Skip to main content

Table 3 Surgical management of MBS in patients with low BMI as reported by the participants of the survey

From: Bariatric and metabolic surgery in patients with low body mass index: an online survey of 543 bariatric and metabolic surgeons

Questions

Responses (percentage) the most reported answer was bolded

Do you recommend intragastric balloon for this group?

Yes

(50.83%)

No

(49.17%)

     

Do you recommend endoscopic intervention for this group?

NO

(68.61%)

Yes, Endoscopic plication

(7.50%)

Yes, Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty

(22.22%)

Other

(1.67%)

   

Is a reversible MBS such as RYGB/OAGB preferred to an irreversible BS such as SG in class I Obesity?

Yes

(35.00%)

NO

(65.00%)

     

Do you think MBS is cost-effective in this group?

Yes

(84.72%)

NO

(15.28%)

     

What should be the procedure of choice for adolescents with class 1 obesity (under 18 years old)? (you can choose more than one answer)

a

      

What should be the procedure of choice for patients with class 1 obesity in 18 to 65 years old? (you can choose more than one answer)):

a

      

What should be the procedure of choice for patients with obesity class 1 older than 65 years old? (you can choose more than one answer)

a

      

What should be the alimentary limb (AL) and Bilio-Pancreatic limb (BPL) length for RYGB in this group? (you can choose more than one answer)

None of the above

(8.89%)

BPL of 50cm

(18.89%)

BPL of 50–100 cm

(48.89%)

BPL of > 100cm

(18.89%)

AL of 50cm

(6.67%)

AL of 50-100cm

(38.61%)

AL of > 100cm

(25.83%)

Do you think gastric pouch volume and gastrojejunostomy(GJ)size should be larger than standard to allow eat better to prevent malnutrition in this low BMI group?(you can choose more than one answer)

None of the above

(11.67%)

GJ of < 30mm

(29.17%)

GJ of 30-45mm

(40.28%)

GJ of > 45mm

(6.94%)

Pouch volume of < 30cc

(10.28%)

Pouch volume of 30-50cc

(45.00%)

pouch volume of > 50cc

(20.28%)

What should be the BilioPancreatic limb (BPL) length for OAGB in this group?

100cm

(14.17%)

120cm

(13.61%)

150cm

(33.89%)

180cm

(11.39%)

One third of whole small bowel length

(13.33%)

Other

(13.61%)

 

In class 1 obesity, Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy should be based on what bougie size?

32–36 fr

(21.39%)

36–40 fr

(63.61%)

40–44 fr

(10.28%)

44–48 fr

(2.22%)

Other

(2.50%)

  

Do you agree that for patients who have lost enough weight after their bypass surgery to reverse to normal anatomy?

Yes

(11.67%)

NO

(88.33%)

     

Is single incision surgery (SILS) suitable and safe for this patients?

Yes

41.94%

NO

(58.06%)

     
  1. aResults illustrated in Fig. 1A, B &C