higher.

Relationship of AAR and hepatic inflammation and fibrosis

We further investigated the correlation between AAR and hepatic inflammation, cirrhosis, and fibrosis-related indices (ALBI, FIB-4, and ARPI; Fig. 2). Regarding the rate of patients with hepatic inflammation grade G1 or G2, there was a decreased tendency from the low-risk group to the high-risk group. In contrast, in terms of grade G3 or G4, there was an increased tendency from the low-risk group to the high-risk group. These findings suggest that AAR is positively correlated with hepatic inflammation. However, for liver cirrhosis, the correlation between both was not obvious. The ALBI, FIB-4, and ARPI were used to assess liver fibrosis. Despite the significant relationship between the risk score and ALBI or FIB-4, the correlation coefficient R2 was much small (0.36 and 0.45, respectively). Notably, the relationship between ARPI and the risk score was significant (R2 = 0.73, p < 0.001).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Correlation between AAR and hepatic inflammation and fibrosis score. A correlation analysis of AAR and the G score; B–D correlation analysis of AAR and the fibrosis score (ALBI, APRI, and FIB-4)

Full size image

RFS and OS stratified by AAR

Till the final follow-up, there were 295 deaths and 556 recurrences. Survival analysis was performed based on AAR. As expected, the score could significantly distinguish the OS of HCC patients between the subgroups (all: p < 0.001, intermediate-risk vs. low-risk: p < 0.001, high-risk vs. intermediate-risk: p < 0.001). In terms of the RFS, the risk score still performed well (all: p < 0.001, intermediate-risk vs. low-risk: p = 0.006, high-risk vs. intermediate-risk: p < 0.001). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS were 93.8%, 85.0%, and 75.8% for the low-risk group; 89.0%, 73.0%, and 61.6% for the intermediate-risk group; and 73.5%, 47.8%, and 43.5% for the high-risk group, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS were 76.3%, 54.6%, and 41.1% for the low-risk group; 68.1%, 44.4%, and 35.5% for the intermediate-risk group; and 48.2%, 31.9%, and 22.5% for the high-risk group, respectively. With a higher score, the prognosis was worse (Fig. 3A and B).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Kaplan–Meier estimates of survival by AAR in the primary and validation cohorts. A and B In the primary cohort, HCC patients in the high-risk group had worst prognosis in terms of RFS, whereas those in the low-risk group had best prognosis. A higher risk score was correlated with worse prognosis. C and D In the validation cohort, AAR (> 1.6, 0.7–1.6, and < 0.7) performed well in stratifying patients with distinguished prognosis. RFS recurrence-free survival, OS overall survival

Full size image

As shown in Fig. 4, the multivariable analysis determined that AAR (HR 1.434, 95% CI 1.193–1.723; p < 0.001) was an independent predictor of OS in HCC patients undergoing hepatectomy, followed by tumour size, multiple tumours, AFP > 400 ng/mL, satellite lesions, MVI, liver cirrhosis, HBeAg-positivity, and INR (all p < 0.05). Similarly, the multivariable analysis determined that AAR (HR 1.162, 95% CI 1.020–1.323; p = 0.024) was an independent predictor of RFS in HCC patients undergoing hepatectomy, followed by tumour size, multiple tumours, satellite lesions, MVI, liver cirrhosis, and HBeAg-positivity (all p < 0.05).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses of the clinicopathological factors associated with RFS and OS. A Factors associated with RFS in the multivariate analysis model. B Factors associated with OS. RFS recurrence-free survival, OS overall survival

Full size image

External validation

As shown in Additional file 1: Table S1, the clinicopathological features were distributed among the three groups similar to those in the primary cohort. A high AAR was associated with advanced tumours and active HBV replication. To validate the predictive role of AAR, we included another 883 patients who underwent hepatectomy between 2010 and 2014 at West China Hospital. AAR was constructed as abovementioned. As shown in Fig. 3C, and D, AAR could significantly distinguish the OS of HCC patients between the subgroups (all: p < 0.001, intermediate-risk vs. low-risk: p = 0.02, high-risk vs. intermediate-risk: p = 0.002). In terms of RFS, the risk score still performed well (all: p < 0.001, intermediate-risk vs. low-risk: p = 0.005, high-risk vs. intermediate-risk: p = 0.187) (Fig. 3C and D).

