Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the selected studies

From: Comparison of the clinical outcomes after esophagectomy between intrathoracic anastomosis and cervical anastomosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

year

Country

author

study design

Group

N

Neoadjuvant

Tumor location (U/M/L/J/O)

Anastomotic technique (HS/S/O)

Tumor pathology (AC/SC/O)

Anastomotic leakage

2001

Switzerland

Schilling et al. [14]

Cohort study

CA

62

NA

NA

0/62/0

12/37/13

5

    

IA

33

NA

NA

0/33/0

30/1/2

2

2001

Canada

Blewett et al. [15]

Cohort study

CA

19

NA

NA

NA

11/8/0

1

    

IA

55

NA

NA

NA

40/15/0

9

2003

Sweden

Walther et al. [16]

RCT

CA

41

NA

3/19/16/0/1

41/0/0

14/25/2

1

    

IA

42

NA

1/10/24/0/0

0/42/0

18/17/7

0

2006

Yemen

Homesh et al. [17]

Cohort study

CA

43

NA

6/2/34/1/0

NA

24/19/0

9

    

IA

41

NA

3/16/18/4/0

NA

23/18/0

5

2007

Japan

Okuyama et al. [18]

RCT

CA

18

NA

0/13/5/0/0

18/0/0

0/17/1

3

    

IA

14

NA

0/10/4/0/0

0/14/0

0/13/1

1

2008

Germany

Egberts et al. [19]

Cohort study

CA

33

15

NA

NA

3/29/1

11

    

IA

72

29

NA

NA

41/25/6

13

2011

India

Kawoosa et al. [20]

Cohort study

CA

205

NA

0/91/71/33/10

NA

91/98/16

23

    

IA

177

NA

0/81/67/23/6

NA

58/105/14

5

2012

Germany

Klink et al. [21]

Cohort study

CA

36

NA

NA

36/0/0

26/10/0

11

    

IA

36

NA

NA

0/36/0

29/7/0

4

2015

China

Zhai et al. [22]

Cohort study

CA

40

NA

0/23/17/0/0

0/40/0

6/32/2

12

    

IA

32

NA

0/15/17/0/0

0/32/0

5/26/1

3

2015

China

Huang et al. [23]

Cohort study

CA

114

NA

0/114/0/0/0

0/114/0

0/114/0

10

    

IA

91

NA

0/91/0/0/0

0/91/0

0/91/0

2

2016

Netherlands

Workum et al. [24]

Cohort study

CA

146

137

0/0/106/40/0

123/5/18

120/23/3

43

    

IA

210

201

0/0/172/38/0

6/204/0

189/19/2

43

2017

China

Liu et al. [25]

Cohort study

CA

126

62

0/0/37/89/0

45/32/49

90/28/2

21

    

IA

332

176

0/0/64/268/0

33/201/98

249/77/6

34

2018

Netherlands

Gooszen et al. [26]

Cohort study

CA

654

600

0/47/607/0/0

NA

533/104/17

143

    

IA

654

604

0/42/612/0/0

NA

545/92/17

111

2018

China

Shao et al. [27]

Cohort study

CA

282

NA

25/201/56/0/0

NA

0/282/0

42

    

IA

282

NA

15/220/47/0/0

NA

0/282/0

12

2019

Germany

Schroder et al. [28]

Cohort study

CA

430

281

NA

175/255/0

289/141/0

74

    

IA

536

420

NA

0/536/0

466/70/0

85

2020

America

Chidi et al. [29]

Cohort study

CA

380

380

NA

NA

280/44/56

54

    

IA

528

528

NA

NA

369/40/119

65

2020

Netherlands

Workum et al. [30]

Cohort study

CA

210

195

0/0/194/16/0

NA

161/38/11

59

    

IA

210

194

0/0/192/18/0

NA

183/24/3

29

2020

Netherlands

Jezerskyte et al. [31]

Cohort study

CA

89

3

0/0/75/14/0

NA

60/24/4

22

    

IA

115

22

0/0/98/17/0

NA

103/9/3

10

2021

Netherlands

Workum et al. [8]

RCT

CA

123

120

0/3/106/14/0

108/15/0

114/7/2

42

    

IA

122

120

0/6/105/11/0

4/118/0

105/12/5

15

2021

America

Takahashi et al. [32]

Cohort study

CA

132

78

NA

NA

107/19/6

13

    

IA

714

459

NA

NA

611/73/30

31

  1. Tumor location (U: Upper/M: Middle/L: Lower/J: Junction/O: other); Anastomotic technique (HS: handsewn/S: Stapler/O: Other); Tumor pathology (AC: Adenocarcinoma/SC: Squamous carcinoma/O: Other)