Skip to main content

Table 3 Radiographic parameters of patients in the two groups

From: Effect of spinal-pelvic sagittal balance on the clinical outcomes after lumbar fusion surgery

  

Group M

Group MM

P value

LL (°)

PRE

41.03 ± 12.64

39.18 ± 14.08

0.229

FINAL

47.72 ± 11.22**

41.96 ± 11.93**

< 0.001*

PI (°)

PRE

51.00 ± 11.85

53.66 ± 12.79

0.061

FINAL

50.65 ± 11.03**

56.77 ± 11.67**

< 0.001*

PT (°)

PRE

19.94 ± 9.75

22.17 ± 10.44

0.055

FINAL

15.42 ± 6.41**

22.52 ± 8.37**

< 0.001*

SS (°)

PRE

31.40 ± 9.53

31.40 ± 10.35

0.994

FINAL

35.23 ± 8.78**

34.25 ± 9.32**

0.353

Lumbar spondylolisthesis

PRE

97(59.5%)

81(57.9%)

0.771

FINAL

7(4.3%)**

5(3.6%)**

0.793

Lumbar instability

PRE

50(30.7%)

41(29.3%)

0.748

FINAL

5(3.10%)**

3(2.1%)**

0.617

  1. LL: lumbar lordosis; SS: sacral slope; PI: pelvic incidence; PT: pelvic tilt. PRE: preoperative, FINAL: final follow-up.Group M: spinal-pelvic match group; Group MM: spinal-pelvic mismatch group
  2. ** Significant difference compared with the preoperative, P < 0.05
  3. * Significant difference between the two groups, P < 0.05
Back to article page

BMC Surgery

ISSN: 1471-2482

Contact us