Skip to main content

Table 6 Physical function

From: A systematic review and meta-analysis of risks and benefits with breast reduction in the public healthcare system: priorities for further research

Author

Year

Country

Study design

Number of patients

Withdrawals—dropouts

Intervention

Breast reduction

Mean (SD)

Control

No surgery

Mean (SD)

P values of intergroup difference if not state otherwise

Comments

Directness*

Study limitations*

Precision*

Freire

2007

Brazil [37]

RCT

100

I: 50

C: 50

8

I: 4

C: 4

HAQ-20

Pre-op: 0.44 (0.38)

6 months post-op:

0.12 (0.23)

HAQ-20

Baseline: 0.48 (0.40)

6 months after baseline:

0.46 (0.30) p < 0.001

MD 0.34

HAQ-20 has 8 dimensions that evaluate aspects of daily life: dress, get up without support, feed yourself, walk on the flat, take a shower, reach objects, grasp objects, domestic tasks. It gives a summary score between 0 (able) to 3 (disabled)

 + 

?/−

?

Neto

2008

Brazil [36]

RCT

(same as above)

100

I: 50

C: 50

8

I: 4

C: 4

Roland-Morris questionnaire

Pre-op: 5.9 (4.9)

6 months post-op: 1.2 (1.9)

Intragroup difference, p < 0.001

Roland-Morris questionnaire

Baseline: 6.2 (4.8)

6 months after baseline: 6.2 (3.9)

Intragroup difference, N.S

MD 0.5 (p < 0.001)

Roland-Morris questionnaire measures functional capacity and is scored from 0 (best performance) to 24 (worst performance)

Intergroup difference NR

 + 

−

−

Saariniemi

2008

Finland [34]

RCT

82

I: 40

C: 42

8

I: 11

C: 7

SF-36 physical summary score

Pre-op: 42 (8.6)

6 months post-op: 51.7 (SD NR)

SF-36 physical summary score

Baseline: 42.6 (8.9)

6 months after baseline: 43.3 (SD NR)

MD 8.4 (95% CI 5.8 to 11.8), p < 0.0001

The SF-36 physical summary score represents a norm-based scoring with a mean value of 50 and a SD of 10 (range 0–100). The higher the score, the greater the satisfaction. No MID is established

?/ + 

?

 + 

Andrade

2018

Brazil [42]

Non-randomized controlled study

100

I: 50

C: 50

0

Breast Q physical well-being

Post-op median: 79 (48–100)

Breast Q physical well-being

pre-op median: 48 (0–83)

p = 0.001

Total scores for the subscale physical well-being range from 0 to 100. The higher the score, the greater the satisfaction. There are no MID for subscales

 + 

−

?/ + 

Hermans

2005

The Netherlands [43]

Non-randomized controlled study

165

I: 94

C: 71

10

I: 10

C: 0

SF-36 physical function

Postop mean value after 12–24 months: 84.76

SF-36 physical function

Before surgery

77.46 p < 0.05

SF-36 is scored 0–100 where a higher score indicates better health status. MID not possible to establish

?

?/−

?

    

EQ 5D-daily activities

Postop mean after 12–24 months:

No problems 72.3

Some problems 25.3

Many problems 2.4

EQ 5D-daily activities

Before surgery

No problems 46.5

Some problems 50.7

Many problems 2.8

p < 0.005

    
    

DAS-59 I have physical disabilities because of my features

12–24 months postoperatively:

Almost never 89%

Sometimes 6%

Always often 5%

DAS-59 I have physical disabilities because of my features

Almost never 6%

Sometimes 23%

Always often 72%

p = NS

    
  1. DAS-59 Derriford Appearance Scale 59, EQ-5D EuroQol 5 Dimensions, HAQ-20 Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire, MID minimally clinically important difference, MD mean difference, NR not reported, NS non-significant, SF36 Short Form Health Survey 36
  2. * + No or minor problems; ? Some problems; - Major problems