Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Axillary lymphadenectomy for breast cancer in elderly patients and fibrin glue

  • 1Email author,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1
BMC Surgery201313 (Suppl 2) :S8

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-13-S2-S8

  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Axillary lymphadenectomy or sentinel biopsy is integral part of breast cancer treatment, yet seroma formation occurs in 15-85% of cases. Among methods employed to reduce seroma magnitude and duration, fibrin glue has been proposed in numerous studies with controversial results.

Methods

Thirty patients over 60 years underwent quadrantectomy or mastectomy with level I/II axillary lymphadenectomy; a suction drain was fitted in all patients. Fibrin glue spray were applied to the axillary fossa in 15 patients; the other 15 patients were treated with harmonic scalpel.

Results

Suction drainage was removed between post-operative Days 3 and 4. Seroma magnitude and duration were not significant in patients receiving fibrin glue compared with the harmonic scalpel group.

Conclusions

Use of fibrin glue does not always prevent seroma formation, but can reduce seroma magnitude, duration and necessary evacuative punctures.

Keywords

  • Sentinel Lymph Node
  • Fibrin Glue
  • Axillary Dissection
  • Harmonic Scalpel
  • Seroma Formation

Background

Axillary dissection represents an integral part of the treatment for breast cancer for prognostic and curative purposes. There is still a significant incidence (15-81%) of complications associated with axillary lymphadenectomy, including lymphorrhea, lymphoceles, and in rare cases lymphedema (swelling of the arm) [15]. It is possible to avoid axillary dissection in selected patients (T1 N0) using the sentinel lymph node technique. However, in all cases where T > 3 cm, and in patients with T1 N1 or with a metastatic sentinel lymph node, conventional axillary lymphadenectomy remains the primary surgical protocol for quadrantectomy and mastectomy. Many different methodologies have been used in an effort to reduce seroma formation following axillary lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. These include suction drainage [6, 7] topical application of tetracycline [8], closing and stitching the axillary fossa [9, 10], axillary dissection with axilloscopy [11], external compression [12, 13], use of harmonic scalpel and application of fibrin glue [14, 15]. To date, no practical guidelines exist on how to conduct suction drainage, and the views of surgeons are varied. Some surgeons believe that it is best to remove the drain on the first day of the post-operative period, some think the drain should be left in place until the drained volume falls below 50 ml/day [16], while others feel that drainage could in fact prolong and intensify the inflammatory stage of the wound-healing process, with a subsequent increase in seroma formation [17]. Regardless of contradicting opinions, the possibility of reducing the time for which drainage is present during the recovery period, therefore eliminating the need to discharge patients with drainage in situ, may represent a valid solution for reducing seroma formation. This prospective study evaluates the effectiveness of using fibrin glue to reduce seroma formation following axillary lymphadenectomy for breast cancer.

Methods

Between January 2010 and December 2012, 30 patients over 60 years were enrolled in the study. All patents had N+ breast adenocarcinoma and required either a quadrantectomy or a modified radical mastectomy with level I or II axillary lymphadenectomy, extending from the lower border of the axillary vein superiorly, from the medial border of the smaller pectoral muscle medially, as far as the fourth intercostobrachial nerve inferiorly and to the edge of the latissimus dorsi laterally. The axillary lymphadenectomy was performed in 15 patients with ligations, scissors and electrocautery and in 15 patients with ultrasound scalpel [18]. To be enrolled in the study, patients were required to have no alterations in their blood clotting or immune systems, or at least not be receiving anticoagulant treatment; have no history of sensitisation to bovine aprotinin; no psychological changes; no uncompensated diabetes or advanced liver disease; not be severely obese, and not have had previous surgery on the axillary lymphatic system or any immediate reconstructive surgery. Short-term antibiotic prophylaxis was applied. After surgery, all patients were fitted with a suction drain at the axillary fossa, which was activated 10 minutes after stitching the skin. The harmonic scalpel group received the suction drain without additional treatment, while the other group received fibrin glue (Tisseal®/Tissucol®, Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Deerfield, IL, USA). For patients in the fibrin glue treatment group, following fitting of the drain, fibrin glue prepared with 500 IU/ml of thrombin was applied as a spray (2 ml, from a distance of 10 cm with 2 bars of pressure) at the site of the quadrantectomy or mastectomy. Fibrin glue prepared with 5 IU/ml of thrombin was also applied as a spray (2 ml) to the axillary fossa with approximately three minutes' manual compression. A compression dressing was applied over the treatment site and kept in place for at least 24-72 hours. Fibrin glue for the axillary fossa was prepared by diluting it to 5 IU/ml with calcium chloride solution (20 mM), a concentration capable of maintaining activation of the wound-healing process through a thick mesh of fibrin fibrils. Patients were discharged when the volume drained fell below 100 ml/day and suction drainage could be removed. One week later, patients underwent clinical and instrumental (ultrasound) assessment for the presence of seroma, and any residue was suctioned out using an echo-guided evacuative puncture, as necessary. The primary outcome measures of the study were a) the incidence of seroma, including total volume of serum drained, and b) number of evacuative punctures required. A secondary outcome measure of the study was the duration of the treatment up to the time of healing. Complications associated with the axillary lymphadenectomy procedure were also recorded.

