Skip to main content
Download PDF

Clinical features and surgical selection in colitis-associated colorectal cancer with ulcerative colitis

BMC Surgery volume 23, Article number: 256 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical characteristics of ulcerative colitis (UC) patients who underwent surgery for cancer/dysplasia with those who underwent surgery for refractory disease and to discuss the preoperative preparation for successful hand-sewn IPAA.

Methods

Patients who underwent surgery for UC between January 2014 and December 2021 at Hyogo Medical University were included in the study. A total of 443 UC surgical cases were included in the study, which comprised 188 cancer/dysplasia patients and 255 refractory patients. Clinical records were compared retrospectively.

Results

The proportion of surgical UC cases with cancer/dysplasia has been on the rise, accounting for approximately 40% in recent years. The duration of disease (months) was 186 (2–590) in the cancer/dysplasia group and 48 (1–580) in the refractory group (p = 0.02). UC severity (mild/moderate/severe) was 119/69/0 in the cancer/dysplasia group and 18/157/80 in the refractory group (p < 0.01). The four nutrition factors of weight (55.2 (32.7–99.6) kg: 49.9 (20.3–85.2) kg), body mass index (21.0 (13.9–32.5) kg/m2: 18.3 (11.4–34.1)kg/m2), serum albumin level (4.3 (2.7–5.0)g/dl: 3.4 (1.4–5.2)g/dl) and prognostic nutrition index (49.2 (33.2–61.2): 40.9 (17.4–61.1)) were significantly higher in the cancer/dysplasia group (p < 0.01). The degree of obesity was also significantly higher in the cancer/dysplasia group (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

UC patients with cancer/dysplasia were more likely than refractory patients to have mild inflammation; they also had a longer duration of UC disease and better nutritional status.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The number of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) is increasing worldwide [1], and the number of Japanese patients with UC is estimated to have exceeded 200,000 [2].

In the past, the majority of cases were refractory to surgical indications [3], but recent advances in medical therapy, especially with the advent of tacrolimus and biologic agents, have increased treatment options. As a result, the number of cases in which surgery can be avoided is increasing [4, 5]. While the number of refractory UC cases in which surgery can be avoided has increased, the number of cases that become cancerous due to long-term inflammation has also increased [6]. Eaden et al. reported that the cancer incidence rate of UC is 2.1% at 5 years, 8.5% at 10 years, and 17.8% at 20 years of disease duration [7]. Given continuing advances in medical therapy, the number of patients with cancer dysplasia can be expected to increase.

The basic surgical treatment for UC is restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) with hand-sewn/stapled ileal J-pouch anal anastomosis (hand-sewn IPAA), and there is a certain consensus regarding its safety [8]. At our institution, hand-sewn IPAA is the basic technique, but some institutions use stapled IPAA, which preserves the mucosa of the anal canal, as the standard technique from the viewpoint of preserving sphincter function after surgery [9]. There are differences among facilities. In cases where the indication for surgery is rectal cancer/dysplasia, hand-sewn IPAA is recommended due to the risk of recurrence of cancer from the residual anal canal mucosa [10, 11]. However, among cases in which cancer/dysplasia is an indication for surgery, there are a few in which hand-sewn IPAA is difficult because the J-pouch does not reach the anus due to obesity. In fact, a case of dysplasia from the residual anal canal mucosa was reported [10]. The inability to perform hand-sewn IPAA is a clinically important problem, especially in patients at high risk of cancer in the anal transitional zone.

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical characteristics of cases operated on for cancer/dysplasia with those operated on for refractory disease and to discuss the preoperative preparation for successful hand-sewn IPAA.

Materials and methods

Patients and data collection

Patients who underwent surgery for UC between January 2014 and December 2021 at Hyogo Medical University were included in the study. Overall, 604 patients were included, 188 of which were operated on due to cancer/dysplasia and 255 of which were operated on due to refractory disease. Each study factor (patient characteristics, duration of disease, preoperative medical treatments, surgical indications, preoperative nutrition status) was compared retrospectively. Emergency surgery cases were excluded.

Definitions

The diagnosis of UC was based on recognized radiological, endoscopic, and histopathological criteria. UC disease activity is assessed based on clinical features using the criteria of Truelove and Witts [12].

