Skip to main content

A rare entity of Primary Ewing sarcoma in kidney

Abstract

Background

Ewing sarcoma (ES) or primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNET) represents a spectrum of poorly differentiated and aggressive malignancies. It rarely arises from the kidney and accounts for less than 1% of renal mass. Given the uncharacteristic clinical symptoms and imaging features, renal Ewing sarcoma (RES) is often diagnosed by postoperative pathology.

Case presentation

Herein, we depicted a case of RES, which was administrated in our institution by chief complaints of intermittent left plank pain and palpable abdominal mass. We demonstrated the aggressive behavior of this renal malignancy and summarized its therapeutic modalities and outcomes.

Conclusion

The diagnosis of RES relies on integrated analysis including histomorphology, immunohistochemical staining and confirmation of molecular-genetic testing. Despite the surgery and adjuvant therapy, optimized and potent therapeutic regimes are still urgently needed to improve the poor prognosis of RES.

Peer Review reports

Background

Ewing sarcoma (ES), also known as primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNET), is a group of undifferentiated tumors that originates from neuroectoderm. It typically encountered in the bone and soft tissue of children and young adults [1]. The occurrence of ES/PNET in kidney is firstly depicted in 1975 [2]. Up to date, there emerges limited reported cases of ES/PNET in kidney by the rarity of this disease. Renal Ewing sarcoma (RES) presents highly malignant, grows rapidly, and metastases early to the lung, bone and lymph node [3, 4]. Thus, it is indispensable to distinguish RES from other renal entities. Herein, we present a case of an adult patient with RES who was diagnosed and administered in our hospital. We report this case in accordance with the CARE-Guideline [5].

Case presentation

A 31-year-old female patient was admitted with chief complaints of intermittent pain in the left plank and palpable abdominal mass. No urinary symptoms such as haematuria and dysuria were found. Her past medical history and family history of malignancy were unremarkable. Results of routine blood and urine examination as well as tumor markers including AFP, AFP-L3, CEA, CA199, CA125 and SCC were within the normal range. Enhanced computed tomography (CT) demonstrated a hypoechoic mass (18 cm × 14.5 cm × 14 cm) from the left renal with central necrosis, no invasion to renal veins or inferior vena cava (IVC) was reported (Fig. 1a, b). Further clinical investigations including chest HRCT showed no evidence of metastasis. 3-dimensional imaging of the neoplasm was conducted (Fig. 1c), and an open, left radical nephrectomy was performed. Macroscopic examination showed a huge soft tissue mass attached to the spleen and pancreas tail. In surgery, the spleen was separated from the tumor capsule, and partial left adrenal gland and distal pancreatic involving about 2 cm × 1.5 cm × 1 cm pancreas tail tissue were excised with the assistance of hepatobiliary surgeons. Microscopic examination revealed a small round cell tumor with focal necrosis, endovascular tumor thrombi and adrenal involvement were detected (Fig. 2a, b). The tumor cells were arranged in sheet with fiber segmentation. Immunohistochemistry results indicated positive stained for AE1/AE3, CD99, CD56, synaptophysin (Syn), Ki-67(50%), and negatively stained for S-100, EMA, CgA, WT1, Desmin, SMA and MyoD1 (Fig. 2c–g). In the light of these findings, a pathological diagnosis of primary ES/PNET of the left renal was made. The diagnosis was further confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) by detecting the rearrangements of t (22q12): EWS-FLI1 type 1 translocation (Fig. 2h). A PET-CT examination was conducted at 3 months postoperatively and showed no recurrence or metastasis. Adjuvant chemotherapy including vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide (VAC), ifosfamide, etoposide (IE) and carboplatin (AUC = 4) was delivered after surgery. During the triweekly chemotherapy, metastasis was found in the retroperitoneal lymph node at 6 months postoperative, followed by multiple metastases to the left neck, bilateral adrenal gland, psoas major, retroperitoneum and bilateral diaphragm angles. The chemotherapy was maintained by the follow-up at 12 months postoperatively, and lung metastasis was detected by PET-CT scan. Afterwards, the antiangiogenic drug, apatinib, was recommended by the oncologist due to the intolerance to chemotherapy. This patient survived with tumor by the latest follow-up at 18 months postoperatively.

Fig. 1
figure1

CT scan and three-dimensional imaging. Enhanced computed tomography (CT) revealed a hypoechoic mass about 18 cm × 14.5 cm × 14 cm arising from the left renal. a Cross-section. The black arrows represent the enhanced solid tumors and the white arrows represent non-enhanced tumor necrosis components. b Angiography of bilateral renal. c Three-dimensional imaging of the neoplasm

Fig. 2
figure2

Pathological examination of the surgical specimen. HE staining (a and b) indicated that the tumor was composed of a population of small round cells arranged in sheet. Immunohistochemical staining was positive for c CD99, d CD56, e syn and f Ki67 (50%) and negative for g S100. Magnification details: a × 100; b × 200; c × 100; d × 100; e × 200; f × 100; g × 100. g EWSR1 gene translocation was detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization testing (FISH)

Discussion

ES rarely presents as a primary kidney tumor. The clinical symptoms and signs are usually nonspecific, such as abdominal or flank pain, hematuria and palpable mass. Imaging examinations often reveal indistinctive signs but central necrosis and hemorrhage, which raises the difficulty of accurate preoperative diagnosis of RES. Mostly, the diagnosis was made by postoperative pathological results. Histologically, RES is composed of uniform small round cells. The major differential diagnosis for this histomorphology in kidney consists of Wilms tumor, malignant lymphoma, synovial sarcoma, solid variant of alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma, clear cell sarcoma of the kidney, small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, desmoplastic small round blue cell tumor and small cell carcinoma [6]. These poorly differentiated small round cell tumors share with overlapping morphologic features but have varied prognosis, which makes the distinguish diagnosis notoriously difficult but imperative. Advances in immunohistochemistry and molecular-genetic techniques are helpful, as numerous positive and negative immunohistochemical markers offer a better distinction. CD99 and FLI-1 were commonly positive in ES/PNET, including those arising from the kidney. CD45, WT-1 and Desmin have been reported as negative [7, 8]. These markers by immunohistochemical staining established a useful albeit imprecise diagnosis panel of RES, as some of the markers are shared among small round blue tumors. For the indefinable cases, the ancillary molecular testing is recommended [9, 10]. ES/PNET is characterized by fixed chromosomal translocation t (11:22) between the genes EWS (22q12) and FLI-1 (11q24). In the present case, the EWS-FLI1 type 1 translocation was detected by FISH.

In view of the striking rarity of RES, the standard treatment for this tumor remains absence and mostly referred to clinical regimens of osseous Ewing’s sarcoma (ESB). Currently, radical nephrectomy followed by chemotherapy was commendatory. Surgical intervention may incorporate with cavotomy in the presence of venous tumor thrombus, which was frequently reported in RES and was stated to be associated with the presence of pulmonary metastasis [11, 12]. Chemotherapy was recognized to be beneficial to RES survival [13]. The commonly used chemotherapeutic regimes are comprised of multiple agents including vincristine, ifosfamide, doxorubicin, etoposide, cyclophosphamide, etoposide or actinomycin D. In the latest years, neoadjuvant chemotherapy following biopsy was acceptable [14], however, its survival benefits need to be verified in the future. Radiation has shown some success as salvage therapy for targeted lesions. However, conflicting views exist surrounding recommending radiotherapy as the primary treatment modality [15]. Given the multiple metastasis and the poor physical condition of this patient, radiation therapy was not recommended by oncologists. Owing to the aggressive adjuvant therapy, the prognosis of localized RES is improved [16], whereas the survival of patients with metastasis at initial diagnosis remains poor [17]. In addition, the newly approved anti-tumor agents, such as the antiangiogenic drug apatinib [18], were claimed to serve as one of the therapeutic options for RES. More studies are needed to validate the benefits of targeted anti-tumor agents including apatinib on the recurrence free and overall survival of RES patient in the future.

Due to its atypical location as stated, the diagnosis of ES/PNET in kidney relies on integrated analysis including histomorphology, multiple immunohistochemical staining and confirmation of molecular-genetic testing. Despite the improved prognosis of this tumor by surgery and adjuvant therapy, optimized and potent therapeutic regimes are still urgently needed.

Availability of data and materials

All data and materials in the manuscript will be available from the corresponding author for non-commercial purposes.

Abbreviations

ES:

Ewing sarcoma

PNET:

Primitive neuroectodermal tumors

RES:

Renal Ewing sarcoma

CT:

Computed tomography

IVC:

Inferior vena cava

PET-CT:

Positron emission tomography-computed tomography

VAC:

Vincristine, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide

IE:

Ifosfamide and etoposide

FISH:

Fluorescence in situ hybridization testing

References

  1. 1.