Discussion

The present study is the first to evaluate the clinical significance of preoperative AAR in HCC patients undergoing hepatectomy. Using a multi-institutional database, we demonstrated that AAR was an independent risk factor associated with RFS and OS. The optimal cut-off values were 0.7 and 1.6, respectively. The low-risk (AAR < 0.7), intermediate-risk (AAR 0.7–1.6), and high-risk (AAR > 1.6) groups were constructed based on AAR. The high-risk group had the worst prognosis, whereas the low-risk group had the best prognosis. In the validation cohort, we found that the predictive ability of AAR in OS and RFS remained well.

HCC commonly occurred with the presence of an underlying liver disease, such as viral hepatitis and liver cirrhosis. Data from epidemiological survey revealed that HBV is attributed to 50% of HCC development worldwide. The liver function parameters such as ALT, AST, and ALB are commonly used to assess hepatic inflammation and preserved liver function. Hepatic inflammation indicated by elevated ALT levels increases the risk of HCC development, whereas ALT normalisation can reduce the risk of HCC development [15]. Moreover, serum liver chemistry alone or in combination can predict postoperative hepatic failure after hepatectomy [16]. Given the critical clinical significance of these indices, we proposed and demonstrated that combined liver function parameters (AAR) could predict the prognosis of HCC patients after hepatectomy. Patients with chronic hepatitis or HCC are more likely to have elevated AST levels. Moreover, Takeishi et al. reported that high AST level is significantly associated with tumour size and tumour capsule formation with cancer cell infiltration [17]. Serum AST levels might be associated with tumour malignancy in HCC patients. Serum ALB levels can reflect preserved hepatic function, nutrition status, and systemic inflammation. Based on the correlation analysis, ALB and AST had less influence on each other. Therefore, we combined the AST and ALB to form AAR. A high AAR commonly indicates high AST level and/or low ALB level. Compared with the low AAR group, patients in the high AAR group have more advanced tumours and higher serum TBIL and ALT levels than those in the low AAR group. Large tumour size and the presence of MVI are well-established risk factors associated with patients’ prognosis [18]. Interestingly, the mean tumour size was 4.0 cm in the AAR < 0.7 group, 5.0 cm in the AAR 0.7–1.6 group, and 8.05 cm in the AAR > 1.6 group. Consistently, the incidence of MVI was 13.3% in the AAR < 0.7 group, 25.9% in the AAR 0.7–1.6 group, and 33.1% in the AAR > 1.6 group. AAR appeared positively associated with the rate of MVI occurrence, which might aid to predict the status of MVI. Serum AFP level > 400 ng/mL predicts poor OS and RFS after hepatectomy in patients with HBV-associated HCC [19]. The rate of AFP level > 400 ng/mL was 31.9%, 38.3%, and 49.4% in the AAR < 0.7, AAR 0.7–1.6, and AAR > 1.6 groups, respectively. This evidence showed that AAR was associated with tumour aggressivity. In the present study, patients in the high AAR group had higher serum TBIL level. Elevated TBIL indicates a higher rate of postoperative mortality and long-term survival [20] and its combination with ALB has shown good predictive ability for HCC patients after surgery [6].

In addition to its relationship with tumour characteristics, AAR is related to inflammation. Hepatic inflammation plays a critical role in HCC development and progression [21]. Our study showed that the high AAR group had a higher incidence of severe histologic activity of G3 or G4, whereas the low AAR group had a higher incidence of mild histologic activity of G1 or G2. Thus, AAR could reflect hepatic inflammation to some degree. In our study, the majority of patients had a history of HBV infection, which was the main cause of hepatic inflammation. Interestingly, our result showed that the higher the AAR, the higher the rate of HBeAg-positivity and HBV-DNA > 103 IU/mL. HBV replication could cause chronic liver injury and inflammatory cell infiltration. Consistently, serum ALT level was much higher in the high AAR group. Inflammatory microenvironment, in turn, contributes to tumour recurrence and metastasis [22]. HBeAg-positivity or high HBV-DNA load negatively impacts the prognosis of HBV-related HCC patients [23]. Therefore, AAR can effectively reflect the degree of liver-related inflammation. Inflammation-based scores, including the NLR and PLR, are associated with survival in patients with HCC [24, 25]. In the present study, NLR and PLR were associated with RFS and OS in the univariate analysis but were not independent predictors in the multivariate analysis. Because a high AAR was significantly associated with systemic inflammation, it could serve as an alternative for NLR and PLR. Hepatic and systemic inflammation were significantly higher in the high AAR group than in the low AAR group.