Patients were classified according to the categories proposed by the International Obesity Task Force as nonobese (body mass index [BMI] < 25.0 kg/m2), obese I (BMI 25.0-29.9 kg/m2), and obese II (BMI≧30 kg/m2).

Blood parameters were also retrospectively obtained from the clinical records, including C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, white blood cell (WBC) counts, serum albumin levels, hemoglobin (HGB) levels, and TLC just before initial surgery. Furthermore, we reviewed Onodera's prognostic nutritional index (O-PNI) values, which were calculated as 10 × serum Alb (g/dL) + 0.005 × TLC [13].

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were carried out using JMP ver. 15 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA). Each variable was compared with the Pearson χ2 test, Student’s t test, or Mann–Whitney U test. Statistical significance was set as a p value less than 0.05.

Ethical considerations

All study protocols were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Hyogo Medical University (No. 4210).

Results

Patient characteristics

Table 1 shows the number of cases of cancer/dysplasia that resulted in surgery in our hospital. In 2012, the proportion of cancer/dysplasia cases was approximately 20%, but in the past few years, the number has been increasing to 30-40%. The patients’ clinical characteristics are shown in Table 2. The sex (male/female) ratios were 112/76 in the cancer/dysplasia group and 174/81 in the refractory group (p=0.07). The ages at surgery (years; median (range)) were 54 (25-81) years in the cancer/dysplasia group and 47 (7-90) years in the refractory group (p<0.01). The duration of disease (months) was 186 (2-590) in the cancer/dysplasia group and 48 (1-580) in the refractory group (p=0.02). UC severity (mild/moderate/severe) was 119/69/0 in the cancer/dysplasia group and 18/157/80 in the refractory group (p<0.01).

Table 1 Number of cases of cancer/dysplasia that resulted in surgery
Full size table
Table 2 Patient characteristics
Full size table

Preoperative medical treatments

The preoperative medical treatments are shown in Table 3. The total steroid dose (mg; median (range)) was 1,000 (0-100,000) in the cancer/dysplasia group and 3,190 (0-150,000) in the refractory group (p=0.97). The daily steroid doses (mg) were 0 (0-40) in the cancer/dysplasia group and 0 (0-60) in the refractory group (p<0.01). Immunosuppressive drugs were used in 63 (33.5%) patients in the cancer/dysplasia group and 208 (81.6%) in the late group (p<0.01). Leucocyte apheresis was used in 40 (21.3%) patients in the cancer/dysplasia group and 122 (47.8%) in the refractory group (p<0.01). Antitumor necrosis factor agents were used in 49 (26.1%) patients in the cancer/dysplasia group and 188 (73.7%) in the refractory group (p<0.01). The four factors of daily steroid doses, immunosuppressive drug use, leucocyte apheresis use and antitumor necrosis factor agent use were significantly higher in the refractory group.

Table 3 Preoperative medical treatment
Full size table

Preoperative nutritional status

Table 4 shows the preoperative nutritional status. The weight (kg; median (range)) was 55.2 (32.7-99.6) kg in the cancer/dysplasia group and 49.9 (20.3-85.2) kg in the refractory group (p<0.01). The height (m; median (range)) was 1.63 (1.43-1.90) in the cancer/dysplasia group and 1.63 (1.15-1.87) in the refractory group (p=0.32). The body mass index (median (range)) was 21.0 (13.9-32.5) in the cancer/dysplasia group and 18.3 (11.4-34.1) in the refractory group (p<0.01). The serum albumin level (g/dl; median (range)) was 4.3 (2.7-5.0) in the cancer/dysplasia group and 3.4 (1.4-5.2) in the refractory group (p<0.01). The prognostic nutrition index (median (range)) was 49.2 (33.2-61.2) in the cancer/dysplasia group and 40.9 (17.4-61.1) in the refractory group (p<0.01). The four factors of weight, body mass index, serum albumin level, and prognostic nutrition index were significantly higher in the refractory group.

