Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: A comparative study on the efficacy of a retrograde perfusion technique and an antegrade perfusion technique for donor kidney recovery in transplantation in pigs

Original Submission
1 Aug 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
27 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lluís Peri
13 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alkesh Jani
23 Nov 2016 Author responded Author comments - Xiu-wu HAN
Resubmission - Version 2
23 Nov 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alkesh Jani
15 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Xiu-wu HAN
Resubmission - Version 3
15 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Xiu-wu HAN
Resubmission - Version 4
3 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
23 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Xiu-wu HAN
Resubmission - Version 5
23 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
21 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Xiu-wu HAN
Resubmission - Version 6
21 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
26 Jul 2017 Editorially accepted
3 Aug 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12893-017-0285-z

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page