Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Surgery

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Adherence to guidelines of antibiotic prophylactic use in surgery: a prospective cohort study in North West Bank, Palestine

BMC Surgery201414:69

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-14-69

Received: 25 June 2013

Accepted: 13 August 2014

Published: 9 September 2014

Abstract

Background

Surgical site infection is a major contributor to increased mortality and health care costs globally which can be reduced by appropriate antibiotic prophylactic use. In Palestine, there is no published data about preoperative antibiotic use. This study aims to find the pattern of antimicrobial prophylaxis use by evaluating time of the first dose, antibiotic selection and duration after surgery in three governmental hospitals in North West Bank/ Palestine during 2011.

Methods

After approval of Institutional Review Board, a prospective cohort study included a total of 400 abdominal, orthopedic, and gynecological operations which were performed during study period. Trained clinical pharmacists observed selected 301 operations and followed the patient’s files for the three intended study parameters. Compliance of prophylactic antibiotic administration was evaluated according to published guidelines of the American Society for Hospital Pharmacist. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 16 applying descriptive methods. Relationship between guideline compliance and selected operation factors such as type of surgery, patient care unit, and hospital shift, in addition to provider’s age, gender, experience, and specialization were examined applying chi square test. The statistically significant factors with p < 0.01 were further analyzed using logistic regression model.

Results

Overall compliance for the studied parameters was very low (2%); only 59.8% received their first dose in appropriate time, 18.5% had appropriate antibiotic selection, and 31.8% of patients received antibiotic in appropriate duration. The OBGYN department had much better compliance regarding timing and duration of antibiotic use (P < 0.001), however the proper antibiotic selection was best adhered to for the abdominal surgeries (OR = 3.64, P = 0.002). Male providers were statistically significantly much less adherent to the timing of antibiotic dose (OR = 0.28, p < 0.001), but better adherent in antibiotic selection (OR = 0.191, p = 0.028). Anesthetic technicians showed higher compliance than nurses in timing and duration of antibiotic use.

Conclusions

Lack of guidelines explains the low adherence to appropriate surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in Palestine, with high rate of broad spectrum antibiotic use, long duration and inappropriate time of first dose .We recommend adopting guidelines for prophylaxis and training all health care providers accordingly.

Keywords

Surgical prophylaxisGuidelinesAdherencePalestine

Background

Surgical site infection (SSI) is an infection that occurs somewhere in the operative field following a surgical intervention. According to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), SSI includes incisional and organ space infections [1]. SSI is a major contributor for increased mortality and health care costs [2]. Of nearly 30 million operations in the United States each year, more than 2% are complicated by SSI, mortality rates are 2-3 times higher in patients in whom SSI develops compared with un-infected patients [3].

The risk of SSI depends on patient-related factors such as age, nutritional status and existing infections in addition to surgical factors, such as duration of procedure and the type of operation (clean, clean- contaminated, contaminated, or dirty-infected) [4, 5]. The basic principle of antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery is to achieve adequate serum and tissue drug levels, for the duration of the operation [6].

SSI prevention is important and is based on a combination of preoperative preparation, surgical techniques, peri operative antibiotic prophylaxis and postoperative wound care [7]. There is evidence that appropriate use of antibiotic in surgery is effective in decreasing mortality and health care costs associated with infections developed after surgery [8, 9].

In Palestine, there is no published data about antibiotic use in surgery till the time we started our research. Availability of protocols that illustrate antibiotic use in surgery in the hospitals, and the adherence to these protocols are very important items that need evaluation. This study aims to find the pattern of antimicrobial prophylaxis use by evaluating time of the first dose, antibiotic selection and duration after surgery for patients undergoing abdominal, orthopedic and gynecologic operations in three governmental hospitals in North Palestine during 2011.

