Skip to main content

Synchronous hepatocellular carcinoma and gallbladder adenocarcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation: a case report and literature review

Abstract

Background

Double primary cancers have a low incidence rate, and synchronous hepatocellular carcinoma and gallbladder adenocarcinoma are rarely reported. Here, we report such a case— the 12th case of synchronous double primary cancers featuring HCC and GC, but the first case of neuroendocrine differentiation in the gallbladder.

Case presentation

A 77-year-old female was admitted to the hospital complaining of weakness and inappetence for six months. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen indicated an 11 cm space-occupying lesion in the right lobe of the liver. Later, magnetic resonance imaging showed a high possibility of a massive hepatoma, and multiple gallstones were also seen. After transhepatic arterial chemoembolization, a repeat abdominal CT showed obvious local nodular thickening in the gallbladder wall. Finally, resection of the right lobe of the liver and cholecystectomy were performed. During an approximately 2-year follow-up, the patient recovered uneventfully without recurrence or metastasis.

Conclusion

The disease in this case is rare and lacked typical radiological features. More precise and advanced diagnostic techniques are needed to obtain a clear diagnosis and refine treatment strategies. The management strategy should always be curative, even in the presence of multiple malignancies.

Peer Review reports

Background

Multiple primary cancers (MPCs) refer to two or more kinds of malignancies occurring in the same or different organs, with unknown pathogeneses. MPC involving both the liver and gallbladder is rarely reported, and only 15 cases have been recorded, with 11 cases histologically proven as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and gallbladder adenocarcinoma (GC). Here, we present the 12th case of synchronous double primary cancers featuring HCC and GC, but the first case of neuroendocrine differentiation in the gallbladder.

Case presentation

In 2017, a 77-year-old retired female patient was admitted to our hospital, which serves as an outpatient hospital, with only complaints of weakness and inappetence for 6 months. A contrast-enhanced CT indicated an 11 cm space-occupying lesion in the right lobe of the liver. There was no particular family history or infectious medical history. She did not receive any medical intervention before admission, and her vital signs, such as blood pressure, heart rate, respiration rate and body temperature, were normal. Physical examination showed the appearance of mild cachexia, no significant abdominal symptoms such as tenderness, rebound tenderness or muscular tension were noticed, and the abdomen was soft. Palpation revealed a normal liver and spleen, and normal borborygmus existed. The blood routine was normal, other blood chemistries showed a serum albumin of 29.3 (40–55 g/L), ALT of 21 (< 15U/L), AST of 98 (13-35U/L), T-Bil of 17.7 (5.1–20.5 µmol/L), CEA of 3.02 (< 4.7 ng/mL), CA19-9 of 7.49 (< 39U/mL) and CA12-5 of 20.35 (< 35U/mL), but a unusually high level of AFP (more than 1210 ng/mL). Serological tests for hepatitis viruses B and C were negative, as were other infectious indications. Then, the patient underwent an MRI examination that revealed a suspicion of a massive hepatoma (8.9 × 12.3 × 9.9 cm) and multiple gallstones. In fact, there was slight local nodular thickening in the gallbladder wall that was easily ignored (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure1

Abdominal MRI showed an 8.9 × 12.3 cm-sized mass, gallstones and slightly local nodular thickening in the gallbladder wall; a and c T1W images, b and d T2W images

TACE is the most widely used primary treatment for unresectable HCC, and was the recommended first-line therapy for patient with intermediate-stage disease [1]. Liver resection remains the curative for various liver malignancies [2]. Currently the extent of liver resection/future liver remnants volume has been shown to most consistently and decisively determine the liver regeneration [3]. Truly some centers for radiation segmentectomy has also shown the encouraging results using selective internal radiation therapy(SIRT) as an alternative to curative therapies, but it is not supported by guidelines due to a lack of solid evidence. Therefore, considering the massive entity, the patient first underwent TACE to minimize the size of the mass. Approximately one and a half months later, a repeat abdominal enhanced CT was performed, showing the changes after TACE (Fig. 2). Additionally, the gallbladder lesion became more obvious (Fig. 3).

Fig. 2
figure2

Abdominal CT images after TACE to observe the hepatoma. a Plain scan, b arterial phase, c venous phase, d coronal plane

Fig. 3
figure3

Abdominal CT images after TACE to observe the gallbladder mainly. a Arterial phase (white arrow indicating nodular thickening in the gallbladder wall), b venous phase

From the CT images it could be concluded that a future remnant liver volume of at least 30% of the original total liver volume, which met the current guidelines for extended liver resection [4]. Moreover, the tumor located in the right lobe of liver, without metastasis in either the peritoneal cavity or the rest of the liver. So routinely right hemi-hepatectomy and cholecystectomy were planned. After preoperative preparation and general anesthesia, the patient underwent surgery in the supine position performed by the chief physician, who has approximately 25 years of specialized training. Intraoperatively, the tumor located in the right lobe involved segments V, VI, VII, and VIII and partially invaded the right diaphragm (Fig. 4), and the size of the gallbladder was 6.5 × 3.5 × 2 cm, with the wall was partly thickened to 0.5 cm. Without adhesion and invasion, anatomy of hepatic portal area was clear, then complete resection of hepatoma with negative margin and lymphadenectomy were achieved.

