Skip to main content
Download PDF

The relationship of tongue fat content and efficacy of uvulopalatopharyngoplasty in Chinese patients with obstructive sleep apnea

BMC Surgery volume 23, Article number: 254 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

To investigate the relationship between tongue fat content and severity of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and its effects on the efficacy of uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) in the Chinese group.

Method

Fifty-two participants concluded to this study were diagnosed as OSA by performing polysomnography (PSG) then they were divided into moderate group and severe group according to apnea hypopnea index (AHI). All of them were also collected a series of data including age, BMI, height, weight, neck circumference, abdominal circumference, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of upper airway and the score of Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) on the morning after they completed PSG. The relationship between tongue fat content and severity of OSA as well as the association between tongue fat content in pre-operation and surgical efficacy were analyzed.Participants underwent UPPP and followed up at 3rd month after surgery, and they were divided into two groups according to the surgical efficacy.

Results

There were 7 patients in the moderate OSA group and 45 patients in the severe OSA group. The tongue volume was significantly larger in the severe OSA group than that in the moderate OSA group. There was no difference in tongue fat volume and tongue fat rate between the two groups. There was no association among tongue fat content, AHI, obstructive apnea hypopnea index, obstructive apnea index and Epworth sleepiness scale (all P > 0.05), but tongue fat content was related to the lowest oxygen saturation (r=-0.335, P < 0.05). There was no significantly difference in pre-operative tongue fat content in two different surgical efficacy groups.

Conclusions

This study didn’t show an association between tongue fat content and the severity of OSA in the Chinese group, but it suggested a negative correlation between tongue fat content and the lowest oxygen saturation (LSaO2). Tongue fat content didn’t influence surgical efficacy of UPPP in Chinese OSA patients.

Trial registration

This study didn’t report on a clinical trial, it was retrospectively registered.

Peer Review reports

Background

Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) refers to a common sleep disorder that results in hypopnea and hypoxemia caused by repeated collapse of the upper airway during sleep [1]. In the latest epidemiological study, China has the largest number of affected individuals of OSA in the global, with a prevalence of about 23.6% in people aged 30–69 years old. [2] OSA is a main cause of excessive sleepiness which effects quality of life and high risk in vehicle crash. And it is associated with increase in incidence for various diseases such as hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation and stroke. [1] Effective treatments for OSA include behavioral measures, medical devices (e.g. positive airway pressure and oral appliances) and surgery. [1] The most widely applied surgical procedure in OSA is uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP), but the surgical efficiency is 40-50% which implys that we need strict surgical indications. [3].

The development of the obesity epidemic is likely to contribute to the rising of the incidence of OSA. [2,4,5] The characteristic of fat deposition in OSA patients is imbalanced which means fat often distribute around the upper airway. [6,7,8] Tongue is the largest muscular organ, mainly composed of the largest dilator of the upper airway – genioglossus. [9,10,11] The fat deposition in the tongue can contribute to the disorder of enlargement of the upper airway, this may also affect efficacy of UPPP. Previous study had shown that tongue fat volume correlated with apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and body mass index (BMI), and hypothesized the tongue fat volume could link obesity to OSA. [12] However, because of differences in races, there is a few numbers of researches in relationships between tongue fat content and the severity of OSA in Chinese group. And a research suggested that there were no significant post-volumetric changes of upper airway including tongue volume in 6 months post-surgery, [13] but it is also not clear if fat content influence surgery outcomes.

The purpose of this study was to explore:1) the correlation between tongue fat content and the severity of OSA; 2) the association between tongue fat content in pre-operation and surgical efficacy, whether tongue fat content could be considered as a predicator of surgical treatment.