Methods

Study design and setting

This observational non interventional prospective study was performed in the largest three governmental (general) hospitals from January 15 through December 30, 2011. These hospitals are located in the main cities of North West Bank Palestine with a capacity of 213, 105, and 127 beds; all provide orthopedic, general surgery, and Obstetrics &Gynecology (OBGYN) services to the general public. Surgical prophylaxis in the three hospitals is practiced according to general non written guidelines and individual judgment; antibiotics are usually administered by either a nurse (in the ward) or anesthetic technician (in the operating room).

Convenient sampling of all emergent and elective operations in these hospitals meeting inclusion criteria was studied. Institutional Review Board (IRB) of An-Najah National University approval in addition to the approval of the General Directorate of Government Hospitals in the Palestinian MoH in the West Bank was obtained to observe peri operative antibiotic use. Following this approval the General Directors of the selected hospitals (Rafidia surgical hospital in Nablus, Thabet Thabet governmental Hospital in Tulkarem, and Jenin Governmental Hospital in Jenin) also approved the study to be performed in their hospitals. The ethics committee (IRB) waived a formal informed consent for this type of study since it is considered a type of quality assurance whose goal is the improvement of care at the institution.

Patient population

All patients undergoing abdominal, orthopedic, or gynecologic surgical intervention during the study period were chosen to be our study population. Elective and emergent procedures were included to allow for a comparison between the two types of procedures. The researchers followed the CDC wound classification in order to include only the clean (mainly closed uninfected wound) and clean-contaminated (mainly surgeries entered under controlled conditions and without unusual contamination) [10]. All contaminated or dirty category surgeries in addition to those patients who received therapeutic antibiotic before surgery or those with signs and symptoms of infection after surgery were excluded from the study in order avoid difficulties in distinguishing prolonged prophylaxis from postoperative infection treatment. A total of 400 operations (135 from Hospital 1, 135 from Hospital 2 and 130 from Hospital 3) were studied; 216 (54%) were elective and 184 (46%) were emergent.

Study variables

Compliance of prophylactic antibiotic administration was evaluated based on the published guidelines of the American Society for Hospital Pharmacist (ASHP) [11]. The following 3 aspects of antimicrobial prophylaxis were assessed:

1- Time of first dose antibiotic: Antibiotic should be administered within 1 hr before incision to achieve prophylactic level during surgery and optimize efficacy. For vancomycin, the infusion should begin within two hours before incision. Doses should be repeated intra operatively if the operation is still in progress two half lives after the first dose.

2- Duration: Antibiotic administration should be discontinued within 24 hours after the end of surgery, to prevent emergence of resistance.

3- Antibiotic selection: In general, inexpensive, non-toxic, and limited-spectrum antibiotic should be used; therefore IV Cefazolin is recommended for most of procedures (orthopedic, gastroduodenal, biliary tract, cesarean section after umbilical cord clamp, and hysterectomy procedures). Cefoxitin is recommended for appendectomy and colorectal procedures; Vancomycin is reserved for patients with beta-lactam allergy.

Each observed operation in the study was classified as adherent or non adherent to each of the three mentioned aspects of compliance.

Patient studied variables were: type of surgery (elective vs emergent),patient care unit (general, orthopedic or OBGYN), and hospital shift (A:8 am -3 pm,B:3-11 pm,C:11 pm-8 am). Health provider variables were age, gender, specialization of provider administering antibiotics (nurse vs anesthetic tech), and years of experience.

Data collection

Data were collected by two trained clinical pharmacist researchers through frequent visits to the three research sites. Charts of 400 operations which met study criteria were reviewed to collect relevant patient data and compliance data; in addition out of the 400 cases, the researchers were able to observe 301 operations which were carefully selected to represent the three hospitals’ patient care units and shifts. The observation aimed to document incision time, antibiotic first dose time, in addition to health provider characteristics. Data regarding antibiotic selection and post operative antibiotic administration was obtained through file review.

