Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Burn wounds infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa triggers weight loss in rats

  • 1, 2Email author,
  • 1, 4,
  • 1,
  • 4,
  • 4,
  • 2,
  • 4,
  • 4,
  • 3 and
  • 1
BMC Surgery20055:19

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-5-19

©  Steinstraesser et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005

  • Received: 16 April 2005
  • Accepted: 17 September 2005
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Despite dramatic improvements in the management of burns, infection still remains a serious risk for the burn patient. The aim of this study was to shed light on the impact of acute burn injury with or without infection on cytokine profiles.

Methods

Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 21) were randomized into three groups: 1) burn only 2) burn and infection or 3) sham burn. Weight was monitored and blood was collected for cytokine ELISA, LPS quantification, and peripheral blood analysis. Animals were sacrificed either after 6 or 12 days.

Results

Infected animals showed substantial weight loss until day 6 post-burn as compared to burn alone. Endotoxin and TNF-α levels were elevated early in the infected burn group within 48 hours post-burn. In contrast, significant up-regulation of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 occurred later in the clinical course and was associated with the recovery from weight loss.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that in the presence of infection, you get a SIRS response possibly due to transient endotoxemia that is only seen in the infection group. In contrast, both burn and infection get a late IL-10 (CARS) response, which is then associated with a return to normal weight in the infection group.

Keywords

  • Infected Group
  • Thermal Injury
  • Endotoxin Level
  • Total Body Surface Area
  • Treatment Control Group

Background

While current procedures for burn injury management have improved patient prognosis, increased morbidity and mortality remains a major challenge for the clinician. Thus, identification of the mechanisms responsible for post-burn immune dysfunction and increased susceptibility to wound infection, subsequent sepsis and multiple organ failure under such conditions, is crucial for the development of improved treatment modalities. Thermal injury induces an immuncompromised state that predisposes patients to sepsis and multiple organ failure [1–6]. Skin, as the first line of defense against invading microbes, is equipped with an array of immune mediators capable of recruiting inflammatory cells to enable neutralization and clearance of bacteria and fungi [7, 8]. Hence, immune failure in a burn patient who has lost the skin barrier is vulnerable to infection. These are major complications associated with burn trauma and recent evidence suggests that activation of a pro-inflammatory cascade plays an important role in their development [9].

For a long time the integument had been considered as an organ of passive protection but over the past few years several discoveries have shown that the skin is not only the target of diseases connected with immunological mechanisms but moreover, an important immunocompetent organ in itself [10]. The difficulty depends on the causal connectivity of findings since a clear distinction has not always been made between the early shock phase and the later continuance of organ failure. Various physiologic and immunologic alterations are observed in acute inflammations associated with infection, trauma and thermal injury. Recently, increasing attention has been directed to the role of cytokines in the mechanisms of such alterations. Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), which are pro-inflammatory cytokines, and interleukin-10 (IL-10) are considered potential mediators of inflammation produced by immunoregulatory cells as well as by a variety of other cell types [11]. Cytokines play a major role in the regulation of immune response, hematopoesis and inflammation [12].

The aim of this paper is to shed light on the role of wound infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa on the systemic inflammatory response and weight loss in burn injury.

Methods

Bacteria

A multi drug resistant strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from human burn wound was used for this study. Over night culture was diluted into fresh TSB and incubated for 2.5 h at 37°C. The subculture was centrifuged (10 min, 4°C, 880 g). The bacterial pellet was washed once and resuspended in a cold sodium phosphate buffer (J.T.Baker, Deventer, Holland, pH 7.4). CFU were calculated by OD600 nm measurement (UV-VIS-Spektrometer, Perkin Elmer 555).

Animals

Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (250–300 g) were obtained from the Unit for Laboratory Animal Medicine (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI) and maintained under standard laboratory conditions. In addition to a resting period at the institutional vivarium, animals were acclimated to the laboratory environment for at least 48 hours before treatment. After treatment, the rats were placed in individual cages in a temperature controlled room with food and water provided ad libitum and a 12 hour light and a 12 hour dark diurnal cycle. All experiments were performed in accordance with National Institute of Health guidelines and approval was obtained from the University of Michigan Animal Care and Use Committee.