Statistical analysis was performed on the patients who completed the postoperative evaluation using SPSS for Windows (version 17.0; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). Results were expressed as mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated. Continuous variables were compared by Student t test and dichotomic variables were compared by the chi-squared test and the McNemar test. P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Factors as age, size of tumors and its ratio to the residual breast volume following surgery, the number of lymph node removed and the number of metastatic lymph nodes, also did not represent significant variables in terms of seroma magnitude. All patients were discharged 3-4 days following surgery. Compared with patients in the control group, patients in the fibrin glue group had a lower drainage volume 150 [60-350] versus 180 [110-400] ml; p = NS), fewer evacuative punctures (2 [0-3] versus 3 [13]), and a not significantly reduced mean seroma duration i.e. healing time 12 [421]versus 14 (4-25) days; p = NS). The incidence of complications was 20% (3 with cellulitis) and 20% (2 with cellulitis and 1 with wound diastasis) in patients who underwent surgery with and without fibrin glue, respectively. No significant relationship was observed in either patient group, between the magnitude of seroma formation and the type of surgical procedure (quadrantectomy or mastectomy) conducted.

Discussion

Breast cancer surgery, and in particular axillary lymphadenectomy, has changed in the last few years with the advent of the sentinel lymph node technique [11]. However, even today there are a number of situations where a conventional axillary lymphadenectomy is indicated, including patients with tumours greater than 3 cm in diameter, with positive or suspect axillary lymph nodes based on an objective examination and an instrumental diagnosis, or with a positive sentinel lymph node. In this group of patients, the axillary lymphadenectomy still has complications, in particular seroma formation (15-81%)[15], which can delay the patient's discharge, healing and supplementary radiotherapy and chemotherapy treatments. The formation of seroma can result from a lesion of the axillary lymphatic vessels [2] or from an inflammatory reaction [17], which may also be prolonged and intensified by the continuance of suction drainage. The removal of drainage for some surgeons is indicated when the volume per day is less than 50 ml2, but we prefer to remove the drainage when the volume per day is less than 100 ml, since in our experience drains do not prevent seroma formation, and they also dictate the date of discharge, resulting in a longer stay [3]. A number of surgeons believe that it is possible to discharge patients with the drainage in situ [3] despite the associated discomfort and increase in percentage infection rate. This issue of drainage management in the home arises in cases of procedures carried out in day surgery. Many published articles on the usefulness of drainage following axillary lymphadenectomy contradict each another with regard to seroma control, magnitude and duration. Porter17reported a non-significant difference in the incidence and degree of seroma between patients with suction drainage (73%) versus patients without suction drainage (89%). Divino [4] reported a 6% incidence of seroma for patients with drainage, compared with 40% for patients without. Burak [19] noted a relationship between seroma magnitude and patient age. Jeffrey [20] reported a 92% seroma incidence in patients without drainage, and sharing the view of others that repeated suctions may be the cause of infections of the axillary fossa [2125], applied evacuative puncture only in symptomatic cases (42%). In terms of the methods of reducing seroma magnitude, there have been numerous reports of the benefits of using an external compression dressing [26], immobilization of the arm [27], use of sutures to close the axillary fossa [28], excessive use of the electric scalpel compared to ligature of the lymphatic branches [29, 30], benefits of multiple drains[21], and the type of suction (high- or low-pressure) applied [31]. The use of fibrin glue has also produced contrasting results: reduction of seroma according to Moore and Gilly [11, 26] no difference in