Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of surgery related factors between the non-refracture group and refracture group

From: Development of a nomogram model for prediction of new adjacent vertebral compression fractures after vertebroplasty

 

Non-refracture (n = 289)

Refracture (n = 43)

P value

Surgical method, n (%)

  

0.816

PKP

200 (69.2%)

29 (67.4%)

 

PVP

89 (30.8%)

14 (32.6%)

 

Dosage of bone cement, n (%)

  

0.084

< 4 ml

14 (4.8%)

1 (2.3%)

 

4–6 ml

202 (69.9%)

26 (60.5%)

 

>6 ml

73 (25.3%)

16 (37.2%)

 

Shape of bone cement, n (%)

  

< 0.001

“O” shape

91 (31.5%)

30 (69.8%)

 

“H” shape

198 (68.5%)

13 (30.2%)

 

Dispersion distribution grade of bone cement, n (%)

 

0.576

Grade 1

8 (2.8%)

1 (2.3%)

 

Grade 2

35 (12.1%)

4 (9.3%)

 

Grade 3

246 (85.1%)

38 (88.4%)

 

Leakage of bone cement, n (%)

 

<0.001

Yes

51 (17.6%)

27 (62.8%)

 

No

238 (82.4%)

16 (37.2%)

 

AVH restoration, (cm)

0.21 (0.13–0.31)

0.20 (0.10–0.30)

0.536

Kyphotic angle restoration, (°)

5.90 (4.60–7.20)

5.90 (4.70–7.50)

0.557

Cobb angle restoration, (°)

4.50 (3.60–6.00)

4.70 (3.50–6.20)

0.655