Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Indications and outcomes of enterovesical and colovesical fistulas: systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of prevalence

Original Submission
15 Feb 2021 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Mar 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
9 Mar 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sameh Hany Emile
21 Mar 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
22 Mar 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mario Trompetto
28 Mar 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Triantafyllos Doulias
14 Apr 2021 Author responded Author comments - Christian Cotsoglou
Resubmission - Version 2
14 Apr 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 2
15 Apr 2021 Author responded Author comments - Christian Cotsoglou
Resubmission - Version 3
15 Apr 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 3
15 Apr 2021 Author responded Author comments - Christian Cotsoglou
Resubmission - Version 4
15 Apr 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 4
21 Apr 2021 Author responded Author comments - Christian Cotsoglou
Resubmission - Version 5
21 Apr 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 5
23 Apr 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sameh Hany Emile
24 Apr 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
3 May 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mario Trompetto
9 May 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
18 May 2021 Author responded Author comments - Christian Cotsoglou
Resubmission - Version 6
18 May 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 6
18 May 2021 Author responded Author comments - Christian Cotsoglou
Resubmission - Version 7
18 May 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 7
20 May 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sameh Hany Emile
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
21 May 2021 Editorially accepted
27 May 2021 Article published 10.1186/s12893-021-01272-6

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page