Skip to main content
Download PDF

Volume 18 Supplement 1

Updates and New Technology in Endocrine Surgery

  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

The role of prophylactic central compartment lymph node dissection in elderly patients with differentiated thyroid cancer: a multicentric study

BMC Surgery volume 18, Article number: 110 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Prophylactic central neck lymph-nodes dissection is still a topic of major debate in Literature. There is a lack of randomized controlled trials proving advantages in its application in terms of overall survival and local recurrence. Due to the recent rapid increase of elderly population, differentiated tumor carcinoma diagnosis increased in patients over 65 years old. The aim of this study was to compare recurrence rate, complications rate and histological features of tumors in elderly population.

Methods

A retrospective study was carried out collecting data from 371 patients with differentiated thyroid cancer without clinical evidence of lymph-nodes involvement in three Italian referral centers from 2005 to 2015. All patients were aged ≥ 65 years and were divided in two groups based on the performed surgery (total thyroidectomy alone or associated with central lymph-nodes dissection). Moreover, patients were stratified according to the age between 65 and 74 years old and over 75 years old.

Results

Total thyroidectomy alone was performed in 184 patients (group A) and total thyroidectomy with prophylactic central neck dissection was performed in 187 cases (group B). There was a statistically significant difference in complications between the groups in terms of neck hematoma (0.5% group A vs 3.7% group B), temporary hypoparathyroidism (11.4% group A vs 21.4% group B), and temporary unilateral recurrent nerve injury (1.5% group A vs 6.4% group B). Lymph nodes recurrence rate was 9.2% in group A and 8.5% in group B, with no statistically significant difference. There was a statistically significant difference in patients over 75 years old in terms of temporary hypoparathyroidism (24% group A vs 11% group B), permanent hypoparathyroidism (2,7% group A vs 0,3% group B) and recurrent nerve injury (9,5% group A vs 2% group B).

Conclusions

The role of prophylactic central neck dissection is still controversial, especially in elderly patients, and an aggressive surgical approach should be carefully evaluated. The Authors reported a similar low recurrence rate between total thyroidectomy and total thyroidectomy associated with prophylactic central neck dissection, with increased postoperative complications in the lymphadenectomy group and in patients over 75 years old, advocating a tailored surgical approach in elderly population.

Background

Differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) is the most common tumor among endocrine malignant pathology with an incidence that has dramatically increased in the last few decades (almost 310% from 1950 to 2004). In Italy, there were almost 15,300 new cases of thyroid cancer during 2016, representing 4% of all malignant neoplasm with a 1:4 male/female ratio. Despite the increased incidence, mortality did not raise accordingly. Thyroid cancer has a peak of incidence between 45 and 55 years with 5:10000 cases per year. Below 45 years old and above 55 years old, the incidence decreases reaching 1:10000 cases per year in over 75 years old population [1].

DTC has generally an indolent clinical course, an excellent prognosis and is associated with a low mortality rate witch lead to a “crafty” approach to this pathology. In fact, well-differentiated (papillary and follicular) thyroid cancer had an expected 20-year survival of 90% or greater, exclusive of other causes of mortality [2]. Unfortunately, the long-term recurrence rate is not negligible (15–30%), even more if we consider the regional lymph node micro metastases, which are involved in up to 80% cases, defining the high recurrence rate as the main obstacle for clinical node-negative (cN0) patients [3, 4]. Prophylactic central neck dissection (pCND) is defined as the complete excision of level VI and VII lymph nodes (based on the recognized anatomic continuity from the neck and superior mediastinum) in patients with no evidence of nodal involvement and may be performed safely in referral centers [5]. Several surgeons suggested that pCND associated with total thyroidectomy (TT) should be performed in cN0 patients to avoid the locoregional recurrence and provide pathological evidence for the adjuvant radioiodine (RAI) treatment [6, 7]. Certainly, tumor histotype influences the survival and recurrence rate, representing the most significant prognostic factor. According to ESMO (European Society of Medical Oncology), BTA (British Thyroid Association), ATA (American Thyroid Association), NCCN (National Comprehensive Cancer Network), therapeutic central neck dissection should be performed in case of a clinical or ultrasonographic evidence of lymph nodes metastases in central compartment [8,9,10,11]. However, the role of pCND remains controversial in patients without clinically evident lymph nodes metastasis. Due to the recent rapid increase in the life expectancy of the general population, the elderly population has growth by 90% over the last 30 years [12]. Elderly patients are conventionally defined as those with an age of 65 years or over [13]. Nevertheless, this definition is not worldwide accepted, thus several Authors have proposed a different cut-off at the age of 75 years old (very old patient) [2]. Recent papers described a dissimilar incidence of lymph node recurrence after DTC in aged people compared to young ones without reaching definitive conclusions [2, 12,13,14]. The implications for recurrent disease are very different among elderly and younger population. Moreover, assessing the rate of recurrence of DTC and the impact of thyroid cancer recurrence on mortality is made more challenging because recurrence and mortality are competing risks. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence, the risk factors and the recurrence of central compartment lymph nodes in elderly patients (age ≥ 65 years) with cN0 PTMC.