Table 4 Preoperative nutritional status
Full size table

Degree of obesity

Table 5 indicates the degree of obesity in each group. One hundred sixty-six (166) patients were nonobese (BMI < 25.0 kg/m2) (88%) in the cancer/dysplasia group, and 244 (96%) were nonobese in the refractory group. The proportion of obese I patients (BMI 25.0–29.9 kg/m2) was 10% (18) in the cancer/dysplasia group and 4% (10) in the refractory disease group. The proportion of obese II patients (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) was 2% (4) in the cancer/dysplasia group and 0% (1) in the refractory disease group. The degree of obesity was significantly different between the two groups (p < 0.01).

Table 5 Degree of obesity
Full size table

Details of cancer cases

In this study, 141 were cancer cases and 47 were dysplasia cases. Of the 141 cancer cases, 79 (56%) underwent surveillance colonoscopy, while 62 (44%) were found incidentally. The Stage (0/I/II/III/IV) of the 141 cancer cases included in this study was 43/45/27/12/11. None of the patients had preoperative interventions such as chemotherapy or radiation therapy. The number of cases in which preoperative endoscopic resection was attempted was 78/36/8/13/3/3 for tissue (tub1/tub2/por/muc/sig/etc.). The other 3 cases were 2 neuroendocrine carcinomas and 1 carcinosarcoma. The age at onset (median(range)) of the 141 cancer cases was 53(24–80) months, and the time from UC onset to cancer diagnosis was 60.5(6.5–114.2) months.

Discussion

This study showed that patients with cancer/dysplasia had conditions that were less severe, had a longer disease duration, and had better nutritional status than refractory patients. The following is a discussion of how these results can be used clinically.

The ECCO Guidelines recommend screening for patients with UC with a disease duration of more than 6–8 years [14]. In Japan, screening is also recommended for patients who have had UC for more than 8 years [15]. The detection rate of cancer is thought to be increasing as surveillance becomes more widespread. On the other hand, there are some problems with UC, such as the fact that many cases have inflammation of the mucosa in the background, making detection difficult, and that an established surveillance method is lacking. In recent years, there have been reports comparing random biopsy with targeted biopsy [16], and if the quality of surveillance improves in the future, the number of cancer/dysplasia cases may increase. As the quality of surveillance improves, the number of cancer/dysplasia cases may increase, and the number of surgical cases is expected to increase accordingly. Therefore, we believe that this study, in which the characteristics of cancer/dysplasia cases are analyzed from a surgical perspective, is important for future clinical practice.

Hand-sewn IPAA and stapled IPAA, the basic techniques for UC, are standard worldwide. The advantage of hand-sewn IPAA is that the entire colonic mucosa can be resected, while the disadvantage is soiling due to internal anal sphincter dysfunction. Hand-sewn IPAA involves difficult to perform mucosectomy and hand-sewn anastomosis. In stapled IPAA cases, sphincter function is preserved, but the mucosa of the anal canal remains. Therefore, some centers use stapled IPAA as the basic technique from the viewpoint of anastomosis risk and preservation of sphincter function.

We have reported that the incidence of cancer and dysplasia from the residual anal canal mucosa after stapled IPAA is approximately 3.4% (3/88) [11]. We have also reported that 6.4% (14/220) of patients who underwent hand-sewn IPAA with mucosal resection for UC-related cancer had cancer in the anal canal mucosa and that the risk factors were multiple cancers and rectal cancer [11]. The ECCO guidelines also note that hand-sewn IPAA is a reasonable technique in such cases because lower rectal cancer is a risk factor for carcinogenesis from the mucosa of the anal canal [17]. Regarding the localization of cancer/dysplasia, it has been reported that rectal and sigmoid colon carcinomas occur more commonly in patients with UC due to the continuous spread of inflammation from the rectum to the oral side. In the Japanese real-world surgical resection case report, sigmoid colon cancer accounted for 20%, and rectal cancer accounted for 50% [18]. In a large proportion of cases from Canada (36.5%; 443/1213), rectal cancer was reported [19].