Data analysis

All analyses were performed with Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16 statistical program. Descriptive analysis was used to evaluate performance and demonstrate the characteristics of the study sample. Frequency of operations with appropriate first dose time, appropriate type, and appropriate duration were evaluated.

Chi-square test was used to examine the relationship between antibiotic administration and factors such as provider’s age, gender, specialization, years of experience, hospital site, patient care unit, hospital shift, and type of surgery; the results were considered statistically significant at P value ≤ 0.05.

To eliminate confounding factors, multivariate analysis was then applied by building a model of independent variables which were significant in univariate analysis at p < 0.01. Therefore patient care unit, provider’s age and specialization were entered in each of three logistic regression models for time of antibiotic use, proper antibiotic choice and duration of postoperative antibiotic use.

Results

Table 1 describes the pattern of antibiotic prophylactic use and types of surgeries included in the study; all operations included in the study received preoperative prophylactic antibiotic and most of them received postoperative antibiotic for 24 hours or more. The duration of the surgeries observed was between 30 minutes to two hours and therefore none of these surgeries needed operative antibiotic redosing.
Table 1

Surgical operation types and pattern of antibiotic prophylactic use in the study

Name of operation

Number (%)

Type

Antibiotic administration

Duration of operation

Duration of post operative antibiotic

Mean

Range

Mean

Range

OBGYN

138 (34.5)

      

Cesarean section

118 (29.5)

Clean

Yes

45 min

40-60 min

24 hr

18-72 hrs

Hysterectomy

15 (3.8)

Clean

Yes

1 hr

50-65 min

20 hr

18-72 hrs

Dilation and curettage

5 (1.2)

Clean

Yes

30 min

20-35 min

Only one dose

---

General surgery

143 (35.8)

      

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

60 (15)

Clean

Yes

1 hr

50-70 min

24 hr

18-36 hrs

Open cholecystectomy

20 (5)

Clean

Yes

1 hr

50-70 min

48 hrs

24-72 hrs

Appendectomy

63 (15.8)

Clean

Yes

1 hr

50-66 min

36 hrs

24-48 hrs

Orthopedics

119 (29.7)

      

Total hip replacement surgery

51 (12.7)

Clean

Yes

2 hr

90-120 min

4 days

2-6 days

Total knee replacement surgery

54 (13.5)

Clean

Yes

2 hr

90-130 min

3 days

2-5 days

Repair of ankle fracture

4 (1)

Clean-contaminated

Yes

2 hr

90-130 min

2 days

1-3 days

Repair of trochanteric fracture

3 (0.8)

Clean-contaminated

Yes

2 hr

90-130 min

3 days

2-4 days

Repair of femoral shaft fracture

2 (0.5)

Clean-contaminated

Yes

2 hr

90-130 min

3 days

2-3 days

Repair of radius fracture

5 (1.2)

Clean-contaminated

Yes

2 hr

90-125 min

2 days

2-3 days

Table 2 summarizes the characteristics of the studied operations; as expected more than half of operations were done during shift A and were elective surgeries. The health care provider category was observed in 301 operations; mean age for providers was 30.8 (5.4 SD), were mainly (64.5%) anesthetic technicians, with majority (75%) having less than 5 years’ experience.
Table 2

Characteristic of the health care facilities and providers for the study sample

Patient care unit

All procedures n = 400

Observed procedures n = 301

n (%)

n (%)

Orthopedic surgeries

119 (29.7)

89 (29.6)

Abdominal surgeries

143 (35.8)

107 (35.5)

OBGYN surgeries

138 (29.5)

105 (34.9)

Shift time

  

A (8 am – 3 pm )

233(58.2)

175(58.1)

B (3 pm – 11 pm)

106(26.5)

80(26.6)

C (11 pm – 8 am )

61(15.2)

46(15.3)

Operation type

  

Elective

216 (54)

164 (54.4)

Emergent

184 (46)

137 (45.6)

Provider specialty

  

Practical nurse

 

107 (35.5)

