Skip to main content
Download PDF

Change of cervical flexion range of motion influences postoperative sagittal alignment of the cervical spine after laminoplasty

BMC Surgery volume 24, Article number: 155 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Objective

The relationships between preoperative cervical spine range of motion (ROM) and postoperative cervical sagittal alignment (CSA), and clinical outcomes after laminoplasty (LMP) have been widely studied. However, the impact of ROM changes on postoperative CSA and clinical outcomes after LMP remains unclear. Herein, patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) were retrospectively analyzed to explore the association between postoperative cervical ROM changes and CSA and surgical outcomes.

Methods

Patients who underwent cervical LMP at our hospital between January 2019 to June 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. CSA parameters were measured before the surgery and at the final follow-up. Loss of cervical lordosis (LCL) was defined as preoperative cervical lordosis (CL) - postoperative CL. An increase in the cervical sagittal vertical axis (I-cSVA) was defined as postoperative cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) - preoperative cSVA. We defined the changes in cervical flexion range of motion (△Flex ROM, preoperative Flex ROM minus postoperative Flex ROM) > 10° as L- Flex ROM group, and △Flex ROM ≤ 10° as S- Flex ROM group. Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and visual analog score (VAS) were used to assess the surgical outcomes.

Results

The study comprised 74 patients and the average follow-up period was 31.83 months. CL, total ROM, and Flex ROM decreased and cSVA increased after cervical LMP. LCL and I-cSVA were positively correlated with △Flex. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that a decrease in the Flex ROM was a risk factor for LCL and I-cSVA after LMP. LCL and I-cSVA were higher in the L-Flex ROM group than in the S-Flex ROM group. Postoperative JOA and the JOA recovery rate were worse in the L-Flex ROM group than in the S-Flex ROM group.

Conclusions

Cervical total and Flex ROM decreased after cervical LMP. The reduction of Flex ROM was associated with LCL and I-cSVA after surgery. The preservation of cervical Flex ROM helps maintain CSA after LMP. Therefore, more attention should be paid to maintaining cervical ROM to obtain good CSA and surgical effects after cervical LMP.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Cervical laminoplasty (LMP) is a developed posterior approach surgical procedure for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM), with excellent surgical outcomes [1, 2]. The decompression effects provided by LMP mainly include direct posterior decompression through lamina lifting and indirect anterior decompression through cord posterior shifting. Therefore, it is very important to maintain adequate sagittal alignment of the cervical spine to obtain sufficient space for the shifting of the spinal cord.

The cervical spine range of motion (ROM) refers to the change in cervical lordosis (CL) in flexion and extension compared with the neutral position. Recent studies have reported that preoperative cervical ROMs are important predictors for changes in cervical sagittal alignment (CSA) and clinical outcomes after cervical LMP [3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Fujishiro et al. [4] speculated that a large cervical flexion range of motion (Flex ROM) indicated that posterior neck muscular-ligament complex (PMLC) forces restricting motion toward the kyphotic position were weak, and Lee et al [5] thought that a small cervical extension range of motion (Ext ROM) indicated the low contraction reserve of PMLC. Although cervical LMP is a non-fusion procedure, cervical ROM also reduces after surgery [10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. As far as we know, some studies have reported the factors associated with the loss of motion after cervical LMP [10, 14, 17]. However, the impact of ROM changes on postoperative CSA and clinical outcomes after LMP remains elusive.

Herein, patients with CSM were retrospectively analyzed to explore the changes in cervical Flex and Ext ROM after cervical LMP. Meanwhile, this study explored the relationship between changes in postoperative cervical ROM and postoperative CSA and surgical outcomes. It was hypothesized that postoperative cervical ROM reduces, and excessive loss of cervical ROM is associated with cervical sagittal malalignment as well as poor clinical outcomes.