Experimental design

Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 21) were randomized into three groups: 1) burn only; 2) burn and infection (108 CFU of multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa) or 3) sham burn. Animals in the first two groups received a 30% (TBSA) partial thickness burn. The animals were anesthetized prior to each intervention with intraperitoneal Ketamine hydrochloride (100 mg/kg; Fort Dodge Laboratories, Fort Dodge, Iowa) and Xylazine (13 mg/kg; Bayer Corporation, Shawnee Mission, Kansas) injection. The skin of the whole torso was clipped and treated with depilatory cream (Sally Hansen®Div. Del Laboratories, Inc., Farmingdale. NY). Twenty-four hours later, rats were placed in a mold, which exposed an area of 30% total body surface area (TBSA). Rats, except the sham burn group 3, sustained a superficial partial scald injury at the defined area on both flanks and back at 60°C for twenty seconds. This extend of injury in this animal model is time dependent and has been previously described [13]. Additionally, the burn wound of the infected group was covered with a 2 cm × 2 cm gauze containing 108 CFU (colony forming units) of log-phase Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Injury was covered with Tegaderm™ HP (3 M Health Care, St. Paul, MN) and Flex-Wrap™ Self-Adherent Wrap (The Kendall Company, Mansfield, MA). After treatment, rats were resuscitated subcutaneously with 5 ml saline. For the remainder of the study, all animals received buprenorphine (0.3 mg/kg) intra peritoneal twice daily for pain control post-burn. In previous experiments we have not observed any abdominal injury with this scald burn model which could affect food intake or absorption [13–17]. Weight changes were monitored daily. Blood was collected after 12, 24, 48 and 72 h, then after 6 and 12 days. This was used for cytokine ELISA, LPS quantification, and peripheral blood analysis. After either 6 or 12 days the animals were sacrificed and treated areas of the infected and non infected wound tissues were harvested aseptically, weighed, homogenized, serially diluted and plated in triplicate on trypticase soy agar with 5% sheep blood and Pseudomonas isolation agar (both from Becton Dickinson). Bacterial plates were then incubated for 18 hours and the number of colony forming units were counted in blinded fashion. Results are expressed as CFU per gram infected skin tissue.

Peripheral blood analysis

At appropriate time points, 20 μl of EDTA anti-coagulated blood was collected from the rat tail vein. A Hemavet Mascot Multispecies Hematology System Counter 1500 R (CDC Technologies Inc., Oxford, CT) was used to measure the blood differential, WBC, RBC, hemoglobin and hematocrit. Furthermore, 200 μl of plasma was collected and stored at -20°C for cytokine and endotoxin screening.

Endotoxin levels

For the purpose of determining the amount of endotoxin present in the plasma, a QCL-1000 Limulus Amebocyte Lysate Assay (Bio Whittaker Inc., Walkersville, MD) was performed. This assay uses a modified Limulus Amebocyte Lysate and a coloring substrate to detect gram-negative bacterial endotoxin chromogenically. Following the manufacturer's instruction, 50 μl of plasma was diluted 1:10 in order to quantify the endotoxin levels. Concentrations were photospectrometrically analyzed at 410 nm and calculated corresponding to the standard curve.

Cytokines

With the purpose of quantifying changes in cytokine levels, ELISA's were performed for IL-1β, IL-6, Il-10 and TNF-α using Cytoscreen™ Immunoassay Kits (BioSource International, Inc., Camarillo, CA). Following the manufacturer's instruction, 50 μl of plasma was used in a 1:1 dilution. ELISA plates were read on a plate reader (Bio-Tek Instruments, Windoski, VT) at dual wavelengths of 465 nm and 590 nm. Sample concentrations were determined by comparison to a standard curve.

