This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Acute scrotum as a complication of Thiersch operation for rectal prolapse in a child
© Saleem and Al-Momani; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 11 August 2006
Accepted: 28 December 2006
Published: 28 December 2006
We report a case of acute scrotal condition that presented in a four year old male child one year after being treated for an idiopathic rectal prolapse utilizing Thiersch wire.
The acute scrotum had resulted from spreading perianal infection due to erosion of the circlage wire. The condition was treated with antibiotics and removal of the wire. The child made an uneventful recovery.
This case highlights that patients with Thiersch wire should be followed until the wire is removed. Awareness of anal lesions as a cause of acute scrotal conditions, and history and physical examination are emphasized.
Acute scrotum is a surgical emergency. Causes are usually intra scrotal conditions, of which torsion of the testis is the most important. Less common causes are extra scrotal in origin, namely idiopathic scrotal edema. Anal conditions are rare causes of acute scrotum. Diagnosis sometimes may be very difficult without surgical exploration. Careful history taking and physical examination including perianal region is emphasized.
Culture taken from the site of the wound grew streptococcus fecalis sensitive to the administered antibiotics. The scrotal swelling and redness subsided gradually. The child was discharged without any complications. Follow up was uneventful for both the scrotal redness and swelling as well as the rectal prolapse.
Common causes of acute scrotum at the age of four years are torsion of the testis or its appendix and incarcerated hernia. Less common causes are idiopathic scrotal edema and vasculitis (Henoch-Schonlein purpura). Rare causes are of anal pathology. Idiopathic scrotal edema was suggested by Nicholas et al to be of anal pathology origin . Nour and MacKinnon reported ten cases out of 143 cases of acute scrotum were due to anal pathology .
The exact diagnosis of acute scrotum is very difficult in spite of available diagnostic means. The majority of cases require surgical exploration to rule out a testicular torsion. Careful history taking and physical examination can, as in this case, save the child from an operation.
Rectal prolapse in children is the result of self-limiting underlying disease, such as diarrhea, constipation, and weight loss . Minor corrective procedures are injection of sclerosing agent [4, 5], such as alcohol , phenol , or hypertonic saline into the submucosa, cauterization of mucosa or anal encirclement according to the Thiersch-Ombredanne or its modification [8–10]. Each has its own advantages and recurrence rate. The advantages of the Thiersch operation are simplicity, effectiveness, and safety. The disadvantages are poor tolerance, rigidity, breakage and infection. Infection has always been described as local and superficial. As a matter of fact the principle of Ekehorn's operation for rectal prolapse is based on perirectal infection to prevent the rectum from prolapse by the formation of adhesions between the rectum and the surrounding structures . Infection has also been reported after a Dacron prosthesis was used instead of wire, necessitating its removal . Perineal clostridial myonecrosis has been described as a complication of Thiersch operation . In the case we have reported the complication resulted from long standing wire acting as a hard foreign body that eroded the overlying skin resulting in perineal wound infection. Spreading of the infection may be related to the characteristics of the bacteria involved or because of shared lymphatic drainage. This case adds to the spectrum of the anal pathologies that may lead to scrotal infection. Awareness of such a complication, as well as close follow up of patients and a high degree of suspicion are the key to successful management.
This case highlights that patients with Thiersch wire should be followed until the wire is removed. Awareness of anal lesions as a cause of acute scrotal conditions, and history and physical examination are emphasized
Consent has been obtained
- Nicholas JL, Morgan A, Zachary RB: Idiopathic oedema of scrotum in young boys. Surgery. 1970, 67: 847-850.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nour S, MacKinnon AE: J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1991, 36: 392-394.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zempsky WT, Rosenstien BJ: The cause of rectal prolapse in children. Am J dis Child. 1988, 142: 338-339.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schepens MA, Verhelst AA: Reappraisal of the Ekehorns rectopexy in the management of rectal prolapse in children. J Ped Surg. 1993, 28 (11): 1494-1497. 10.1016/0022-3468(93)90439-R.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Malyshev Y, Gulin V: Our experience with the treatment of rectal prolapse in infants and children. Am J Proctol. 1973, 24: 270-272.Google Scholar
- Wyllie G: The injection treatment of rectal prolapse. J Ped Surg. 1979, 14: 62-64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kay N, Zachary R: The treatment of rectal prolapse in children with injection of 30% saline solution. J Ped Surg. 1970, 5: 334-337. 10.1016/0022-3468(70)90190-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Thiersch C: Carl Thiersch 1822–1895. Concerning prolapseof the rectum with special emphasis on the operation by Thiersch. Dis Colon Rectum. 1988, 31 (2): 154-155.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Khanduja KS, Hardy TG, Aguilar PS, Plasencia G, Hartman RF, Bowers F, Stewart WR: A new silicone prosthesis in the modified Thiersch operation. Dis Colon Rectum. 1988, 31 (5): 380-383.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Larach SW, Vazquez B: Modified Thiersch procedure with silastic mesh implant: a simple solution for fecal incontenance and severe prolapse. South Med J. 1986, 79 (3): 307-309. 10.1097/00007611-198603000-00012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Poole GV, Pennell TC, Myers RT, Hightower F: Modified Thiersch operation for rectal prolapse. Technique and results. Am Surg. 1985, 51 (4): 226-229.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rye BA, Seidelin C, Dueholm S: perineal myonecrosis following Thiersch operation for rectal prolapse. Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1987, 76 (2): 136-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2482/6/19/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.