Skip to main content

Table 2 Details of colorectal diseases treated by the first and second surgeries according to second surgical approach

From: Benefits of a laparoscopic approach for second colorectal resection after colectomy or proctectomy –a retrospective study-

  

Lap

Op

 

Variable

 

(n = 37)

(n = 32)

p value

a) First operation

    

 Type of disease

   

1.00

 Benign

Perforation due to bowel obstruction

0 (0%)

1 (3%)

 
 

Iatrogenic perforation

0 (0%)

1 (3%)

 

 Malignant

Carcinoma

36 (94%)

29 (91%)

 
 

Neuroendocrine neoplasm

1 (3%)

0 (0%)

 

 Unknown

 

0 (0%)

1 (3%)

 

 Locationa

Cecum/appendix

2 (5%)

1 (3%)

0.90

 

Ascending colon

7 (18%)

4 (12%)

 
 

Transverse colon

4 (11%)

4 (12%)

 
 

Descending colon

0 (0%)

2 (6%)

 
 

Sigmoid colon

10 (26%)

13 (38%)

 
 

Rectum

15 (39%)

10 (29%)

 

 Approach

Open

21 (57%)

30 (94%)

0.0007

 

Laparoscopic

16 (43%)

2 (6%)

 

b) Second operation

    

 Type of disease

   

0.94

 Benign

Diverticulum

1 (3%)

0 (0%)

 
 

Benign neoplasm

0 (0%)

1 (3%)

 

 Malignant

Carcinoma

35 (94%)

30 (94%)

 
 

Neuroendocrine neoplasm

1 (3%)

1 (3%)

 

 Locationa

Cecum/appendix

1 (3%)

2 (6%)

0.81

 

Ascending colon

6 (16%)

11 (33%)

 
 

Transverse colon

15 (41%)

9 (27%)

 
 

Descending colon

3 (8%)

1 (3%)

 
 

Sigmoid colon

8 (22%)

6 (18%)

 
 

Rectum

6 (16%)

4 (12%)

 
  1. aMultiple disease locations were found in several patients