Skip to main content

Hyperspectral Imaging (HSI) as a new diagnostic tool in free flap monitoring for soft tissue reconstruction: a proof of concept study

Abstract

Objectives

Free flap surgery is an essential procedure in soft tissue reconstruction. Complications due to vascular compromise often require revision surgery or flap removal. We present hyperspectral imaging (HSI) as a new tool in flap monitoring to improve sensitivity compared to established monitoring tools.

Methods

We performed a prospective observational cohort study including 22 patients. Flap perfusion was assessed by standard clinical parameters, Doppler ultrasound, and HSI on t0 (0 h), t1 (16–28 h postoperatively), and t2 (39–77 h postoperatively). HSI records light spectra from 500 to 1000 nm and provides information on tissue morphology, composition, and physiology. These parameters contain tissue oxygenation (StO2), near-infrared perfusion- (NIR PI), tissue hemoglobin- (THI), and tissue water index (TWI).

Results

Total flap loss was seen in n = 4 and partial loss in n = 2 cases. Every patient with StO2 or NIR PI below 40 at t1 had to be revised. No single patient with StO2 or NIR PI above 40 at t1 had to be revised. Significant differences between feasable (StO2 = 49; NIR PI = 45; THI = 16; TWI = 56) and flaps with revision surgery [StO2 = 28 (p < 0.001); NIR PI = 26 (p = 0.002); THI = 56 (p = 0.002); TWI = 47 (p = 0.045)] were present in all HSI parameters at t1 and even more significant at t2 (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

HSI provides valuable data in free flap monitoring. The technique seems to be superior to the gold standard of flap monitoring. StO2 and NIR PI deliver the most valuable data and 40 could be used as a future threshold in surgical decision making. Clinical Trial Register This study is registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) under the registration number DRKS00020926.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The performance of free tissue transfer in the context of soft tissue reconstruction has been performed since the late 1950s using a vascularized intestinal segment for cervical esophagus reconstruction [1]. Due to the continuous optimization of pre-, peri- and postoperative settings, survival rates of free flaps range between 91 and 95% nowadays [2,3,4,5]. Despite overall good success rates, vascular complications play a decisive role in postoperative management. Revision surgery due to vascular complications occurs in 5–25% [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. Vascular processes such as microthrombolization, endothelial cell retraction, and vascular spasms lead to a “no reflow” phenomenon, which is irreversible (0% survival rate, n = 15) in terms of free flap salvage when perfusion has been inhibited for more than 12 h in a rabbit model after revascularization. Flap salvage in the correlated groups with revascularization after 1 h (n = 15), 4 h (n = 15) and 8 h (n = 15) was 80–100%. Thus the survival rate is inversely related to the occurrence of ischemia [14, 15].

Vascular monitoring of the transplanted flaps by clinical and instrumental tools is therefore of crucial importance and leads to a better outcome [16]. Monitoring should be rapid, accurate, reliable, and practicable to all flap types. The gold standard of flap monitoring to date is clinical assessment (flap color, capillary refill, tissue turgor, temperature) and handheld Doppler sonography [17]. Several other techniques measure the circulatory flow (implantable Doppler, color duplex ultrasonography, fluorescence angiography, laser Doppler flowmetry) or tissue metabolism and ischemia (Near-Infrared Spectroscopy, microdialysis) [18,19,20,21,22,23]. So far, however, none of these methods have been able to establish itself in clinical routine since there is a lack of data that demonstrates a reliable, clinical superiority and cost efficiency [17, 18, 24].

A particular challenge is the monitoring of transplanted flaps without a skin island. The skin is missing as a reliable predictor of possible vascular complications. In the case of venous thrombosis, for example, Doppler ultrasound continues giving regular sound feedback and abnormal tissue configuration can be prolonged [25, 26].

Hyperspectral imaging is a new in vivo imaging technique that combines the principles of spectroscopy and imaging in a non-contact fashion to provide information about tissue morphology, composition, and physiology [27]. HSI creates high-resolution images that contribute information about oxygenation or ischemia in superficial tissue layers. Several experimental and clinical studies have shown that HSI delivers reliable data in wounds (diabetic, peripheral arterial occlusive disease, burn) [28,29,30,31,32,33], oncologic surgery (esophagectomy) [34], intestinal resections [35], left liver resection [36] and maxillofacial surgery [37].