Liver fibrosis/cirrhosis is caused by chronic hepatic inflammation and is demonstrated to be an independent risk factor related to RFS and OS. However, in this study, no significant difference was noted in liver cirrhosis among the three groups. AAR could not reflect the status of cirrhosis. FIB-4 and APRI are scores for diagnosing liver fibrosis/cirrhosis. Interestingly, the correlation coefficient between AAR and APRI reached up to 0.73, whereas that between AAR and FIB-4 was 0.46. The APRI and FIB-4 are widely recommended for the evaluation of liver fibrosis; however, their performance remains controversial [26]. Therefore, the relationship between AAR and liver cirrhosis remains to be further elucidated. Based on the demographics, we found that AAR does not differ between female and male patients and no difference was noted in terms of age and the incidence of diabetes among the three groups. Multivariate analysis revealed multiple tumours, satellite lesions, HBeAg-positivity, and INR as independent risk factors related to prognosis. These variables were validated in various studies [11, 27]. In the present study, AAR was revealed to have good clinical utility in patients showing different clinical characteristics.

AAR was constructed based on preoperative liver function parameters (AST and ALB). The calculation process and risk stratification were relatively simple and could be easily applied. Notably, AAR could effectively reflect the tumour characteristics and hepatic inflammation as shown in the primary multi-institutional data or validation cohort. The association between a higher AAR and worse OS and RFS was also identified and maintained in the primary multi-institutional data and validation cohort.

There were some limitations to the present study. First, this was a retrospective study, which might lead to selection bias. To overcome this shortcoming, we included multi-center database to investigate the clinical significance of AAR. Additionally, we included a homogeneous group of HCC patients, which improved the external validity of the present findings. Second, the liver function test might be different in different hospitals. However, AAR might increase compatibility among the different hospitals when compared with AST or ALB alone. Finally, the liver function indices might be influenced by different antiviral drugs.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hyun MH, Lee YS, Kim JH, Lee CU, Jung YK, Seo YS, et al. Hepatic resection compared to chemoembolization in intermediate- to advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis of high-quality studies. Hepatology. 2018;68(3):977–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kwo PY, Cohen SM, Lim JK. ACG clinical guideline: evaluation of abnormal liver chemistries. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017;112(1):18–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kariyama K, Nouso K, Hiraoka A, Wakuta A, Oonishi A, Kuzuya T, et al. EZ-ALBI score for predicting hepatocellular carcinoma prognosis. Liver Cancer. 2020;9(6):734–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sinn DH, Lee J, Goo J, Kim K, Gwak GY, Paik YH, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma risk in chronic hepatitis B virus-infected compensated cirrhosis patients with low viral load. Hepatology. 2015;62(3):694–701.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson PJ, Berhane S, Kagebayashi C, Satomura S, Teng M, Reeves HL, et al. Assessment of liver function in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a new evidence-based approach-the ALBI grade. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(6):550–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Toyoda H, Kumada T, Tada T, Kaneoka Y, Maeda A. A laboratory marker, FIB-4 index, as a predictor for long-term outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma patients after curative hepatic resection. Surgery. 2015;157(4):699–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Okamura Y, Ashida R, Yamamoto Y, Ito T, Sugiura T, Uesaka K. FIB-4 index is a predictor of background liver fibrosis and long-term outcomes after curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(Suppl 4):467–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Maegawa FB, Shehorn L, Aziz H, Kettelle J, Jie T, Riall TS. Association between noninvasive fibrosis markers and postoperative mortality after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(1): e187142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang YY, Zhong JH, Su ZY, Huang JF, Lu SD, Xiang BD, et al. Albumin-bilirubin versus Child-Pugh score as a predictor of outcome after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg. 2016;103(6):725–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chan AWH, Zhong J, Berhane S, Toyoda H, Cucchetti A, Shi K, et al. Development of pre and post-operative models to predict early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after surgical resection. J Hepatol. 2018;69(6):1284–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Guo Z, Zhong JH, Jiang JH, Zhang J, Xiang BD, Li LQ. Comparison of survival of patients with BCLC stage A hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatic resection or transarterial chemoembolization: a propensity score-based analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(9):3069–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sun Y, Zhou J, Wang L, Wu X, Chen Y, Piao H, et al. New classification of liver biopsy assessment for fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B patients before and after treatment. Hepatology. 2017;65(5):1438–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Camp RL, Dolled-Filhart M, Rimm DL. X-tile: a new bio-informatics tool for biomarker assessment and outcome-based cut-point optimization. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10(21):7252–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim S, Lee Y, Bang SM, Bak H, Yim SY, Lee YS, et al. Early normalization of alanine aminotransferase during antiviral therapy reduces risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in HBV patients. J Clin Med. 2021;10(9):1840.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Olthof PB, Huiskens J, Schulte NR, Wicherts DA, Besselink MG, Busch OR, et al. Postoperative peak transaminases correlate with morbidity and mortality after liver resection. HPB (Oxford). 2016;18(11):915–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Takeishi K, Maeda T, Shirabe K, Tsujita E, Yamashita Y, Harimoto N, et al. Clinicopathologic features and outcomes of non-B, non-C hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(Suppl 3):S1116-1124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lim KC, Chow PK, Allen JC, Chia GS, Lim M, Cheow PC, et al. Microvascular invasion is a better predictor of tumor recurrence and overall survival following surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma compared to the Milan criteria. Ann Surg. 2011;254(1):108–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang SL, Liu LP, Yang S, Liu L, Ren JW, Fang X, et al. Preoperative serum alpha-fetoprotein and prognosis after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg. 2016;6:716–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Marasco G, Poggioli F, Colecchia A, Cabibbo G, Pelizzaro F, Giannini EG, et al. A nomogram-based prognostic model for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with sorafenib: a multicenter study. Cancers. 2021;13(11):2677.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Grivennikov SI, Greten FR, Karin M. Immunity, inflammation, and cancer. Cell. 2010;140(6):883–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim BK, Park JY, Kim DY, Kim JK, Kim KS, Choi JS, et al. Persistent hepatitis B viral replication affects recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after curative resection. Liver Int. 2008;28(3):393–401.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Qu LS, Zhu J, Chen H, Jin F, Ni RZ, Lu CH. Effects of hepatitis B e-antigen on recurrence of hepatitis B-related hepatocellular carcinoma after curative resection: a meta-analysis. Hepatol Res. 2013;43(4):347–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kaida T, Nitta H, Kitano Y, Yamamura K, Arima K, Higashi T, et al. Preoperative platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio can predict recurrence beyond the Milan criteria after hepatectomy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Res. 2017;47(10):991–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Motomura T, Shirabe K, Mano Y, Muto J, Toshima T, Umemoto Y, et al. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio reflects hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplantation via inflammatory microenvironment. J Hepatol. 2013;58(1):58–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Dong M, Wu J, Yu X, Li J, Yang S, Qi X, et al. Validation and comparison of seventeen noninvasive models for evaluating liver fibrosis in Chinese hepatitis B patients. Liver Int. 2018;38(9):1562–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang XP, Zhou TF, Wang ZH, Zhang F, Zhong CQ, Hu YR, et al. Association of preoperative hypercoagulability with poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with microvascular invasion after liver resection: a multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26(12):4117–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all the medical staff who contributed to the collection and maintenance of the multi-institutional medical record HCC database.