Methods

Participants

This is a retrospective study. These patients who were from the department of otolaryngology of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiao tong University, China from February 24th to December 8th in 2021. They were diagnosed as OSA defined by AHI ≥ 5 by performing polysomnography (PSG). And they were collected a series of data on the morning after they were performed PSG, which included age, BMI, height, weight, neck circumference, abdominal circumference, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of upper airway and the score of Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). [1] They also did the Müller test under the laryngoscopy which results showed that their upper airway was predominantly collapsed in the palatal region. All participants were evaluated by 2–3 senior otolaryngology doctors to confirm the feasibility for surgery. The indications of surgery were according to the Chinese Multidisciplinary guidelines of OSA (2018) and the SAMS clinical trial. [14,15] We included participants based on the following criteria. The eligibility criteria was age 18–50 years, BMI < 32 kg/m2, Friedman stage I-II and the score of ESS > 8 [16]. The exclusion criteria was prior surgery on palate, tongue, mandible or maxilla, nasal obstruction uncontrolled by medication or surgery, clinically significant retrognathia (confirmed by lateral skull x-ray), and other chronic diseases including moderate to severe COPD (FEV/FVC ratio < 70% and FEV 1 < 50%), heart failure, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, chronic narcotic use, major depression (e.g. hospitalisation for depression, suicide attempt or symptoms necessitating antidepressant drug dose escalation in the previous 3 months), unacceptable anaesthetic or surgical risk (e.g. anticoagulant or antiplatelet medication which cannot be withdrawn). Written informed consents from participants were obtained.

There were very few patients with mild OSA who could meet the above criteria, and most of them chose non-surgical treatment such as weight loss. So there were no suitable patients with mild OSA could be included in this study. Since it was a retrospective research, we didn’t include non-OSA participants.

PSG

Participants accepted in-laboratory PSG (Alice 6, PHILIPS, America) according to the guide of American Academy of Sleep Medicine at night, and the studying started from lights-off and ended in lights-on. [17] The parameters included AHI, obstructive apnea hypopnea index (OAHI), obstructive apnea index (OAI), the lowest oxygen saturation (LSaO2). All test results are interpreted by two sleep medicine technologists. Participants were divided into moderate OSA group and severe OSA group according to AHI (15–29 indicates moderate OSA and ≥ 30 indicates severe OSA).

Surgery intervention

Standardized surgery called uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) was performed on every participants. [18] The amount of tongue fat content was blind to operators. The procedure removed the palatine tonsils, part of fat pads, mucosa of lateral pharyngeal and uvula. Additionally, the anterior and posterior arches were fixed with apposition suture and the uvula was remodeled. In this procedure, no more measures on the tongue were performed.

Patients were performed PSG at a 3-month follow-up visit. In this study, the successful surgical treatment was defined as a > 50% reduction in AHI according to a meta-analysis which we thought it was more representative. [19] Patients who received follow-ups were divided into two groups namely responders (AHI reduced by > 50%) and non-responders (AHI reduced by ≤ 50%).

MRI analysis

Upper airway imaging studies were performed by using 3T MRI scanner (GE medical system SIGNA Pioneer) according to a standardized scanning protocol. Participants were instructed to lie in supine position, breathe through noses and refrain from swallowing. Contiguous T1-weighted spin-echo axial and sagittal images were obtained to confirm the boundary of tongue. IDEAL sequence scanning was added to manifest the fat of tongue, which could overcome the influence of magnetic field in homogeneity and separate water and fat thoroughly than Dixon sequence.

Image analysis was performed by ITK-SNAP (Version 3.8.0). In this study, the segmentation of tongue fat content (tongue fat volume and tongue fat rate) was marked by people. It was finished by a single professional with the measurement reproducibility confirmed.

The basic anatomical figures including pharyngeal length (between the hard palate and epiglottis base) which was divided into two parts according to the uvula tip, airway cross-sectional area (CSA) (the narrowest area, nasopharynx and oropharynx), velopharynx length was from the hard palate and the end of the soft palate (SPt), oropharynx length was from the SPt to the base of the epiglottis, pharynx length was the sum of velopharynx one and oropharynx one, soft palate length was from the posterior nasal spine (PNS) to the SPt, length from PNS to the hyoid bone (Hy) and the angle of tongue base. Upper airway was divided into two areas: Retropalatal (RP) area was from the level of hard palate to the tip of uvula; Retroglossal (RG) area was from the level of the tip of uvula to the base of epiglottis. All of these figures were performed on mid-sagittal images (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Magnetic resonance imaging analysis. A) Sagittal view of segmentation in tongue with segmentation of tongue (area in yellow). B) The region of tongue fat which is marked in red. C) Upper airway is divided into two parts: Retropalatal (RP) area is from the level of hard palate to the tip of uvula (transparent yellow); Retroglossal (RG) area is from the level of the tip of uvula to the base of epiglottis (transparent green). D) The diagram of landmarks which are used to calculate the length from posterior nasal spine (PNS) to hyoid (Hy) and soft palate tip (SPt). The angle of tongue base is defined as the inferior margin of geniohyoid and the posterior of pharyngeal wall

Full size image

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed by using SPSS (version 26.0, IBM Corporation). Intraclass correlation coefficients were computed to assess the reproducibility of tongue fat content. Continuous variables were assessed for normality of distribution. The baseline demographics of responders and non-responders’ groups were compared by using independent t-tests or Mann-Whitney tests.

Results

Participant characteristics

Totally 52 participants were concluded according to inclusion/exclusion criteria. 24 of the 52 participants were followed up by PSG, and 14 were responders. Their upper airway mainly collapsed in the palatal region according to the laryngological examination combined with Müller test. There were no significant differences in all variables between responders and non-responders. On average, participants were overweight (BMI 26.78 ± 2.84 kg/m2) with severe OSA (AHI 57.73 ± 21.65 events/hour) (Table 1).

Table 1 Characteristics of all participants
Full size table

Measurement reproducibility

The segmentation of intra-tongue fat was performed by the same operator at intervals of six months. Intra-rater reliability was assessed by using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). In this study, the ICC was 0.84 which means the reliability and reproducibility of manual data are excellent (n = 52).

Characteristics of tongue fat content in group of OSA

The whole tongue volume of all participants was (116.01 ± 19.04) cm3, and that in moderate and severe patients were (97.29±29.34) cm3 and (118.98±15.34)cm3 respectively. The total fat volume and fat rate of 52 patients were (10.37 ± 2.74) cm3 and (9.03 ± 2.14)% respectively (Table 2). Fat content was higher in RG region than that in RP region. The image of tongue fat in the mid-sagittal slice of IDEAL image was fanned out (Fig. 2).

Table 2 Charateristics of pre-operative fat content in moderate and severe OSA patients
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Characteristics of tongue fat. The sagittal slice of MRI in tongue fat which characteristics of distribution are fanned out (A), fat was marked by yellow (B)

Full size image

Higher whole tongue volume was associated with higher tongue fat volume (r = 0.318, P < 0.05). Higher tongue fat volume was associated with tongue fat rate (r = 0.308, P < 0.05) in RG region. We also analysed relationships between tongue fat content and clinical factors in this group. Higher whole tongue volume was associated with higher BMI (r = 0.377, P < 0.05), higher weight (r = 0.478, P < 0.05), longer neck circumference (r = 0.445, P < 0.05), longer abdominal circumference (r = 0.487, P < 0.05) (see Figure S1 in the supplemental material).

Relationship between the severity of OSA and intra-tongue fat in Chinese

There was significant difference in the tongue volume between moderate and severe patients (P < 0.05) (Table 2), but there was no statistical difference in the tongue fat content between these two groups. Tongue fat volume was negative correlated to the level of LSaO2 (r = − 0.335, P < 0.05) (Fig. 3). There were no linear correlations among tongue fat content, the severity of OSA and ESS (see Figure S2 in the supplemental material).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Correlations between indicators of intra-tongue fat and LSaO2. 95% confidence intervals are plotted on each graph. LSaO2: lowest oxygen saturation

Full size image

The relationship between pre-operative tongue fat content and surgery efficacy

By comparing pre-operative tongue fat content between the responders and non-responders, there was no significant difference between these two groups. The same result was shown in the percentage of intra-tongue fat. The details were shown in the Table 3.

Table 3 Tongue fat volume and fat rate of responders versus non-responders
Full size table

Correlations

There was no significantly difference between moderate group and severe group in anatomical measurements (Table 4). Then we analyzed correlations between indicators of tongue fat content and other anatomical measurements (Fig. 4).

Table 4 Anatomical measurements of moderate and severe group in OSA
Full size table
Fig. 4
figure 4

Correlations between related indicators of tongue fat and other anatomical measurements. 95% confidence intervals are plotted on each graph. PNS-SPt: length from posterior nasal spine to soft palate tip; CSA: Cross-sectional area; RP: Retropalatal; RG: Retroglossal

Full size image

Higher tongue volume was positively associated with longer length of PNS-SPt (r = 0.324, P < 0.05). Higher tongue fat volume was positively associated with larger cross-sectional area of nasopharynx (r = 0.391, P < 0.05). Higher tongue fat volume in RP region was negatively related to larger angle of tongue base, and higher tongue fat volume in RG region was positively related to larger angle of tongue base (r=-0.373, P < 0.05; r = 0.324, P < 0.05).

Discussion

The former study showed that the type of disproportion between tongue volume and craniofacial framework will cause increased tissue pressure around the upper airway, and lead to the closure of the pharyngeal airway. [20] Kim et. al’s study showed that tongue fat played an important role in increasing tongue volume. [12] Studies about the measurement on the tongue-fat in Chinese and related data was less. [21,22,23] So the objective of this study was to determine whether the intra-tongue fat was related to the severity of OSA and had effects on surgery in Chinese group (participants came from Chinese mainland).

The study showed that tongue fat volume and tongue fat rate were 32.97 ± 9.18 cm3 and 32.6 ± 7.9% in Caucasian and African American people. [12] In our study, Chinese people had lower tongue fat volume (10.37 ± 2.74 cm3) and fat rate (9.03 ± 2.14%). This may be due to lower BMI range (26.78 ± 2.84 kg/m2) of the participants recruited than that study (34.1 ± 4.8 kg/m2).12 In another research, the average BMI was close to 27 kg/m2 and the tongue fat percentage was 17.9 ± 4.6% which was still higher than our study. [24] It’s necessary to do related research in Chinese group because of inter-ethnic differences.

There were no significant correlations among the tongue fat content and AHI, OAHI and OAI. This result was different from that in Kim et al.’s study (Both tongue volume and tongue fat volume had significant positive correlations with AHI). [12] However, the higher tongue fat volume was related to the lower LSaO2. This may closely related to hypoxia inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) which is a vital hypoxia-induced chemokine, and it can mediate overall adipose tissue inflammation by participating in process of insulin resistance and glucose intolerance. [25,26] It may explain why tongue fat volume was associated with hypoxia index. And maybe we should focus on more hypoxia indicators including LSaO2 when we assess the severity of OSA rather than only using AHI. [27].

Another finding of our study was that whole tongue volume was positively related to BMI, but tongue fat rate was not related to BMI, which was not consistent to the result of Jugé et al.’s study. [24] The tongue volume was larger in severe group than in moderate group, and it was the same as Schwab et al.’s study and Jugé et al.’s study. [24,28] Tongue volume was positively related to neck circumference and abdominal circumference, maybe tongue volume could contribute to more severe OSA besides the latter two factors. [29] These results may suggest that tongue size is more important than fat content in patients with OSA in Chinese group, and it is consistent with previous hypotheses. [6,7] Perhaps the large tongue volume in the Chinese population is not due to an increase in tongue fat volume, but is due to edema and inflammation of the muscle tissue mostly.

There are several methods recommended to predict surgical efficacy including Friedman staging system and TCM scoring system. [30,31] Although performing UPPP on patients who are Friedman stage I, the surgical success rates could not reach at a good level. [32] To enhance the success rate of surgery, the further study of surgical indications for patients with OSA is important. In this study, there was no difference was seen in tongue fat content of baseline between patients with responders and non-responders to UPPP. It may suggest that although non-visible tongue fat content may contribute to tongue retropulsion, it was not an important factor to surgical efficacy in this cohort of patients who were eligible for surgery. That was consistent to the main result of Sutherland et al.’s study which showed there was no association between anatomical changes (tongue volume and tongue fat volume) and AHI improvement. [13] This result was the same after divided by anatomical regions (RP and RG region). Tongue is a motor organ which is comprised by muscle entirely, some research suggested that tongue muscle activity is higher during wakefulness and would diminish to a greater extent during sleep in patients with OSA, especially in REM sleep. [33] Fatigue of muscle and change of shape at night may contribute to a greater impact in tongue retropulsion than tongue fat content. [34] In the future, we could try to simulate the state of the upper airway during sleep by using Muller test and acquire MRI images. This may help us to understand tongue shape and tongue fat distribution at night then we can explore the impact of tongue fat to tongue retropulsion. In addition, maybe we need other methods like computer methods to manifest the characteristics of fat deposition in tongue without the limit of traditional anatomy which defined by retropalatal and retroglossal region.

Our limitations involve: (1) Our study population was small, we could not generalize the same conclusions to women since our participants were all male. Because of low prevalence in female, OSA has been considered as a male disease with male: female ratios ranging from 3:1 to 5:1 in the general population. [35] Future studies should collect more patients to enrich the population of different genders, ages and builds. (2) We didn’t recruit people with no-OSA as controls to analyse. (3) Because of the limitation in surgical indications, participants were mainly moderate and severe patients with OSA. (4) Since there was no uniform standard for professional to mark tongue fat region, there may be some errors in the results. So it is important to improve the accuracy of segmentations in tongue fat, we would accumulate abundant numbers of images to apply computer algorithm such as deep learning in segmentation. It can obtain much more accurate figure about this structure.

Conclusions

This study didn’t show an association between tongue fat content and the severity of OSA in the Chinese group, but it suggested a negative correlation between tongue fat content and the lowest oxygen saturation (LSaO2). Tongue fat content didn’t influence surgical efficacy of UPPP in Chinese OSA patients.

Data Availability

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due individual privacy could be compromised but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

OSA:

Obstructive sleep apnea

UPPP:

Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty

PSG:

Polysomnography

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

AHI:

Apnea-hypopnea index

LSaO2:

The lowest oxygen saturation

BMI:

Body mass index

ESS:

Epworth Sleepiness Scale

SAMS:

Sleep Apnea Multilevel Surgery

COPD:

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

FEV:

Forced expiratory volume

FVC:

Forced vital capacity

OAHI:

Obstructive apnea hypopnea index

OAI:

Obstructive apnea index

CSA:

Airway cross-sectional area

SPt:

Soft palate

PNS:

Posterior nasal spine

Hy:

Hyoid bone

RP:

Retropalatal

RG:

Retroglossal

HIF-1α:

Hypoxia inducible factor-1α

REM:

Rapid eye movement

References

  1. Gottlieb DJ, Punjabi NM. Diagnosis and management of obstructive sleep apnea: a review. JAMA. 2020;323(14):1389–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Benjafield AV, Ayas NT, Eastwood PR, et al. Estimation of the global prevalence and burden of obstructive sleep apnoea: a literature-based analysis. Lancet Respir Med. 2019;7(8):687–98.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Verse T, Dreher A, Heiser C, et al. ENT-specific therapy of obstructive sleep apnoea in adults: a revised version of the previously published german S2e guideline. Sleep Breath. 2016;20(4):1301–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Peppard PE, Young T, Barnet JH, Palta M, Hagen EW, Hla KM. Increased prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing in adults. Am J Epidemiol. 2013;177(9):1006–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang SH, Keenan BT, Wiemken A, et al. Effect of weight loss on Upper Airway anatomy and the Apnea-Hypopnea Index. The importance of Tongue Fat. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;201(6):718–27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Xu L, Keenan BT, Wiemken AS et al. Differences in three-dimensional upper airway anatomy between asian and european patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep 2020;43(5).

  7. Schwab RJ, Pasirstein M, Pierson R, et al. Identification of upper airway anatomic risk factors for obstructive sleep apnea with volumetric magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;168(5):522–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Li Y, Lin N, Ye J, Chang Q, Han D, Sperry A. Upper airway fat tissue distribution in subjects with obstructive sleep apnea and its effect on retropalatal mechanical loads. Respir Care. 2012;57(7):1098–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mu L, Sanders I. Neuromuscular specializations of the pharyngeal dilator muscles: II. Compartmentalization of the canine genioglossus muscle. Anat Rec. 2000;260(3):308–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Takahashi S, Ono T, Ishiwata Y, Kuroda T. Breathing modes, body positions, and suprahyoid muscle activity. J Orthod 2002;29(4).

  11. Blumen MB, de La Sota AP, Quera-Salva MA, Frachet B, Chabolle F, Lofaso F. Tongue mechanical characteristics and genioglossus muscle EMG in obstructive sleep apnoea patients. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2004;140(2):155–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim AM, Keenan BT, Jackson N, et al. Tongue fat and its relationship to obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep. 2014;37(10):1639–48.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Sutherland K, Lowth AB, Antic N et al. Volumetric magnetic resonance imaging analysis of multilevel upper airway surgery effects on pharyngeal structure. Sleep 2021;44(12).

  14. MacKay S, Carney AS, Catcheside PG, et al. Effect of Multilevel Upper Airway surgery vs Medical Management on the apnea-hypopnea index and patient-reported daytime sleepiness among patients with moderate or severe obstructive sleep apnea: the SAMS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2020;324(12):1168–79.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Chinese Academy Society of Sleep Medicine CMDA. Guidelines for the multidisciplinary management of obstructive sleep apnoea in adults. Natl Med J China. 2018;98(24):1902–14.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Johns MW. A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth sleepiness scale. Sleep. 1991;14(6):540–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kushida CA, Littner MR, Morgenthaler T, et al. Practice parameters for the indications for polysomnography and related procedures: an update for 2005. Sleep. 2005;28(4):499–521.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fujita S, Conway W, Zorick F, Roth T. Surgical correction of anatomic azbnormalities in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: uvulopalatopharyngoplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1981;89(6):923–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rosvall BR, Chin CJ. Is uvulopalatopharyngoplasty effective in obstructive sleep apnea? Laryngoscope. 2017;127(10):2201–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Watanabe T, Isono S, Tanaka A, Tanzawa H, Nishino T. Contribution of body habitus and craniofacial characteristics to segmental closing pressures of the passive pharynx in patients with sleep-disordered breathing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;165(2):260–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sutherland K, Keenan BT, Bittencourt L, et al. A Global comparison of anatomic risk factors and their relationship to obstructive sleep apnea severity in clinical samples. J Clin Sleep Med. 2019;15(4):629–39.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee RWW, Vasudavan S, Hui DS, et al. Differences in craniofacial structures and obesity in caucasian and chinese patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep. 2010;33(8):1075–80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Feng Y, Keenan BT, Wang S, et al. Dynamic Upper Airway Imaging during Wakefulness in obese subjects with and without Sleep Apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;198(11):1435–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Jugé L, Olsza I, Knapman FL et al. Effect of upper airway fat on tongue dilation during inspiration in awake people with obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep 2021;44(12).

  25. Lee YS, Kim J-W, Osborne O, et al. Increased adipocyte O2 consumption triggers HIF-1α, causing inflammation and insulin resistance in obesity. Cell. 2014;157(6):1339–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Li P, Oh DY, Bandyopadhyay G, et al. LTB4 promotes insulin resistance in obese mice by acting on macrophages, hepatocytes and myocytes. Nat Med. 2015;21(3):239–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Malhotra A, Ayappa I, Ayas N et al. Metrics of sleep apnea severity: beyond the apnea-hypopnea index. Sleep 2021;44(7).

  28. Schwab RJ, Leinwand SE, Bearn CB, et al. Digital Morphometrics: a New Upper Airway phenotyping paradigm in OSA. Chest. 2017;152(2):330–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. McNicholas WT, Pevernagie D. Obstructive sleep apnea: transition from pathophysiology to an integrative disease model. J Sleep Res. 2022;31(4):e13616.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Friedman M, Tanyeri H, La Rosa M, et al. Clinical predictors of obstructive sleep apnea. Laryngoscope. 1999;109(12):1901–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang J, Li Y, Cao X, et al. The combination of anatomy and physiology in predicting the outcomes of velopharyngeal surgery. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(7):1718–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Friedman M, Ibrahim H, Bass L. Clinical staging for sleep-disordered breathing. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;127(1):13–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Carberry JC, Jordan AS, White DP, Wellman A, Eckert DJ. Upper Airway Collapsibility (Pcrit) and pharyngeal dilator muscle activity are Sleep Stage Dependent. Sleep. 2016;39(3):511–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Zaidi FN, Meadows P, Jacobowitz O, Davidson TM. Tongue anatomy and physiology, the scientific basis for a novel targeted neurostimulation system designed for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Neuromodulation 2013;16(4).

  35. Bonsignore MR, Saaresranta T, Riha RL. Sex differences in obstructive sleep apnoea. Eur Respir Rev 2019;28(154).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Jiangjiang Shi and Xiaohao Wei who assisted with performing PSG on patients, Wei Huang who provided technical support on MRI.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 62076198) and Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province (No. 2020GXLH-Y005 & No. 2023-YBSF-298).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Bingjie Zhao, Zine Cao and Yushan Xie contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, No.157, Xiwu Road, Xi’an, Shaanxi, 710004, China

    Bingjie Zhao, Zine Cao, Yushan Xie, Yewen Shi, Yitong Zhang, Xi Chen, Lina Ma, Xiaoxin Niu, Yonglong Su, Yani Feng, Xiaoyong Ren & Haiqin Liu

  2. School of Mathematics and Statistics, Xi’an Jiaotong University, No.28, Xianningxi Road, Xi’an, Shaanxi, 710049, China

    Shiyu Liu & Chunfeng Lian

Authors
  1. Bingjie Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zine Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yushan Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yewen Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yitong Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Shiyu Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xi Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Lina Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Xiaoxin Niu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Yonglong Su
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Yani Feng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Chunfeng Lian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Xiaoyong Ren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Haiqin Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Bingjie Zhao, Yewen Shi and Yitong Zhang contributed to the study design. Zine Cao and Yushan Xie collected the clinical data. Bingjie Zhao, Xiaoxin Niu and Yonglong Su analyzed the data. Xi Chen, Lina Ma and Yani Feng conducted the literature search. Bingjie Zhao wrote the article. Chunfeng Lian and Shiyu Liu performed imaging data analysis and drafted. Haiqin Liu performed polysomnography monitoring and confirmed results. Xiaoyong Ren, Yewen Shi and Yitong Zhang revised the article. Haiqin Liu gave the final approval of the version to be submitted. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chunfeng Lian, Xiaoyong Ren or Haiqin Liu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All experiments were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. And it have been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University (No.2021235). This study confirmed that informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

Consent for publication

All authors were informed and agree to publish. And this study was not involving any identifiable images/data, so consent for publication of images may not be required.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Additional File 1: Figure s1 and s2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, B., Cao, Z., Xie, Y. et al. The relationship of tongue fat content and efficacy of uvulopalatopharyngoplasty in Chinese patients with obstructive sleep apnea. BMC Surg 23, 254 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02144-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02144-x

Keywords

BMC Surgery

ISSN: 1471-2482

Contact us