This study aims to show the superiority of the HSI technique over already established monitoring procedures and that it can thus reduce the occurrence of vascular complications.

Patients and methods

Study collective

We performed a prospective observational cohort study. Patients aged 18 and older who underwent soft tissue reconstruction using a free flap between March 2019 and January 2020 and had given informed consent were eligible. In total, 22 patients (17 males, five females) with a median age of 55 (26–92) were included. Next to age, we analyzed gender, flap indication, comorbidities, and the hospitalization after surgery (Table 1).

Table 1 Baseline data

Flaps included ALT flaps (n = 11), Latissimus Dorsi flaps (n = 4), Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator (DIEAP) flaps (n = 3), Muscle Sparing Free Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneus (MS2-TRAM) flaps (n = 2), Parascapular flaps (n = 1) and Rectus Abdominis flaps (n = 1). Both flaps with (n = 18) and without (n = 4) skin islands were included.

The primary endpoint was revision surgery during hospitalization and the primary outcome was the revision rate.

Flap assessment by clinical and handheld Doppler sonography

Flap perfusion was assessed by standard clinical parameters (flap color, capillary refill, tissue turgor, temperature) regularly due to our clinical standard assessment (every 2 h within the first 24 h and every 4–72 h postoperatively) by handheld Doppler ultrasound (Dopplex D900 Audio Only Doppler, Huntleigh Healthcare Limited, Cardiff, United Kingdom).

Flap assessment by hyperspectral imaging

Next to clinical and Doppler controls, we performed hyperspectral imaging at three fixed points in time (t0 = day of surgery, t1 = first day postoperatively, t2 = second day postoperatively) using the hyperspectral imaging camera and its evaluation software (Fig. 1). For HSI data acquisition the commercially available TIVITA® Tissue camera (Diaspective Vision GmbH, Germany) was used. The system uses a built-in halogen light source to record reflectance spectra from 500 to 1000 nm in 6.4 s. This data is processed in real-time and false-color images represent physiologic tissue parameters in the range from 0 to 100. These parameters were previously described and evaluated by Holmer et al. [38]. Tissue oxygenation (StO2) and near-infrared perfusion index (NIR PI) are more suitable for the assessment of flap perfusion than tissue hemoglobin- (THI) and tissue water index (TWI). Thus, the focus in this work is on StO2 and NIR PI. StO2 provides information about the microcirculation in the most superficial tissue layers (penetration depth 1 mm) whereas near-infrared light has a higher penetration depth (4–6 mm) into the body due to lower absorption by hemoglobin. The field of view (FOV) for all parameters was 21 × 30 cm2, which corresponds to the size of a DIN A4 page, and the spatial resolution was 0.56 mm at 630 nm (evaluated with the 1951 USAF resolution test chart at 50 cm object distance). For the measurement process, the hyperspectral camera, which consists of a mobile table stand, a swiveling hyperspectral camera including illumination unit and objective lenses as well as integrated evaluation software, is placed at a distance of 50 cm above the patient in a contactless fashion. The data recorded by the camera is visually processed by the built-in software supplied and made available as false-color images. The entire evaluation takes about 15 s, is contactless and safe. Further analysis was performed by placing three circular regions of interest (ROI) at the center of the proximal third, intermediate, and distal flap part with diameters about 3 cm. Each ROI was assessed separately regarding the clinical parameters, mean StO2, and mean NIR PI.

Fig. 1
figure1

Copyright© Leipzig University Hospital, Department of Orthopedic, Trauma and Plastic Surgery; Leipzig Saxony, Germany

The Hyperspectral Imaging Camera System consisting of a mobile table stand, a swiveling hyperspectral camera including an illumination unit and objective lenses as well as the integrated evaluation software. Picture

Statistical analysis

Continuous data are presented in mean and standard deviation (SD), categorical data in frequencies and percentages. The f-test was performed to check for equal variances and an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test was used to detect differences in means of normally distributed data. P-values less than 0.05 were considered significant. All calculations were performed with TIVITA® Suite and Microsoft Excel 2013. For flap survival, a complete or partial revision was counted as an event. The observation period ended after the patient discharge from the hospital.

Institutional review board number

The study protocol of this study was approved by the institutional ethics committee (reference number 051/19-ek).

