Table 2 Statistical comparison of demographic and disease data of the patients
From: A new technique for closure of pericardial defects: pericardial rug weave
Rug Weave (n = 12) | Mesh (n = 11) | Total (n = 23) | p | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean Age | 63,08 ± 6,58 | 56,55 ± 9,71 | 59,96 ± 8,7 | 0,071 | t = 1,91 |
Gender | 1,00 | x 2= 0,958 | |||
Male | 11 (%91,7) | 11 (%100) | 22 (%95,7) | ||
Female | 1 (%8,3) | 0 (%0) | 1 (%4,3) | ||
Stage | 0,478 | x 2= 2,008 | |||
II | 2 (%16,7) | 0 (%0) | 2 (%8,7) | ||
III | 10 (%83,3) | 11 (%100) | 21 (%91,3) | ||
Complication | 1,00 | x 2= 0,062 | |||
Exists | 5 (%41,7) | 4 (%36,4) | 9 (%39,1) | ||
Doesn’t exist | 7 (%58,3) | 7 (%63,6) | 14 (%60,9) | ||
Length of Stay (median (min,max)) | 7 (min = 6, max = 15) | 9 (min = 6, max = 21) | 8 (min = 6, max = 21) | 0,151 | z= -1,436 |