    Celli R, Cai G. Ewing sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the kidney: a rare and lethal entity. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016;140(3):281–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Seemayer TA, Thelmo WL, Bolande RP, Wiglesworth FW. Peripheral neuroectodermal tumors. Persp Pediatr Pathol. 1975;2:151–72.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Zhang S, Li Y, Wang R, Song B. Ewing’s sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the kidney: a case report and literature review. Transl Androl Urol. 2019;8(5):562–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Ellinger J, Bastian PJ, Hauser S, Biermann K, Muller SC. Primitive neuroectodermal tumor: rare, highly aggressive differential diagnosis in urologic malignancies. Urology. 2006;68(2):257–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Riley DS, Barber MS, Kienle GS, Aronson JK, von Schoen-Angerer T, Tugwell P, Kiene H, Helfand M, Altman DG, Sox H, et al. CARE guidelines for case reports: explanation and elaboration document. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;89:218–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Jimenez RE, Folpe AL, Lapham RL, Ro JY, O’Shea PA, Weiss SW, Amin MB. Primary Ewing’s sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the kidney: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical analysis of 11 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2002;26(3):320–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Risi E, Iacovelli R, Altavilla A, Alesini D, Palazzo A, Mosillo C, Trenta P, Cortesi E. Clinical and pathological features of primary neuroectodermal tumor/Ewing sarcoma of the kidney. Urology. 2013;82(2):382–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Parham DM, Roloson GJ, Feely M, Green DM, Bridge JA, Beckwith JB. Primary malignant neuroepithelial tumors of the kidney: a clinicopathologic analysis of 146 adult and pediatric cases from the National Wilms’ Tumor Study Group Pathology Center. Am J Surg Pathol. 2001;25(2):133–46.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Folpe AL, Goldblum JR, Rubin BP, Shehata BM, Liu W, Dei Tos AP, Weiss SW. Morphologic and immunophenotypic diversity in Ewing family tumors: a study of 66 genetically confirmed cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29(8):1025–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Yang Y, Zhang L, Wei Y, Wang H, Xiong W, Chen Z, Hes O, Zheng J. Detection of EWSR1 translocation with nuclear extraction-based fluorescence in situ hybridization for diagnosis of Ewing’s sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor. Anal Quant Cytol Histol. 2007;29(4):221–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Karpate A, Menon S, Basak R, Yuvaraja TB, Tongaonkar HB, Desai SB. Ewing sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the kidney: clinicopathologic analysis of 34 cases. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2012;16(4):267–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Fergany AF, Dhar N, Budd GT, Skacel M, Garcia JA. Primary extraosseous ewing sarcoma of the kidney with level III inferior vena cava thrombus. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2009;7(3):E95-97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Miser JS, Kinsella TJ, Triche TJ, Steis R, Tsokos M, Wesley R, Horvath K, Belasco J, Longo DL, Glatstein E, et al. Treatment of peripheral neuroepithelioma in children and young adults. J Clin Oncol. 1987;5(11):1752–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Rowe RG, Thomas DG, Schuetze SM, Hafez KS, Lawlor ER, Chugh R. Ewing sarcoma of the kidney: case series and literature review of an often overlooked entity in the diagnosis of primary renal tumors. Urology. 2013;81(2):347–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Thomas JC, Sebek BA, Krishnamurthi V. Primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the kidney with inferior vena cava and atrial tumor thrombus. J Urol. 2002;168(4 Pt 1):1486–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Grier HE, Krailo MD, Tarbell NJ, Link MP, Fryer CJH, Pritchard DJ, Gebhardt MC, Dickman PS, Perlman EJ, Meyers PA, et al. Addition of ifosfamide and etoposide to standard chemotherapy for Ewing’s sarcoma and primitive neuroectodermal tumor of bone. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(8):694–701.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ladenstein R, Potschger U, Le Deley MC, Whelan J, Paulussen M, Oberlin O, van den Berg H, Dirksen U, Hjorth L, Michon J, et al. Primary disseminated multifocal Ewing sarcoma: results of the Euro-EWING 99 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(20):3284–91.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Zhao Y, Chen Y, Cheng K, Li ZP, Zeng H, Liu JY. Renal Ewing sarcoma treated with apatinib. Anticancer Drugs. 2018;29(7):702–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

None.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LC: Data analysis, Writing; YX: Data collection; HS: Data collection; HH: Manuscript revision; DZ: Data analysis and manuscript revision. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dong Zhuo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Institutional Review Board of Yijishan Hospital Ethics Committee approved the present case report.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cheng, L., Xu, Y., Song, H. et al. A rare entity of Primary Ewing sarcoma in kidney. BMC Surg 20, 280 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-020-00948-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Renal ewing sarcoma (RES)
  • Primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET)
  • Nephrectomy
  • Chemotherapy