Methods

Study design

Data of elderly patients’ undergone total thyroidectomy (TT) between January 2005 and December 2015 in three referral centers for endocrine surgery were retrospectively assessed. 371 DTC patients with clinically negative lymph nodes who underwent surgery with curative intent, were enrolled in the study. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 65 years with a fine needle cytology (FNC) proven DTC, tumor with cN0 and ≥ cT1, no history of head and neck surgery or radiation and no history of other tumors. All patients had a documentation of a normal vocal cord mobility by preoperative laryngoscopy. A preoperative neck ultrasound was required to assess status of thyroid, central and lateral cervical compartments. FT3, FT4, TSH, Tg and anti-Tg antibody levels were also evaluated. Exclusion criteria were the presence of lymph node metastases in the central or in the lateral compartment discovered during preoperative investigations or during surgery. Other exclusion criteria were primary hyperparathyroidism, previous cervical surgery or radioactive iodine therapy. The following information were retrospectively collected from the medical records of the patients: gender, age, tumor size, bilaterality, multifocality, lymph nodes metastasis, capsular invasion, extra thyroidal invasion, cTNM and pTNM, postoperative complications.

Patients

The patients were divided into two groups: the patients of group A underwent TT and the patients of group B underwent TT with prophylactic lymphadenectomy of the bilateral central neck compartment. The group A procedures were performed by one surgery unit (Napoli University) while group B procedure were performed by two surgery units (Perugia and Cagliari University). All the procedures in each single center were performed by the same experienced team with an average of more than 200 thyroidectomies per year (with a 20–25% rate of cancers). Moreover, in each group, patients were stratified according to the age between 65 and 74 years old and over 75 years old (very old people). Written informed consent was obtained for all patients before surgery.

Surgical technique

Every TT was performed by experienced endocrine surgeons and with standardized surgical technique. In some cases, an ultrasound scalpel (Harmonic Ace; Ethicon Endosurgery, Blue Ash, Cincinnati, OH) was used and hemostasis was completed with the use of Floseal Hemostatic Matrix (Baxter, Zurich, Switzerland). Recurrent laryngeal nerve was routinely bilaterally identified until its insertion into the larynx. In case of removal or injury of the parathyroid glands, the auto-implantation was carried out at the level of the stern-mastoid muscle. The central neck compartment lymph node dissection included prelaryngeal, pretracheal and paratracheal lymph nodes basin on the ipsilateral and contralateral side to the tumor. Drainage was used selectively in group B and it was not used in group A. Serum calcium level was evaluated in the first two postoperative days and after one week from surgery.

Radioiodine ablation

After surgery, adjuvant radioactive ablation (RAI) was administered in case of tumor size > 1 cm, distant or locoregional extension, non-papillary histologic subtype, multifocal disease. Adequate levels of TSH (> 30 mU/mL) were obtained by ceasing for 4 weeks thyroid hormone therapy or using recombinant human thyrotropin (rhTSH; Thyrogen, Genzyme Corp). Whole body scans were performed after RAI therapy to evaluate disease persistence.

Follow up

Tumor size, extension, lymph node metastases and adjacent or distant organs involvement were evaluated using the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM Classification of Thyroid Cancer. Post-operative diagnosis of central neck lymph nodes recurrence was obtained during follow up (6 months after surgery during suppressive L-thyroxine treatment) using US-guided FNAC on suspicious lymph nodes (≥1 cm) in patients with high levels of serum Tg (> 1 ng/mL). Major perioperative and postoperative complications found were neck hematoma requiring reoperation, transient or permanent unilateral or bilateral recurrent nerve injury and transient or permanent hypoparathyroidism. Hypoparathyroidism was considered permanent if it lasted more than 6 months and required medical therapy with normal levels of parathyroid hormone serum levels. Paralysis of the recurrent laryngeal nerve was confirmed by laryngoscopy and it was considered permanent if it persisted for more than 6 months.

Statistical analysis

All statistical data was obtained using SPSS 24 software. Data were compared with a chi-square test. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05 with a Confidence Interval (CI) at 95%.

Results

Demographic data of the 371 DTC patients are reported in Table 1.

