Skip to main content

Table 4 Univariate and multivariate analyses of the prognostic factors for CSS after PSM

From: Comparison between radical surgery and chemoradiotherapy in patients with cervical esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis

Characteristic

Univariate

Multivariate

HR

95% CI

P value

HR

95% CI

P value

Year of diagnosis

      

  2004–2010

1.000

     

  2011–2015

1.190

0.754—1.879

0.454

   

Age, years

      

 < 65

1.000

     

 ≥ 65

1.185

0.794—1.768

0.407

   

Sex

      

 Male

1.000

     

 Female

1.190

0.762—1.857

0.445

   

Race

      

 White

1.000

 

0.173

   

 Black

1.829

0.971—3.444

0.061

   

 Other

1.036

0.478—2.244

0.929

   

Tumor grade

      

 I

1.000

 

0.799

   

 II

1.296

0.585—2.874

0.523

   

 III

1.269

0.555—2.902

0.573

   

 Other

0.973

0.369—2.566

0.956

   

Histology

      

 SCC

1.000

 

0.045

1.000

 

0.010

 AD

0.396

0.113—0.847

0.013

0.396

0.191—0.821

0.013

 Other

0.000

0.000—1.305

0.971

0.000

0.000—1.563

0.971

T stage

      

 T 1

1.000

 

0.057

1.000

 

0.125

 T 2

1.663

0.787—3.512

0.183

1.608

0.756—3.413

0.217

 T 3

1.901

1.042—3.468

0.036

1.686

0.915—3.108

0.094

 T 4

2.253

1.272—3.990

0.005

2.035

1.137—3.640

0.017

 N stage

      

 N0

1.000

     

 N1

1.155

0.735—1.814

0.531

   

Treatment

      

 RS

1.000

  

1.000

  

 CRT

0.829

0.556—1.236

0.358

0.767

0.512—1.149

0.198

  1. RS, Radical surgery; CRT, chemoradiotherapy; CEC, cervical esophageal cancer; PSM, propensity score matching; SCC, Squamous cell carcinoma; AD, adenocarcinoma; HR, hazard risk; CI, confidence interval; CSS, cancer-specific survival; P < 0.05 represents significant difference
  2. oradiotherapy;