Statistical analysis

Data with normal distribution was analyzed using ANOVA and Student's t-test (StatView®, Abacus Concepts/SAS® Institute, Cary, N.C.). Results were considered to be significant at p < 0.05 and expressed as the mean ± SEM.

Results

Wound infection

Macroscopic evaluation of burned skin immediately after the scald injury revealed notable paleness. A few minutes later a reddish pink coloration appeared, giving way to progressive pallor over the next 30–60 minutes. Edema reached a peak after approximately 2 hours and then slowly regressed, disappearing completely during the ensuing 24 hours. At the day of sacrifice, the infected wounds showed clear signs of macroscopic wound infection with pus and redness in the inoculated and adjacent tissue. Tissue counts in the infected group showed 106-107 CFU of P. aeruginosa per gram of tissue compared to 101-102 CFU in the non infected groups. Throughout the study period no mortalities in any of the groups was observed.

Weight changes

Weight loss is a prominent metabolic response to thermal injury and infection. As shown in figure 1, weight loss was significant higher for 6 days postoperatively in the infected burn group compared to the other treatment groups. In the infected group, weight decreases constantly until day 6 (mean difference day 1–6: 38.820 g). In this period the weight loss shows significance (p < 0.05) compared to the control group at every time point. Although the infected burn group recovers from the first weight loss and regained weight after 7 days postoperatively, weight remains significantly lower than in the control group. No significant difference in weight loss was observed comparing the sham burn groups with the burn only group. Differences in food intake or direct metabolic effects comparing the burn and the infected burn group have not been observed.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Animal body weight. Body weight of each animal was measured every day during the whole experiment.

Peripheral blood analysis

Lymphocytes were significantly lower after 12 hours post treatment for the burn (5000/ml ± 900; p = 0.04) and the infected group (3000/ml ± 500; p = 0.02) compared to no treatment control (9000/ml ± 800). No significant differences were observed for neutrophils, monocytes, red blood cell count, platelets, hemoglobin and hematocrit (data not shown).

Endotoxin levels

In the infected animals, endotoxin levels were significantly higher 12 hours post treatment for the infected burn group (625 pg/ml ± 200) compared to the burn (172 pg ± 30; p = 0.02) and control (216 pg/ml ± 48; p = 0.02) group with no difference comparing burn only with the control group. 24 hours post treatment no difference between the groups was noticeable (Figure 2).
Figure 2
Figure 2

Endotoxin level. Blood serum endotoxin levels were measured 12, 24, 48, 72 h, 6 and 12 days post burn injury in infected and control group (each n = 6). Endotoxin amount was calculated in ng/ml serum. The values at 12 h, 6 and 12 days were further displayed as bar graph to demonstrate significant (p < 0,05) differences.

Cytokines

IL-1

Until 48 hours after thermal injury, IL-1 levels were detected in comparable concentrations (Figure 3). After 72 hours, IL-1 concentrations in the infected group (1.125 ng/ml ± 0.19) and in the burn group (0.997 ng/ml ± 0.07) peaked and remained significantly (p = 0.03) higher compared to the no treatment control group until they returned to baseline after 12 days.
Figure 3
Figure 3

Cytokine expression. Blood was obtained from each rat in the separated treatment groups after 24, 48 and 72 h, 6 and 12 days post injury. Serum was separated and analyzed for IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10 and TNF-α using ELISA detection system. A time course is shown including the whole follow up of the study. Amount cytokine expression is displayed in pg/ml serum.

IL-6

In the burn group and infected burn group, IL-6 concentrations showed a peak 48 h postburn followed by a descend (p < 0.02) reaching baseline levels on day 6 compared to no treatment control (Figure 3). No significant difference was observed comparing the burn vs. infected burn group.

IL-10

Between 24 and 72 hours postburn IL-10 levels increased significantly in the burn and infected burn group with a steady state after the 6 th day postburn (Figure 3). No significant difference was seen comparing the burn vs. infected burn group.

TNF-α

Levels for TNF-α were significantly higher 48 h postburn in the infected burn group compared to the burn and no treatment control group. The initial endotoxemia is followed by 24 and 48 hr TNF rise which is then followed by gradual weight loss in the infection vs. burn alone group. After 48 hours TNF-α concentrations of the infected and burn groups were comparable and significantly higher compared to the control group until day 12 (p < 0,01).

Discussion

Extensive burn trauma induces an acute inflammatory response that is associated with a variety of systemic alterations including increased vascular permeability, myocardial dysfunction, hypermetabolism and altered hepatic synthetic activity [18–21].

This study demonstrates significantly higher TNF-α and endotoxin levels associated with substantial higher weight loss in infected burn wounds compared to non-infected burn wounds. In the utilized animal model, weight loss was observed for 6 days post burn in the infected group, whereas no differences in weight loss were observed in the non-infected burn group. However, no pair feeding was carried out within this study in order to explain differences in weight gain or loss. In a clinical setting it is impossible to investigate the reason for hypermetabolism in burn patients [22].

Previous in vivo experiments have demonstrated higher endotoxin levels after bacterial challenge [16, 17, 23, 24]. Furthermore, it has been shown that cachectin and TNF is associated with weight loss [25], which can be reversed by blocking TNF and IL-1 receptors [26]. TNF-α is a multifunctional cytokine that is secreted in response to injury, inflammation or infection. In thermal injury, TNF-α is considered a potent mediator of other cytokines such as IL-6 [25]. Clinical and experimental studies have shown a significant elevation in IL-6 production after burn injury and sepsis, which correlates with suppressed cell-mediated immunity and increased mortality [27–29]. In addition, blockade of IL-6 biological activity following burn injury and/or sepsis has been shown to improve outcome [30]. In our study we did not see any significant difference in IL-6 production. This is due, in part, to the limited burn area (30% BSA) without differences in mortality and development of burn-associated immunosuppression. A number of experimental studies have shown implication of Th-2 cytokines, like IL-10, in immunosuppression after thermal injury as well as in sepsis [31–33]. Recent findings have demonstrated that the macrophages are resistant to the suppressive effects of IL-10 post burn [34, 35]. It has been verified that block of endogenous IL-10 enhances IL-6 and TNF-α release in response to LPS. Addition of exogenous IL-10 to the macrophages cultures suppresses inflammatory mediator release [36]. In this study we were able to show that IL-10 expression levels were associated with weight gain in animals with infected burn wounds.

Conclusion

We hypothesize that infection control in burned patients is the most important factor for preventing burn-associated weight loss. Our results suggest that in the presence of infection, you get a SIRS response possibly due to transient endotoxemia that is only seen in the infection group. In contrast, both burn and infection get a late IL-10 (CARS) response, which is then associated with a return to normal weight in the infection group. More studies are clearly needed to fully understand the pathophysiology in infected burn wounds.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We wish to express our gratitude to Dr. Nancy Gong and Mita Ghosh for their assistance with experiments. This work was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health Grants GM54911 (SCW), HL03803-01, DK02210 (GLS), DK53296 (GLS).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Dept. of Surgery, University of Michigan, 1150 W. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0666, USA
(2)
Medicine, University of Michigan, 1150 W. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0666, USA
(3)
Pathology, University of Michigan, 1150 W. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0666, USA
(4)
Dept. Plastic Surgery Burn Center, Ruhr-University Bochum, Buerkle-de la-Camp Platz 1, 44789 Bochum, Germany