Table 1 Demographics and pathologic findings
Full size table

TT was performed in 184 patients (49.5%; group A), and TT with pCND was performed in 187 cases (50.5%; group B). The two groups were similar in demographics, clinical and pathologic findings. The main histological feature was unifocal tumor (85% of cases) with a stage I disease (90% of cases). PCND identified unexpected positive lymph node metastases in 41 of 187 cases (21.9%). In 29 (15.5%) of these patients, tumors > 1 cm were found, whereas tumors < 1 cm were found in 12 (6.4%) cases (p < 0.05). In 33 of 371 patients (8.8%) (14/184 or 7.6% in group A and 19/187 or 10.1% in group B) parathyroid tissue was implanted in the sternomastoid muscles, and in 42/371 (11.3%) cases parathyroid tissue was identified in the final pathology analyses. There was a statistically significant difference in complications between Group A and Group B patients in terms of neck hematoma (0.5%vs 3.7%, P = 0.03), temporary hypoparathyroidism (11.4% vs 21.4%, P = 0.009), temporary unilateral recurrent nerve injury (1.5% vs 6.4%, p = 0.019) (Table 2).

Table 2 Postoperative Complications
Full size table

In 4 cases of 371 patients (1%, 1 in group A and 3 in group), patients underwent neck re-exploration for severe neck hematoma.

Follow-up and oncologic outcomes

Lymph nodes recurrence rate was observed in 17 of 184 cases of the group A (9.2%, 10 central recurrence and 7 ipsilateral recurrence) and in 16 of 187 cases of the group B (8.5%, 8 central recurrence and 8 ipsilateral recurrence). The clinicopathological findings of these patients are reported in Table 3.

Table 3 Locoregional relapse: patient demographics and pathologic findings
Full size table

The two groups exhibited similar incidences of central and ipsilateral compartment recurrence and elapsed time between the primary operation and the recurrence, with no statistically significant difference. In the 85% of cases, the histopathological variant was papillary thyroid carcinoma. On 371 patients, 198 (53%) completed 5 years follow up. None of the enrolled patients died due to DTC-related recurrence or distant metastasis during the follow up period. After surgery, 321 patients (86.5%) underwent RAI.

Analysis of patient pathologic findings stratified by age

Pathologic findings and complications of patient stratified for different ages were compared and collected in Table 4.

Table 4 Recurrence rate and clinicopathological findings of patient stratified for different ages
Full size table

Considering complications, multifocality and tumor stage, there was a statistically significant difference in patients over 75 years old in terms of temporary hypoparathyroidism (24% vs 11%; p = 0,003; CI = 95%), permanent hypoparathyroidism (2,7% vs 0,3%; p = 0.03; CI = 95%), recurrent nerve injury (9,5% vs 2%; p = 0,001; CI = 95%), tumor multifocality (15% vs 7%; p = 0.03; CI = 95), tumor stage II (16,4% vs 5%; p = 0,0008; CI = 99%), tumor stage III (9,5% vs 1%; p = 0,0003; CI = 99%). Conversely, there was a statistically significant higher incidence of tumor stage I in 65–74 years old group. There were no statistically significant differences in microcarcinoma rate and in tumor size, even if patients over 75 years old presented slightly larger tumors.

Discussion

The treatment of DTC have changed drastically in last 10 years due to new evidence-based clinical data and constant guidelines revisions [10]. Nevertheless, there are still many controversial aspects matter of intense debate in Literature. PCND is one of the major discussed topic. In fact, while there is a common consensus about recommendation of lateral neck dissection in case of clinically involved lymph nodes, several surgeons, mainly in Eastern countries, perform routinely pCND associated with TT in all patients with DTC [15]. The most likely explanations are that ultrasonography (US) might undervalue smaller lymph nodes, and, in case of central lymph node recurrence, reoperation is associated with higher rate of severe complications such as recurrent laryngeal nerve injury [16]. According to ATA 2015 guidelines, there is a strong recommendation to not perform pCND for smaller DTC (T1-T2 cN0) while it should be considered (weak recommendation) in case of a laterocervical lymph node involvement (cN1b), of a T3-T4 tumor or in order to stage the neoplasm and plan a subsequent RAI ablation. In DTC, lymph node metastases rate ranges from 20 to 50% with a micrometastases (size < 2 mm) rate being as high as 90% with a subsequent locoregional recurrence rate of 15–30%, while central compartment recurrence rate, ranges between 5 and 20% in 5–10 years [6, 17,18,19,20]. While performing a pCND potentially treat the local disease decreasing the recurrence rate, it will not change the overall prognosis [21]. This is the main reason, along with the increased postoperative complications, which brought Authors to debate about usefulness of pCND in clinically negative lymphnodes patients [22]. Patients who underwent TT without pCND presented a low risk of locoregional recurrence and improved staging seems to be the only advantages of this approach [5]. Moreover, pCND might cause upstaging of the tumor and potential overtreatment by the administration of RAI ablation [5].