seroma formation compared with patients treated without fibrin glue, according to Burak [19], Langer [27] and Dinsmore [28]. The latter Authors attributed the lack of benefit to the presence of drainage possibly interfering with the stabilization of a fibrin clot, and with closure of the lymphatic capillaries. Fibrin glue interacts with the tissues damaged during the surgical procedure, favoring the growth of fibroblasts and wound healing. It favors hemostasis by preventing hematomas, which delay the surgical healing processes; makes the lymphatic branches impermeable, reducing seroma formation; and makes it possible to close the dead spaces through tissue adhesion. A number of papers have presented comparative studies of patients with and without fibrin glue in the axillary fossa. In a study of 24 patients who underwent quadrantectomy or mastectomy with axillary lymphadenectomy, In a group of 20 patients who underwent quadrantectomy with axillary lymphadenectomy, Jain [29] reported a seroma incidence of around 40%, with a reduction in seroma magnitude in mastectomy patients upon whom fibrin glue was used. Although a significant difference was not observed between quadrantectomy patients treated with or without fibrin glue. The study demonstrated that suction drainage did not limit the incidence or magnitude of seromas, and that it was associated with extended time spent in hospital and post-operative pain. Soon [30] showed that, among patients who underwent quadrantectomy or mastectomy with axillary lymphadenectomy, there was no difference in terms of the incidence of seromas with or without the use of suction drainage, and that, for the group of patients without drainage, the seromas formed in greater magnitude and for a longer duration, but with a lower percentage of complications. Kuroi [31] in a Medline search about one meta-analysis, 51 randomized controlled trials, 7 prospective studies and 7 retrospective studies showed that there was moderate evidence to support a risk for seroma formation in individuals with heavier body weight, extended radical mastectomy and greater drainage volume in the initial 3 days; with regard to the use of adhesive glue many retrospective studies failed to show any significant effect on seroma formation. Based on our experience and reviewing data from the literature [3, 10, 21, 3137], it seems that the magnitude and duration of the seromas are limited, but they are present in over 80% of patients, without significant differences between mastectomy and quadrantectomy. Use of harmonic scalpel can reduce the magnitude of seromas and acute blood loss after axillary dissection [3848]. The use of fibrin glue may therefore be useful, in our opinion, in traditional breast cancer surgery for reducing seroma magnitude and duration, and shortening the stay in hospital which, in this pathology too, is increasingly conducted in day surgery.

Authors' information

GD Associate Professor of Surgery at Second University of Naples; PL Assistant Professor of Surgery at Second University of Naples; GC Assistant Professor of Surgery at Second University of Naples; SG Research Fellow at Second University of Naples; AB Surgical Fellow at Second University of Naples; AR Research Fellow at Magna Grecia University; VA Surgical Fellow at Second University of Naples; SM Medical Student at Second University of Naples; NL Medical Student at Second University of Naples; AE, Medical Student at Second University of Naples; CV Medical Student at Second University of Naples; LF Full Professor of Surgery at Second University of Naples; DP Assistant Professor of Surgery at Second University of Naples; LD Full Professor of Surgery at Second University of Naples.

Declarations

Declarations

This article has been funded by personal funds.

This article has been published as part of BMC Surgery Volume 13 Supplement 2, 2013: Proceedings from the 26th National Congress of the Italian Society of Geriatric Surgery. The full contents of the supplement are available online at http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcsurg/supplements/13/S2

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Second University of Naples, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
(2)
Department of Medical and Surgical Science, Magna Grecia University, Catanzaro, Italy

