Skip to main content

Table 4 Oncological parameters according to second surgical approach

From: Benefits of a laparoscopic approach for second colorectal resection after colectomy or proctectomy –a retrospective study-

  

Lap

Op

 

Variable

 

(n = 37)

(n = 32)

p value

Length of bowel resection, mm

Mean ± SD

270 ± 96

245 ± 130

0.37

Resection margina,b

Positive

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

1.00

Number of harvested lymph nodesa

Median (IQR)

21 (9–33)

14 (5–26)

0.13

Pathological Ta,c

-T1

17 (47%)

10 (32%)

0.41

 

T2

1 (3%)

1 (3%)

 
 

T3

14 (39%)

11 (36%)

 
 

T4

4 (11%)

9 (29%)

 

Pathological Na

N0

28 (78%)

23 (74%)

0.94

 

N1

6 (17%)

6 (19%)

 
 

N2

2 (5%)

2 (7%)

 

Distant metastasisa

Present

0 (0%)

3 (9%) d

0.095

Stagea,c

0-I

16 (45%)

10 (32%)

0.56

 

II

12 (33%)

12 (39%)

 
 

III

8 (22%)

6 (20%)

 
 

IV

0 (0%)

3 (9%)

 
  1. acalculated for patients with colorectal malignancy
  2. bevaluated for colorectal lesions
  3. cmore advanced stage was counted in patients with multiple tumors
  4. dliver metastasis in three, peritoneal metastasis in two, and lung metastasis in one
  5. SD Standard deviation, IQR Interquartile range