This hot topic become even more debated in case of elderly patients. In fact, in younger population where thyroid cancer is generally diagnosed, it would be rare for a patient not to outlive the recurrence. However, in a study population whose average age is over 70 years, this may not be the case because many elderly patients are not living long enough for recurrence to become a reality. Recurrence, then, in the elderly population becomes an indicator that a patient has survived longer [22].

DTC is the most common malignancy of the endocrine system, and usually, is highly treatable and curable. Tumor stage, extrathyroidal extension, stage of disease, sex and age have been advocated as potential risk factors influencing prognosis and oncologic outcome [22]. The prevalence of DTC grow consensually to the age, which was considered a major prognostic factor in several large studies [14, 23,24,25]. In Literature are reported several staging systems considering different cutoff age such as 45, 60, 65, 75 or 85 years old due to the lack of a precise definition of old age [12, 26, 27]. Aging was already described to be a risk factor for aggressive thyroid pathology associated with worst prognosis (ATA 2015) and different recent works described the role of age as a major independent prognostic factor in central compartment lymph node recurrence [28,29,30,31]. Very old patients have generally more aggressive clinicopathological features such as tumor size, extrathyroidal extension, T status and lymphnodes metastases, probably for the delayed diagnosis [2, 14]. Chereau et al. described a more aggressive tumor behavior in elderly patients with a higher recurrence rate of lymph node metastasis and a lower disease free survival compared to young patients [2]. In particular, the patients over 75 years old were affected by a 2-fold increased risk of recurrence compared with younger patients. Similar findings were reported by Niemann et al., who described a very aggressive pattern among patients with DTC aged under 25 years old and over 75 years old [32]. The former Authors supported a more aggressive surgical approach in DTC patients, suggesting to perform a lymph node dissection along with TT in all patients over 75 year old, especially if RAI ablation would supposed to be problematic and not administrated in this population [2]. In fact, postoperative RAI therapy is affected by several severe complications among elderly population, such as insomnia, osteoporosis and arrhythmias, and is generally administrated with a lower dose [33, 34]. Moreover, Biliotti et al. reported that the effectiveness of radioiodine therapy decreases in the elderly, postulating that uptake of 131I is age dependent, probably for to the diminished differentiation of follicular and papillary carcinomas in geriatric patients [35]. Several studies focusing on DTC elderly patients reported a longer overall survival and disease free survival in patients treated by an aggressive approach, with an acceptable postoperative complications rate [36, 37]. On the other hand, Nixon and Lang et al. reported an increasing risk in terms of neck hematoma and generally of postoperative complications as the price for a more radical surgery in elderly patient [38, 39]. Recently, in a meta-analysis Zhao et al. [40] reported a decreased central lymph nodes recurrence rate at most of 1% in patients undergoing pCND, unfortunately associated with increasing postoperative complication rate (mainly hypoparathyroidism and recurrent laryngeal nerve injury). However, Zhao reported also a higher incidence of complications following reoperation for neck recurrence, when compared to complications associated with first operation, especially for permanent hypoparathyroidism (8–27%) [41, 42]. Opposite conclusions were reached by Kim et al. that reported a significantly better prognosis in patients over 65 years old, suggesting a tailored treatment approach especially in case of microcarcinomas [14].

The present series showed a lymph nodes recurrence rate of 17 out of 184 cases in the patient underwent TT alone (9.2%, 10 central recurrence and 7 ipsilateral recurrence) and of 16 out of 187 cases in the patient underwent TT with pCND (8.5%, 8 central recurrence and 8 ipsilateral recurrence), with a difference not statistically significant. There was a difference statically significant between group A and group B in terms of neck hematoma (0.5% vs 3.7%), temporary hypoparathyroidism (11.4% vs 21.4%) and temporary unilateral nerve injury (1.5% vs 6.4%). According to Literature data, the recurrence rate in central lymph nodes compartment in patients aged over 65 years was higher compared to series of younger patients and was associated with a higher tumor staging and an increased rate of tumor multifocality [5, 43, 44]. Considering the patient stratified by age, the Authors reported a double rate of central lymph nodes compartment recurrence in over 75 years old patients, without statistically significant difference with patients aged 65–74 years. Moreover, in the present series a higher incidence of multifocality, of tumor stage and of postoperative complications such as recurrent nerve injury and temporary and definitive hypoparathyroidism, was reported in patients over 75 year old. These results are consistent with current Literature describing more aggressive pattern for DTC in very old and very young patients [16]. The improved staging by the discovery of unexpected lymphnodes metastases (21.9%) was the main advantage in the pCND group, especially in case of microcarcinomas, even if can cause upstaging and potential overtreatment with the risk of iatrogenic morbidity [5]. Conzo et al., in a large series on DTC patients, reported a similar incidence in TT patients and TT associated with pCND, followed by RAI administration and TSH suppression, in terms of local recurrence [5]. Moreover, in case of relapse, in their experience reoperations was not associated with increased postoperative complications, if performed in referral center by experienced endocrine surgeons [45,46,47,48,49,50].

