Skip to main content

Table 4 Univariable and multivariable analysis of risk factors of Blood transfusion

From: The surgical outcomes and risk factors of giant hepatic haemangiomas: a single centre experience

Variable

Untransfused (n = 242)

Transfused (n = 131)

Univariable analysis

Multivariable analysis

OR (95%CL)

P-value

OR (95%CL)

P-value

Gender

      

 Male

78 (32.2%)

48 (36.6%)

1.488 (0.803–2.756)

0.456

  

 Female

164 (67.8%)

83 (63.4%)

 

Age

      

60

231 (95.5%)

125 (95.4%)

1.284 (0.739–2.231)

0.807

  

 > 60

11 (4.5%)

6 (4.6%)

  

Number

      

 Solitary

195 (80.6%)

94 (71.8%)

1.757 (0.952–3.241)

0.069

  

 Multiple

47 (19.4%)

37 (28.2%)

  

Location

      

 Unilateral

189 (78.1%)

101 (77.1%)

1.192 (0.601–2.366)

0.927

  

 Bilateral

53 (21.9%)

30 (22.9%)

  

Size

      

 GH group

159 (65.7%)

82 (62.6%)

1.857 (1.040–3.315)

 < 0.01

0.093 (0.034–0.252)

 < 0.05

 EH group

83 (34.3%)

49 (37.4%)

Operative time (min)

193.8 + 25.2

261.6 + 52.1

1.942 (1.121–3.392)

 < 0.01

1.091 (1.072–1.111)

 < 0.05

Operative method

      

 Major hepatectomy

67 (27.7%)

54 (41.2%)

1.968 (1.264–3.057)

 < 0.01

1.236 (0.673–2.657)

0.596

 Minor hepatectomy /enucleation

188 (72.3%)

77 (58.8%)

  1. Location refers to the location of the largest liver hemangioma for patients with multiple lesion
  2. Major hepatectomy included resection of three or more segments (right hepatectomy, left hepatectomy, extended right hepatectomy, extended left hepatectomy, and any trisegmentectomy
  3. Minor hepatectomy included resection of two or fewer segments and non-anatomic wedge resection according to the classification of Couinaud