Skip to main content

Table 3 Basic characteristics of the 8 articles included in this study

From: Effectiveness and safety analysis of titanium mesh grafting versus bone grafting in the treatment of spinal Tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Included Literature

Year

Cases

Mean Age

Follow-up Time (months)

NOS Score

Outcome Indicators

Titanium Mesh

Bone Graft

Titanium Mesh

Bone Graft

Titanium Mesh

Bone Graft

Wence Wu [23]

2019

86

60

53.1 ± 18.8

48.0 ± 16.5

59.2 ± 17.4

57.5 ± 13.8

8

①②③⑤⑧

Weiyang Zhong [24]

2020

30

30

45.78 ± 19.10

46.23 ± 17.20

48.70 ± 27.30

50.20 ± 25.10

8

①②③④⑤⑥⑦⑧

Danny Suya [25]

2019

19

18

49.53 ± 17.05

56.56 ± 13.00

19.63 ± 4.63

20.33 ± 4.73

7

①②③④⑤⑦

Xin H. Yin [10]

2017

17

19

49.9 ± 15.4

55.5 ± 12.6

46.4 ± 8.0

47.8 ± 8.7

8

①②③④⑥⑧

Yongjian Gao [26]

2017

34

25

39.99 ± 13.65

42.4 ± 12.5

36.09 ± 10.36

34.8 ± 7.0

7

①②⑤⑥⑦⑧

Wael Koptan [27]

2011

16

14

43 ± 13.00

45.57 ± 13.76

65.15 ± 14.70

7

①②⑤⑧

Xing Du [28]

2020

32

66

38.9 ± 13.1

41.45 ± 15.73

28 ± 9.5

27.98 ± 8.58

8

①②③④⑤⑧

Hong-Qi Zhang [29]

2019

33

24

49.03 ± 9.39

48.38 ± 10.75

71 ± 5

74 ± 7

7

①②④⑤⑦

  1. Note: ① Surgical time; ② Intraoperative blood loss; ③ Bone graft fusion time; ④ Spinal cord injury grade E evaluation; ⑤ VAS score; ⑥ Lumbar pain score; ⑦ Kyphotic angle post graft; ⑧ Postoperative complications