Anesthetic technician

 

194 (64.5)

Provider age

  

Less than 30

 

226 (75.1)

30-40

 

65 (21.6)

More than 40

 

10 (3.3)

Provider gender

  

Male

 

149 (49.5)

Female

 

152 (50.5)

Provider experience (year)

  

1-5

 

226 (75.1)

6-10

 

20 (6.6)

More than 10

 

55 (18.3)

Among 301 patients undergoing abdominal, orthopedic, and gynecological procedures, only 59.8% received their first dose with appropriate time (Table 3). Antibiotic selection for all 400 studied procedures was consistent with published guidelines for only 18.5%, and was discontinued within 24 hours post operation for only 31.8% of patients.
Table 3

Compliance ɤ with antibiotic prophylaxis in the 3 research sites

Variable

Adherence in dosing time n = 180* n (%)

P value

Adherence in antibiotic selection n = 74** n (%)

P value

Adherence in duration of antibiotic use n = 127** n (%)

P value

Hospital

 

0.023

 

0.21

 

0.27

Hospital 1

72 (69.9)

 

30 (22.2)

 

49 (36.6)

 

Hospital 2

55 (53.9)

 

19 (14.1)

 

37 (27.4)

 

Hospital 3

53 (55.2)

 

25 (19.1)

 

41 (31.5)

 

Patient care department

 

<0.001

 

<0.001

 

<0.001

Orthopedic

42 (47.1)

 

12 (10.1)

 

24 (20.2)

 

Abdominal

55 (51.4)

 

53 (37.1)

 

33 (23.2)

 

OBGYN

83 (79.1)

 

9 (6.5)

 

70 (50.7)

 

Hospital shift time

 

0.26

 

0.43

 

0.87

A(8 am – 3 pm)

109 (62.3)

 

40 (17.2)

 

76 (32.8)

 

B(3 pm – 11 pm)

42 (52.5)

 

24 (22.6)

 

33 (31.1)

 

C(11 pm – 8 am )

29 (63.1)

 

10 (16.4)

 

18 (29.5)

 

Type of surgery

 

0.24

 

0.04

 

0.61

Emergent

77 (56.2)

 

42 (22.8)

 

61 (33.2)

 

Elective

103 (62.8)

 

32 (14.8)

 

66 (30.7)

 

ɤaltogether compliance of all three was only in six procedures (2%).

*Out of observed procedures (301).

**Out of all studied procedures (400).

Of all studied and observed procedures only 6 (2%) were compliant with surgical prophylaxis studied guidelines altogether (dosing time, antibiotic choices, and postoperative duration of antibiotic use); these six procedures were from the three hospitals and were done in all shifts. When we compared between the three research sites (Table 3), there was no significant statistical difference except for the timing for first dose (p = 0.023). Tables 3 and 4 show that OBGYN department had a much better compliance regarding timing compared to orthopedics (OR =0.15, CI: 0.06-0.38,p <0.001) and abdominal procedures (OR = 0.25,CI: 0.10-0.6,p = 0.003). The duration of antibiotic use was also found to be adhered to in OBGYN department much more than orthopedics (OR = 0.27, CI: 0.13-0.54, p < 0.001), and abdominal procedures (OR = 0.39, CI: 0.20-0.77, p = 0.007), however abdominal procedures were more likely to adhere to proper antibiotic choice (OR = 3.64. CI: 1.57-8.41, p = 0.028).
Table 4

Compliance with antibiotic prophylaxis according to health care facilities and provider characteristics using multivariate analysis

Variable

Adherence in dosing time OR (CI)

P value

Adherence in antibiotic selection OR (CI)

P value

Adherence in duration of antibiotic use OR (CI)

P value

PCU

      

Orthopedic

0.15 (0.06-0.38)

<0.001

0.67 (0.25-0.17)

0.378

0.27 (0.13-0.54)

<0.001

Abdominal

0.25 (0.10-0.63)