Based on the above, hand-sewn IPAA may be more often indicated for patients with cancer/dysplasia in UC, depending on the localization of the tumor, than for patients with refractory UC. A potential problem is obesity. In recent years, a number of new drugs have been introduced, greatly increasing medical treatment options. This has led to an increase in the number of UC cases with chronic inflammation and an increase in cancer/dysplasia cases due to the avoidance of surgery. These patients are in good nutritional condition; in this study, serum albumin levels and BMI were significantly higher than in refractory cases. Some patients had a BMI over 30. In these patients, hand-sewn IPAA may not be performed because of the thick tissue of the mesentery and the poor accessibility of the ileal pouch to the anastomotic site. As a result, preservation of the mucosa of the anal canal, which is at high risk for cancer, may be necessary. In this case, rectal amputation and permanent ileostomy may be needed. To prevent such situations, daily weight control may be important, especially in patients with long disease duration and anorectal inflammation. In fact, in the present study, we have experienced cases in which hand-sewn IPAA was possible with preoperative weight control. In cancer patients, it is not possible to lose weight for a long period of time before surgery, so it is important to maintain a certain degree of weight control on a daily basis. In addition, it has been reported in the field of colorectal cancer that high BMI or obesity is a risk factor for complications such as operation time, blood loss, and death [20,21,22]. It is desirable to keep weight under control from the viewpoint of safe cancer surgery.

With the advent of newer drugs, the number of refractory cases is likely to decrease, which will equate to an increase in the number of cancer/dysplasia cases. Most patients with UC who have relatively well-controlled inflammation are greatly surprised and anxious when they are told that they need surgery for cancer/dysplasia. To prevent this from happening in advance, it may be important to explain the surgical procedure to patients undergoing surveillance. To make the surgical outcome more desirable for patients, it is important to manage nutritional status from the UC follow-up period in patients with rectal inflammation and multiple dysplasia lesions. In patients with a preoperative BMI over 30, surgery after weight loss is an option, taking into consideration the progression of the cancer.

There are several limitations to this study. First, this is a single-center, retrospective study. Second, Hyogo Medical University is one of the few institutions in Japan with an IBD center. Therefore, there is bias because more patients with severe IBD are seen there. As a result, the postoperative mortality rate may be higher. Second, most of the patients in this study period underwent open surgery, and the rate of laparoscopic surgery was low.

Conclusion

UC with cancer/dysplasia cases were more likely to involve mild inflammation than refractory cases, and such patients also had a longer duration of UC disease and better nutritional status.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Molodecky NA, Soon IS, Rabi DM, Ghali WA, Ferris M, Chernoff G, et al. Increasing incidence and prevalence of the inflammatory bowel diseases with time, based on systematic review. Gastroenterology. 2012;142(1):46-54.e42; quiz e30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Murakami Y, Nishiwaki Y, Oba MS, Asakura K, Ohfuji S, Fukushima W, et al. Estimated prevalence of ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease in Japan in 2014: an analysis of a nationwide survey. J Gastroenterol. 2019;54(12):1070–7.