Materials and methods

Patient enrollment

Following the receipt of IRB approval (IRB number: 2018-086). Patients who underwent cervical LMP for CSM at our hospital between January 2019 to June 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The exclusion criteria were as follows: a history of cervical spine surgery or fracture, significant spondylolisthesis, continuous ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, decompression levels including C2 or thoracic spine levels, less than 3 levels of cervical LMP or twelve months of follow-up, without complete radiographic or clinical data, and with postoperative complications during follow-up, such as stroke, lower extremity arterial disease.

Surgical procedures

All patients were placed in a prone position on the operating table after general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. An incision was made at the back of the neck and the paravertebral muscles were carefully separated from the spinous process and lamina while protecting the joint capsule. All patients underwent open-door posterior decompression using a mini titanium plate system. One side of the lamina was opened, while the other side acted as a hinge [18]. All patients were required to wear collars for 3–4 weeks after surgery. All patients did not receive systematic rehabilitation exercise after surgery.

Radiological and clinical parameters

Radiological data were obtained on preoperative and follow-up X-rays, including CL, CL in flexion (Flex CL), CL in extension (Ext CL), and cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) (Fig. 1). The cervical ROM was defined as Ext CL - Flex CL. The cervical Flex ROM was defined as CL - Flex CL. The cervical Ext ROM was defined as Ext CL - CL. △ indicated the changes (preoperation minus postoperation). Loss of cervical lordosis (LCL) was defined as preoperative CL - postoperative CL. An increase in cSVA (I-cSVA) was defined as postoperative cSVA - preoperative cSVA. All radiological parameters were performed two times for each patient by two surgeons separately and the average value was used for statistical analyses. Patients were divided into groups L- Flex ROM (△Flex ROM > 10°) and S- Flex ROM (△Flex ROM ≤ 10°) according to the changes in postoperative Flex ROM. The Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and visual analog score (VAS) were used to assess the surgical outcomes. JOA recovery rate was calculated as follows: 100 × (postoperative JOA - preoperative JOA)/ (17 - preoperative JOA). The flowchart of the study is depicted in Fig. 2.

Fig. 1
figure 1

A, cervical X-ray in the neutral position: cSVA (a), the horizontal distance from plumbline dropped from the C2 vertebral body to the posterosuperior corner of the C7 vertebra; CL (b), the angle between the C2 lower endplate and the C7 lower endplate; B and C, cervical X-ray in the flexion and extension position: Flex CL (c) and Ext CL (d) refer to CL in flexion and extension positions. cSVA, cervical sagittal vertical axis; CL, cervical lordosis; Flex CL, cervical lordosis in flexion; Ext CL, cervical lordosis in extension

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

The flowchart of study. CSM: cervical spondylotic myelopathy, △Flex ROM: changes of cervical flexion range of motion

Full size image

Statistical analysis

All data were analyzed using SPSS version 22.0 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Pearson correlation analysis was used to examine the correlations between the variations in CSA and cervical ROM. Multiple linear regression models were conducted to identify the independent association between changes in cervical ROM and LCL and I-cSVA. T-tests and Mann-Whitney tests were performed to compare radiographic and clinical parameters between two groups. Statistical significance was defined as a p-value of less than 0.05.

Results

Patient characteristics

A total of 74 patients were recruited (mean age 61.49 ± 9.22 years; 52 males and 22 females). The average follow-up time was 31.83 (range 12–49) months. Patient demographics, surgery segments, and surgical outcomes are shown in Table 1. The reasons for the loss of follow up were as follows: died: 1, geographical reasons: 44, loss of contact: 15, old patients living alone: 9.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients (n = 74)
Full size table

Comparison of pre- and post-operative dynamic and static parameters of the cervical spine

CL decreased and cSVA increased after cervical LMP (Table 2). Total ROM and Flex ROM decreased postoperatively, while Ext ROM remained unchanged after surgery (postoperative Ext ROM decreased in 51.35% (38/74) of the patients but increased 48.65% (36/74) of the patients).

Table 2 Comparison of sagittal parameters between pre-operation and post-operation (N = 74)
Full size table

Correlation analysis

Correlation analysis showed that LCL was negatively correlated with △Ext ROM (r = -0.588, p < 0.01) and positively correlated with △Flex (r = 0.653, p < 0.01). No significant correlation was observed between LCL and △total ROM. I-cSVA was positively correlated with △total ROM (r = 331, p < 0.05) and △Flex (r = 373, p < 0.05). No significant correlation was observed between I-cSVA and △Ext ROM (Table 3).

Table 3 Correlation analysis (N = 74)
Full size table

Risk factors for LCL and I-cSVA

Multiple linear regression analysis was performed using variables that demonstrated a significant correlation with the LCL or I-cSVA (Table 4). The results showed that LCL decreased by 0.413° (p = 0.001) for each change in Ext ROM and increased by 0.333° (p = 0.000) for each change in Flex ROM. LCL was predicted using the following regression equation: LCL = 0.333 △Flex − 0.413 △Ext ROM. I-cSVA increased by 0.305 mm for each change in Flex ROM (p = 0.025). I-cSVA was predicted using the following regression equation: I-cSVA = 0.305△Flex. No independent association was found between I-cSVA and △Ext ROM (p = 0.707).

Table 4 Multiple linear regression model shows correlations between LCL, I-cSVA and the changes in cervical motion (n = 74)
Full size table

Comparison of evaluated parameters based on △Flex ROM

Compared with the S-Flex ROM group, postoperative LCL was significantly higher and postoperative JOA and the JOA recovery rate were significantly lower in the L-Flex ROM group. I-cSVA was higher in the L-Flex ROM group compared with the S-Flex ROM group but with no significant statistical significance (9.28 ± 9.11 VS 1.89 ± 6.60, p = 0.089) (Table 5).

Table 5 Comparison of evaluated parameters according to the changes of postoperative Flex ROM
Full size table

Representative cases

Two representative cases are shown in Fig. 3. Figure 3-A. shows a patient in the S-Flex ROM group. A 46-year-old man who underwent laminoplasty of C3-7. After 34 months of surgery, no significant changes were observed in CL, cSVA, and Flex ROM. Pre-JOA was 13, post-JOA was 17, and the JOA recovery rate was 100%. No neck pain was reported before and after surgery. Figure 3-B shows a patient in the L-Flex ROM group. A 66-year-old man who underwent laminoplasty of C3-7. After 23 months of surgery, Flex ROM and CL decreased significantly, and cSVA increased significantly. Pre-JOA was 12, post-JOA was 14, and the JOA recovery rate was 40%. A mild axial symptom (pain around the posterior neck and suprascapular areas) occurred after surgery.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Representative images of case

Full size image

Discussion

A reduction in cervical ROM is one of the common complications after LMP [13, 14, 19]. C3 laminoplasty, disruption of subaxial deep extensors, postoperative intervertebral fusion, and prolonged cervical collar use are potential risk factors for loss of ROM [10, 12, 20, 21]. The current study found that total cervical ROM decreased at a mean of 32 months follow-up after LMP, which was mainly due to the decrease in Flex ROM. Cervical Flex ROM decreased in most patients (89.19%); however, only half of the patients (51.35%) had a reduction in Ext ROM after LMP. Most studies have reported the loss of total cervical ROM after LMP but the change in Ext ROM remains controversial. Some studies found a significant decrease in Ext ROM after cervical LMP [13], while others showed that Ext ROM remained stable [21] or even increased segmentally after surgery [22]. We speculate that LMP can lead to contracture and bony union of posterior cervical structures, which might restrict postoperative Flex ROM rather than Ext ROM.