Results

Baseline data

Complete revision of the flap was necessary in four cases (18.2%) including two Latissimus Dorsi flaps, one Rectus abdominis flap, and ALT flap. Partial revision in two cases (9.1%), both were ALT flaps. The indication for revision was determined by our routine check-ups (clinical, handheld Doppler). Revision surgery in cases with complete flap loss was performed between postoperative day two and eight. One case with partial flap loss was covered with split skin 20 days after initial surgery, the other case was managed in a secondary wound healing setting without the need for revision surgery. None of the revised flaps could be saved by an early salvage revision.

Three of the six revised flaps were skin island flap designs (50%). Patients with complete flap removal had significantly longer hospitalization (p = 0.0013). The other baseline data parameter age, gender, flap indication, and comorbidity did not present any significant differences in correlation to flap survival (Table 1).

Hyperspectral imaging

Sixteen out of 22 flaps showed regular healing with no need for revision surgery (72.2%). In all these 16 viable flaps, both StO2 (p = 0.0002) and NIR PI (p = 0.0022) were above 40 at t1. Furthermore, all flaps that had StO2 and NIR PI values below 40 at t1 had to be partially or completely revised due to partial or complete flap loss (Fig. 2). These differences between viable (StO2 = 49; NIR PI = 45; THI = 16; TWI = 56) and revised flaps [StO2 = 28 (p < 0.001); NIR PI = 26 (p = 0.002); THI = 56 (p = 0.002); TWI = 47 (p = 0.045)] were present in all tissue parameters at t1 and even more significant (p < 0.0001 for all tissue parameters) at t2 (Figs. 3, 4). All cases with complete flap loss showed venous thrombolization. The cause of partial flap loss could not be conclusively determined. It is suspected that critical perfusion was achieved in the tissue areas furthest away from the anastomosis (Fig. 5a–c).

Fig. 2
figure2

Tissue oxygenation (StO2-) and NIR Perfusion Index of all measured areas at t1 (three areas per flap). The orange square is indicating the critical zone. All areas on viable flaps were outside and at least one area of each revised flap was in the critical zone

Fig. 3
figure3

Tissue oxygenation (StO2-) Index differences over time (t0-t2) between revised (n = 6) and non-revised flaps (n = 16)

Fig. 4
figure4

NIR Perfusion Index differences over time (t0–t2) between revised (n = 6) and non-revised flaps (n = 16)

Fig. 5
figure5

First line (ac) showing a patients HSI results on t1 showing decreasing circulatory support with increasing distance from the A. tibialis anterior pedicle. The distal part had to be revised and covered by meshed skin graft. Second line (df) showing HSI results in a Latissimus Dorsi free flap tissue transfer on t0 indicating complete flap failure (both in StO2 and NIR PI)

The HSI technique was able to provide valid data for flaps with and without skin islands as well as split skin grafted free flaps (Fig. 5d–f).

Clinical assessment and Doppler ultrasound were not able to detect flap failure at t0 or t1 in any of the revision cases. At t2, two out of 6 (25%) revised flaps showed clinical anomalies, both skin paddle free flaps. None of the three revised flaps without skin island showed clinical anomalies nor irregular Doppler ultrasound at t0–t2.

Discussion

The monitoring of flaps in reconstructive surgery has been a much-described topic since the 1970s and is still of great interest. So far, none of the many invasive and non-invasive monitoring tools has managed to clearly distinguish itself from clinical evaluation only. Our findings indicate that hyperspectral imaging technology might close this gap, delivering reliable data in a patient and user-friendly setting.

In this pilot study with 22 patients, HSI was observed to demonstrate superiority to clinical and Doppler ultrasound monitoring assessments. The technique was not only accurate; it was also faster in detecting signs of vascular problems. This may help to prevent flap losses due to reasons that could be missed clinically. Chen et al. demonstrated, that the timing of occurrence of first vascular compromise signs is of the greatest importance and dictates the outcome of free flap salvage surgery [37, 39]. HSI managed to detect decreasing perfusion of the transferred tissue latest 16–28 h postoperatively. Clinical assessment and Doppler ultrasound failed to detect any of those revised cases on day 1 after surgery (Fig. 6). The Doppler ultrasound showed regular findings during the entire observation period, as the monitoring is limited to arterial feedback. Arterial thrombosis is significantly less frequent in free tissue transfer [25, 40], which also emphasizes the advantages of HSI technology in detecting venous and arterial vascular compromises. Not only does it indicate a vascular problem, but it is also able to distinguish venous from arterial compromise by pattern differentiation as Holmer et al. have already described [38].

