Skip to main content
Download PDF

Anterolateral thigh flaps in closing large abdominal wall defect after the resection of mucinous adenocarcinoma: a case report

BMC Surgery volume 22, Article number: 100 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

It is a big challenge to repair a large abdominal wall defect after tumor resection, and en bloc resection with vascularized tissue reconstruction might be an alternative to achieve an improved survival for abdominal wall tumors.

Case presentation

A 45-year-old woman presented with a 1-year history of persistent abdominal pain of the right lower quadrant and a mass with dermal ulceration. An enhanced computed tomography scan and biopsy of the mass were performed to achieve the definite diagnosis of abdominal mucinous adenocarcinoma. After four courses of “FOLFOX” chemotherapy, the tumor grew to 6 × 5 cm during preoperative examination. Thereafter, we removed the tumor and involved tissues and organs and repaired the sizeable abdominal wall defect used by biological meshes and vascularized anterolateral thigh flaps. The patient suffered green drainage of 450 ml in the abdominal cavity and intestinal anastomotic fistula, for which she readmitted and recovered afterward.

Conclusions

Biological mesh combined with vascularized anterolateral thigh flaps could effectively repair the large abdominal wall defect and restore the biological function of the abdominal wall.

Peer Review reports

Background

The reconstruction of the abdominal wall would protect the integrity of abdominal structures, keep the intraabdominal pressure, and retain the abdominal function. A sizeable abdominal defect is usually caused by tumor resection, trauma, burn, and so on [1, 2]. Mesh implanting and component separation technique(CST) are commonly available for the abdominal wall defect with a smaller size(< 40 cm2), while both of which might lead to tissue necrosis and abdominal compartment syndrome for the abdominal wall defects with a larger size(> 40 cm2). Therefore, vascularized tissues would be employed [3] with contamination resistance and angiogenesis promotion [4, 5].

Case presentation

A 45-year-old woman presented a one-year history of persistent abdominal pain of the right lower quadrant and a mass with dermal ulceration. One year before admission, the pain occurred without obvious triggers, and the laparoscopy showed a cystic mass in the right lower quadrant of the abdominal cavity. Then, the patient was prescribed oral Chinese herbal medicine without others being performed at the local hospital. During the treatment, the pain recurred and became even worse with the formation of dermal ulceration, and the mass developed even larger after two times attempts of drainage of the purulent group with nothing draining out. After four courses of regular “FOLFOX” chemotherapy, the abdominal pain persisted in the right lower quadrant, and swelling pain occurred on the right back with a mass protruding from the epidermis. She had a history of appendectomy, colonic polypectomy, and left ovarian cyst resection.

A rigid mass with a 6 × 5 cm size protruded from the skin without apparent tenderness and fluctuation(Fig. 1a), which lacked mobilization and could not be distinguished by the tissues around. The primary mass originated from the right part of the pelvis and invaded the uterus, bowels, right adnexa, and whole abdominal wall layers (Fig. 1c). Then it was diagnosed as abdominal low-grade mucinous adenocarcinoma(cT4N0M0 stage IIB, ypT4N0M0), proved by pathological puncture biopsy.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The preoperative appearance, intraoperative process, and postoperative appearance when follow-up. a the mucinous adenocarcinoma was examined in vivo preoperatively; b the fistula was closed, and the patient received the third course of chemotherapy five months postoperatively; c the tumor displayed on preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography; d the large abdominal wall defect (approximately 87 cm2) after resection of mucinous adenocarcinoma on the abdominal wall; e placement of a drainage tube in the abdominal cavity, mesh implanting (approximately 170 cm2, Cook Group Inc., U.S.) of the abdominal wall defect, and dissection of anterolateral vascularized thigh flaps from doner site; f placement of another drainage tube under the flap and suturing the skin

Full size image

Subsequently, we resected the tumor and adjacent tissues and repaired the large abdominal wall defect(Fig. 1d). During surgery, the terminal ileum, ileocecal junction, and proximal ascending colon were found tightly adhered to the abdominal wall and the tumor. We resected the tumor and 15 cm of the ileum and conducted hand-sewn end-to-end anastomosis of the bowel, and the abdominal wall defect was approximately 87 cm2. Moreover, we also conducted enterolysis and right ureteral exploration intraoperatively.

After flushing the abdominal cavity thoroughly and placing a silicone drainage tube in the right iliac fossa, we performed a tension-free repair of abdominal wall defects by COOK biological patch(170 cm2, Cook Group Inc., U.S.) with continuous suture and 2 cm of the mesh overlapping on the edge of abdominal wall defect. Afterward, we consulted the plastic surgeons for the reconstruction and performed the anterolateral femoral free flap transfer nourished by the perforator branch vessels(Fig. 1e). Another silicone drainage tube was placed under the flap without suction, and gauze was placed above the flap for local compression hemostasis(Fig. 1f).

