Skip to main content

Table 2 Surgical data of patients in the two groups

From: Effect of spinal-pelvic sagittal balance on the clinical outcomes after lumbar fusion surgery

 

Full sample

Group M

Group MM

P value

ASA

   

0.523

 1

59 (19.5%)

28(17.2%)

31(22.1%)

 

 2

208 (68.6%)

116(71.2%)

92(65.7%)

 

 3

36 (11.9%)

19(11.7%)

17(12.1%)

 

Fusion number

   

0.076

 1

230 (75.9%)

131(80.4%)

99(70.7%)

 

 2

57 (18.8%)

27(16.6%)

30(21.4%)

 

 3

16 (5.3%)

5(3.1%)

11(7.9%)

 

L4/5 fusion

237(78.2%)

122 (74.8%)

155 (82.1%)

0.125

L5/S1 fusion

78 (25.7%)

42 (25.8%)

36 (25.7%)

0.992

Surgical time/min

255.10 ± 95.25

246.78 ± 96.06

264.79 ± 93.70

0.101

Blood loss/ml

248.91 ± 278.51

215.83 ± 173.25

287.43 ± 361.62

0.034*

LOS/day

15.29 ± 33.23

14.99 ± 36.56

15.65 ± 28.98

0.863

  1. LOS: length of stay; ASA: American society of Aneshesiologists physical status classification system; Group M: spinal-pelvic match group; Group MM: spinal-pelvic mismatch group
  2. * Significant difference between the two groups, P < 0.05