Skip to main content

Table 1 Study Characteristics With Efficacy and safety Data

From: Cold EMR vs. Hot EMR for the removal of sessile serrated polyps larger than 10 mm: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study

techniques

methods

SSPs

SSPs followed up

Residual polyps

bleeding

Immediate bleeding

Delayed bleeding

Perforations

Agarwal2017

H

E

101

52

2

2

NA

NA

1

Chaves2018

H

E,P

16

NA

NA

0

NA

NA

NA

Hattem2020

H,C

E,P

562

399

18

23

5

18

2

Pellise2016

H

E,P

323

190

12

NA

17

14

1

Rao2015

H

E,P

251

176

5

0

0

0

0

Rex2015

H

E,P

46

46

4

NA

NA

NA

NA

Rex2019

H,C

E,P

57

NA

NA

3

2

1

0

Tutticci2017

C

NA

163

134

1

3

1

2

0

Mangira2020

C

P

134

109

4

NA

NA

NA

NA

Rameshshanker2018

C

P

29

29

1

0

NA

0

0

Tate2018

H

NA

20

9

1

NA

NA

NA

NA

Seo2017

H

P

28

28

2

NA

NA

NA

NA

Muniraj2015

C

NA

10

10

0

0

0

0

0

McWhinney2020

C

P

522

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

  1. *H, hot EMR; C, cold EMR; E, en-bloc; P, piecemeal; NA, not available; SSPs, sessile serrated polyps