0.003

3.64 (1.57-8.41)

0.378

0.39 (0.20-0.77)

0.007

OBGYN*

1

 

1

 

1

 

Gender

      

Male

0.28 (0.16-0.48)

<0.001

1.19 (1.07-3.41)

0.028

0.79 (0.46-1.34)

0.385

Female*

1

 

1

 

1

 

Specialization

      

Nurse

0.24 (0.13-0.43)

<0.001

1.67 (0.91-3.08)

0.095

0.44 (0.23-0.83)

0.012

Anesthesia* technician

1

 

1

 

1

 

*Reference category.

OR: Odds Ratio.

CI: Confidence Interval.

Our study findings in Tables 4 and 5 show that health provider who administers the antibiotic prophylaxis may influence adherence; for example male providers were statistically significantly more adherent to the antibiotic choice (OR = 1.19,CI:1.07-3,41, p = 0.028), but much less adherent in timing for first dose (OR = 0.28, CI: 0.16-0.48, p < 0.001). Interestingly the anesthetic technicians showed a higher compliance than nurses in timing (OR = 0.24, CI: 0.13-0.43, p <0.001) and duration (OR = 0.44, CI: 0.23-0.83, p =0.012) of antibiotic use.
Table 5

Compliance with antibiotic prophylaxis according to health provider characteristics

Variable

Adherence in dosing time n = 180 n (%)

P value

Adherence in antibiotic selection n = 74 n (%)

P value

Adherence in duration of antibiotic use n = 88 n (%)

P value

Age

 

0.81

 

0.16

 

0.38

Less than 30

136 (60.2)

 

51 (22.6)

 

69 (30.7)

 

More than 30

44 (58.7)

 

23 (30.7)

 

19 (25.3)

 

Total

180 (59.8)

 

74 (24.6)

 

88 (29.3)

 

Gender

 

<0.001

 

0.013

 

0.23

Male

70 (47.0)

 

46 (30.9)

 

39 (26.2)

 

Female

110 (72.4)

 

28 (18.4)

 

49 (32.5)

 

Total

180 (59.8)

 

74 (24.6)

 

88 (29.3)

 

Specialization

 

<0.001

 

0.005

 

<0.001

Nurse

39 (36.4)

 

36 (33.6)

 

17 (15.9)

 

Anesthetic technician

141 (72.7)

 

38 (19.6)

 

71 (36.8)

 

Total

180 (59.8)

 

74 (24.6)

 

88 (29.3)

 

Years of experience

 

0.81

 

0.16

 

0.38

Less than 5

136 (60.2)

 

51 (22.6)

 

69 (30.7)

 

More than 5

44 (58.7)

 

23 (30.7)

 

19 (25.3)

 

Total

180 (59.8)

 

74 (24.6)

 

88 (29.3)

 

Discussion

The most important finding in this study is the absence of any written agreed upon guidelines for antibiotic surgical prophylaxis in all governmental hospital sites studied. This finding explains the very low adherence to international guidelines found in the study (only six observed ones). Low adherence is shared by other studies in the region; For example the Jordanian study found that none of the observed cardiac operations was adherent to all antimicrobial prophylaxis guidelines with wide variation in adherence to selected parameters studied [12]. The Iranian study also found only one surgical procedure of the observed 155 to be adherent to all parameters of prophylaxis guidelines with varying degrees of compliance in different parameters [13], and the Turkish study found only 13.7% of the perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis given were appropriate and correct [9].

Even in USA where following surgical prophylaxis guidelines is an expected practice, a study of medicare in patients undergoing different kinds of surgical procedures demonstrated that 55.7% of patients received their antibiotic dose within one hour before the surgical incision , and antimicrobial prophylaxis was discontinued within 24 hours after surgery for only 40.7% of patients [14].

