Skip to main content

Table 2 Univariate and multivariate analyses of the prognostic factors for CSS before PSM

From: Comparison between radical surgery and chemoradiotherapy in patients with cervical esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis

Characteristic

Univariate

Multivariate

HR

95% CI

P value

HR

95% CI

P value

Year of diagnosis

      

 2004–2010

1.000

     

 2011–2015

1.021

0.798—1.305

0.871

   

Age, years

      

 < 65

1.000

  

1.000

  

 ≥ 65

1.328

1.049—1.681

0.018

1.318

1.039—1.672

0.023

Sex

      

 Male

1.000

  

1.000

  

 Female

0.694

0.543—0 0.887

0.004

0.651

0.508—0.836

0.001

Race

      

 White

1.000

 

0.446

   

 Black

1.202

0.875—1.653

0.256

   

 Other

0.901

0.564—1.441

0.663

   

Tumor grade

      

 I

1.000

 

0.269

   

 II

1.631

0.923—2.883

0.092

   

 III

1.543

0.854—2.787

0.150

   

 Other

1.334

0.730—2.439

0.349

   

Histology

      

 SCC

1.000

 

0.009

1.000

 

0.006

 AD

0.453

0.264—0.777

0.004

0.426

0.245—0.749

0.002

 Other

0.318

0.045—2.269

0.253

0.362

0.050—2.624

0.315

T stage

      

 T 1

1.000

 

0.169

   

 T 2

0.776

0.563—1.071

0.123

   

 T 3

0.742

0.466—1.181

0.208

   

 T 4

1.047

0.793—1.382

0.748

   

 N stage

      

 N0

1.000

  

1.000

  

 N1

1.419

1.122—1.793

0.003

1.378

1.091—1.761

0.008

Treatment

      

 RS

1.000

  

1.000

  

 CRT

1.119

0.831—1.505

0.459

0.955

0.704—1.295

0.766

  1. RS, Radical surgery; CRT, chemoradiotherapy; CEC, cervical esophageal cancer; PSM, propensity score matching; SCC, Squamous cell carcinoma; AD, adenocarcinoma; HR, hazard risk; CI, confidence interval; CSS, cancer-specific survival; P < 0.05 represents significant difference
Back to article page

BMC Surgery

ISSN: 1471-2482

Contact us