Fig. 6
figure6

First column (a, d, g) = HSI color image; second column (b, e, h) = HSI StO2; third column (c, f, i) = HSI NIR Perfusion Index. First line (ac) = t0, second row (df) = t1, third line (gi) = t2. HSI photos and parameters over time. It becomes apparent that critical zones are already visible in the HSI, even though the clinical appearance is still regular (df). The critically areas both had to be removed and covered by meshed skin graft

For future decision making, the value 40 (NIR PI = 40; StO2 = 40%) seems to play a decisive role here and could be investigated as a future threshold in reconstructive surgery. So far, no cut-off values have been defined for the individual HSI parameters, but studies are outlining tissue oxygenation of 50 and higher as an indicator for regular wound healing, 30–50 as a grey zone, and lower than 30 as a predictor of bad wound healing caused by lack of perfusion [41].

Perfusion related indices have already proven to be a good indicator for vascular compromise not only in wounds [28,29,30,31,32] but also in reconstructive surgery. Repez et al. [42] monitored 50 flaps continuously with near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) and compared it to clinical observation alone. NIRS detected all cases of flow failure before clinical observation with no false positives or negatives. These results are consistent with our findings. All revised flaps could be detected earlier by HSI, especially by parameters measuring the oxygen saturation in the superficial tissue layers (StO2 up to 1 mm; NIR PI up to 4–6 mm) [38].

The limitations of this study include its small sample size and the heterogeneity of the study’s endpoint. Also, to improve selectivity in future studies with higher case numbers, it may be of interest to split individual flap entities by composition (fasciocutaneous, myocutaneous) and by the entity (e.g., ALT, latissimus dorsi, subscapular). However, we want to outline that HSI is able to analyze different tissues like skin or just muscle and is thus able to deliver reliable data for different flap designs. A cost-efficiency analysis has to be planned to not only show clinical evidence, but also practicability in the long term. The current technology allows only static images. It should be discussed whether the technique is not also capable of producing dynamic images and thus providing continuous information about perfusion conditions. Future studies may then monitor flaps continuously so that early detection of vascular compromise can allow for immediate return to the operating room. Furthermore, HSI data could help intraoperatively to analyze the perfusion of the flap after performing the anastomosis and thus help surgeons in case of early, intraoperative decision making.

Nevertheless, HSI is an approach with high potential and could lead to lower total flap failure and higher salvage rates leading to better overall survival. It combines the advantages of non-invasive and invasive monitoring methods and has so far only shown advantages compared to the other techniques.

Conclusion

Hyperspectral Imaging combines imaging, spectroscopy and tissue oximetry in a dynamic, non-invasive and contactless fashion. It provides valuable data to monitor perfusion and oxygenation of transplanted free soft tissue flaps. The technique may detect complications at a very early stage when clinical and Doppler check-ups still have limitations due to different vascular compromise.

Availability of data and materials

All data is contained within the manuscript. The datasets used and analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

HSI:

Hyperspectral Imaging

et al.:

Et alii. And others.

StO2:

Tissue oxygenation index

NIR-PI:

Near-infrared perfusion index

THI:

Tissue hemoglobin index

TWI:

Tissue water index

ALT:

Anterolateral thigh flap

DIEP:

Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap

MS-2 TRAM:

Muscle sparing free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneus flap

FOV:

Field of view

SD:

Standard deviation

NIRS:

Near infrared spectroscopy

References

  1. 1.