  3. Ikeuchi H, Uchino M, Matsuoka H, Bando T, Matsumoto T, Tomita N, et al. Surgery for ulcerative colitis in 1,000 patients. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2010;25(8):959–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaplan GG, Seow CH, Ghosh S, Molodecky N, Rezaie A, Moran GW, et al. Decreasing colectomy rates for ulcerative colitis: a population-based time trend study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107(12):1879–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rönnblom A, Holmström T, Tanghöj H, Karlbom U, Thörn M, Sjöberg D. Low colectomy rate five years after diagnosis of ulcerative colitis. Results from a prospective population-based cohort in Sweden (ICURE) diagnosed during 2005–2009. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2016;51(11):1339–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Farraye FA, Odze RD, Eaden J, Itzkowitz SH. AGA technical review on the diagnosis and management of colorectal neoplasia in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2010;138(2):746–74, 74.e1-4; quiz e12-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Eaden JA, Abrams KR, Mayberry JF. The risk of colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis: a meta-analysis. Gut. 2001;48(4):526–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Hahnloser D, Pemberton JH, Wolff BG, Larson DR, Crownhart BS, Dozois RR. Results at up to 20 years after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis. Br J Surg. 2007;94(3):333–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lovegrove RE, Constantinides VA, Heriot AG, Athanasiou T, Darzi A, Remzi FH, et al. A comparison of hand-sewn versus stapled ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) following proctocolectomy: a meta-analysis of 4183 patients. Ann Surg. 2006;244(1):18–26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Remzi FH, Fazio VW, Delaney CP, Preen M, Ormsby A, Bast J, et al. Dysplasia of the anal transitional zone after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: results of prospective evaluation after a minimum of ten years. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46(1):6–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Horio Y, Uchino M, Bando T, Sasaki H, Goto Y, Kuwahara R, et al. Incidence, risk factors and outcomes of cancer of the anal transitional zone in patients with ulcerative colitis. J Crohns Colitis. 2020;14(11):1565–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Truelove SC, Witts LJ. Cortisone in ulcerative colitis; preliminary report on a therapeutic trial. Br Med J. 1954;2(4884):375–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Onodera T, Goseki N, Kosaki G. Prognostic nutritional index in gastrointestinal surgery of malnourished cancer patients. Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 1984;85(9):1001–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Van Assche G, Dignass A, Bokemeyer B, Danese S, Gionchetti P, Moser G, et al. Second European evidence-based consensus on the diagnosis and management of ulcerative colitis part 3: special situations. J Crohns Colitis. 2013;7(1):1–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Matsuoka K, Kobayashi T, Ueno F, Matsui T, Hirai F, Inoue N, et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for inflammatory bowel disease. J Gastroenterol. 2018;53(3):305–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Watanabe T, Ajioka Y, Mitsuyama K, Watanabe K, Hanai H, Nakase H, et al. Comparison of targeted vs random biopsies for surveillance of ulcerative colitis-associated colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2016;151(6):1122–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Øresland T, Bemelman WA, Sampietro GM, Spinelli A, Windsor A, Ferrante M, et al. European evidence based consensus on surgery for ulcerative colitis. J Crohns Colitis. 2015;9(1):4–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hata K, Anzai H, Ikeuchi H, Futami K, Fukushima K, Sugita A, et al. Surveillance colonoscopy for ulcerative colitis-associated colorectal cancer offers better overall survival in real-world surgically resected cases. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019;114(3):483–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ni A, Al-Qahtani M, Salama E, Marinescu D, Khalil MA, Faria J, et al. Trends in colectomies for colorectal neoplasms in ulcerative colitis: a national inpatient sample database analysis over two decades. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020;24(8):1721–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Matsubara N, Miyata H, Gotoh M, Tomita N, Baba H, Kimura W, et al. Mortality after common rectal surgery in Japan: a study on low anterior resection from a newly established nationwide large-scale clinical database. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57(9):1075–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Alizadeh RF, Moghadamyeghaneh Z, Whealon MD, Hanna MH, Mills SD, Pigazzi A, et al. Body mass index significantly impacts outcomes of colorectal surgery. Am Surg. 2016;82(10):930–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Govaert JA, Lijftogt N, van Dijk WA, Tseng LN, Liem RS, Tollenaar RA, et al. Colorectal cancer surgery for obese patients: Financial and clinical outcomes of a Dutch population-based registry. J Surg Oncol. 2016;113(5):489–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Funding

None declared.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Division of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Surgery, Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Japan

    Ryuichi Kuwahara, Hiroki Ikeuchi, Kurando Kusunoki, Tomohiro Minagawa, Yuki Horio, Kei Kimura, Kozo Kataoka, Naohito Beppu, Masataka Ikeda & Motoi Uchino

Authors
  1. Ryuichi Kuwahara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hiroki Ikeuchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kurando Kusunoki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tomohiro Minagawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yuki Horio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kei Kimura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Kozo Kataoka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Naohito Beppu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Masataka Ikeda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Motoi Uchino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Ryuichi Kuwahara and Hiroki Ikeuchi performed the investigation, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. Kurando Kusunoki, Tomohiro Minagawa, Yuki Horio, Kei Kimura, Kozo Kataoka, Naohito Beppu, Masataka Ikeda, Motoi Uchino performed the investigation and analyzed the data. Ryuichi Kuwahara designed the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryuichi Kuwahara.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All methods were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. The study protocol complied with the ethical guidelines of the 2013 Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval for this study was granted by the Institutional Review Board of the Hyogo College of Medicine (No.4210). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuwahara, R., Ikeuchi, H., Kusunoki, K. et al. Clinical features and surgical selection in colitis-associated colorectal cancer with ulcerative colitis. BMC Surg 23, 256 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02160-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02160-x

Keywords

BMC Surgery

ISSN: 1471-2482

Contact us