Peer Review reports
From: Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: a multicenter, propensity score matching analysis
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 Jan 2022 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 20 Mar 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Chikato Koga |
| 23 Mar 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 4 May 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Byung Mo Kang |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 4 May 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 17 May 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Byung Mo Kang |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 17 May 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 18 May 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Byung Mo Kang |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 18 May 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 26 May 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Chikato Koga |
| 29 May 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 7 Jun 2022 | Editorially accepted | |
| 16 Jun 2022 | Article published | 10.1186/s12893-022-01681-1 |
You can find further information about peer review here.