References

  1. Baue AE, Durham R, Faist E: Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), multiple organ failure (MOF): are we winning the battle?. Shock. 1998, 10 (2): 79-89.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Harris BH, Gelfand JA: The immune response to trauma. Semin Pediatr Surg. 1995, 4 (2): 77-82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Nguyen TT, Gilpin DA, Meyer NA, Herndon DN: Current treatment of severely burned patients. Ann Surg. 1996, 223 (1): 14-25. 10.1097/00000658-199601000-00004.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Saffle JR, Sullivan JJ, Tuohig GM, Larson CM: Multiple organ failure in patients with thermal injury. Crit Care Med. 1993, 21 (11): 1673-1683.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Still JMJ, Belcher K, Law EJ: Experience with polymicrobial sepsis in a regional burn unit. Burns. 1993, 19 (5): 434-436. 10.1016/0305-4179(93)90069-K.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Teodorczyk-Injeyan JA, Sparkes BG, Mills GB, Peters WJ, Falk RE: Impairment of T cell activation in burn patients: a possible mechanism of thermal injury-induced immunosuppression. Clin Exp Immunol. 1986, 65 (3): 570-581.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Steinstraesser L, Oezdogan Y, Wang SC, Steinau HU: Host defense peptides in burns. Burns. 2004, 30 (7): 619-627. 10.1016/j.burns.2004.05.013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Nizet V, Ohtake T, Lauth X, Trowbridge J, Rudisill J, Dorschner RA, Pestonjamasp V, Piraino J, Huttner K, Gallo RL: Innate antimicrobial peptide protects the skin from invasive bacterial infection. Nature. 2001, 414 (6862): 454-457. 10.1038/35106587.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Meakins JL: Etiology of multiple organ failure. J Trauma. 1990, 30 (12 Suppl): S165-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hengge UR, Benninghoff B, Ruzicka T, Goos M: Topical immunomodulators--progress towards treating inflammation, infection, and cancer. Lancet Infect Dis. 2001, 1 (3): 189-198. 10.1016/S1473-3099(01)00095-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kawakami M, Terai C, Okada Y: Changes of the interleukin-6 levels in skin at different sites after thermal injury. J Trauma. 1998, 44 (6): 1056-1063.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Reddy RC, Chen GH, Tekchandani PK, Standiford TJ: Sepsis-induced immunosuppression: from bad to worse. Immunol Res. 2001, 24 (3): 273-287. 10.1385/IR:24:3:273.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Steinstraesser L, Fohn M, Klein RD, Aminlari A, Remick DG, Su GL, Wang SC: Feasibility of biolistic gene therapy in burns. Shock. 2001, 15 (4): 272-277.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Jacobsen F, Baraniskin A, Mertens J, Mittler D, Mohammadi-Tabrisi A, Schubert S, Soltau M, Lehnhardt M, Behnke B, Gatermann S, Steinau HU, Steinstraesser L: Activity of histone H1.2 in infected burn wounds. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005, 55 (5): 735-741. 10.1093/jac/dki067.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Jacobsen F, Mittler D, Hirsch T, Gerhards A, Lehnhardt M, Voss B, Steinau HU, Steinstraesser L: Transient cutaneous adenoviral gene therapy with human host defense peptide hCAP-18/LL-37 is effective for the treatment of burn wound infections. Gene Ther. 2005Google Scholar
  16. Steinstraesser L, Klein RD, Aminlari A, Fan MH, Khilanani V, Remick DG, Su GL, Wang SC: Protegrin-1 enhances bacterial killing in thermally injured skin. Crit Care Med. 2001, 29 (7): 1431-1437. 10.1097/00003246-200107000-00022.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Steinstraesser L, Tack BF, Waring AJ, Hong T, Boo LM, Fan MH, Remick DI, Su GL, Lehrer RI, Wang SC: Activity of novispirin G10 against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in vitro and in infected burns. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002, 46 (6): 1837-1844. 10.1128/AAC.46.6.1837-1844.2002.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Dehne MG, Sablotzki A, Hoffmann A, Muhling J, Dietrich FE, Hempelmann G: Alterations of acute phase reaction and cytokine production in patients following severe burn injury. Burns. 2002, 28 (6): 535-542. 10.1016/S0305-4179(02)00050-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Cohen J: The immunopathogenesis of sepsis. Nature. 2002, 420 (6917): 885-891. 10.1038/nature01326.