Treatment of humeral shaft fractures: a new minimally-invasive plate osteosynthesis versus open reduction and internal fixation: a case control study

Table 1 MIPO group

Case	Age (years)	Gender	Side	AO/OTA classification	Plate type	Incision length (cm)	Bleeding volume (ml)	Fluoroscopy times	Operative time (min)	HSD (days)	BH (weeks)	FFU (months)	Post-op RNP	QuickDASH score	Constant score
1	63	Male	Left	A1.2	LCP	6	90	22	110	8	15.2	12	NA	0.0	90
2	46	Female	Left	A1.2	LCP	8	100	18	98	5	14.31	13	NA	4.5	85
3	38	Male	Left	A3.2	LCP	7	95	19	90	4	14.2	29	NA	2.3	86
4	51	Male	Left	A1.2	LCP	6	110	27	95	5	15.3	34	NA	2.3	90
5	45	Male	Left	A3.2	LCP	6	85	15	105	6	16.2	15	NA	3.2	80
6	26	Male	Left	A3.2	LCP + MDLS	10	80	16	140	5	15.3	12	NA	2.3	86
7	64	Male	Left	A2.2	LCP	6	80	20	100	7	14.3	12	NA	0.0	100
8	63	Female	Left	A2.2	LCP	6	90	25	113	6	15.4	14	NA	3.2	88
9	74	Female	Right	B1.2	LCP	7	110	19	105	8	16.4	12	NA	2.2	90
10	25	Female	Right	B1.3	LCP	8	95	21	95	5	15.3	14	NA	4.5	80
11	35	Female	Left	B1.3	LCP	8	75	19	90	6	14	13	NA	3.5	90
12	81	Male	Left	A3.2	LCP	6	110	18	102	8	16.2	12	NA	3.2	85
13	31	Female	Right	B1.3	LCP + MDLS	11	95	20	145	6	13.0	28	NA	2.2	95
14	27	Male	Left	A1.3	LCP + MDLS	14	130	22	160	9	14	36	NA	2.0	95

BH bone healing, FFU final follow-up, Post-op RNP postoperative radial nerve paralysis, LCP locking compression plate, MDLS multi-directional locking screw system, NA not applicable

ISSN: 1471-2482