    Seidenberg B, Rosenak SS, Hurwitt ES, et al. Immediate reconstruction of the cervical esophagus by a revascularized isolated jejunal segment. Ann Surg. 1959;149:162–71. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-195902000-00002.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Smit JM, Acosta R, Zeebregts CJ, et al. Early reintervention of compromised free flaps improves success rate. Microsurgery. 2007;27:612–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.20412.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Nakatsuka T, Harii K, Asato H, et al. Analytic review of 2372 free flap transfers for head and neck reconstruction following cancer resection. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2003;19:363–8. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2003-42630.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Heinz TR, Cowper PA, Levin LS. Microsurgery costs and outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104:89–96.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Jones NF, Jarrahy R, Song JI, et al. Postoperative medical complications–not microsurgical complications–negatively influence the morbidity, mortality, and true costs after microsurgical reconstruction for head and neck cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119:2053–60. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000260591.82762.b5.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Lineaweaver WC, Buncke HJ. Complications of free flap transfers. Hand Clin. 1986;2:347–51.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Macnamara M, Pope S, Sadler A, et al. Microvascular free flaps in head and neck surgery. J Laryngol Otol. 1994;108:962–8. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022215100128634.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Hidalgo DA, Jones CS. The role of emergent exploration in free-tissue transfer: a review of 150 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;86:492–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Irons GB, Wood MB, Schmitt EH. Experience with one hundred consecutive free flaps. Ann Plast Surg. 1987;18:17–23. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-198701000-00005.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Schusterman MA, Miller MJ, Reece GP, et al. A single center’s experience with 308 free flaps for repair of head and neck cancer defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;93:472–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Kroll SS, Schusterman MA, Reece GP, et al. Timing of pedicle thrombosis and flap loss after free-tissue transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;98:1230–3. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199612000-00017.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Krag C. Experience with transplantation of composite tissues by means of microsurgical vascular anastomoses. II. Late results and comments. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985;19:157–73. https://doi.org/10.3109/02844318509072372.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Kubo T, Yano K, Hosokawa K. Management of flaps with compromised venous outflow in head and neck microsurgical reconstruction. Microsurgery. 2002;22:391–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.10059.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    May JW, Chait LA, O’Brien BM, et al. The no-reflow phenomenon in experimental free flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1978;61:256–67. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-197802000-00017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Siemionow M, Arslan E. Ischemia/reperfusion injury: a review in relation to free tissue transfers. Microsurgery. 2004;24:468–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.20060.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Chen K-T, Mardini S, Chuang DC-C, et al. Timing of presentation of the first signs of vascular compromise dictates the salvage outcome of free flap transfers. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:187–95. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000264077.07779.50.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Smit JM, Zeebregts CJ, Acosta R, et al. Advancements in free flap monitoring in the last decade: a critical review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:177–85. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181c49580.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Karinja SJ, Lee BT. Advances in flap monitoring and impact of enhanced recovery protocols. J Surg Oncol. 2018;118:758–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.25179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Fox PM, Zeidler K, Carey J, et al. White light spectroscopy for free flap monitoring. Microsurgery. 2013;33:198–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.22069.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Koolen PGL, Vargas CR, Ho OA, et al. Does increased experience with tissue oximetry monitoring in microsurgical breast reconstruction lead to decreased flap loss? The learning effect. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137:1093–101. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000481071.59025.82.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Ricci JA, Vargas CR, Ho OA, et al. Evaluating the use of tissue oximetry to decrease intensive unit monitoring for free flap breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2017;79:42–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000000999.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ricci JA, Vargas CR, Lin SJ, et al. A novel free flap monitoring system using tissue oximetry with text message alerts. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2016;32:415–20. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1582264.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Mericli AF, Wren J, Garvey PB, et al. A prospective clinical trial comparing visible light spectroscopy to handheld Doppler for postoperative free tissue transfer monitoring. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140:604–13. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003600.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Chae MP, Rozen WM, Whitaker IS et al. (2015 May) Current evidence for postoperative monitoring of microvascular free flaps: a systematic review, vol 5, United States.

  25. 25.

