Skip to main content

Table 2 Primary outcome and ERCP-related measures

From: Outcomes of delayed versus early endoscopic intervention for acute biliary pancreatitis with non-severe acute cholangitis

 

Group I

(n = 70)

Group II

(n = 94)

p-value

Diameter of CBD (cm),

1.11 ± 0.95

1.13 ± 0.89

0.89

Cannulation success rate, N (%)

68(97.14)

92(97.87)

0.83

Technical success rate, N (%)

66 (94.29)

92(97.87)

0.43

Advanced cannulation techniques, N (%)

24(34.29)

16(17.02)

0.01

ERCP procedure, N (%)

  

0.18

 EST

30 (42.86)

36 (38.30)

 

 EPBD

25 (35.71)

29 (30.85)

 

 EST + EPBD

11(15.71)

27 (28.72)

 

Size of stone (mm)

10.25 ± 3.54

10.02 ± 2.71

0.49

Amylase(U/L)a

250.09 ± 408.12

200.20 ± 321.29

0.40

Lipase(U/L)a

166.25 ± 201.10

166.11 ± 199.52

0.12

Post-ERCP complications, N (%)

6 (8.57)

9 (9.57)

0.83

 ERCP-related pancreatitis

4 (5.71)

7 (7.45)

0.90

 Bleeding

1 (1.43)

0 (0)

0.43

 Perforation

0 (0)

0 (0)

 

 Cholangitis

1 (1.43)

1 (1.06)

1.00

 Cholecystitis

0 (0)

1 (1.06)

1.00

Mortality, N(%)

0 (0)

0 (0)

 

LC after the ERCP, N(%)

22 (31.43)

32 (34.04)

0.72

Total length of hospital stays (day)b

12.76 ± 9.33

13.48 ± 4.53

0.13

Length of hospital stay after ERCP (day)b

10.94 ± 9.43

6.59 ± 3.37

0.00

Cost on the ERCP (¥)

12172.10 ± 4133.55

12435.38 ± 4178.54

0.33

Total hospital cost (¥) b

24993.06 ± 9503.63

29547.13 ± 6815.92

0.15

  1. Continuous data were showed as mean ± SD
  2. CBD conmen bile duct; EST endoscopic sphincterotomy; EPBD endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation
  3. a24 h post-ERCP
  4. bThe patients with LC were excluded