Most clinical studies investigating the association between cervical ROM and CSA focused on the prognostic effects of preoperative cervical ROM on postoperative LCL. Lee et al [5] and Ren et al [7] found that cervical Ext ROM was a predictor of kyphotic alignment change after LMP and significant LCL occurred much more frequently in patients whose Ext ROM was < 14° and cervical kyphosis occurred much more frequently in patients whose Ext ROM was < 22.1°. Meanwhile, a greater gap or ratio between Flex ROM and Ext ROM was also associated with severe LCL [3, 6, 23]. The present study found that postoperative CL decreased and cSVA increased after cervical LMP, which is consistent with previous studies [24,25,26,27]. Meanwhile, a significant correlation between the decrease in Flex ROM and cervical sagittal malalignment after LMP was also registered. The multiple linear regression model indicated that a reduction in Flex ROM was the risk factor for LCL and I-cSVA. It was found that the more Flex ROM decreased, the more postoperative LCL and I-cSVA occurred. As a posterior approach, LMP can damage the muscles, ligaments, and bones of the cervical spine. This procedure can cause postoperative contracture of posterior cervical structures and bony fusion, which are closely associated with the reduction in Flex ROM [17, 22]. Additionally, excessive reduction in Flex ROM aggravates LCL and I-cSVA after surgery.

As a common surgical procedure for the treatment of CSM, the surgical outcomes of LMP are not always satisfactory for all patients. Insufficient postoperative CL due to severe LCL and postoperative cervical sagittal imbalance due to severe I-cSVA are associated with poor recovery of neurological function and neck pain [3, 24,25,26, 28,29,30,31]. Our data showed that compared with △Ext ROM, △Flex ROM had a larger influence on cervical sagittal malalignment after surgery. Therefore, we divided patients into two groups based on the changes in Flex ROM after cervical LMP: L-Flex ROM (△Flex ROM > 10°) and S-Flex ROM (△Flex ROM ≤ 10°). The results showed that the neurological function and neck pain recovered in the two groups after surgery, but with varying degrees of recovery. Compared with the S-Flex ROM group, the L-Flex ROM group exhibited a worse post-JOA and JOA recovery rate. Furthermore, patients in the S-Flex ROM group had better relief of neck pain but with no statistical significance (S-Flex ROM group: deterioration of neck pain occurred in 3.57% (1/28) of the patients, L-Flex ROM group: deterioration of neck pain occurred in 13.04% (6/46) of the patients, p = 0.242). These results were analogous to those obtained by Chen et al. [21], who reported that better clinical outcomes occurred in patients with stable CL, cSVA, and Flex ROM after cervical LMP. These clinical outcomes may be explained by several factors. Firstly, the degeneration of the posterior cervical structure is more serious in patients with excessive loss of cervical Flex ROM after LMP and the contraction reserve is less. Secondly, insufficient CL and cervical sagittal imbalance are the reasons for insufficient posterior drift space of the spinal cord after surgery. Finally, an increase in cSVA may lead to an increase in posterior cervical stress, which maintains the cervical sagittal balance.

According to these findings, we speculate that the preservation of postoperative CSA is not primarily due to intervertebral soft tissue contracture or bony fusion. Instead, it appears to be maintained by dynamic factors such as muscles or ligaments. We believe that the less decrease in cervical Flex ROM and the better preservation of cervical flexibility are associated with the maintenance of CSA after LMP. Therefore, early removal of cervical collars and early postoperative systematic rehabilitation exercise to restore the flexibility of the cervical spine is significantly important. Stable dynamic and static sagittal alignment of the cervical spine help obtain good surgical effects after LMP.

Nonetheless, this study has several limitations. First, since this is a retrospective study, a selection bias may exist. Meanwhile, the patients in this study are mainly elderly patients from different parts of the country, so some patients lost to follow up. In fact, we made great efforts to promote the level of the quality of follow-up, including pre-discharge education and multiple out-of-hospital contacts. Second, this study did not evaluate the cervical paraspinal muscles. We believe that cervical ROMs are also valuable in estimating the cervical functional reserve, corresponding to measuring muscle volume. Thus, the results of this study have a certain reference significance.

Conclusions

Cervical total and Flex ROM decreased after cervical LMP. The reduction in Flex ROM was associated with LCL and I-cSVA after surgery. The preservation of cervical Flex ROM helps maintain CSA after LMP. Therefore, more attention should be paid to maintaining cervical ROM to obtain good CSA and surgical effects after cervical LMP.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

LMP:

Laminoplasty

CSM:

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy

CL:

Cervical lordosis

cSVA:

Cervical sagittal vertical axis

Flex CL:

CL in flexion

Ext CL:

CL in extension

ROM:

Cervical spine range of motion

Flex ROM:

Cervical flexion range of motion

Ext ROM:

Cervical extension range of motion

CSA:

Cervical sagittal alignment

LCL:

Loss of cervical lordosis

I-cSVA:

Increase in the cervical sagittal vertical axis

JOA:

Japanese Orthopedic Association score

VAS:

Visual analog score

PMLC:

Posterior neck muscular-ligament complex

BMI:

Body mass index

References

  1. Choi SH, Kang CN. Degenerative cervical myelopathy: pathophysiology and current treatment strategies. Asian Spine J. 2020;14:710–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Fehlings MG, Wilson JR, Kopjar B, et al. Efficacy and safety of surgical decompression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: results of the aospine north America prospective multi-center study. J Bone Joint Surgery-American Volume. 2013;95:1651–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu C, Shi B, Wang W, et al. Effect of preoperative dynamic cervical sagittal alignment on the loss of cervical lordosis after laminoplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023;24:233.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Fujishiro T, Nakano A, Yano T, et al. Significance of flexion range of motion as a risk factor for kyphotic change after cervical laminoplasty. J Clin Neurosci. 2020;76:100–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee SH, Son DW, Lee JS et al. Does extension dysfunction affect postoperative loss of cervical lordosis in patients who undergo laminoplasty? Spine 2019;44:E456-64.

  6. Ono K, Murata S, Matsushita M, et al. Cervical lordosis ratio as a novel predictor for the loss of cervical lordosis after laminoplasty. Neurospine. 2021;18:311–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Ren HL, Shen X, Ding RT et al. Preoperative range of motion in extension may influence postoperative cervical kyphosis after laminoplasty. Spine 2023.