Funding

This study was supported by Grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 82070625, 82100650), and the Science and Technological Supports Project of Sichuan Province (Grant Nos. 2022YFS0257, 2022YFS0255, 2022YFS0377).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Liver Surgery & Liver Transplantation Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, China

    Wei Peng, Junyi Shen, Junlong Dai & Tianfu Wen

  2. Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China

    Wei Peng & Xin Sun

  3. Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, Chengdu, 610072, Sichuan Province, China

    Shusheng Leng

  4. Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First People’s Hospital of Neijiang City, Neijiang, 641000, Sichuan Province, China

    Fei Xie

  5. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, 610072, Sichuan Province, China

    Yu Zhang

  6. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, 550000, Guizhou Province, China

    Shun Ran

  7. Laboratory of Liver Transplantation, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-Related Molecular Network, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, China

    Tianfu Wen

Authors
  1. Wei Peng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Junyi Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Junlong Dai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shusheng Leng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Fei Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yu Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Shun Ran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Xin Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Tianfu Wen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Material preparation was completed by WP. Data collection and follow up were performed by WP, JS, JD, SL, FX, YZ and SR. Data analysis were performed by WP and XS. The first draft of the manuscript was written by WP. TW designed this study and reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tianfu Wen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All methods were performed in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki. This study has been approved by the West China Hospital of Sichuan University Biomedical Research Ethics Committee. Informed consent forms were obtained from all patients and its relatives.

Consent for publication

Informed Consent to publish has been received from all participants.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file1: Table S1.

Baseline characteristics.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Peng, W., Shen, J., Dai, J. et al. Preoperative aspartate aminotransferase to albumin ratio correlates with tumor characteristics and predicts outcome of hepatocellular carcinoma patients after curative hepatectomy: a multicenter study. BMC Surg 22, 307 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01751-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01751-4

Keywords

BMC Surgery

ISSN: 1471-2482

Contact us