Only one hospital in our study which is the main site for medical and nursing students’ training had better adherence in the first time dosing of antibiotics, in addition the OBGYN department showed a very high compliance to dosing time. Time of antibiotic administration before surgery is very important issue in prophylaxis and infection prevention, microorganisms are expected to enter body fluids and tissues from the time of incision until the injury is closed, during this time the antimicrobial level must be in the inhibitory level in serum [15].

One of factors associated with poor adherence in time of prophylaxis administration in our study is the administration of antibiotics by nurses on the ward at fixed clock rounds instead of adjusting this to the time before surgery, this is also the cause for inappropriate time documented in a study in a multicenter audit in Dutch hospitals [16]. The timely administration of first dose by anesthesia technician is also shared by American study which found that timely administration improves when antibiotic prophylaxis is given in the operation room [17].

Both selection of antibiotic for prophylaxis (18.5%) and duration of post-operative use (31.8%) were far from adherence to the guidelines in our study. For most types of orthopedic, abdominal and gynecological operations, single pre-operative dose of the first generation cephalosporin is recommended; further post-operative doses are not needed and the antibiotic should be discontinued within 24 hours post operation [18]. However because of lack of protocols, and hospital supply availability of antibiotics, personal judgments of treating physicians may explain the tendency to use broad spectrum or combination antibiotics and to continue use beyond 24 hours in our study. These findings are shared with Jordanian study which found that neither antibiotic choice(1.7%) nor duration(39.4%) were appropriate [12], the Turkish study [9] which also found that prolonged antibiotics prophylaxis was used in 56.9%, however the US study where protocols are usually followed showed excellent compliance (92.6%) in antibiotic selection [14].

The general surgery department in this study showed a better adherence in selection of antibiotic compared with OBGYN and orthopedic department, a finding shared with a Turkish study which showed that general surgeons use antibiotic prophylaxis more appropriately [19]. On the other hand OBGYN had much better adherence to the dosing time and duration possibly because most of surgeries done in this department are cesarean sections which follow agreed on non-written protocol.

An interesting finding is the tendency of female providers to be more adherent to the time of first dose and males to show better adherence to the selection of antibiotic, it is difficult to explain this finding since all providers regardless of their gender receive the same training and role in performing their jobs according to their qualification.

Although there is no written protocol, it seems that the anesthetic technicians were much more compliant to the time of first dose and postoperative antibiotic duration. This is possibly because the technician's main training and job skills are related to operation room; on the other hand nurses have wider scope of work for patients on the ward.

Conclusion

None of the hospitals studied is following guidelines for perioperative prophylaxis. This explains the low adherence to appropriate surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in Palestine, with high rate of broad spectrum antibiotic use; long duration and inappropriate time of first dose.We recommend adopting guidelines for surgical prophylaxis in addition to the need to train all health care providers accordingly. Role of anesthesia technician in administering prophylactic antibiotic seems to be important and needs to be emphasized.

Declarations

Acknowledgment

We thank the General directorate of hospitals in the west bank for facilitating the researcher’s data collection. We also thank the directors of governmental hospitals in North West bank, and the directors of operating rooms in these hospitals for facilitating all steps of research field work.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Community and Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University
(2)
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University

