Skip to main content

Table 3 Short-term surgical outcomes in entire cohort

From: Utility of robotic surgery for Siewert type II/III adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction: transhiatal robotic versus laparoscopic approach

Variables

RS group

(n = 15)

LS group

(n = 26)

p value

Operative time (min)

382.20 ± 77.23

351.34 ± 61.01

0.2612

Docking time (min)

16.60 ± 4.00

N.A

N.A

Console timea (min)

206.20 ± 49.95

N.A

N.A

Operative blood loss (mL)

75.67 ± 78.40

71.69 ± 104.28

0.3079

d-AMY on POD 1 (IU/L)

361.06 ± 547.24

453.38 ± 484.13

0.3939

Retrieved LNs (n)

30.80 ± 14.67

27.38 ± 14.57

0.3638

Postoperative hospital stay (days)

14.20 ± 7.10

18.73 ± 17.82

0.0388

Morbidityb (no/yes)

14/1

22/4

0.4113

 Grade II

0

3

 

 Grade III

1

1

 

 Grade IV

0

0

 

 Grade V

0

0

 

Complicationsb

 Pancreatic fistula

0

1

 

 Ileus

1

0

 

 Anastomotic leakage

0

2

 

 Intraluminal bleeding

0

1

 
  1. Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation or n
  2. LS Laparoscopic surgery, RS Robotic surgery, d-AMY Drain amylase content, POD Postoperative day, LN Lymph node, N.A. Not available
  3. aFrom docking to gastrectomy
  4. bClavien–Dindo grade ≥ 2