Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
3 Mar 2004 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
12 Mar 2004 | Author responded | Author comments - Shashank Chitgopkar |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
12 Mar 2004 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
26 Apr 2004 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - J. Eric Gordon |
11 Jun 2004 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Israel Dudkiewicz |
29 Jun 2004 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - susan stott |
10 Oct 2004 | Author responded | Author comments - Shashank Chitgopkar |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
10 Oct 2004 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
29 Oct 2004 | Author responded | Author comments - Shashank Chitgopkar |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
29 Oct 2004 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
19 Nov 2004 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Israel Dudkiewicz |
27 Nov 2004 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - susan stott |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
21 Dec 2004 | Author responded | Author comments - Shashank Chitgopkar |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
21 Dec 2004 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
2 Feb 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - susan stott |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
12 Mar 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Shashank Chitgopkar |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
12 Mar 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
29 Mar 2005 | Editorially accepted | |
29 Mar 2005 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2482-5-6 |
You can find further information about peer review here.