Skip to main content

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of high ligation and low ligation groups (before and after PSM)

From: Potential short-term outcome advantage of low vs. high ligation of inferior mesenteric artery for sigmoid and rectal cancer: propensity score matching analysis

 

Before matching

After matching

High ligation (n = 577)

Low ligation (n = 317)

p value

High ligation (n = 245)

Low ligation (n = 245)

SMD

p value

Age

62.93 ± 12.13

64.91 ± 11.97

0.625

64.84 ± 11.43

64.14 ± 11.90

0.059

0.600

Gender

 Male

333 (57.7%)

182 (57.4%)

0.931

141 (57.6%)

144 (58.8%)

0.024

0.784

 Female

244 (42.3%)

135 (42.6%)

104 (42.4%)

101 (41.2%)

BMI

 < 25

336 (58.2%)

184 (58.0%)

0.957

144 (58.8%)

146 (59.6%)

0.016

0.854

 ≥ 25

241 (41.8%)

133 (42.0%)

101 (41.2%)

99 (40.4%)

ASA class

 1

93 (16.1%)

60 (18.9%)

0.548

35 (14.3%)

43 (17.6%)

0.053

0.557

 2

388 (67.3%)

204 (64.4%)

171 (69.8%)

161 (65.7%)

 3

96 (16.6%)

53 (16.7%)

39 (15.9%)

41 (16.7%)

Medical illness (CVD, DM)

271 (47.0%)

156 (49.2%)

0.520

118 (48.2%)

119 (48.6%)

0.008

0.928

Neoadjuvant therapy

20 (3.5%)

17 (5.4%)

0.173

12 (4.9%)

12 (4.9%)

0

1.000

Pre-operative laboratory data

 CEA

  < 5 ng/mL

436 (75.6%)

269 (84.9%)

0.001

209 (85.3%)

203 (82.9%)

0.066

0.459

  ≥ 5 ng/mL

141 (24.4%)

48 (15.1%)

36 (14.7%)

42 (17.1%)

 Albumin

  < 3.5 g/dL

23 (4.0%)

7 (2.2%)

0.158

5 (2.0%)

4 (1.6%)

0.030

0.737

  ≥ 3.5 g/dL

554 (96%)

310 (97.8%)

240 (98.0%)

241 (98.4%)

Tumor location

 Sigmoid

346 (60.0%)

140 (44.1%)

< 0.001

117 (47.8%)

120 (49.0%)

0.067

0.457

 Upper rectum

78 (13.5%)

45 (14.2%)

41 (16.7%)

36 (14.7%)

 Middle rectum

131 (22.7%)

114 (36.0%)

69 (28.2%)

78 (31.8%)

 Lower rectum

22 (3.8%)

18 (5.7%)

18 (7.3%)

11 (4.5%)

Tumor length

3.63 ± 4.33

3.22 ± 7.80

0.264

3.41 ± 6.36

3.13 ± 6.35

0.044

0.835

T stage

 0

6 (1.0%)

12 (3.8%)

< 0.001

4 (1.6%)

5 (2.0%)

0.073

0.415

 1

69 (12.0%)

95 (30.0%)

53 (21.6%)

63 (25.7%)

 2

106 (18.4%)

59 (18.6%)

61 (24.9%)

44 (18.0%)

 3

299 (51.8%)

136 (42.9%)

114 (46.5%)

118 (48.2%)

 4

97 (16.8%)

15 (4.7%)

13 (5.3%)

15 (6.1%)

N stage

 0

317 (54.9%)

205 (64.7%)

0.018

148 (60.4%)

149 (60.8%)

0.004

0.964

 1

177 (30.7%)

77 (24.3%)

64 (26.1%)

65 (26.5%)

 2

83 (14.4%)

35 (11.0%)

33 (13.5%)

31 (12.7%)

TNM stage

 0

5 (0.9%)

12 (3.8%)

< 0.001

4 (1.6%)

5 (2.0%)

0.013

0.885

 1

134 (23.2%)

135 (42.6%)

87 (35.5%)

93 (38.0%)

 2

178 (30.8%)

58 (18.3%)

57 (23.3%)

51 (20.8%)

 3

260 (45.1%)

112 (35.3%)

97 (39.6%)

96 (39.2%)

Operative method

 Open

91 (15.8%)

21 (6.6%)

< 0.001

25 (10.2%)

20 (8.2%)

0.04

0.653

 Laparoscopy

474 (82.1%)

278 (87.7%)

208 (84.9%)

215 (87.7%)

 Robot

12 (2.1%)

18 (5.7%)

12 (4.9%)

10 (4.1%)

Splenic mobilization

290 (50.3%)

59 (18.6%)

< 0.001

61 (24.9%)

57 (23.3%)

0.038

0.673

  1. PSM: propensity score matching; SMD: standardized mean difference; BMI: body mass index; ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologist; CVD: cardiovascular disease; DM: diabetes mellitus; CEA: carcinoembryonic antigen; TNM: tumor node metastasis