Methods | Inclusion criteria |
---|---|
ACDF | 1. One or two level of cervical spinal cord compression is shown by the magnetic resonance imaging |
2. No abnormalities were reported by other specialists from neurology, ophthalmology, cardiovascular and otolaryngology. | |
3. No improvement of symptoms was achieved after at least 3 months of conservative treatment. | |
4. Have no history of cervical surgery. | |
5. Patient chose ACDF over TDR. | |
TDR | 1. One or two level of cervical spinal cord compression is shown by the MRI |
2. Myelopathy or refractory radiculopathy due to degenerative disc disease confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging and/or computed tomography myelogram | |
3. No abnormalities were reported by other specialists from neurology, ophthalmology, cardiovascular and otolaryngology. | |
4. No obvious facet joint arthrosis and no instability was found in the cervical spine. | |
5. Have no history of cervical surgery | |
6. Patient chose TDR over ACDF | |
Laminoplasty | 1. More than two level of cervical spinal cord compression is shown by the MRI |
2. Abnormalities of neurology, ophthalmology, cardiovascular, otolaryngology were excluded | |
3. No improvement of the symptom after at least 3 months of conservative treatment. | |
4. Have no history of cervical surgery. | |
5.Patient agreed to receive open door laminoplasty |