Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of studies included in meta-analysis

From: Comparison of laparoscopic hepatectomy and percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis

Author and year

Journal

Country

Number of patient

Age

(years)

Follow-up (month)

Type of study

Outcome

Kai-Chi Cheng 202 2[26]

Transl Cancer Res

China

130

63.60 ± 9.86 vs 65.48 ± 11.73

34(1–175)

RS

OS、RFS

S. Di Sandro 201 9[25]

Eur J Surg Oncol

Italy

182

65(62–72) vs 65(56–76)

33(17–56)

RS

OS、RFS

Satoshi Ogiso 202 1[24]

HPB

Japan

221

69(46–88) vs 73(47–87)

66(1–153) vs 57(1–130)

RS

OS、RFS

Yan-Hua Zhang 202 0[22]

World J Clin Cases

China

175

63.5 ± 7.6 vs 62.8 ± 8.5

24 ± 6

RS

OS、RFS

Dong Ho Lee 202 1[20]

Liver Cancer

Korea

566

57.5 ± 9.3 vs 60.8 ± 9.6

30.0 ± 12.5

RS

RFS

Chong LAI 201 6[21]

J Zhejiang Univ-Sci B

China

94

56.5 ± 12.6 vs 62.8 ± 11.3

36

RS

OS

Yang-xun Pan 202 0[23]

Eur J Surg Oncol

China

477

51 (44–60) vs 57 (46–65)

26.22(1.30–44.77) vs 24.20(0.97–44.73)

RS

OS、RFS

Juxian Song 201 5[27]

Surg Endosc

China

156

48 (44–57) vs 48 (43–58)

31.2(21.1–49.5)

RS

OS、RFS

  1. RS Retrospective study: OS Overall survival: RFS Recurrence-free survival.