Does the intraoperative 3D-flat panel control of the planned implant position lead to an optimization and increased in safety in the anatomically demanding region C1/2?

Table 2 Patient population with treatment via anterior approach

n	Age	Gender	Diagnosis	Duration 3D Scan (s)	Dental implants	Image quality NAS	Malposition	Malposition correction
1	61	m	And Type II	242	Yes	7	No	No
2	90	m	And Type II + OA	258	No	9	C1 leftside too medial	Yes
3	89	f	And Type II + OA	237	Yes	6	No	No
4	28	m	And Type II	287	No	10	No	No
5	78	f	And Type II	241	No	9	No	No
6	80	m	And Type II + OA	255	No	9	No	No
7	88	f	And Type II	258	No	9	No	No
8	84	f	And Type II + OA	242	No	9	No	No
9	86	f	Unhappy triad	232	No	8	No	No
10	88	f	And Type II + OA	237	No	9	C2 leftside too long	draw back wire
11	95	f	And Type II + OA	259	No	9	No	No
12	76	f	And Type II + OA	247	Yes	7	No	No
13	80	m	And Type II + OA	287	Yes	8	C2 leftside too lateral	Yes
14	75	m	And Type II	299	Yes	7	No	No
15	88	f	And Type II + OA	239	No	9	C2 too long	draw back wire
16	92	f	And Type II + OA	254	No	9	No	No
17	90	f	And Type II + OA	281	Yes	7	No	No
18	76	m	And Type II + OA	240	Yes	7	No	No
19	77	m	And Type II + OA	288	Yes	7	No	No
20	86	f	And Type II + OA	252	No	8	C1 leftside too medial	Yes
21	78	f	And Type II + OA	263	Yes	9	No	No
22	18	m	And Type II	251	No	9	No	No
23	89	m	And Type II + OA	290	No	9	No	No
24	83	m	And Type II + OA	310	Yes	8	No	No
25	79	f	And Type II + OA	237	No	10	No	No
26	67	m	And Type II	285	Yes	8	No	No
27	92	f	And Type II	266	Yes	7	No	No
28	79	f	And Type II + OA	252	No	10	No	No
29	79	f	And Type II + OA	258	No	10	C2 too medial	Yes
30	78	m	And Type II + OA	248	Yes	7	No	No
31	83	m	And Type II + OA	272	No	9	C2 too long	draw back wire
32	75	f	And Type II + OA	261	Yes	8	No	No
33	93	f	And Type II + OA	281	No	8	C2 too long	draw back wire
34	83	f	And Type II + OA	309	No	9	No	No
35	84	m	And Type II + OA	242	Yes	7	No	No
36	87	f	And Type II + OA	257	No	10	C1 rightside too cranial	Yes

ISSN: 1471-2482