The study has some limitations. First, a unique definition of “old” patients is not available in Literature and various Authors adopt different age cutoff, eg 60,65,70,75 years, to classify elderly patients. The Authors considered age > 75 years old as a major risk factor for increased recurrence rate and aggressive tumor behavior. Second, the retrospective manner of the study did not allow any correction of confounding factors. Third, given the indolent clinical course of DTC, this study was conducted with a relatively short follow up period (53% completed 5 years follow up), limiting the analysis on late recurrence and death.

Conclusion

The role of pCND in DTC is still controversial, especially in elderly patients. Aging lead to a decreased quality of life due to the frequent comorbidities, which could worsen in case of postoperative complications. An aggressive approach, with extensive prophylactic lymph node dissection, should be carefully evaluated. The present series showed a similar low recurrence rate between TT and TT associated with pCND, with an increased postoperative complications in the lymphadenectomy group and in patients over 75 years old, advocating a tailored surgical approach in elderly population. Further randomized controlled study are needed in order to evaluate the clear advantages of pCND, especially in elderly patients.

Abbreviations

CI:

Confidential interval

DTC:

Differentiated Thyroid Cancer

FNC:

Fine needle aspiration cytology

OR:

Odds ratio

pCND:

Prophylactic central neck dissection

PTC:

Papillary thyroid cancer

TT:

Total thyroidectomy

US:

Ultrasonography

References

  1. Sentieri Working Group. Sentieri: mortality, cancer incidence and hospital discharges. Epidemiol Prev. 2014;38(2 Suppl 1):5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chereau N, Trésallet C, Noullet S, Godiris-Petit G, Tissier F, Leenhardt L, Menegaux F. Prognosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma in elderly patients after thyroid resection: a retrospective cohort analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(47):e5450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mazzaferri EL, Doherty GM, Steward DL. The pros and cons of prophylactic central compartment lymph node dissection for papillary thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid. 2009;19(7):683–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Marotta V, Sciammarella C, Capasso M, Testori A, Pivonello C, Chiofalo MG, Gambardella C, Grasso M, Antonino A, Annunziata A, Macchia PE, Pivonello R, Santini L, Botti G, Losito S, Pezzullo L, Colao A, Faggiano A. Germline Polymorphisms of the VEGF Pathway Predict Recurrence in Nonadvanced Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102(2):661-71.

  5. Conzo G, Calò PG, Sinisi AA, et al. Impact of prophylactic central compartment neck dissection on locoregional recurrence of differentiated thyroid cancer in clinically node-negative patients: a retrospective study of a large clinical series. Surgery. 2014;155(6):998–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lundgren CI, Hall P, Dickman PW, Zedenius J. Clinically significant prognostic factors for differentiated thyroid carcinoma: a population-based, nested case-control study. Cancer. 2006;106(3):524–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gyorki DE, Untch B, Tuttle RM, Shaha AR. Prophylactic central neck dissection in differentiated thyroid cancer: an assessment of the evidence. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(7):2285–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pacini F, Castagna MG, Brilli L, Pentheroudakis G, ESMO Guidelines Working Group. Thyroid cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(Suppl 7):vii110–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Perros P, Boelaert K, Colley S, Evans C, Evans RM, Gerrard Ba G, Gilbert J, Harrison B, Johnson SJ, Giles TE, Moss L, Lewington V, Newbold K, Taylor J, Thakker RV, Watkinson J, Williams GR. British Thyroid Association. Guidelines for the management of thyroid cancer. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2014;81(Suppl 1):1–122.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ferris RL, Baloch Z, Bernet V, Chen A, Fahey TJ 3rd, Ganly I, Hodak SP, Kebebew E, Patel KN, Shaha A, Steward DL, Tufano RP, Wiseman SM, Carty SE. American Thyroid Association surgical affairs committee. American Thyroid Association statement on surgical application of molecular profiling for thyroid nodules: current impact on perioperative decision making. Thyroid. 2015;25(7):760–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tuttle RM, Haddad RI, Ball DW, Byrd D, Dickson P, Duh QY, Ehya H, Haymart M, Hoh C, Hunt JP, Iagaru A, Kandeel F, Kopp P, Lamonica DM, Lydiatt WM, McCaffrey J, Moley JF, Parks L, Raeburn CD, Ridge JA, Ringel MD, Scheri RP, Shah JP, Sherman SI, Sturgeon C, Waguespack SG, Wang TN, Wirth LJ, Hoffmann KG, Hughes M. Thyroid carcinoma, version 2.2014. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2014;12(12):1671–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim ES, Lee Y, Seo H, Son GS, Kwon SY, Kim YS, Seo JA, Kim NH, Suh SI, Ryoo I, You SH. Clinical features of recently diagnosed papillary thyroid carcinoma in elderly patients aged 65 and older based on 10 years of sonographic experience at a single institution in Korea. Ultrasonography. 2017;36(4):355–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mudge AM, Hubbard RE. Frailty: mind the gap. Age Ageing. 2017;29. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afx193. [Epub ahead of print].

