Volume 13 Supplement 1

Abstracts from the 26th National Congress of the Italian Society of Geriatric Surgery

Open Access

Radical pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients: a feasible and adequate therapeutic option?

  • Marcello Garavoglia1,
  • Alberto Oldani1Email author,
  • Clemente De Rosa1,
  • Manuela Monni1 and
  • Alfonso Terrone1
BMC Surgery201313(Suppl 1):A23

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-13-S1-A23

Published: 16 September 2013

Introduction

Pancreatic cancer remains one of the deadliest malignancies in the western emisphere despite improved surgical technique, chemotherapy and radiation therapy [1].

Due to the late diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, surgery is the gold standard method to increase the patients’ overall survival; pancreaticoduodenectomy (or Whipple procedure), with lymph nodes dissection, is the standardized radical surgical procedure for pancreatic and periampullary tumors; it comprehends the removal of pancreas head, distal common bile duct, duodenum and the distal portion of the stomach (if the pylorus preserving technique is not used) and consequently the reconstruction with gastro-jejunal, bilio-jejunal anasthomosis, and Wirsung-gastric or Wirsung-jejunal anasthomosis [2].

Pancreaticoduodenectomy is a complex high risk procedure that has infrequently performed until the 1980s, due to high mortality and morbidity rates; in the last 2 decades, surgical techniques improved and postoperative adverse events became more infrequent; Cameron et al reported, on a series of 1000 consecutive pancreaticoduodenctomies, a mortality and morbidity rates of 1% and 4% respectively [3].

The aim of our study is to consider pancreatic surgery in a population of elderly patients, in order to evaluate mortality, morbidity and outcome.

Methods

From 01/01/1994 to 01/01/2013, 54 patients, 33 males (61.11%) and 21 females (38.89%) aged more than 70 years old (mean age 73 years, range 70-82), underwent radical pancreaticoduodenectoy for periampullar cancer.

Tumor localization was: pancreatic head in 32 cases (%), Vater ampulla in 11 (20.37%), distal common bile duct in 6 (11.11%), duodenum in 4 (7.41%).

In one case (1.85%), pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed because of pancreatic head infiltration by right colon cancer.

Results

All patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy with Whipple-Child technique; macroscopic complete tumor ablation was always achieved.

Standard lymphadenectomy was performed in 43 cases (79.63%), extended lymphadenectomy in 7 (12.96%).

Mucosa-to-mucosa Wirsung-jejunal anastomosis was chosen in 34 cases (62.96%); 19 patients (35.19%) were reconstructed with Wirsung-gastric anastomosis; in 1 case no pancreatic duct reconstruction was performed.

Perioperative mortality rate was 3.70%; one patient died for postoperative acute pancreatitis and one for respiratory failure.

Morbidity was 14.81%; 2 patients (3.70%) developed postoperative peritoneal bleeding; we have also observed 3 cases of gastrointestinal bleeding (5.56%), portal thrombosis in 2 patients (3.70%) and one pancreatic fistula (1.85%).

All postoperative complications have been managed conservatively except peritoneal bleedings, in which re – operation has been necessary.

No differences in terms of morbidity have been demonstrated between the two methods of reconstruction (Wirsung-gastric versus Wirsung-jejunal anasthomosis); Wirsung-jejunal anasthomosis seems to prevent pancreatic atrophy in long surviving patients.

Overall 3 years and 5 years survival was respectively 22% and 15%.

3 and 5 years survival rates were 24% and 16% in patients without lymph node involvement, 2% in patients with lymph node metastatization.

Causes of death have been liver metastasis (25.97%), local recurrence (11.11%), cardiovascular event (3.70%).

Conclusions

The considerable increase of the aged population in western civilization within the next years will result in a rising incidence of pancreatic cancer. Until the year 2020 an increment of 20% of patients beyond 65 years old can be anticipated; until now only a few retrospective data analyses evaluating the perioperative and long term outcome in geriatric patients exist [4].

Our experience shows that radical surgery for periampullar malignancies is a good option in elderly patients; despite comorbidities we observed good results in terms of survival, mortality and morbidity, similar to what observed in younger patients.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Surgery University of Eastern Piedmont “Amedeo Avogadro, Hospital “Maggiore della Carità” Novara

References

  1. Kumar R, Herman JM, Wolfgang CL, Zheng L: Multidisciplinary management of pancreatic cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2013, 22 (2): 265-87. 10.1016/j.soc.2012.12.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Furukawa H, Okada S, Saisho H, et al: Clinicpathologic features of small pancreatic adenocarcinoma. A collective study. Cancer. 1996, 78: 986-990. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960901)78:5<986::AID-CNCR7>3.0.CO;2-A.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Cameron JL, Riall TS, Coleman J, Belcher KA: One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Ann Surg. 2006, 244 (1): 10-5. 10.1097/01.sla.0000217673.04165.ea.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Nieß H, Kleespies A, Andrassy J, Pratschke P, Angele MK, Guba M, Jauch KW, Bruns CJ: Pancreatic cancer in the elderly: guidelines and individualized therapy. Chirurg. 2013, 84 (4): 291-5. 10.1007/s00104-012-2455-y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Garavoglia et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement