Skip to main content

Table 4 Short-term surgical outcomes in Siewert II AEG cohort

From: Utility of robotic surgery for Siewert type II/III adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction: transhiatal robotic versus laparoscopic approach

Variables

RS group

(n = 8)

LS group

(n = 17)

p value

Operative time (min)

402.62 ± 103.75

349.59 ± 58.79

0.1801

Docking time (min)

15.50 ± 4.28

N.A

N.A

Console timea (min)

200.88 ± 67.11

N.A

N.A

Operative blood loss (mL)

64.00 ± 61.91

77.71 ± 122.95

0.4285

d-AMY on POD 1 (IU/L)

238.00 ± 198.43

275.52 ± 235.68

0.7049

Retrieved LNs (n)

26.50 ± 9.66

24.82 ± 11.15

0.6827

Postoperative hospital stay (days)

15.13 ± 7.73

20.11 ± 21.70

0.4091

Morbidityb (no/yes)

7/1

14/3

0.7433

 Grade II

0

2

 

 Grade III

1

1

 

 Grade IV

0

0

 

 Grade V

0

0

 

Complicationsb

 Ileus

1

0

 

 Anastomotic leakage

0

2

 

 Intraluminal bleeding

0

1

 
  1. Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation or n
  2. AEG Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction, LS Laparoscopic surgery, RS Robotic surgery, d-AMY Drain amylase content, POD Postoperative day, LN Lymph node, N.A. Not available
  3. aFrom docking to gastrectomy
  4. bClavien–Dindo grade ≥ 2