References

  1. Woodworth PA, McBoyle MF, Helmer SD, Beamer RI: Seroma formation after breast cancer surgery: incidence and predicting factors. Am Surg. 2000, 66: 444-451.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Classe JM, Dupre PF, Francois T, et al: Axillary padding as an alternative to closed suction drain for ambulatory axillary lymphadenectomy: a prospective cohort of 207 patients with early breast cancer. Arch Surg. 2002, 137: 169-173.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ruggiero R, Procaccini E, Piazza P, Docimo G, Iovino F, Antoniol G, Irlandese E, Gili S, Lo Schiavo F: Effectiveness of fibrin glue in conjiuction with collagen patches to reduce seroma formation after axillary lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2008, 196 (2): 170-4. 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.09.042.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Divino CM, Kuerer HM, Tartter PI: Drains prevent seromas following lumpectomy with axillary dissection. Breast J. 2000, 6: 31-33. 10.1046/j.1524-4741.2000.99037.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Rice DC, Morris SM, Sarr MG, et al: Intraoperative topical tetracycline sclerotherapy following mastectomy: a prospective, randomized trial. J Surg Oncol. 2000, 73: 224-227. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9098(200004)73:4<224::AID-JSO7>3.0.CO;2-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Marfella R, Luongo C, Coppola M, Luongo M, Capodanno P, Ruggiero R, Mascolo C, Ambrosino I, Boccardi V, Lettieri B, Paolisso G: Use of a non specific immunomodulation therapy as a therapeutic vascu-logenesis strategy in no-option critical limb ischemia oatients. Atherosclerosis. 2010, 208 (2): 473-9. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2009.08.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Gubitosi A, Ruggiero R, Ortolani R, Podzemny V, Parmeggiani D, Esposito E, Foroni F, Esposito A, Villaccio G: Ambulatory laser assisted surgery: a multi center application and experience. Annali Italiani di Chirurgia. 2012, Pii: S0003469X12018842 (Epub ahed of print)Google Scholar
  8. Chaturvedi P, Chaturvedi U: Axillary compression with delayed drain removal reduces prolonged seroma formation. J Surg Oncol. 2001, 78: 279-280. 10.1002/jso.1168.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. O'Hea BJ, Ho M, Petrek JA: External compression dressing versus standard dressing after axillary lymphadenectomy. Am J Surg. 1999, 177: 450-453. 10.1016/S0002-9610(99)00089-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ruggiero R, Procaccini E, Gili S, Cremone C, Parmeggiani D, Conzo G, Docimo L, Sparavigna L, Gubitosi A, Docimo G, Sanguinetti A, Avenia N: New trends on fibrin glue in seroma after axillary lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. G Chir. 2009, 30 (6-7): 306-10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Moore M, Burak WE, Nelson E, et al: Fibrin sealant reduces the duration and amount of fluid drainage after axillary dissection: a randomized prospective clinical trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2001, 192: 591-599. 10.1016/S1072-7515(01)00827-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Dinsmore RC, Harris JA, Gustafson RJ: Effect of fibrin glue on lymphatic drainage after modified radical mastectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Am Surg. 2000, 66: 982-985.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Sajid MS, Utson K, Kaira L, Bonomi R: The role of fibrin glue instillation under skin flaps in the prevention of seroma formation and related morbilities following breast and axillary surgery for breast cancer: a meta analysis. J Surg Oncol. 2012, 10.1002/jso.23140Google Scholar
  14. Berger A, Tempfer C, Harmann B, et al: Sealing of postoperative axillary leakage after axillary lymphadenectomy using a fibrin glue coated collagen patch: a prospective randomized study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2001, 67: 9-14. 10.1023/A:1010671209279.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Watt-Boolsen S, Nielsen VB, Jensen J, Bak S: Postmastectomy seroma. A study of the nature and origin of seroma after mastectomy. Dan Med Bull. 1989, 36: 487-489.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG, for the CONSORT Group: The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet. 2001, 357: 1191-1194. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04337-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Porter KA, O'Connor S, Rimm E, Lopez M: Electrocautery as a factor in stroma formation following mastectomy. Am J Surg. 1998, 176: 8-11. 10.1016/S0002-9610(98)00093-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gubitosi A, Moccia G, Malinconico FA, Gilio F, Iside G, Califano U, Foroni F, Ruggiero R, Docimo G, Parmeggiani D, Agresti M: Unusual metastasis of left colon cancer: consideration on two cases. Acta Biomedica. 2008, 80: 82-Google Scholar