    Dat AD, Loh IW, Bruscino-Raiola F. Free-flap salvage: muscle only versus skin paddle—an Australian experience. ANZ J Surg. 2017;87:1040–3. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.13522.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Khouri RK, Cooley BC, Kunselman AR, et al. A prospective study of microvascular free-flap surgery and outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102:711–21. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199809030-00015.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Lu G, Fei B. Medical hyperspectral imaging: a review. J Biomed Opt. 2014;19:10901. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.19.1.010901.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Nouvong A, Hoogwerf B, Mohler E, et al. Evaluation of diabetic foot ulcer healing with hyperspectral imaging of oxyhemoglobin and deoxyhemoglobin. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:2056–61. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc08-2246.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Daeschlein G, Langner I, Wild T, et al. Hyperspectral imaging as a novel diagnostic tool in microcirculation of wounds. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2017;67:467–74. https://doi.org/10.3233/CH-179228.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Yudovsky D, Nouvong A, Pilon L. Hyperspectral imaging in diabetic foot wound care. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010;4:1099–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/193229681000400508.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Yudovsky D, Nouvong A, Schomacker K, et al. Assessing diabetic foot ulcer development risk with hyperspectral tissue oximetry. J Biomed Opt. 2011;16:26009. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3535592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Yudovsky D, Nouvong A, Schomacker K, et al. Monitoring temporal development and healing of diabetic foot ulceration using hyperspectral imaging. J Biophotonics. 2011;4:565–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.201000117.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Khaodhiar L, Dinh T, Schomacker KT, et al. The use of medical hyperspectral technology to evaluate microcirculatory changes in diabetic foot ulcers and to predict clinical outcomes. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:903–10. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc06-2209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Köhler H, Jansen-Winkeln B, Maktabi M, et al. Evaluation of hyperspectral imaging (HSI) for the measurement of ischemic conditioning effects of the gastric conduit during esophagectomy. Surg Endosc. 2019;33:3775–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06675-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Jansen-Winkeln B, Holfert N, Köhler H, et al. Determination of the transection margin during colorectal resection with hyperspectral imaging (HSI). Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019;34:731–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-019-03250-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Sucher R, Athanasios A, Köhler H, et al. Hyperspectral Imaging (HSI) in anatomic left liver resection. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2019;62:108–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2019.08.025.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Goetze E, Thiem DGE, Gielisch M, et al. Digitalization and use of artificial intelligence in microvascular reconstructive facial surgery (Digitalisierung und Ansätze künstlicher Intelligenz in der mikrovaskulär-rekonstruktiven Gesichtschirurgie). Chirurg. 2020;91:216–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-019-01103-8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Holmer A, Marotz J, Wahl P, et al. Hyperspectral imaging in perfusion and wound diagnostics—methods and algorithms for the determination of tissue parameters. Biomed Tech (Berl). 2018;63:547–56. https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2017-0155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Wong C-H, Wei F-C. Microsurgical free flap in head and neck reconstruction. Head Neck. 2010;32:1236–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.21284.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Okazaki M, Asato H, Takushima A, et al. Analysis of salvage treatments following the failure of free flap transfer caused by vascular thrombosis in reconstruction for head and neck cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119:1223–32. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000254400.29522.1c.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Jafari-Saraf L, Wilson SE, Gordon IL. Hyperspectral image measurements of skin hemoglobin compared with transcutaneous PO2 measurements. Ann Vasc Surg. 2012;26:537–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2011.12.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Repez A, Oroszy D, Arnez ZM. Continuous postoperative monitoring of cutaneous free flaps using near infrared spectroscopy. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;61:71–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2007.04.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. The hyperspectral camera used for the measurements in this publication was developed by Diaspective Vision GmbH. H. Köhler was an employee of this company. In the long term, Diaspective Vision has a proprietary interest in the development of the camera system resulting in a product for routine clinical use. The clinical tests of the camera have been performed by clinicians (authors 1, 3–8). They have no financial interests and financial arrangements with Diaspective Vision and have received no funding for the measurements and/or preparation of this manuscript. The cameras used during the measurements have been provided by Diaspective Vision. No funding was received for this article. None of the other authors has a financial interest in any of the products, devices, or drugs mentioned in this manuscript. Treatments, material and medical decisions have not and will not be influenced by the results of this study in the future.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript. LHK, GO, IG and SL designed the research; LHK, HK, SK and GO obtained the clinical data; LHK, NS and RN were responsible for intraoperative imaging; LHK, RN and SK were responsible for postoperative imaging; GO and HK prepared the tables and figures; LK and SK prepared the manuscript; and LHK, SK, GO, HK and SL revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lukas H. Kohler.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The ethics committee of affiliated Leipzig University Hospital of Leipzig University has approved the feasibility of the study prior to study initiation. In this study all patients signed a preoperative informed consent form and agreed to participate in the accompanying scientific research.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kohler, L.H., Köhler, H., Kohler, S. et al. Hyperspectral Imaging (HSI) as a new diagnostic tool in free flap monitoring for soft tissue reconstruction: a proof of concept study. BMC Surg 21, 222 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01232-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Hyperspectral imaging
  • Reconstructive surgery
  • Monitoring
  • Imaging
  • Flap surgery