Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Comparison of intraoperative handling and wound healing between (NEOSORB® plus) and coated polyglactin 910 suture (NEOSORB®): a prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial

Original Submission
4 Oct 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
1 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Bum Sik Tae
Resubmission - Version 2
1 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Qiang Zhang
29 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Guido Alberto Massimo Tiberio
1 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Luigi Tarallo
4 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Melody Zhifang Ni
21 Dec 2017 Author responded Author comments - Bum Sik Tae
Resubmission - Version 3
21 Dec 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
29 May 2018 Author responded Author comments - Bum Sik Tae
Resubmission - Version 4
29 May 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
20 Jun 2018 Author responded Author comments - Bum Sik Tae
Resubmission - Version 5
20 Jun 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 5
26 Jun 2018 Author responded Author comments - Bum Sik Tae
Resubmission - Version 6
26 Jun 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
26 Jun 2018 Editorially accepted
6 Jul 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12893-018-0377-4

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page