  14. Calò PG, Medas F, Loi G, Erdas E, Pisano G, Nicolosi A. Differentiated thyroid cancer in the elderly: our experience. Int J Surg. 2014;12(Suppl 2):S140–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Conzo G, Docimo G, Pasquali D, Mauriello C, Gambardella C, Esposito D, Tartaglia E, Della Pietra C, Napolitano S, Rizzuto A, Santini L. Predictive value of nodal metastases on local recurrence in the management of differentiated thyroid cancer. Retrospective clinical study. BMC Surg. 2013;13(Suppl 2):S3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ito Y, Miyauchi A. Prognostic factors and therapeutic strategies for differentiated carcinoma of the thyroid. Endocr J. 2009;56(2):177–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Trimboli P, Ulisse S, Graziano FM, Marzullo A, Ruggieri M, Calvanese A, et al. Trend in thyroidcarcinoma size, age at diagnosis, and histology in a retrospective study of 500 cases diagnosed over 20years. Thyroid. 2006;16:1151–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Al-Saif O, Farrar WB, Bloomston M, Porter K, Ringel MD, Kloos RT. Long-term efficacy of lymph node reoperation for persistent papillary thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95:2187–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Schlumberger MJ. Papillary and follicular thyroid carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2009;338:297–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mazzaferri EL. A vision for the surgical management of papillary thyroid carcinoma: extensive lymph node compartmental dissections and selective use of radioiodine. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009 Apr;94(4):1086–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Conzo G, Docimo G, Ruggiero R, Napolitano S, Palazzo A, Gambardella C, Mauriello C, Tartaglia E, Cavallo F, Santini L. Surgical treatment of papillary thyroid carcinoma without lymph nodal involvement. G Chir. 2012;33(10):339–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hollenbeak CS, Boltz MM, Schaefer EW, Saunders BD, Goldenberg D. Recurrence of differentiated thyroid cancer in the elderly. Eur J Endocrinol. 2013;168(4):549–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Raffaelli M, Bellantone R, Princi P, De Crea C, Rossi ED, Fadda G, Lombardi CP. Surgical treatment of thyroid diseases in elderly patients. Am J Surg. 2010;200:467e472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rispoli C, Rocco N, Iannone L, Amato B. Developing guidelines in geriatric surgery: role of the grade system. BMC Geriatr. 2009;9(Suppl. 1):A99.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Falvo L, Catania A, Sorrenti S, D'Andrea V, Berni A, De Stefano M, De Antoni E. Prognostic significance of the age factor in the thyroid cancer: statistical analysis. J Surg Oncol. 2004;88:217e222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zaydfudim V, Feurer ID, Griffin MR, Phay JE. The impact of lymph node involvement on survival in patients with papillary and follicular thyroid carcinoma. Surgery. 2008;144:1070–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tran Cao HS, Johnston LE, Chang DC, Bouvet M. A critical analysis of the American joint committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for differentiated thyroid carcinoma in young patients on the basis of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) registry. Surgery. 2012;152:145–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ito Y, Miyauchi A, Kihara M, et al. Patient age is significantly related to the progression of papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid under observation. Thyroid. 2014;24(1):27–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sojak J, Sičák M, Kališ A, Slašťan M. Papillary thyroid carcinoma: analysis of the central Compartment's lymph nodes metastases. Acta Med (Hradec Kralove). 2017;60(1):44–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hye-Seon O, Suyeon P, Mijin K, Kwon H, Song E, Sung TY, Lee YM, Kim WG, Kim TY, Shong YK, Kim B, Jeon MJ. Young age and male sex can are predictors of large-volume central neck lymph node metastasis in clinical N0 papillary thyroid microcarcinomas. Thyroid. 2017;27(10):1285–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yuan J, Li J, Chen X, Lin X, Du J, Zhao G, Chen Z, Wu Z. Identification of risk factors of central lymph node metastasis and evaluation of the effect of prophylactic central neck dissection on migration of staging and risk stratification in patients with clinically node-negative papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. Bull Cancer. 2017;104(6):516–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Niemann AC, Reid AT, Smith J, Hammond J, DeBolle SA, Wei I, Soong-Ho Lee C, Hughes DT. Association of Patient age with high-risk pathologic features in papillary thyroid Cancer. J Surg Res. 2017;211:228–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sawin CT, Geller A, Wolf PA, Belanger AJ, Baker E, Bacharach P, Wilson PW, Benjamin EJ, D'Agostino RB. Low serum thyrotropin concentrations as a risk factor for atrial fibrillation in older persons. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:1249–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Toft AD. Clinical practice. Subclinical hyperthyroidism. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:512–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Biliotti GC, Martini F, Vezzosi V, Seghi P, Tozzi F, Castagnoli A, Basili G, Peri A. Specific features of differentiated thyroid carcinoma in patients over 70 years of age. J Surg Oncol. 2006;93:194–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Uruno T, Miyauchi A, Shimizu K, Tomoda C, Takamura Y, Ito Y, Miya A, Kobayashi K, Matsuzuka F, Amino N, Kuma K. Favorable surgical results in 433 elderly patients with papillary thyroid cancer. Word J Surg. 2005;29:1497–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Marvin K, Parham K. Differentiated thyroid cancer in people aged 85 and older. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015;63:932–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Nixon IJ, Wang LY, Palmer FL, Tuttle RM, Shaha AR, Shah JP, Patel SG, Ganly I. The impact of nodal status on outcome in older patients with papillary thyroid cancer. Surgery. 2014;156:137–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lang BH, Lo CY, Wong KP, Wan KY. Long-term outcomes for older patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma: should another age cutoff beyond 45 years be added? Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:446–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhao W, Luo H, Zhou YM, Dai WY, Zhu JQ. Evaluating the effectiveness of prophylactic central neck dissection with total thyroidectomy for cN0 papillary thyroid carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017;43(11):1989–2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ito Y, Kihara M, Kobayashi K, Miya A, Miyauchi A. Permanent hypoparathyroidism after completion total thyroidectomy as a second surgery: how do we avoid it? Endocr J. 2014;61:403–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Malki HOE, Abouqal R. Systematic review and meta-analysis of predictors of post-thyroidectomy hypocalcaemia. Br J Surg. 2014;101(7):883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Xiaoyun L, Medici M, Kwong N, Angell TE, Marqusee E, Kim MI, Larsen PR, Cho NL, Nehs MA, Ruan DT, Gawande A, Moore F Jr, Barletta J, Krane JF, Cibas ES, Yang T, Alexander EK. Bethesda categorization of thyroid nodule cytology and prediction of thyroid Cancer type and prognosis. Thyroid. 2016;26(2):256–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Jung-Soo P, Sohn JH, Kang G. Detection of tumor Multifocality is important for prediction of tumor recurrence in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: a retrospective study and meta-analysis. J Pathol Transl Med. 2016;50(4):278–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Conzo G, Tartaglia E, Avenia N, Calò PG, de Bellis A, Esposito K, Gambardella C, Iorio S, Pasquali D, Santini L, Sinisi MA, Sinisi AA, Testini M, Polistena A, Bellastella G. Role of prophylactic central compartment lymph node dissection in clinically N0 differentiated thyroid cancer patients: analysis of risk factors and review of modern trends. World J Surg Oncol. 2016;14:149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Conzo G, Avenia N, Bellastella G, Candela G, de Bellis A, Esposito K, Pasquali D, Polistena A, Santini L, Sinisi AA. The role of surgery in the current management of differentiated thyroid cancer. Endocrine. 2014;47:380–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Gambardella C, Tartaglia E, Nunziata A, Izzo G, Siciliano G, Cavallo F, Mauriello C, Napolitano S, Thomas G, Testa D, Rossetti G, Sanguinetti A, Avenia N, Conzo G. Clinical significance of prophylactic central compartment neck dissection in the treatment of clinically node-negative papillary thyroid cancer patients. World J Surg Oncol. 2016;14(1):247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Conzo G, Avenia N, Ansaldo GL, Calò P, De Palma M, Dobrinja C, Docimo G, Gambardella C, Grasso M, Lombardi CP, Pelizzo MR, Pezzolla A, Pezzullo L, Piccoli M, Rosato L, Siciliano G, Spiezia S, Tartaglia E, Tartaglia F, Testini M, Troncone G, Signoriello G. Surgical treatment of thyroid follicular neoplasms: results of a retrospective analysis of a large clinical series. Endocrine. 2017;55(2):530–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Calò PG, Conzo G, Raffaelli M, Medas F, Gambardella C, De Crea C, Gordini L, Patrone R, Sessa L, Erdas E, Tartaglia E, Lombardi CP. Total thyroidectomy alone versus ipsilateral versus bilateral prophylactic central neck dissection in clinically node-negative differentiated thyroid carcinoma. A retrospective multicenter study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017;43(1):126–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Conzo G, Mauriello C, Docimo G, Gambardella C, Thomas G, Cavallo F, Tartaglia E, Napolitano S, Varriale R, Rossetti G, Fei L, Santini L. Clinicopathological pattern of lymph node recurrence of papillary thyroid cancer. Implications for surgery. Int J Surg. 2014;12(Suppl 1):S194–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

