Skip to main content

Table 5 Previous studies reporting the difference between the SSES group and the SNS group

From: Does temporary ileostomy via specimen extraction site affect the short outcomes and complications after laparoscopic low anterior resection in rectal cancer patients? A propensity score matching analysis

Author

Year

Country

Sample size

SSES

SNS

Outcomes

Lee KY et al. [12]

2019

Korea

198

141

57

The SSES group had a shorter operation time and was associated with fewer cases of wound infection than the SNS group. There was no statistically significant difference between the SSES group and SNS group in all-stoma complications

Wang P et al. [13]

2018

China

331

155

176

The SSES group had a shorter operation time, less estimated blood and wound infections than the SNS group. The estimated 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival rate were similar between the two groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the SSES group and SNS group in all-stoma complications

Li W et al. [14]

2017

China

738

139

599

The SSES had lower parastomal hernia rate, a shorter operation time, less estimated blood and all-stoma complications than the SNS group

Karakayali FY et al. [15]

2015

Turkey

46

21

25

The SNS group had shorter hospital stay, shorter time to resumption of regular diet and lower parastomal hernia rate than the SSES group

Yoo SB et al. [16]

2013

Korea

105

56

49

No significant difference was found between the SSES group and SNS group in terms of all-stoma complications

  1. SSES stoma through the specimen extraction site, SNS stoma through a new site