References

  1. Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA: CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control. 2008, 36 (5): 309-332. 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.03.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Rosario MO, Peña AC, Ampil IDE: Adherence to surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis guidelines in a tertiary private medical center. Phil J Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010, 39: 51-58.Google Scholar
  3. Bratzler DW, Houck PM, Richards C, Steele L, Dellinger P, Fry DE, Wright C, Ma A, Carr K, Red L: Use of antimicrobial prophylaxis for major surgery. Arch Surg. 2005, 140: 174-182. 10.1001/archsurg.140.2.174.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Gaynes RP, Culver DH, Horan TC, Edwards JR, Richards C, Tolson JS: Surgical Site Infection (SSI) rates in the United States, 1992–1998: the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System Basic SSI Risk Index. Clin Infect Dis. 2001, doi:10.1086/321860Google Scholar
  5. Cheadle WG: Risk factors for surgical site infection. Surg Infect. 2006, 7 (s1): s7-s11. 10.1089/sur.2006.7.s1-7. doi: 10.1089/sur.2006.7.s1-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Bratzler D, Houck P: Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: an advisory statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project. Clin Infect Dis. 2004, 38: 1706-1715. 10.1086/421095. doi:10.1086/421095View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Yalcin A, Erbay R, Serin S, Atalay H, Oner O: Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis and cost in a Turkish university hospital. Infez Med. 2007, 15 (2): 99-104.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Collins AS: Preventing Health Care-Associated Infections. Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses. Edited by: Hughes RG. 2008, Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US), Chapter 41. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2683/, 2Google Scholar
  9. Akalin S, Kutlu S, Cirak B, Eskicorapci S, Bagdatli D, Akkaya S: Application of ATC/DDD methodology to evaluate perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis. Int J Clin Pharm. 2012, 34 (1): 120-126. 10.1007/s11096-011-9601-3. doi:10.1007/s11096-011-9601-3. Epub 2011 Dec 30View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kirby JP, Mazuski JE: Prevention of surgical site infection. Surg Clin N Am. 2009, 89: 365-389. 10.1016/j.suc.2009.01.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. ASHP Commission on Therapeutics: ASHP therapeutic guidelines on antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Best Practices for Health System Pharmacy. Edited by: Deffenbaugh J. 1999, Bethesda, MD: ASHP, 349-396.Google Scholar
  12. Al-Momany N, Al-Bakri A, Makahleh Z, Wazaify M: Adherence to International Antimicrobial prophylaxis guidelines in cardiac surgery: a Jordanian study demonstrates need for quality improvement. JMCP. 2009, 15 (3): 262-271.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Vessal G, Namazi S, Davarpanah MA, Foroughinia F: Evaluation of prophylactic antibiotic administration at the surgical ward of a major referral hospital, Islamic Republic of Iran. EMHJ. 2011, 17 (8): 663-668.Google Scholar
  14. Bratzler DW, Houck PM, Richards C, Steele L, Dellinger EP, Fry DE, Wright C, Ma A, Carr K, Red L: Use of antimicrobial prophylaxis for major surgery: baseline results from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project. Arch Surg. 2005, 140 (2): 174-182. 10.1001/archsurg.140.2.174. doi:10.1001/archsurg.140.2.174View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Anne K, Yee Y, Brian A, Robin C, Joseph G, Wayne K, Bradley W: Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Surgical Procedure. Applied Therapeutics: The Clinical Use Of Drugs. 2009, United States Of America: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, section 15 chapter 57, 9Google Scholar
  16. Van Kasteren ME, Kullberg BJ, de Boer AS, Mintjes-de Groot J, Gyssens IC: Adherence to local hospital guidelines for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis: a multicentre audit in Dutch hospitals. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003, 51: 1389-1396. 10.1093/jac/dkg264.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hawn MT, Gray SH, Vick C, Itani KM, Bishop MJ, Ordin DL, Houston TK: Timely administration of prophylactic antibiotics for major surgical procedures. J Am Coll Surg. 2006, 203 (6): 803-811. 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.08.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gyssens I, Geerligs I, Dony J, Van der Vliet J, Kampen A, Van den Broek P, Hekster Y, Van der Meer J: Optimizing drug use in surgery: an intervention study in a Dutch university hospital. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996, 38: 1001-1012. 10.1093/jac/38.6.1001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hosoglu S, Sunbul M, Erol S, Altindis M, Caylan R, Demirdag K, Ucmak H, Mendes H, Geyik MF, Turgut H, Gundes S, Doyuk EK, Aldemir M, Dokucu A: A national survey of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in Turkey. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2003, 24 (10): 758-761. 10.1086/502127.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2482/14/69/prepub

Copyright

© Musmar et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement