Characteristics and outcomes of patients with primary abdominopelvic aggressive angiomyxoma: a retrospective review of 12 consecutive cases from a sarcoma referral center

Table 2 Operative outcome of AAM patients listed case by case

Cases	Age/gender	Symptom	Size(cm3)	Location	Approach	OPT(min)	IBL (ml)	Complication
1	27/F	Asymptomatic	18 × 10 × 4	TPP	SPA	150	300	Rectal-vaginal-perineal fistula
2	49/F	Abdominal discomfort	20 × 12 × 30	AP	AA	300	1500	None
3	30/F	Asymptomatic	16 × 9 × 3.5	TPP	AA	290	500	None
4	46/F	Constipation	12 × 7 × 5	TPP	SPA	120	50	None
5	31/M	Abdominal discomfort	10 × 6 × 5.5	TPP	AA	160	200	None
6	57/M	Low back pain	4 × 3.8 × 2	RP	AA	150	300	None
7	46/F	Buttocks swelling	11 × 9 × 5	TPP	SPA	160	100	Wound infections
8	49/M	Constipation	12 × 9 × 3	TPP	ASA	390	1200	Wound infections
9	27/F	Constipation	10 × 8 × 6	TPP	AA	390	1500	None
10	34/F	Prolonged menstruation	13 × 10 × 3	TPP	AA	300	500	Rectal-vaginal-perineal fistula
11	44/F	Constipation	27 × 24 × 5.5	TPP	ASA	300	1300	Wound infections
12	66/M	Asymptomatic	20 × 18 × 4	TPP	AA	420	3000	Rectal-perineal fistula

OPT Operation time, IBL Intraoperative blood loss, TPP Trans-pelvic diaphragm, extended to perineal area, AP Abdominal-pelvic region, RP Retroperitoneal region, AA Abdominal approach, SPA Sacrococcygeal perineal approach, ASA Abdomino-sacral approaches

ISSN: 1471-2482