Skip to main content

Table 3 Risk factors of postoperative complications

From: Trunk fat volume can be a predictor of postoperative complications after gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study

 

Complications ( +) (n = 57)

Complications (−) (n = 175)

Univariate analysis

Multivariate analysis

Odds ratio (95% CI)

p value

Sex

     

 Male (159)

43 (27.0%)

116 (73.0%)

0.196

  

 Female (73)

14 (19.2%)

59 (80.8%)

Age (years)

     

  ≥ 65(172)

45 (26.1%)

127 (73.9%)

0.340

  

  < 65(60)

12 (20.0%)

48 (80.0%)

BMI (kg/m2)

     

  ≥ 25(50)

13 (26.0%)

37 (74.0%)

0.791

  

  < 25(182)

44 (24.2%)

141 (77.5%)

%TFV

     

  ≥ 150 (120)

39 (32.5%)

81 (67.5%)

0.004

2.73 (1.37–5.46)

0.005

  < 150 (112)

18 (16.1%)

94 (83.9%)

  

cStage

     

 I (170)

39 (22.9%)

131 (77.1%)

0.340

  

 II A/II B/III (62)

18 (29.0%)

44 (71.0%)

Surgery

     

 OP (69)

22 (31.9%)

47 (68.1%)

0.092

1.73 (0.84–3.57)

0.137

 LAP (163)

35 (21.5%)

128 (78.5%)

  

Procedure

     

 TG/PG (55)

26 (47.3%)

29 (52.7%)

 < 0.001

3.57 (1.79–7.12)

 < 0.001

 DG/PPG (177)

31 (17.5%)

146 (82.5%)

  

LD

     

  ≤ D1 + (142)

33 (23.2%)

109 (76.8%)

0.555

  

  ≥ D2 (90)

24 (26.7%)

66 (73.3%)

CCI

     

  ≥ 3 (16)

6 (37.5%)

10 (62.5%)

0.213

  

  < 2 (216)

51 (23.6%)

165 (76.4%)

Operative history

     

 Yes (63)

12 (19.1%)

51 (80.9%)

0.233

  

 No (169)

45 (26.6%)

124 (73.4%)

  1. CI confidence interval, TFV trunk fat volume, BMI body mass index, LD lymph node dissection, CCI Charlson comorbidity index,
  2. OP open, LAP laparoscopic, TG total gastrectomy, DG distal gastrectomy, PPG pylorus-preserving gastrectomy, PG proximal gastrectomy
Back to article page

BMC Surgery

ISSN: 1471-2482

Contact us