Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Synthetic mesh versus biological mesh to prevent incisional hernia after loop-ileostomy closure: a randomized feasibility trial

Original Submission
7 Dec 2022 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
5 Jan 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Claudio Birolini
16 Jan 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
26 Jan 2023 Author responded Author comments - Elisa Mäkäräinen
Resubmission - Version 3
26 Jan 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 3
1 Feb 2023 Author responded Author comments - Elisa Mäkäräinen
Resubmission - Version 4
1 Feb 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 4
7 Feb 2023 Author responded Author comments - Elisa Mäkäräinen
Resubmission - Version 5
7 Feb 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 5
9 Feb 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Claudio Birolini
27 Feb 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
1 Mar 2023 Author responded Author comments - Elisa Mäkäräinen
Resubmission - Version 6
1 Mar 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 6
2 Mar 2023 Author responded Author comments - Elisa Mäkäräinen
Resubmission - Version 7
2 Mar 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 7
10 Mar 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
13 Mar 2023 Editorially accepted
27 Mar 2023 Article published 10.1186/s12893-023-01961-4

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page