Fig. 4
figure4

Intraoperative findings: the tumor located in the right lobe of the liver involved segments V, VI, VII, and VIII and partially invaded the right diaphragm

Finally, postoperative histopathological examination (Fig. 5) proved synchronous primary double cancers in the liver and gallbladder that were moderately differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma and poorly differentiated gallbladder adenocarcinoma accompanied by neuroendocrine differentiation, with immunohistochemical markers AFP(−), CD19(+), CD56(+), and partly SYN(+). There was no microvessel invasion, no lymph node involvement and no perineural invasion.

Fig. 5
figure5

Postoperative histopathological examination of the resected specimen (hematoxylin and eosin stain, × 400). a Moderately differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma, b poorly differentiated gallbladder adenocarcinoma accompanied by neuroendocrine differentiation

The patient was discharged after 14 days and recovered well. The patient had an uneventful recovery over at least 24 months, without metastasis or recurrence. However, the patient was lost to follow-up, so her final outcome is unknown.

Discussion and conclusions

The diagnostic criteria for MPC set by Warren and Cates are commonly accepted: (1) each tumor must present definite features of malignancy, (2) each tumor must be distinct, and (3) the chance of one being a metastasis of the other must be excluded [5]. Based on the different times that each primary cancer arises, they are divided into synchronous MPC and metachronous MPC, where synchronous MPC means a secondary malignancy occurring at the same time or within 6 months after the first malignancy [6]. Thus, we can conclude that the case presented can be regarded as multiple primary malignancies and synchronous double primary cancer. In MPC, liver cancer showed the fewest occurrences compared to other primary cancers [7], and synchronous HCC and GC is even more rare. Reviewing the previous literature, only 15 cases (Table 1) have been reported so far, with 6 in English [8,9,10,11,12,13] and 9 in Chinese. Among these, 11 cases were histologically proven as HCC and GC. Here, we present a case with the largest HCC and the poorest differentiation of GC. Furthermore, this is the first case reported in the literature that presented both HCC and GC accompanied by neuroendocrine differentiation.

Table 1 Cases of synchronous HCC and GC recorded in literature so far

The pathogenesis of MPC has not been exactly clarified, although the etiological factors can be roughly grouped into host-related factors, lifestyle factors and environmental influences [14] as well as genetic factors and treatment-related factors [15]. Furthermore, it is commonly acknowledged that liver cancers are linked to alcohol consumption, virus infection or aflatoxin, while gallbladder carcinoma is linked to gallstones or inflammation. However, in this case, apart from gallstones, the patient appeared to have no other risk factors for MPC.

The preoperative diagnosis of MPC can be difficult, and gallbladder cancer with hepatic metastasis or liver cancer with gallbladder invasion can be mistakenly diagnosed. In this case, except for weakness and inappetence, no other discomfort was observed. A sharp rise in the serum level of AFP is usually linked with liver cancer, while CEA, CA19-9 and CA125 are linked with gallbladder adenocarcinoma, but these levels were normal in this patient. The giant tumor in the right lobe of the liver was noticed first so the tiny lesions in the gallbladder wall were nearly neglected. Six weeks after TACE was performed, an enhanced CT scan clearly demonstrated nodular thickness of the gallbladder wall up to 0.5 cm. To some extent, unobvious symptoms, insensitive serum examinations and atypical radiological manifestations made the diagnosis delayed and vague. Even though these assessments may mislead us to consider the possibility a primary HCC with satellite nodules in the gallbladder may exist, we finally denied this possibility because the two specimens showed totally different histopathological morphologies; moreover, the immunohistochemical markers revealed AFP(+) in liver specimens and AFP(−) in gallbladder specimens.

For all types of cancer, it is necessary to obtain as specific of a diagnosis as early as possible because different kinds of malignancies require various therapeutic methods. Few studies in the literature evaluate the different aspects that MPC involve and are also inconsistent [16], yet it is commonly agreed upon that the multiplicity of primary malignancies itself does not necessarily indicate a poor prognosis as long as an adequate diagnosis and treatment are performed [10]; overall survival depends on the most malignant tumor. According to the stage of each tumor, the pathological type and the patients’ physical condition, therapeutic strategies can be made [17]. When evaluating one primary malignancy, the possibility of finding another primary tumor must always be considered [18]. Radical surgery combined with postoperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy can achieve a longer survival time than conservative treatment [19]. However, metastatic cancers usually require palliative treatment.

In conclusion, synchronous primary double cancers in the liver and gallbladder display are rare and lack apparent radiological features. More precise and advanced diagnostic techniques are needed to obtain a clear diagnosis and refine treatment strategies. The management strategy should always be curative, even in the presence of multiple malignancies.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. tjshibaomin@tongji.edu.cn.

Abbreviations

MPC:

Multiple primary cancers

HCC:

Hepatocellular carcinoma

GC:

Gallbladder adenocarcinoma

CT:

Computed tomography

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

ALT:

Alanine aminotransferase

AST:

Aspartate aminotransferase

T-Bil:

Total bilirubin

CEA:

Carcinoembryonic antigen

CA19-9:

Carbohydrate antigen19-9

CA12-5:

Carbohydrate antigen 12-5

AFP:

Alpha-fetoprotein

TACE:

Transhepatic arterial chemoembolization

CD:

Cluster differentiation

SYN:

Synaptophysin

References

  1. 1.

    Galle PR, Forner A, Llovet JM, et al. EASL clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2018;69:182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Chan J, Perini M, Fink M, et al. The outcomes of central hepatectomy versus extended hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hpb. 2020;22(4):487–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Pravisani R, Baccarani U, Eguchi S. In search of a pathogenesis for impaired liver regeneration after major hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection: the plot thickens! Hepatol Res. 2019;49(10):1091–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Gruttadauria S, Pagano D, Liotta R, et al. Liver volume restoration and hepatic microarchitecture in small-for-size syndrome. Ann Transpl. 2015;20:381–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Warren S, Gates O. Multiple primary malignant tumors: a survey of the literature and a statistical study. Am J Cancer. 1932;16:1358.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    De Luca A, Frusone F, Vergine M, et al. Breast cancer and multiple primary malignant tumors: case report and review of the literature. In Vivo. 2019;33(4):1313–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Hayat MJ, Howlader N, Reichman ME, et al. Cancer statistics, trends, and multiple primary cancer analyses from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) program. Oncologist. 2007;12(1):20–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Zhang ZG, Chen Y, Ji R, et al. Synchronous cancers of gallbladder carcinoma and combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma: an unusual case and literature review. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Lu J, Xiong X-Z, Cheng N-S. Hepatobiliary and pancreatic: coexisting cancers: Hepatic neuroendocrine carcinomas with gall bladder adenocarcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;29(7):1343.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Kim JW, Han JW, Jung SY, et al. Synchronous double primary malignant tumor of the gallbladder and liver: a case report. World J Surg Oncol. 2011;9:84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    La GG, Barbagallo F, Rodolico M, et al. Hepatocarcinoma, gallstone disease and gallbladder carcinoma: a case report of a rare incidental association. Chir Ital. 2004;56(4):571–4.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Taniai N, Onda M, Tajiri T, et al. Synchronous carcinoma of the gallbladder in a patient with intrahepatic bile duct carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology. 2000;47(31):121–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Imada J, Hoshino H, Nishimura D, et al. Case report: multiple cancers: hepatocellular carcinoma and adenocarcinomas of the common bile duct and the gall-bladder in a woman with primary biliary cirrhosis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1996;11(6):546–50.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Vogt A, Schmid S, Heinimann K, et al. Multiple primary tumours: challenges and approaches, a review. ESMO Open. 2017;2(2):e000172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Copur MS, Manapuram S. Multiple primary tumors over a lifetime. Oncology (Williston Park). 2019;33:7.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Nemes A, Nagy V. The impact of multiple primary neoplasms in daily practicea systematic review of the literature. J BUON. 2018;23(1):14–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Zhai C, Cai Y, Lou F, et al. Multiple primary malignant tumors - a clinical analysis of 15,321 patients with malignancies at a single center in China. J Cancer. 2018;9(16):2795–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Babu MCS, Asati V, Babu KG, et al. Synchronous primary cancers: Renal cell carcinoma and rectal cancer. J Cancer Res Ther. 2019;15(1):250–1.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Lv M, Zhang X, Shen Y, et al. Clinical analysis and prognosis of synchronous and metachronous multiple primary malignant tumors. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(17):6799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding was received.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

XY and SBM designed the idea and wrote the manuscript. WH and CQN participated in designing the study and collecting the data. LNB drafted the manuscript and checked the language. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bao-Min Shi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Tongji Hospital, Tongji University Medical School. The patient and her relatives signed informed consent forms before inclusion.

Consent for publication

The patient agreed to release her medical information for research and provided written informed consent for the publication of the details in this manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, Y., Chen, QN., Wang, H. et al. Synchronous hepatocellular carcinoma and gallbladder adenocarcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation: a case report and literature review. BMC Surg 20, 246 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-020-00905-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Hepatocellular carcinoma
  • Gallbladder cancer
  • Synchronous double primary cancer
  • Case report