  19. Burak WE, Goodman PS, Young DC, Farrar WB: Seroma formation following axillary dissection for breast cancer: risk factors and lack of influence of bovine thrombin. J Surg Oncol. 1997, 64: 27-31. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9098(199701)64:1<27::AID-JSO6>3.0.CO;2-R.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Jeffrey SS, Goodson WH, Ikeda DM, Birdwell RL, Bogetz MS, Giuliano A: Axillary lymphadenectomy for breast cancer without axillary drainage. Arch Surg. 1995, 130: 909-913. 10.1001/archsurg.1995.01430080111018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Ruggiero R, Sparavigna L, Docimo G, Gubitosi A, Agresti M, Procaccini E, Docimo L: Post-operative peritonitis due to anastomotic dehiscence after coloni resection. Multicentric experience, retrospective analysis of risk factors and review of the literature. Ann Ital Chir. 2011, 82 (5): 369-75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Purushotham AD, McLatchie E, Young D, et al: Randomized clinical trial of no wound drains and early discharge in the treatment of women with breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2002, 36: 286-292.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. O'Hea BJ, Ho MN, Petrek JA: External compression dressing versus standard dressing after axillary lymphadenectomy. Am J Surg. 1999, 177: 450-453. 10.1016/S0002-9610(99)00089-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. O'Dwyer PJ, O'Higgins NJ, James AG: Effect of closing dead space on incidence of seroma formation following mastectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1991, 172: 55-56.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Van Heurn LW, Brink PR: Prospective randomized trial of high versus low vacuum drainage after axillary lymphadenectomy. Br J Surg. 1995, 82: 931-932. 10.1002/bjs.1800820725.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Gilly FN, Francois Y, Sayag Beaujard AC, et al: Prevention of lymphorrhea by means of fibrin glue after axillary lymphadenectomy in breast cancer: prospective randomized trial. Eur Surg Res. 1998, 30: 439-443. 10.1159/000008611.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Langer S, Guenther M, Fronzo A: Does fibrin sealant reduce drain output and allow earlier removal of drainage catheter in women undergoing operation for breast cancer?. Am Surg. 2003, 69: 77-81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Dinsmore RC, Harris JA, Gustafson RJ: Effect of fibrin glue on lymphatic drainage after modified radical mastectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Am Surg. 2000, 66: 982-985.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Jain PK, Sowdi R, Anderson DG, MacFie J: Randomized clinical trial investigation of the use of drains and fibrin sealant following surgery for breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2004, 91: 54-60. 10.1002/bjs.4435.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Soon PSH, Clark J, Magarey CJ: Seroma formation after axillary lymphadenectomy with and without the use of drains. Breast. 2005, 14: 103-107. 10.1016/j.breast.2004.09.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Kuroi k, Shimozuma K, Taguchi T, Imai H, Yamashiro H, Ohsumi S, Saito S: Evidence based risk for seroma formation in breast surgery. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2006, 36: 197-206. 10.1093/jjco/hyl019.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Ruggiero R, Procaccini E, Gili S, Cremone C, Docimo G, Iovino F, Docimo L, Sparavigna L, Gubitosi A, Parmeggiani D, Avenia N: Fibrin glue to reduce seroma after axillary lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Minerva Chir. 2008, 63 (3): 249-54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Sanguinetti A, Docimo G, Ragusa M, Calzolari F, D'Ajello F, Ruggiero R, Parmeggiani D, Pezzolla A, Procaccini E, Avenia N: The ultrasound scissors versus electocautery in axillary dissection: our experience. G Chir. 2010, 31 (4): 151-3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Sanguinetti A, Rosato l, Cirocchi R, Barberini F, Pezzolla A, Cavallaro G, Parmeggiani D, Ruggiero R, Docimo G, Procaccini E, Santoriello A, Rulli A, Gubitosi A, Canonico S, Taffurelli M, Sciannameo F, Barbarisi A, Docimo L, Agresti M, De Toma G, Noya G, Parmeggiani U, Avenia N: Antibiotic prophlylaxis in breast surgery. Preliminary results of a multi center randomized study on 1400 cases. Ann Ital Chir. 2009, 80 (4): 275-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Van Bemmel AJ, Van de Veide CJ, Schmitz RF, Liefers GJ: Prevention of seroma formation after axillary dissection in breast cancer: a systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011, 37 (10): 829-35. 10.1016/j.ejso.2011.04.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Cipolla C, Fricano S, Vieni S, Graceffa G, Licari G, Torcivia A, Latteri MA: Does the use of fibrin glue prevent seroma formation after axellary limphadenectomy for breast cancer?. A prospective randomized trial in 159 patients. J Surg Oncol. 2010, 101 (7): 600-3. 10.1002/jso.21531.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Iovino F, Ferraraccio F, Orditura M, Antoniol G, Morgillo F, Cascone T, Diadema MR, Aurilio G, Santabarbara G, Ruggiero R, Belli C, Irlandese E, Fasano M, Ciardiello F, Procaccini E, Lo Schiavo F, Catalano G, De Vita F: Serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels correlate with tumor VEGF and P%£ overexpression in endocrine positive primary breast cancer. Cancer Investigation. 2008, 26: 250-5. 10.1080/07357900701560612.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Sanguinetti A, Catania A, Docimo G, Avenia N: Radical axillary dissection in sentinel lymph node biopsy era: it's still a considerable technique in breast cancer management?. G Chir. 2010, 31 (6-7): 344-6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Rispoli C, Rocco N, Iannone L, Compagna R, Cacciapuoti MT, Bellino A, Amato B: Breast reconstruction in older women: A growing request. BMC Geriatrics. 2009, 9 (SUPPL 1): Article number A46Google Scholar
  40. Adwani A, Ebbs SR: Ultracision reduces acute blood loss but not seroma formation after mastectomy and axillary dissection: a pilot study. Int J, Clin, Pract. 2005, 60 (5): 562-564.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Iovino F, Auriemma PP, Ferraraccio F, Antoniol G, Barbarisi A: Preventing seroma formation after axillary dissection for breast cancer: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Surg. 2012, 203: 708-14. 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.06.051.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Sommerville CA, Limongelli P, Pai M, Ahmad R, Stamp G, Habib NA, Williamson RC, Jiao LR: Survival analysis after pancreatic resection for ampullary and pancreatic head carcinoma: an analysis of clinicopathological factors. J Surg Oncol. 2009, 100 (8): 651-6. 10.1002/jso.21390.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Belli G, Cioffi L, Fantini C, D'Agostino A, Russo G, Limongelli P, Belli A: Laparoscopic redo surgery for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients: feasibility, safety, and results. Surg Endosc. 2009, 23 (8): 1807-11. 10.1007/s00464-009-0344-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Amato G, Limongelli P, Pascariello A, Rossetti G, Del Genio G, Del Genio A, Iovino P: Association between persistent symptoms and long-term quality of life after laparoscopic total fundoplication. Am J Surg. 2008, 196 (4): 582-6. 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.09.038.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. del Genio G, Rossetti G, Brusciano L, Limongelli P, Pizza F, Tolone S, Fei L, Maffettone V, Napolitano V, del Genio A: Laparoscopic Nissen-Rossetti fundoplication with routine use of intraoperative endoscopy and manometry: technical aspects of a standardized technique. World J Surg. 2007, 31 (5): 1099-106.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Amato B, Rispoli C, Iannone L, Testa S, Compagna R, Rocco N: Surgical margins of resection for breast cancer: Current evidence. Minerva Chirurgica. 2012, 67 (5): 445-452.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Tolone S, Del Genio G, Docimo G, Brusciano L, del Genio A, Docimo L: Objective outcomes of extra-esophageal symptoms following laparoscopic total fundoplication by means of combined multichannel intraluminal impedance pH-metry before and after surgery. Updates Surg. 2012, 64 (4): 265-71. 10.1007/s13304-012-0171-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Belli G, Fantini C, D'Agostino A, Cioffi L, Limongelli P, Russo G, Belli A: Laparoscopic segment VI liver resection using a left lateral decubitus position: a personal modified technique. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008, 12 (12): 2221-6. 10.1007/s11605-008-0537-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

Advertisement