The patient got antibacterial and nutrition support treatment postoperatively. On the 16th day postoperatively, 450 ml of drainage in dark green was found in the abdominal cavity and 50 ml of drainage in brown subcutaneously. After symptomatic and antibacterial treatment, the patient went well and was discharged 37 days postoperatively. She was readmitted 40 days postoperatively due to an intestinal anastomotic fistula, and it was controlled after symptomatic therapy in the second admission. The patient was discharged without discomfort and followed up actively after discharge, and she had been followed up for five months since the operation(Fig. 1b).

Discussion and conclusions

Nowadays, several studies have indicated that using anterolateral thigh flaps in free flap transfer was practicable, which could provide extensive coverage and vascularized fascia structures and minimize the influence on abdominal wall mechanics [6,7,8,9,10]. Song also used tensor fascia lata (TFL) as the donor site, which would cover at most 40 × 25 cm2 [11], while it was indicated that the recurrence rate of hernia was up to 40% when using TFL alone [12]. Due to the challenges in dissecting intramuscular perforators, implementing flaps with femoris lateralis and perforators would be an alternative to boost success [13].

It remains controversial whether synthetic or biological meshes are necessary to reconstruct abdominal wall defects. In this case, we closed the abdominal wall used by biological mesh before the cover of free flaps, which was available to enhance the reconstruction function and counteract the tension on the suture [14]. For fear of the inflammatory response due to the meshes, Sugarbaker repaired the defect by contralateral rectus abdominis muscle instead to facilitate secondary surgery among people who recurred after abdominal or pelvic cancer resection required further treatments [15]. Considering biological meshes are contamination resistant, it was available to use biological meshes in potentially infected wounds [11, 16,17,18,19]. Sun compared the safety and efficacy of biological meshes and polypropylene meshes in hernia repair, and they found that biological meshes would lead to less pain compared with polypropylene meshes (P < 0.001) [20]. In contrast, Warren showed that permanent synthetic mesh might perform better in safety, bacteria control, and low recurrence than biological meshes and bioabsorbable meshes [21].

Moreover, a late anastomotic leakage happened in this patient, a potential and unforeseen adverse event. It might be associated with anastomotic techniques (stapled versus hand-sewn anastomoses) and surgeon’s specialism, while no conclusions had been drawn to reveal the specific risk factors [22, 23]. Furthermore, even though the leakage happened around the wound, the flap transfer still worked in the contaminated region.

In conclusion, the anterolateral thigh flap transfer is safe and effective for patients with large abdominal defects after resection of abdominal wall malignancy. At the same time, the safety and efficacy of anterolateral thigh flap transfer remained to be further studied in future research, including surgical procedures and selection of meshes.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

CST:

Component separation technique

TFL:

tensor fascia lata

References

  1. Kuo YR, Kuo MH, Lutz BS, Huang YC, Liu YT, Wu SC, Hsieh KC, Hsien CH, Jeng SF. One-stage reconstruction of large midline abdominal wall defects using a composite free anterolateral thigh flap with vascularized fascia lata. Ann Surg. 2004;239(3):352–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sharma RK, Verma GR, Biswas G. Reconstruction of a major abdominal and chest wall defect using latissimus dorsi and extended deep inferior epigastric artery flap. Ann Plast Surg. 1992;28(4):366–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tukiainen E, Leppaniemi A. Reconstruction of extensive abdominal wall defects with microvascular tensor fasciae latae flap. Br J Surg. 2011;98(6):880–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nettelblad H, Tarpila E. Abdominal wall reconstruction with vascularised autologous tissue. Scand J Surg. 2003;92(4):297–300.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bachman S, Ramshaw B. Prosthetic material in ventral hernia repair: how do I choose? Surg Clin North Am. 2008;88(1):101–12. ix.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kuo YR, Seng-Feng J, Kuo FM, Liu YT, Lai PW. Versatility of the free anterolateral thigh flap for reconstruction of soft-tissue defects: review of 140 cases. Ann Plast Surg. 2002;48(2):161–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kuo YR, An PC, Kuo MH, Kueh NS, Yao SF, Jeng SF. Reconstruction of knee joint soft tissue and patellar tendon defects using a composite anterolateral thigh flap with vascularized fascia lata. J Plast Reconstr aesthetic surgery: JPRAS. 2008;61(2):195–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Houtmeyers P, Opsomer D, Van Landuyt K, Monstrey S. Reconstruction of the Achilles tendon and overlying soft tissue by free composite anterolateral thigh flap with vascularized fascia lata. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2012;28(3):205–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Srinivas JS, Panagatla P, Damalacheru MR. Reconstruction of Type II abdominal wall defects: Anterolateral thigh or tensor fascia lata myocutaneous flaps? Indian J Plast surgery: official publication Association Plast Surg India. 2018;51(1):33–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuo YR, Kuo MH, Chou WC, Liu YT, Lutz BS, Jeng SF. One-stage reconstruction of soft tissue and Achilles tendon defects using a composite free anterolateral thigh flap with vascularized fascia lata: clinical experience and functional assessment. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;50(2):149–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Song Z, Yang D, Yang J, Nie X, Wu J, Song H, Gu Y. Abdominal wall reconstruction following resection of large abdominal aggressive neoplasms using tensor fascia lata flap with or without mesh reinforcement. Hernia. 2018;22(2):333–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Henry CR, Bradburn E, Moyer KE. Complex abdominal wall reconstruction: an outcomes review. Ann Plast Surg. 2013;71(3):266–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kuo YR, Jeng SF, Kuo MH, Huang MN, Liu YT, Chiang YC, Yeh MC, Wei FC. Free anterolateral thigh flap for extremity reconstruction: clinical experience and functional assessment of donor site. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107(7):1766–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cobb WS. A Current Review of Synthetic Meshes in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142(3 Suppl):64 s–71 s.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sugarbaker PH. Rectus abdominis muscle transplant for repair of abdominal wall defects required for cancer resections: case report. Int J Surg case Rep. 2019;62:62–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Patel N, Ratanshi I, Buchel E. The best of abdominal wall reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;141(1):113e–136e.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cavallaro A, Lo Menzo E, Di Vita M, Zanghi A, Cavallaro V, Veroux PF, Cappellani A. Use of biological meshes for abdominal wall reconstruction in highly contaminated fields. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16(15):1928–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rosen MJ, Krpata DM, Ermlich B, Blatnik JA. A 5-year clinical experience with single-staged repairs of infected and contaminated abdominal wall defects utilizing biologic mesh. Ann Surg. 2013;257(6):991–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Arnold M, Kao A, Gbozah K, Heniford B, Augenstein V. Optimal management of mesh infection: Evidence and treatment options. Int J Abdom Wall Hernia Surg. 2018;1(2):42–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sun L, Chen J, Li J, Shen Y. Randomized and Comparative Clinical Trial of Bovine Mesh Versus Polypropylene Mesh in the Repair of Inguinal Hernias. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2020;30(1):26–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Warren J, Desai SS, Boswell ND, Hancock BH, Abbad H, Ewing JA, Carbonell AM, Cobb WS. Safety and Efficacy of Synthetic Mesh for Ventral Hernia Repair in a Contaminated Field. J Am Coll Surg. 2020;230(4):405–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Löffler T, Rossion I, Gooßen K, Saure D, Weitz J, Ulrich A, Büchler MW, Diener MK. Hand suture versus stapler for closure of loop ileostomy–a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Langenbeck’s archives of surgery. 2015;400(2):193–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Choy PY, Bissett IP, Docherty JG, Parry BR, Merrie A, Fitzgerald A. Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;9:Cd004320.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors declare that they have no acknowledgements.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Weijia Huang and Hanpeng Lu contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Day Surgery Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Alley, 610041, Chengdu, China

    Weijia Huang, Hanpeng Lu, Yu-Xiao Zhang & Yinghan Song

  2. Lung Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

    Weijia Huang

  3. West China School of Medicine/West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

    Weijia Huang, Hanpeng Lu & Yu-Xiao Zhang

Authors
  1. Weijia Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hanpeng Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yu-Xiao Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yinghan Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

WH, HL, YZ, and YS contributed to the conception of the study and drafting of the manuscript and took full responsibility for the content. WH and HL contributed to the data extraction and literature review. YZ and YS contributed to the follow-up. WH, HL, and YS contributed to the revision of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript..

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yinghan Song.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of West China Hospital of Sichuan University.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent for publication of clinical data and clinical images was obtained from the patient.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, W., Lu, H., Zhang, YX. et al. Anterolateral thigh flaps in closing large abdominal wall defect after the resection of mucinous adenocarcinoma: a case report. BMC Surg 22, 100 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01550-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01550-x

Keywords

BMC Surgery

ISSN: 1471-2482

Contact us