NA

Funding

This article did not receive sponsorship for publication.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the VII Division of General Surgery, Second University of Naples, Via Pansini 5 80,131 Naples, on reasonable request.

About this supplement

This article has been published as part of BMC Surgery Volume 18 Supplement 1, 2018: Updates and New Technology in Endocrine Surgery. The full contents of the supplement are available online at https://bmcsurg.biomedcentral.com/articles/supplements/volume-18-supplement-1.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of General and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Traslational Medical Sciences, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, School of Medicine, Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy

    Claudio Gambardella, Renato Patrone, Francesco Di Capua, Chiara Offi, Claudio Mauriello, Guglielmo Clarizia, Claudia Andretta, Giovanni Docimo & Giovanni Conzo

  2. Endocrine Surgery Unit, University of Perugia, Piazza dell’Università, 06123, Perugia, Italy

    Andrea Polistena, Alessandro Sanguinetti & Nicola Avenia

  3. Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy

    Pietrogiorgio Calò

Authors
  1. Claudio Gambardella
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Renato Patrone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Francesco Di Capua
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chiara Offi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Claudio Mauriello
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Guglielmo Clarizia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Claudia Andretta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Andrea Polistena
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Alessandro Sanguinetti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Pietrogiorgio Calò
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Giovanni Docimo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Nicola Avenia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Giovanni Conzo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed significantly to the present research and reviewed the entire manuscript. GC: Participated substantially in conception, design and execution of the study and in the analysis and interpretation of the data; also participated substantially in the drafting and editing of the manuscript. PR: Participated substantially in conception, design and execution of the study and in the analysis and interpretation of the data. DCF: Participated substantially in conception, design and execution of the study and in the analysis and interpretation of the data. OC: Participated substantially in conception, design and execution of the study and in the analysis and interpretation of the data. MC: Participated substantially in conception, design and execution of the study and in the analysis and interpretation of the data. ClG: Participated substantially in conception, design and execution of the study and in the analysis and interpretation of the data. AC: Participated substantially in conception, design and execution of the study and in the analysis and interpretation of the data. PA: Participated substantially in conception, design and execution of the study and in the analysis and interpretation of the data. SaA: Participated substantially in conception, design and execution of the study and in the analysis and interpretation of the data. CPG: Participated substantially in conception, design and execution of the study and in the analysis and interpretation of the data. DG: Participated substantially in conception, design and execution of the study and in the analysis and interpretation of the data. NA: Participated substantially in conception, design and execution of the study and in the analysis and interpretation of the data. CG: Participated substantially in conception, design and execution of the study and in the analysis and interpretation of the data; also participated substantially in the drafting and editing of the manuscript. All Authors have read and approve the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudio Gambardella.

Ethics declarations

Authors’ information

Gambardella Claudio and Mauriello Claudio are PhD student in Medical, Clinical and Sperimental Sciences at Univerity of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli” – Naples, Italy.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable, data retrospectively obtained by clinical records.

Consent for publication

All patients gave written informed consent to publish.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gambardella, C., Patrone, R., Di Capua, F. et al. The role of prophylactic central compartment lymph node dissection in elderly patients with differentiated thyroid cancer: a multicentric study. BMC Surg 18 (Suppl 1), 110 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-018-0433-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-018-0433-0

Keywords

BMC Surgery

ISSN: 1471-2482

Contact us