  8. Lin S, Lin T, Wu Z, et al. Does the asymmetry and extension function of the preoperative cervical paraspinal extensor predict postoperative cervical sagittal deformity in patients who undergo modified laminoplasty? Spine J. 2022;22:1953–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pettersson SD, Skrzypkowska P, Ali S, et al. Predictors for cervical kyphotic deformity following laminoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurgery-Spine. 2023;38:4–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee DH, Cho JH, Hwang CJ, et al. Can c3 laminectomy reduce interlaminar bony fusion and preserve the range of motion after cervical laminoplasty? Spine. 2016;41:1884–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ratliff JK, Cooper PR. Cervical laminoplasty: a critical review. J Neurosurg. 2003;98:230–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shigematsu H, Ueda Y, Takeshima T, et al. Degenerative spondylolisthesis does not influence surgical results of laminoplasty in elderly cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients. Eur Spine J. 2010;19:720–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim B, Cho S, Hur JW, et al. Kinematics after cervical laminoplasty: risk factors for cervical kyphotic deformity after laminoplasty. Spine J. 2021;21:1822–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Inose H, Yoshii T, Kimura A, et al. Comparison of clinical and radiographic outcomes of laminoplasty, anterior decompression with fusion, and posterior decompression with fusion for degenerative cervical myelopathy: a prospective multicenter study. Spine. 2020;45:E1342–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen T, Zhang X, Meng F, et al. Is laminoplasty or laminectomy the best strategy for c(3) segment in french-door laminoplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021;16:557.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Weigl M, Letzel J, Angst F. Prognostic factors for the improvement of pain and disability following multidisciplinary rehabilitation in patients with chronic neck pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22:330.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Seichi A, Takeshita K, Ohishi I, et al. Long-term results of double-door laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. Spine. 2001;26:479–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rhee JM, Register B, Hamasaki T, et al. Plate-only open door laminoplasty maintains stable spinal canal expansion with high rates of hinge union and no plate failures. Spine. 2011;36:9–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. MAEDA T, ARIZONO T, SAITO T, et al. Cervical alignment, range of motion, and instability after cervical laminoplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;401:132–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Iizuka H, Nakagawa Y, Shimegi A, et al. Clinical results after cervical laminoplasty: differences due to the duration of wearing a cervical collar. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18:489–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen C, Li J, Liao Z, et al. C3 laminectomy combined with modified unilateral laminoplasty and in situ reconstruction of the midline structures maintained cervical sagittal balance: a retrospective matched-pair case-control study. Spine J. 2020;20:1403–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Shigematsu H, Kura T, Iwata E, et al. Increased segmental range of motion is correlated with spondylolisthesis in the cervical spine after laminoplasty. Spine. 2017;42:E385–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fujishiro T, Hayama S, Obo T, et al. Gap between flexion and extension ranges of motion: a novel indicator to predict the loss of cervical lordosis after laminoplasty in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurgery: Spine. 2021;35:8–17.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pan Y, Ma X, Feng H, et al. Effect of posterior cervical expansive open-door laminoplasty on cervical sagittal balance. Eur Spine J. 2020;29:2831–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Seo J, Suk K, Kwon J, et al. Cervical foraminal stenosis as a risk factor for cervical kyphosis following cervical laminoplasty. Spine J. 2022;22:1271–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Xu C, Zhang Y, Dong M, et al. The relationship between preoperative cervical sagittal balance and clinical outcome of laminoplasty treated cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament patients. Spine J. 2020;20:1422–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim KR, Lee CK, Park JY, et al. Preoperative parameters for predicting the loss of lordosis after cervical laminoplasty. Spine. 2020;45:1476–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang X, Gao Y, Gao K, et al. Factors associated with postoperative axial symptom after expansive open-door laminoplasty: retrospective study using multivariable analysis. Eur Spine J. 2020;29:2838–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pinter ZW, Reed R, Townsley SE, et al. Paraspinal sarcopenia is associated with worse patient-reported outcomes following laminoplasty for degenerative cervical myelopathy. Spine. 2023;48:772–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lau D, Winkler EA, Than KD, et al. Laminoplasty versus laminectomy with posterior spinal fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: influence of cervical alignment on outcomes. J Neurosurgery-Spine. 2017;27:508–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu C, Wang W, Li X et al. Preoperative cervical range of motion in flexion as a risk factor for postoperative cervical sagittal imbalance after laminoplasty. Spine 2023.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No.2020YFC2004900), Post-subsidy funds for National Clinical Research Center, Ministry of Science and Technology of China (No.303-01-001-0272-05), R&D Program of Beijing Municipal Education Commission (22JG0059), and the key Science and Technology Project of Beijing Municipal Education Commission (KZ20231002537).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedics, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

    Chengxin Liu, Xiangyu Li, Wei Wang, Bin Shi & Shibao Lu

  2. National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Beijing, China

    Chengxin Liu, Xiangyu Li, Wei Wang, Bin Shi & Shibao Lu

Authors
  1. Chengxin Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiangyu Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wei Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bin Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shibao Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Chengxin Liu: Writing, Reviewing, Editing, Methodology and Data Curation.Xiangyu Li: Writing, Reviewing, Data Curation and Supervision.Wei Wang: Editing, Data Curation and SupervisionBin Shi: Data CurationShibao Lu: Editing and Supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shibao Lu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethical committee of Beijing Xuanwu Hospital (clinical research NO. [2018]086). Informed consent was obtained from all subjects and/or their legal guardian(s). All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

No benefits in any form have been or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, C., Li, X., Wang, W. et al. Change of cervical flexion range of motion influences postoperative sagittal alignment of the cervical spine after laminoplasty. BMC Surg 24, 155 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-024-02431-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-024-02431-1

Keywords

BMC Surgery

ISSN: 1471-2482

Contact us