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Brun-Buisson C: The epidemiology of the systemic inflammatory response. Intensive Care Med. 2000, 26 Suppl 1: S64-74. 10.1007/s001340051121.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Angus DC, Wax RS: Epidemiology of sepsis: an update. Crit Care Med. 2001, 29 (7 Suppl): S109-16. 10.1097/00003246-200107001-00035.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Long CL: Energy balance and carbohydrate metabolism in infection and sepsis. Am J Clin Nutr. 1977, 30 (8): 1301-1310.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Klein RD, Su GL, Aminlari A, Zhang H, Steinstraesser L, Alarcon WH, Wang SC: Skin lipopolysaccharide-binding protein and IL-1beta production after thermal injury. J Burn Care Rehabil. 2000, 21 (4): 345-352. 10.1067/mbc.2000.107542.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Steinstraesser L, Burghard O, Nemzek J, Fan MH, Merry A, Remick DI, Su GL, Steinau HU, Wang SC: Protegrin-1 increases bacterial clearance in sepsis but decreases survival. Crit Care Med. 2003, 31 (1): 221-226. 10.1097/00003246-200301000-00034.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Marano MA, Moldawer LL, Fong Y, Wei H, Minei J, Yurt R, Cerami A, Lowry SF: Cachectin/TNF production in experimental burns and Pseudomonas infection. Arch Surg. 1988, 123 (11): 1383-1388.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Fathalla B, Hamada K, Vannier E, Smith D, Edwards C, Roubenoff R: Effects of aging and cytokine blockade on inflammatory cachexia. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2004, 22 (1): 85-90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Drost AC, Burleson DG, Cioffi WGJ, Mason ADJ, Pruitt BAJ: Plasma cytokines after thermal injury and their relationship to infection. Ann Surg. 1993, 218 (1): 74-78.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Biffl WL, Moore EE, Moore FA, Peterson VM: Interleukin-6 in the injured patient. Marker of injury or mediator of inflammation?. Ann Surg. 1996, 224 (5): 647-664. 10.1097/00000658-199611000-00009.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Kowal-Vern A, Walenga JM, Hoppensteadt D, Sharp-Pucci M, Gamelli RL: Interleukin-2 and interleukin-6 in relation to burn wound size in the acute phase of thermal injury. J Am Coll Surg. 1994, 178 (4): 357-362.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Dinarello CA, Cannon JG, Wolff SM, Bernheim HA, Beutler B, Cerami A, Figari IS, Palladino MAJ, O'Connor JV: Tumor necrosis factor (cachectin) is an endogenous pyrogen and induces production of interleukin 1. J Exp Med. 1986, 163 (6): 1433-1450. 10.1084/jem.163.6.1433.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Friedman G, Jankowski S, Marchant A, Goldman M, Kahn RJ, Vincent JL: Blood interleukin 10 levels parallel the severity of septic shock. J Crit Care. 1997, 12 (4): 183-187. 10.1016/S0883-9441(97)90030-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. van der Poll T, Speelman P, van Deventer SJ: [Immunology in clinical practice. VIII. Role of cytokines in the pathogenesis of bacterial infections]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1998, 142 (1): 14-17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Van der Poll T, Lowry SF: Epinephrine inhibits endotoxin-induced IL-1 beta production: roles of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and IL-10. Am J Physiol. 1997, 273 (6 Pt 2): R1885-90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Schwacha MG, Ayala A, Chaudry IH: Insights into the role of gammadelta T lymphocytes in the immunopathogenic response to thermal injury. J Leukoc Biol. 2000, 67 (5): 644-650.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Schwacha MG, Somers SD: Thermal injury induces macrophage hyperactivity through pertussis toxin-sensitive and -insensitive pathways. Shock. 1998, 9 (4): 249-255.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Seitz M, Loetscher P, Dewald B, Towbin H, Gallati H, Baggiolini M: Interleukin-10 differentially regulates cytokine inhibitor and chemokine release from blood mononuclear cells and fibroblasts. Eur J Immunol. 1995, 25 (4): 1129-1132.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

    37. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2482/5/19/prepub

Copyright

© Steinstraesser et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement

BMC Surgery

ISSN: 1471-2482

Contact us