Skip to main content

Table 1 Sub-group analysis for patients with superficial or complete wound dehiscence

From: Abdominal wall complications following renal transplantation in adult recipients – factors associated with interventional management in one unit

 

Type of wound dehiscence

Superficial dehiscence (n = 45)

Complete dehiscence (n = 9)

p-value

Age

53.80 ± 11.14

59.11 ± 4.31

p = 0.269

BMI

30.08 ± 4.89

32.04 ± 6.48

p = 0.470

Years of dialysis

5.04 ± 3.73

4.50 ± 3.64

p = 0.798

Glucose (mmol/L)

6.40 ± 1.91

6.58 ± 3.15

p = 0.588

Duration of NPWT (days)

40.50 ± 25.80

58.40 ± 36.90

p = 0.244

Time to healing (days)

45.69 ± 32.12

37.40 ± 25.81

p = 0.882

BMI

Quartile 1

9 (22.0%)

0 (0%)

p = 0.266

Quartile 2

9 (22.0%)

3 (42.9%)

Quartile 3

10 (24.4%)

3 (42.9%)

Quartile 4

13 (31.7%)

1 (14.3%)

Sex

Male

30 (66.7%)

4 (44.4%)

p = 0.208

Female

15 (33.3%)

5 (55.6%)

Type of dialysis

Predialysis

2 (4.5%)

1 (11.1%)

p = 0.238

Haemodialysis

39 (88.6%)

6 (66.7%)

Peritoneal dialysis

3 (6.8%)

2 (22.2%)

Smoker

10/29 (34.5%)

3/6 (50%)

p = 0.474

Diabetes mellitus

18/45 (40.0%)

4/8 (50%)

p = 0.597

Peripheral vascular disease

5/45 (11.1%)

4/9 (44.4%)

p = 0.014

Type of donor

Living

7 (15.6%)

2 (22.2%)

p = 0.855

Brain death

29 (64.4%)

5 (55.6%)

Cardiac death

9 (20.0%)

2 (22.2%)

Immuno-suppression

Tacrolimusa

35/45 (77.8%)

6/8 (75%)

p = 0.863

Cyclosporinb

10/55 (22.2%)

2/8 (25%)

Delayed graft function

21/45 (46.7%)

5/9 (55.6%)

p = 0.626

Post-operative dialysis

19/45 (42.2%)

5/9 (55.6%)

p = 0.462

Infection

32/45 (71.1%)

8/9 (88.9%)

p = 0.267

Wound collection

17/45 (37.8%)

7/9 (77.8%)

p = 0.027

Operative intervention

3/45 (6.7%)

9/9 (100%)

p < 0.001

NPWT

11/45 (24.4%)

5/9 (55.6%)

p = 0.062

  1. aTacrolimus based regimen: basiliximab induction followed by maintenance with tacrolimus, a glucocorticoid and mycophenolate mofetil
  2. bCyclosporin based regimen: as above but using cyclosporin instead of tacrolimus
  3. Bold typeface was used to distinguish significant (p<0.05) results